You are hereSyria

Syria


Senators could vote on Syria force next week if diplomacy fails

Reuters - Lawmakers said on Wednesday the Senate could start voting on a resolution to authorize the use of military force against Syria as soon as next week if efforts to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis fall short.

A resolution authorizing strikes against Syria had been expected to come before the full Senate for a vote this week. But it was delayed after President Barack Obama asked lawmakers to wait for the outcome of a Russia-backed diplomatic initiative under which Syria would give up its chemical weapons.

Intercepts caught Assad rejecting requests to use chemical weapons, German paper says

Syrian President Bashar Assad has repeatedly rejected requests from his field commanders for approval to use chemical weapons, according to a report this weekend in a German newspaper.

The report in Bild am Sonntag, which is a widely read and influential national Sunday newspaper, reported that the head of the German Foreign Intelligence agency, Gerhard Schindler, last week told a select group of German lawmakers that intercepted communications had convinced German intelligence officials that Assad did not order or approve what is believed to be a sarin gas attack on Aug. 21 that killed hundreds of people in Damascus’ eastern suburbs.

Obama's War on Syria Delayed, Not Deterred

 

Obama's War on Syria Delayed, Not Deterred

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

John Kerry's stumble delayed Obama's war. It's not averted. He intends to wage it. He'll do it later, not now.

 

In London, Kerry said Assad "could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week. Turn it over, all of it, without delay, and allow a full and total accounting for that."

 

Obama's Rage for War on Syria

 

Obama's Rage for War on Syria

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Obama's hell bent for war. He intends lawless aggression. A separate article called his plans delayed. They're not deterred. 

 

Syria deplores war. It wants peaceful conflict resolution. So do important world leaders. 

 

Obama's speech on Syria - analysis


President Barack Obama spoke as if his political future was on the line Wednesday evening during his address to the nation on the Syria crisis.  He went through the horrors of the Syrian civil war, blamed the Syrian government for the August 21 chemical weapons attack, and provided verifiable (but, as yet, unverified) statements of fact concerning his certainty that the Syrian government initiated the chemical weapons attack.  (Full speech)

Before acknowledging the deal that was done to prevent an attack -- the surrender of chemical weapons to Russia by the Bashar al-Assad government -- the president went through his rationale for planning an attack on Syria and his switch to unilateral action to congressional involvement.  He then explained how he submitted his proposal to Congress.

As we were wondering if the president had already let missiles fly, he announced the plan for Syria to turn their chemical weapons over to Russia.  This move, he argued, was the direct outcome of the threat of military force.    

Nobel Laureate president defends unprovoked war against Syria: Obama Offers No Evidence Assad Ordered Syria Poison Gas Attack

By Dave Lindorff


In what NPR called “perhaps President Obama’s last best chance” to make his case for launching a war against Syria, the president tellingly didn’t make a single effort to present hard, compelling evidence to prove that Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad had been behind the alleged Sarin Aug. 21 attack on residents of a suburb of Damascus.


Not one piece of evidence.

Syria News - Sep 11

 

Syria wants to join chemical weapons ban treaty, to give other countries and the United Nations access to its arsenal - FM says - AFP


Lavrov: Russia, Syria in Talks for 'Concrete' Chem Arms Plan - Naharnet


Putin: Syria chem arms handover will work only if US calls off strike (VIDEO) - RT News


Putin, Obama discussed Syria chem plan at G20, Kremlin says - AFP


VIDEO: President Obama interview: 'I've had spoken to Putin about a Syria chemical weapons handover' - PBS Newshour


U.S. to Work Through U.N. on Syria Arms Proposal - NYTimes.com


Michelle Obama Opposes Syria Strike, President Says - huffingtonpost.com

 

Iran welcomes Russia proposal for Syria - PressTV

 

Turkey welcomes CW proposal, insists on Syria strike for chemical attack - Today's Zaman

 

Russia chemical arms plan won't stop Syria bloodshed, Gulf says - AFP

 

Israel Skeptical on Syria Giving up Chemical Arms - ABC News

 

Syrian opposition leaders Jarba and Idris slams global apathy, demands strikes against Assad - AFP

 

Syrian opposition officials denounce the Russian move as a political maneuver that will delay action and cause more death -  AFP

 

VIDEO: Can we even trust the Russians?: Syrian Coalition member - MSNBC

 

Bombing of Dam by Assad may cause a disaster: opposition - World Bulletin

 

Syria Believed to Have Vast Chemical Weapons Arsenal - VOA

 

Dismantling Syria chemical weapons arsenal would be tough task - Reuters

 

Syria’s chemical weapons pose a decade-long problem for the world - The Globe and Mail

 

Libya may serve as model for Syria's chemical stockpiles - usatoday.com

 

Syria signs "big contracts" with Iran to provide the war-torn country with food and medical supplies, SANA says - AFP

 

Syria supports IAEA probe of the risks posed by any US-led airstrikes hitting a small research reactor outside Damascus - AFP

 

Al Jazeera’s Fake Story Of “Iran’s Fighters In Aleppo” - EA WorldView 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Syria hostage Domenico Quirico 'treated like animal' by rebels - BBC News


Freed Captives Differ on Claim Syrian Rebels Framed Assad With Gas Attack - NYTimes.com


VIDEO: Belgian Prisoner and Former FSA Supporter Claiming Rebels Used Gas in Syria [English Subs] - YouTube


Intl experts have strong proof images of chemical victims fabricated – Moscow - RT News

 

Defecting Syrian chemical doctor blames regime for Khan al-Assal chemical attack - AFP

 

Syria: Government Likely Culprit in Chemical Attack - Human Rights Watch

 

The Mystery Component Of The UMLACA - Brown Moses Blog

 

VIDEO - Tension And Fury At Christian Funerals of Maaloula residents - Sky News

 

VIDEO: Battle For Ancient Historic Christian Village Of Maaloula In Syria - LiveLeak.com

 

VIDEO: Rebels torture Syrian civilian, getting him to chant pro opposition slogans - LiveLeak.com

 

To contact Bartolo email peaceloversingle@gmail.com

A people’s victory over Syrian attack plan: In Historic First, American Empire is Blocked at the Starting Line

By Dave Lindorff


Let’s be clear here. The people of the US and the world have won a huge victory over a war-obsessed US government and an administration that was hell-bent on yet again launching a criminal war of aggression against a country that poses no threat to the US or its neighbors. Overwhelming public opposition in the US and the nations of Europe, as well as most of the rest of the world to a US strike on Syria have forced the US to falter and to accept the idea of a compromise deal offered by Russia.


Senate's Bipartisan Top War-Mongers Drafting Unconstitutional Conditional War Declaration

They're drafting a bill that would declare war on Syria IF chemical weapons removal doesn't meet a deadline, and regardless of what else happens in the world in the meantime, presumably including a ceasefire or a peace settlement.  Are they insane? Of course. Can we stop them? Yes we can.

The Other Super Power Is Winning

It's not Russia.  It's not al Qaeda.  It's not Bashar al-Assad.  The other super power is the people of the world -- and the people of, but not by or for, the United States.

The world's people are protesting.  U.S. citizens abroad are protesting at U.S. embassies.  The British Parliament said no to war for the first time since Yorktown. 

The U.S. polls began with single-digit support for attacking Syria, climbed a little with the corporate media onslaught, and then started sinking again as the propaganda push shifted into self-defeating top gear.

Taking the stage after Colin Powell, the Obama-Kerry war marketing team was compelled by public pressure, foreign pressure, government-insider pressure, past public statements, and the inability of even the corporate media to keep a straight face, to take this war proposal to Congress -- and to do so while Congress members and senators were at home in their districts and states, where people were able to get in their faces.

Congress has been feeling the heat.  Sure, there is greater willingness by some Republican members to oppose a war if the president is a Democrat.  But there are also Democrats openly supporting the war because the president wants them to.  The decisive factor has been public pressure.  Senators and representatives have been turned around by their constituents, and that minority still supporting an attack on Syria openly says they're defying the people who elected them.  If there is no vote in Congress, it will be because the vote would fail.

Now is the time for Congress and the president to hear our voices more loudly than ever.

Secretary Kerry stressed on Monday that he hadn't been serious about a diplomatic solution.  It was just "rhetoric." He was just pointing out the "impossibility" of Assad handing weapons over.  He didn't want anyone to take it seriously.  Not when we have to get a war started. Not when the clock is ticking and he has already Colin-Powelled himself in front of his old committee with his wife behind him and protesters with bloody hands filling the room and everybody snickering when he claimed al Qaeda would install a secular democracy. Not after all THAT!

How can you ask a man to be the last one to lie for a dead idea?

But warmongering senators and presidents and presidential wannabes jumped at the chance of a way out of watching Congress vote down a war, and watching Congress vote down a war because we made them do it.  Democratic Congresswoman Barbara Lee has a proposal for a diplomatic resolution.  Republican Congressman Chris Smith has proposed a United Nations war crimes tribunal.  (One might hope it will even look at the crimes of both sides in the Syrian war.)  The always obvious, but hidden, fact that there are alternatives to bombing people is bursting out all over.

Sure, some people dislike this war because it would cost money, or because the Iraqis are ungrateful for the destruction of their country, or because Obama was born in Africa, but mostly people oppose this war for very good reasons -- and the financial cost is not really a bad reason.  From right to left, people don't think the United States should be the world's vigilante.  From left to right, people don't believe the justifications presented without evidence.  From right to left, people understand that killing people with the right weapons to protest their being killed with the wrong weapons is little bit crazy.  From left to right, people don't believe tales of short and easy wars that will pay for themselves.  And, across the political spectrum, people have begun to be able to smell lies, even when those lies are wrapped in flags and uniforms.

We should give our government credit for listening -- if it listens.  By no means are we out of the woods yet.  If you want to be able to say you were part of the movement that prevented a U.S. war, now is the time to email and telephone and join in activities.  We should not, however, fantasize that our government secretly held our position against the war it was trying to roll out, before we compelled it to hold our position. 

Let them thump their chests a bit about how their threats won something out of Assad, if that allows their war fever to pass.  But don't for a minute lose the significance of what the U.S. public has done to the otherwise broken U.S. government.  Out of whatever combination of factors, it just may turn out that we've stopped a war.  Which means that we can stop another war.  Which means that we can begin to work our way out of the war machine that has eaten our economy, our civil liberties, our natural environment, and our soul.

Assad may be lying.  Or Obama may lie that Assad is lying.  Or this whole thing may otherwise fall apart and the push for this war be back with a full-court press on Congress.  But we can stop it if we choose to do so.  We can push as hard for peaceful solutions in Syria as we've pushed to prevent the bombs from falling.  In fact, we can push 10 times harder.

And the warmakers will be back with another war.  Have no fear of that.  Seriously, have no fear of it: We are a super-power.  They are a vestige of a barbaric practice that has become an anachronism even while remaining our largest public investment.  They are dinosaurs.  They'll come back with a "defensive war".  That was their biggest failure this time; they didn't make Syria a threat.  Senator Harry Reid on Monday painted Syria as Nazi Germany, but he sounded like Elmer Fudd warning of a killer rabbit.

Laughter is our most potent tool.  We must mock their fear-mongering.  We must laugh at their claims of power and benevolent intent.  We must ask to see the list of nations that are grateful for past bombs.  We must inquire whether senators who play video poker while debating war plans, or secretaries of state who promise wars that will be both tiny and significant with no impact and a decisive result, are perhaps in need of better medication.

But let's not count our doves before they hatch.  Get in on this successful movement now.  It's going to be one to tell your grandchildren about.

Secretary Kerry to Participate in a Google+ Hangout on "Syria: Weighing the U.S. Response"

[]

 
Secretary Kerry will participate in a Google+ Hangout hosted by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof and Lara Setrakian, founder of the digital news site Syria Deeply on September 10 at 2:00 p.m. EDT.
 

New York Times War on Syria

 

New York Times Wants War on Syria

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Obama's the latest in a long line of US warrior presidents. He exceeds the worst of all his predecessors. He jeopardizes world peace. They risks global war.

 

New York Times editors and columnists support his lawlessness. They do it shamelessly. They do it unapologetically. They betray their readers in the process.

 

Syria News - Sep 10

 

Obama: Russia's offer on Syria chemical weapons a "potentially positive development" (VIDEO) - CBS News


Russia urges Syria hand over chemical weapons to international control for further destruction to avoid strike - RT News


Syria backs Russian proposal for regime to hand over chemical weapons - latimes.com


France, Germany welcome Russian Syria proposal - Yahoo! News


Cameron says "big step forward" if Syria hands over chemical weapons - AFP


UN chief Ban calls for destruction of Syria chemical arms - Yahoo! News


Time for Plan B? US lawmakers pushing a resolution that would give Syria 45 days to join the international convention against chemical weapons - Fox News

 

Feinstein: U.S. should consider Russian proposal on Syrian chemical weapons - washingtonpost.com

 

POLL: Opposition to Syrian airstrikes surges - USA TODAY

 

Constituent Mailbag: A Deluge Of Opposition To Syria Strikes - NPR

 

RT sources: Syrian rebels plan chem attack on Israel from Assad-controlled territories as a provocation - RT News

 

Leaked Iranian letter warned US that Syrian rebels have chemical weapons - CSMonitor.com

 

Russia, Syria push for UN chemical experts return - Yahoo! News

 

Statement by the Syria's Kurdistan National Congress on the chemical attack - ekurd

 

VIDEO: Russian FM & his Syrian counterpart Presser in Moscow (P. 1) - YouTube

 

VIDEO: Russian FM & his Syrian counterpart Presser in Moscow (P. 2) - YouTube

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Freed Belgian, Italian recount kidnap ordeal, picked up by Free Syrian Army who handed them over to a rebel group "more bandit than Islamist" - AFP


Freed Belgian, Italian hostages heard their jailers talking about the chemical weapon attack and saying that Assad was not to blame - IBTimes UK


VIDEO: Crying Maaloula resident talks to BBC: she didn't know if she would ever return after rebels "stole everything" - BBC News


VIDEO: Maaloula Christians flee to Damascus cathedral - BBC News

 

Coalition of FSA and Al Qaida fighters seized Christian village Maaloula in Syria - McClatchy

 

Syrian army launches attack on hills around Christian village Maaloula - Fox News

 

Syrian rebel group could revive al Qaeda's fortunes: report - Reuters

 

Syria: Raqqa Military Council aims to boost FSA against jihadist elements - allvoices.com

 

Woman activist assassinated in Al-Raqqa, Most accusations are directed towards The Islamic state of Iraq and the Levant - Syria Newsdesk

 

Obama Admin Keeping Syrian Rebel Leader Out of DC, Congressional Sources Say - The Cable

 

Gen. Paul Vallely: Syrian Rebel General "Paid Off" by Muslim Brotherhood - The American Spectator

 

VIDEO: Rebels executing a guy after accusing him of being a spy to the Syrian army - LiveLeak.com

 

PHOTOS: Haunting Photos Of 10-Year-Old Boy Working In A Syrian Rebels' Weapons Factory - Business Insider

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

CBS's Transcript of Assad Interview - nytimes.com

 

VIDEO (Part 1): Assad: U.S. does not have "a single shred of evidence" of chemical weapons attack - CBS News

 

VIDEO (Part 2): Assad says any U.S. strike on Syria "is going to support al Qaeda" - CBS News

 

VIDEO (Part 3): Assad on retaliation: "Expect everything" if U.S. strikes Syria - CBS News Video

 

VIDEO (Part 4): Assad on potential U.S. strike: "There will be repercussions" - CBS News Video

 

VIDEO (Part 5): Assad responds to "butcher" allegations - CBS News Video

 

To contact Bartolo email peaceloversingle@gmail.com

Kerry Couldn't Sell a Used Car

After Secretary of State John Kerry suggested that President Bashar al-Assad avoid a war by handing over any chemical weapons his government possesses, Russia quickly seconded the motion, and Assad agreed to it.  Just as quickly, aparently panicked by the possible delay or prevention of missile strikes, Kerry's staff put out this statement:

"Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used.  His point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."

Could Assad be lying?  Could he hope to stash away a hidden weapons stockpile? Yes, and then at least a U.S. attack would have been delayed and more time gained to work on preventing it.  But that's not likely.  Inspectors are very good.  That's why Prsident George W. Bush wanted them pulled out of Iraq, where they had done a stellar job and the weaponry been eliminated.  That could conceivably also be why President Barack Obama wanted them kept away from the site of the August 21st attack and wanted to send missiles into Syria before the inspectors reached any results.

So, to all appearances, Assad has immediately done what Kerry just declared impossible.  How reliable, then, are other assertions of which Kerry professes to be certain?

Is it really an important international norm that one nation should bomb another in support of fanatical terrorists and on the stated basis that people had been killed with the wrong variety of weapon?

Is it really true that this war will be both unbelievably small and a significant blow to the Syrian government?

Kerry is trying to sell the same used car to people who want an ambulance and other people who want a tank.

Nobody's buying.

It's not entirely Kerry's fault that he had to come on stage after Colin Powell's performance, but it is his fault that he's flubbed all of his lines.

If Obama withdraws his demand for Congressional authorization of war, it will not be because he and John Kerry played 12-dimensional chess and secretly hope to bring peace to the earth.  It will be because they played duck-duck-goose with such incompetence that they managed to knock each other unconscious in the process.

If a war is prevented here -- and it's way too early to say that -- it will be the result of public opinion in the United States and the world, the courage of Parliament in Britain, and the glimmerings of actual representation beginning to sparkle through the muck and slime on Capitol Hill.

If celebrating Obama and Kerry's super brave and strong heroism in stumbling into a Russian barrier to their madness gives them the "credibility" to put their guns back in their pants, then by all means celebrate that fiction.

But if we get this crisis behind us, we should understand that Parliament acted against war for the first time in centuries, and the public stopped Congress for the first time ever.  If President Obama doesn't ask for an authorization, it will be because it is not going to pass.  Even if he didn't expect to use it right away, he would want it passed if possible. 

Congress' apparent willingness to say no is the result of many factors, including the perversity of partisanship.  But the primary factor is public pressure.  That public pressure needs to intensify now that victory is in sight, not diminish.

And if it succeeds, Syria will still be in desperate need of a cease-fire, disarmament, a peace settlement, and actual aid (as opposed to humanitarian bombs).  Let's not allow those needs to be forgotten if they depart from our television screens.  Those same television screens have tried to move us into support for war and failed dramatically.  We're in charge now.  We run this country. They fill fluff that no one listens to into the spaces between advertisements for crap no one buys.  Fill the government in on the new arrangement.

Lavrov Calls Kerry's Bluff

 

Lavrov Calls Kerry's Bluff

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Russian Foreign Sergei Lavrov wants peace. He's going all out against war on Syria. He's doing it responsibly. 

 

Important world leaders back him. So does overwhelming global anti-war sentiment.

 

If Obama Doesn't Reveal Sources on Syria, He Ain't Got 'em

Time to Reveal US Intel on Syria

September 9, 2013

Editor Note:  Countering growing opposition to plans for bombing Syria, the White House dispatched Chief of Staff Denis McDonough to the Sunday talk shows. But the choice underscored the Obama administration’s credibility problems and raised new doubts about the case for war.

By Ray McGovern

Were White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough not pushing for yet another war based on what look to be false pretenses, one might feel sorry for him after his multiple TV appearances on Sunday arguing for a military strike on Syria. This unenviable job fell to McDonough as pinch-hitter for the two more natural choices to push the Obama administration’s case for a “limited” war on Syria.

Progressive Caucus Sends 67 Questions to Obama on Syria

The questions include some excellent and some awful ones.  Here they are:

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS

September 6, 2013

President Barack Obama The White House

Obama’s Case for Syria Didn’t Reflect Intel Consensus

By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Sep 9 2013 (IPS) - Contrary to the general impression in Congress and the news media, the Syria chemical warfare intelligence summary released by the Barack Obama administration Aug. 30 did not represent an intelligence community assessment, an IPS analysis and interviews with former intelligence officials reveals.

The evidence indicates that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper culled intelligence analyses from various agencies and by the White House itself, but that the White House itself had the final say in the contents of the document.

Associated Press Admits White House Has No Evidence Whatsoever

BEIRUT (AP) — The U.S. government insists it has the intelligence to prove it, but the public has yet to see a single piece of concrete evidence produced by U.S. intelligence – no satellite imagery, no transcripts of Syrian military communications – connecting the government of President Bashar Assad to the alleged chemical weapons attack last month that killed hundreds of people.

In its absence, Damascus and its ally Russia have aggressively pushed another scenario: that rebels carried out the Aug. 21 chemical attack. Neither has produced evidence for that case, either. That’s left more questions than answers as the U.S. threatens a possible military strike.

Burning Churches and Chasing Christians Out of Their Homes - Yay Team!

Syrian Army Attacks Hills Around Christian Village

 

 

Syrian troops launched an attack Monday on hills overlooking a Christian-majority village near the capital Damascus, two days after rebel forces captured the ancient community, an activist group said.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said fighters from the al-Qaida-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra or Nusra Front and the Qalamon Liberation Front still control Maaloula, an ancient village that is home to two of the oldest surviving monasteries in Syria. Rebels captured the village on Saturday.

The battle has thrown a spotlight on the deep-seated fears that many of Syria's religious minorities harbor about the growing role of Islamic extremists on the rebel side in Syria's civil war.

Rami Abdul-Rahman, who heads the Observatory, said troops attacked the hills around Maaloula early Monday under the cover of heavy shelling. He said the aim of the troops appears to "to isolate the rebels in the village."

The village, famous for being home to two of the oldest surviving monasteries in Syria, is nearly empty of its inhabitants. Only around 50 people remain there, according to a resident who left the area in the past days.

The man, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals from rebels, said there was a truce Monday morning in order for paramedics to evacuate 10 wounded Christian residents.

He added that one church on the western side of the village was burnt.

A nun in the village told the Lebanon-based Al-Mayadeen TV that Nusra Front members are still in control of the village, adding that they entered her convent early Monday and took pictures and videos of the site.

"The Syrian army is on the outskirts," said Pelagia Sayaf, who heads the Mar Takla convent. "We only know about what is happening in the convent. We know nothing about outside and whether anyone was killed or kidnapped ... There are sporadic clashes and I can hear the sound of warplanes."

Situated about 40 miles (60 kilometers) northeast of Damascus, Maaloula had until recently been firmly under the regime's grip despite sitting in the middle of rebel-held territory east and north of the capital.

The village was a major tourist attraction before the civil war. Some of its residents still speak a version of Aramaic, a Biblical language believed to have been used by Jesus.

The attack highlights fears among Syrian Christians that the alternative to Assad's regime — which is made up mostly of Alawites, followers of an offshoot of Shiite Islam — would not tolerate minority religions.

Such concerns have helped Assad retain the support of large chunks of Syria's minority communities, including Christians, Alawites, Druze and ethnic Kurds. Most of the rebels and their supporters are Sunni Muslims.

Syria's crisis, which began in March 2011, has killed more than 100,000 people according to the U.N.

Liberal Luminaries in Senate Are Swing Votes on Bombing Syria

By Norman Solomon

Many senators began this week still uncommitted on whether they’ll vote for attacking Syria. Among the fence-sitters are enough “progressives” to swing the Senate’s decision one way or the other.

That decision is coming soon -- maybe as early as Wednesday -- and the Obama White House is now pulling out all the stops to counter public opinion, which remains overwhelmingly against a war resolution. The administration hopes to win big in the Senate and carry momentum into the House, where the bomb-Syria agenda faces a steeper climb.

Some Democratic senators who’ve cultivated progressive reputations nationwide -- Barbara Boxer of California, Dick Durbin of Illinois and Al Franken of Minnesota -- haven’t hesitated to dive into Obama’s war tank. Boxer, Durbin and Franken quickly signed on as carnage bottom-feeders, pledging their adamant support for the U.S. government to attack yet another country.

Other Democrats, like Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Tom Udall of New Mexico, have made clear their intention to vote “no” when the war-on-Syria measure reaches the Senate floor.

But more than a dozen other senators widely viewed as liberal or progressive have held back from committing themselves on how they’ll vote. Here’s a partial list of those equivocators:

     *  Both Massachusetts senators, Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey

     *  Both Oregon senators, Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley

     *  Both Colorado senators, Mark Udall and Michael Bennet

     *  Both Washington senators, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell

     *  Ohio senator Sherrod Brown

     *  Wisconsin senator Tammy Baldwin

     *  Rhode Island senator Sheldon Whitehouse

     *  Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono

     *  Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar

If you live in one of those states, or anywhere else in the USA for that matter, you can send a quick email to your senators and representative to tell them “No Attack on Syria” by clicking here.

Perhaps no “undecided” stance from senators is more egregious than the one from Wisconsin’s Tammy Baldwin, who won a hard-fought race that elevated her from the House of Representatives last year on the strength of major progressive support.

Speaking at the annual Fighting Bob Fest in Madison last weekend, Baldwin sparked an angry response to her doubletalk about Syria. A video of the encounter shows a wooden politician who badly needs reminding of her progressive roots. In a suitably confrontational mode, activists serenaded Wisconsin’s junior senator with a stirring rendition of “Which side are you on Tammy?”

The symbolism could hardly have been more apt. Senator Baldwin was behind the podium at an event named after “Fighting Bob” La Follette, the senator from Wisconsin who led opposition to U.S. entry into World War One. In a Senate speech, La Follette denounced those who “inflame the mind of our people into the frenzy of war.”

Which side are you on Tammy… and Elizabeth, Ed, Ron, Jeff, Mark, Michael, Patty, Maria, Sherrod, Sheldon, Mazie, Amy?

Senators who portray themselves as progressive are at crossroads as they decide how to vote on attacking Syria. At this historic moment, with enormous consequences, will they cave in to the presidential juggernaut?

Later this week, senators will vote about launching a war on Syria. We’ve got to let them know -- right away -- that we are watching very closely. And will not forgive or forget any vote for war on the Senate floor.

 

 

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” Information about the documentary based on the book is at www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.

AIPAC Lobbies for War on Syria

 

AIPAC Lobbies for War on Syria

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Previous articles discussed the Israeli Lobby's rage for war on Syria. AIPAC and 50 other Zionist organizations endorse it. 

 

They threaten world peace. They want Israeli interests served. Ravaging and destroying Syria does so. Much greater stakes are involved. 

 

Stop AIPAC!

 

Stop AIPAC!

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

AIPAC's a weapon of mass destruction. It fronts for Israel's worst crimes. It promotes war. It threatens world peace. 

 

It menaces humanity's survival. It operates extrajudicially. It's an unregistered foreign agent.

 

Lee Syria Resolution to Hold Assad Regime Accountable and Resolve the Crisis through a Negotiated Political Settlement

Support Forceful Diplomacy, Not Military Force

Dear Colleague:

I write to urge your support for my proposal which lays out non-military options the United States can pursue, in partnership with the international community, that is consistent with law and would hold perpetrators accountable for heinous crimes against humanity.

While I believe the Assad regime must be held accountable, I reject that it has to mean a military response to be effective. There is no military solution to this complex civil war, and while a negotiated settlement is necessary, I do not believe military action will further that goal.

Instead of pursuing military force, United States policy should focus on working with the United Nations and the international community on an enhanced diplomatic strategy to facilitate a negotiated political settlement and hold the Assad regime, and all responsible parties, accountable for human rights violations. My Resolution lays out options such as:

1) requiring the Government of Syria to allow unfettered access to humanitarian organizations;

2) pressuring all internal and external parties to participate urgently and constructively in the Geneva process and other negotiations and regional arrangements with the League of Arab States and the Organization for Islamic Cooperation;

3) seeking to strengthen and coordinate multilateral sanctions targeted against the assets of Assad;

4) investigating and prosecuting crimes against humanity and other crimes under international law, including appropriately-timed International Criminal Court referral;

5) working with member states of the Chemical Weapons Convention;

6) working with the international community to establish a Syrian war crimes tribunal; and

7) enabling United States courts to investigate and prosecute crimes against humanity and other crimes under international law committed in Syria.

We must recognize that we do have alternatives to the use of force and we should be vigorously pursuing them. I urge you in joining me to support non-military means to hold the perpetrators accountable and bring about a negotiated settlement to the conflict.

Please direct requests to cosponsor or questions to _________________.

Sincerely,

BARBARA LEE

Syria News - Sep 9

 

White House: “Common-Sense Test” And Not “Irrefutable, Beyond-a-Reasonable-Doubt Evidence” Hold Assad Responsible (VIDEO) - Slate


Lingering doubts remain over Syria chemical attack, the public has yet to see a single piece of concrete evidence produced by U.S. intelligence -  AP


Where Congress stands on Syria, only a small fraction of the 533 lawmakers are willing to say they will support the use of force in Syria - usatoday


Members of U.S. Congress question White House approach on Syria - Reuters


Congressional veterans line up against military action in Syria - The Hill's DEFCON Hill

 

Congress Members Who Have Seen Classified Evidence About Syria Say It Fails to Prove Anything - Alex Jones' Infowars

 

U.S. official says CIA has authenticated at least 13 videos showing victims of Syrian gas attack - The Washington Post

 

VIDEO: 13 videos showing victims of Syrian gas attack - U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

 

In TV Ad MoveOn.org Urges Opposition To Syria Military Strike (VIDEO) - AP

 

Syria Protests In NYC, DC Oppose Military Action - AP

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Syria chemical weapons attack not ordered by Assad, says German press - The Guardian


VIDEO: Charlie Rose interviews Syrian President Bashar Assad - CBS News


Syrian President Assad says no evidence of chemical attack: CBS - Reuters


POLL: French Oppose Syria Action By Two-Thirds Margin - AP


POLL: No attack on Syria, no matter what, say UK voters - Telegraph


European Union: No strikes on Syria before UN report — MSNBC

 

Iraq joins Iran in opposing U.S.-led military strike in Syria - The Washington Post

 

Ukrainian port eyed as analysts seek Syria’s arms source - The Washington Post

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Syrian rebels led by al-Qaida-linked fighters seize control of Christian village - The Denver Post


Christians flee Syria village that speaks the language of Jesus - Telegraph


VIDEO: Jihadists re-take historic Syrian Christian village as stand-off continues - RT News


Assad Forces Fear Syrian Rebel Rampage After U.S. Strike - AP

 

German jihadis kill Syrian Christians - JPost | Israel News

 

Alawites escape jihadists in Syria, take shelter in Turkey - hurriyetdailynews

 

Syria’s al-Nusra Front claims assassination of Hama governor - Alarabiya.net English | Front Page

 

Strange bedfellows: Syrian rebels of all stripes welcome at Turkey safe house - NBC World News

 

Interview With A Secular Rebel - Syria News

 

To contact Bartolo email peaceloversingle@gmail.com

White House lies to launch the next illegal war: There is no Justification for Obama’s War on Syria

By Dave Lindorff 


The Obama administration’s campaign for war against Syria is so flagrantly wrong, so ill-advised and so illegal, that it is making a fool of both the president and his secretary of state, John Kerry.


Obama Plans Shock and Awe Madness on Syria

 

Obama Intends Shock and Awe Madness on Syria

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Overwhelming support for peaceful conflict resolution at home and abroad opposes him. It doesn't matter. He plans devastating strikes on Syria.

 

He ordered an expanded hit list. He wants more targets struck. US and French warplanes will supplement cruise missiles. Reports suggest long range B-2 and B-52 bombing. 

 

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.