You are herecontent / A Practical Guide to Diffusing the Iran Crisis and Halting Nuclear Proliferation
A Practical Guide to Diffusing the Iran Crisis and Halting Nuclear Proliferation
By Alice Slater, GRACE Policy Institute
www.gracelinks.org
There most definitely is a diplomatic solution to the crisis being manufactured over Iran’s nuclear ambitions--but it goes much further than the current impotent suggestions being offered for jaw-jaw rather than war-war with Iran. The US must honor its own disarmament agreement under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, put a halt to the development of new nuclear weapons, and take up Putin's offer of several years ago to cut our mutual nuclear arsenals of about 10,000 weapons to 1,000. Once the US and Russia get down to reasonable numbers approaching the arsenals of the other nuclear weapons states--China, UK, France and Israel, who have stockpiles in the hundreds, and India, Pakistan, and North Korea who have less than one hundred bombs in their arsenals-- then we can take up China's offer to negotiate a treaty to eliminate nuclear weapons and call all the nuclear weapons states to the table. Civil society has already produced a Model Nuclear Weapons Convention drafted by scientists, lawyers, and policy makers in the international Abolition 2000 Network, which was introduced into the UN General Assembly by Costa Rica as a discussion document. It lays out all the steps for dismantlement, verification, guarding, and monitoring the disassembled arsenals to insure that we will all be secure from nuclear break-out.
As part of that negotiation, we must take up Russia and China's proposal, offered every year for the past four years in the UN General Assembly, to ban all weapons in space. That is a pre-condition for Russia and China's agreement to abolish nuclear weapons as they do not want to be dominated from space, the mission blatantly proclaimed by the US Space Command for its control of the whole planet. We must also supercede the NPT's guarantee of an "inalienable right" to so-called "peaceful" nuclear technology, upon which Iran is now lawfully relying, by establishing an International Sustainable Energy Agency as we phase out nuclear power. Since every nuclear power plant is a potential bomb factory we wouldn't be dealing with a full deck if we attempted to eliminate nuclear weapons without phasing out nuclear power. We could easily fund the Agency, and jump-start a 21st Century sustainable economy powered by the safe, clean energy of our sun, wind and tides, by re-distributing the more than $200 billion in tax breaks and subsidies going to the nuclear and fossil fuel industries world-wide. The negotiations and dismantlement of the nuclear arsenals could be done within 10 years, which is how long it would take Iran to enrich its "peaceful" technology to make a bomb. By that time, with the whole world declaring nuclear weapons and nuclear power taboo, we should be able to convince Iran that it would be acting illegally under these new conditions.
All of the other nuclear weapons states have stated that they would be willing to give up their nuclear weapons, numbering in the 100s or 10s, if everyone else does. So the ball's in our court. The US has been the biggest block to the world’s ability to stop nuclear proliferation. It's totally naive to think that anything less than the total elimination of nuclear weapons, and their evil twins, nuclear reactors, would actually work. To think otherwise is a clear indication that we’re not dealing with reality and will condemn our planet to a state of perpetual war, with unimaginable catastrophes. Giving peace a chance by negotiating an end to the nuclear age is the only practical way out of our terrifying dilemma.
- Login or register to post comments
-

- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version









You can't have "full spectrum dominance" without enough nukes to blow up the entire planet at least a few times. Surely no one actually believes that their retention is for deterrence and defensive purposes only. The threat of their "pre-emptive" use is absolutely essential for exporting American style "freedom and democracy" to reluctant recipients.
__
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde
"Civil society has already produced a Model Nuclear Weapons Convention drafted by scientists, lawyers, and policy makers in the international Abolition 2000 Network, which was introduced into the UN General Assembly by Costa Rica as a discussion document."
But "democracy" doesn't put "scientists, lawyers, and policy makers" that are in to rational decision making in power; that's just not entertaining. And if you're not entertaining, you can't get elected.
The author's majoritarian paradigm is the source of the problem, not the solution.
The solution is desolution of power. Disarmament being one of it's early manifestations. It is, however, correct that disarmament must be initiated and led by example. This is the responsibility of the most powerful.
That can't come from the criminal gang that masquerades as two distinct political partys in the U.S. They are irrevocably committed to the aquisition and excercise of power.
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."--- George Washington
It's time to recognize government's nature. It's time to cast aside the throughly discredited 20th century ideological fashion statements that any and all must be directed and dictated by government.
Torture? Nuclear Weapons? Different manifestation, same purpose:
"This is torture’s true purpose: to terrorize—not only the people in Guantánamo’s cages and Syria’s isolation cells but also, and more important, the broader community that hears about these abuses. Torture is a machine designed to break the will to resist—the individual prisoner’s will and the collective will.
This is not a controversial claim. In 2001 the US NGO Physicians for Human Rights published a manual on treating torture survivors that noted: “perpetrators often attempt to justify their acts of torture and ill treatment by the need to gather information. Such conceptualizations obscure the purpose of torture….The aim of torture is to dehumanize the victim"
From: Torture’s Dirty Secret: It Works
by Naomi Klein
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0512-23.htm
"Asked if there was anything to Seymour Hersh's scoop revealing U.S. plans for a nuclear strike against Tehran, Bush replied:
"All options are on the table. We want to solve this issue diplomatically and we're working hard to do so."
All options? Including genocide? Well, uh, yes – but don't worry. We'll issue a good number of threats before we actually commit mass murder: we'll bellow and beat our chests, like King Kong atop the Empire State Building. Then we'll nuke 'em! That's "diplomacy" in the Age of Bush II."
From: 'Diplomatic' Terrorism
Nuclear blackmail: The essence of U.S. foreign policy
by Justin Raimondo
http://antiwar.com/justin/
---the Bikemessenger
"Civil society has already produced a Model Nuclear Weapons Convention drafted by scientists, lawyers, and policy makers in the international Abolition 2000 Network, which was introduced into the UN General Assembly by Costa Rica as a discussion document."
But "democracy" doesn't put "scientists, lawyers, and policy makers" that are in to rational decision making in power; that's just not entertaining. And if you're not entertaining, you can't get elected.
The author's majoritarian paradigm is the source of the problem, not the solution.
The solution is desolution of power. Disarmament being one of it's early manifestations. It is, however, correct that disarmament must be initiated and led by example. This is the responsiblity of the most powerful.
That can't come from the criminal gang that masquerades as two distinct political partys in the U.S. They are irrevocably committed to the aquisition and excercise of power.
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."--- George Washington
It's time to recognize government's nature. It's time to cast aside the throughly discredited 20th century ideological fashion statements that any and all must be directed and dictated by government.
Torture? Nuclear Weapons? Different manifestation, same purpose:
"This is torture’s true purpose: to terrorize—not only the people in Guantánamo’s cages and Syria’s isolation cells but also, and more important, the broader community that hears about these abuses. Torture is a machine designed to break the will to resist—the individual prisoner’s will and the collective will.
This is not a controversial claim. In 2001 the US NGO Physicians for Human Rights published a manual on treating torture survivors that noted: “perpetrators often attempt to justify their acts of torture and ill treatment by the need to gather information. Such conceptualizations obscure the purpose of torture….The aim of torture is to dehumanize the victim"
From: Torture’s Dirty Secret: It Works
by Naomi Klein
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0512-23.htm
"Asked if there was anything to Seymour Hersh's scoop revealing U.S. plans for a nuclear strike against Tehran, Bush replied:
"All options are on the table. We want to solve this issue diplomatically and we're working hard to do so."
All options? Including genocide? Well, uh, yes – but don't worry. We'll issue a good number of threats before we actually commit mass murder: we'll bellow and beat our chests, like King Kong atop the Empire State Building. Then we'll nuke 'em! That's "diplomacy" in the Age of Bush II."
From: 'Diplomatic' Terrorism
Nuclear blackmail: The essence of U.S. foreign policy
by Justin Raimondo
http://antiwar.com/justin/
---The Bikemessenger