You are herecontent / Follow The Deployments

Follow The Deployments

Did Bush Administration troop deployment patterns suggest a President who was content to give peace a chance? Or did they suggest a President bent on war regardless of Saddam Hussein's degree of cooperation, and the findings of the UN weapons inspectors?

As far as I'm concerned, it's the latter. And if the latter is true, then the Downing Street memos are tantamount to a smoking gun.

Think about it. George Bush and Tony Blair contend that when they went to the UN, they went in order to give Saddam Hussein one last chance to cooperate. Yet, if you follow the troop deployment patterns of both the United States and Great Britain - and the fashion in which both nations were stranding several hundred thousand troops in Qatar and Kuwait, at states of high readiness - the only conclusion that I can draw is that Bush and Blair were planning to go to war regardless of Saddam’s degree of cooperation with the UN inspectors. By going to the UN, Bush and Blair were only looking for political cover.

On the other hand, if Bush’s and Blair’s real intention was coercion diplomacy, then a significantly smaller force of British and American troops would have been sufficient to send the message that this time the UN was serious. And with fewer troops in the region, it would have been much more feasible to wait another six months or even a year for a peaceful resolution to emerge, and to rotate troops in/out.

But with virtually the entire available United States military fighting force either in the region, or headed there, by early 2003, President Bush had little choice but to use those troops sooner rather than later.

In my view, the evidence suggests that an invasion was always the intention of Bush and Blair – and hence, George Bush was not being straight with either the United States Congress, or the American people, when he stated in September 2002 that a Congressional Resolution authorizing force did not mean that war was inevitable or unavoidable.

If a President who lies in a civil suit about infidelity can be impeached, what fate does a President deserve when he lies about whether the nation is going to war?


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It is so obvious that the Bush administration had plans for war from day one, it seems incredulous that the American people tolerate these criminals.

And, with two bogus elections under their belt, this administration must feel that they are totally above the law.

Has the public become so brain dead and susceptible to "marketing"?
Are the issues of gay marriage and abortion the real issues facing the United States. I think not.

Will we never have an electorate that can rise above "buzz word" tactics and delve into the real issues? Is the American investigative press dead?

Is democracy doomed simply because it is attached to capitalism?
Is capitalism succeeding at the expense of democracy?

If Ken Starr can spend over $200M in tax-payer money investigating President Clinton, where in the world are the congressmen with enough "balls" to stand up to Bush and Cheney? Incidentially, Ken Starr's investigation was as worthless as the right-wing nuts who promoted it.

Has America become into such a crying, frightened, self-centered society that hope for the future of true democracy is lost?

The system we have now is nothing more than "the best government money can buy".

"The system we have now is nothing more than "the best government money can buy".

This says it all. Sad to say I would have to answer "yes" to all your questions. Democracy as invisioned by Madison and Jefferson is all but dead in this country. It has been hijacked by the Corporate/Military Complex Inc. Who has the will to change it? I'm afraid that "brain dead" is an apt description of our society. All that's left is to unplug and bury. The only question is, who will unplug and bury Amercica? China/India?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Julie Varughese


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.