You are hereBlogs / dlindorff's blog / Government Racism: A Case Worse than Shirley Sherrod's Firing

Government Racism: A Case Worse than Shirley Sherrod's Firing


By dlindorff - Posted on 30 July 2010

By Linn Washington Jr.

The telephone at the DC area home of Marsha Coleman-Adebayo began ringing non-stop after the story broke recently about the hasty firing of U.S. Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod on false charges of being a racist.

Outraged callers wanted not just to express sympathy over Sherrod’s mistreatment but also to offer continuing support for Coleman-Adebayo, whose epic battle with a federal agency over despicable employment discrimination and retaliation produced America’s first civil rights law of the 21st Century.

Over a dozen years ago Coleman-Adebayo, an MIT-trained PhD, faced an onslaught from officials at the Environmental Protection Agency because she had spoken out about racism within that agency as well as about the EPA’s coddling of a U.S. corporation whose regulation-skirting mining practices in South Africa were seriously injuring workers there.

The gross mistreatment of Coleman-Adebayo by EPA officials so incensed both a conservative white Congressman and a progressive black Congresswoman that this unlikely pair collaborated on passage of the Notification and Federal Employee Anti-Discrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (NOFEAR).

That legislation makes federal agencies more accountable when found guilty of discriminating against employees or of trying to silence whistleblowers.

While simple fairness should have protected Sherrod (USDA officials refused to allow her to rebut the false charges before they forced her to resign), NOFEAR could cost the USDA plenty, should decide Sherrod sue over her treatment (she has already announced plans to bring a libel suit against her initial tormentor, Andrew Breitbart, the maker of a deceptively edited video clip of her speech to the NAACP).

“What happened to Ms. Sherrod happens to thousands of federal employees daily,” said Coleman-Adebayo, whose NOFEAR Coalition is demanding an investigation into the Sherrod firing.

“Sherrod was a political appointee, so I think it’s unlikely that her firing was done without some consultation with the White House,” said Coleman-Adebayo, brushing off claims by USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, a former Democratic governor of Iowa, that he alone had decided to pull the plug on Sherrod.

“How far did this firing go up the political chain of command? We think an investigation will find a cover-up,” Coleman-Adebayo said during a recent interview with ThisCan’tBeHappening!

While the circumstances surrounding the firing of Sherrod and the bashing of Coleman-Adebayo differ, these two classic cases of workplace abuse over racial issues share similarities that give the lie to the ‘convention wisdom’ of conservatives regarding workplace discrimination complaints.

First of all, both Coleman-Adebayo and Sherrod sued federal agencies over charges of employment discrimination and won…Sherrod as part of a class-action lawsuit by black employees against the USDA, and Coleman-Adebayo as an individual against the EPA.

Courtroom success in employment discrimination lawsuits is rare, contrary to the vapid contention of FOX News talking-heads and Tea Party-types, who regularly make the false claim that so-called “activist judges” and/or “liberal-dominated” juries routinely dump bundles of dollars into the bank accounts of minorities who make allegedly trumped-up claims of workplace racism...

For the rest of this article by LINN WASHINGTON in ThisCantBeHappening!, the new independent journalist-run online newspaper, please go to: ThisCantBeHappening!

Amazing how people are similar and we have so many likes the same. The facilitator told us to break up into groups of doglovers and catlovers, so we were two different groups. Then she told us to break up into groups of our favorite drink, so there were many groups then. Then she asked us to break up into Walmart shoppers and Target shoppers, two different groups again. And then she asked us to break up into groups of our favorite toothpaste (when it is NOT on sale)> many groups again! A simple exercise like this can show us that we are all PEOPLE and we have differences and likes just like everyone else , and sometimes we find like minded people depending on the issue. But we all have one thing in common, we are all PEOPLE. I learned something else yesterday, since it specialized on Age and Disability in the 4th of the Diversity Series> I learned that we are a Melting Pot in school in my generation, that we were supposed to come together and assimilate. That is not being taught anymore, a young person said that schools are teaching that we are a MIXED SALAD, of many differences coming together. I like that better ;-)

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.