You are herecontent / It's the Beginning of the End-For the Empire, Not Just the War

It's the Beginning of the End-For the Empire, Not Just the War

By Kim Scipes, ZNet | Foreign Policy

This past September, I wanted to write something about the juxtaposition of the extremely successful mobilization against the war in Iraq on September 24th with the failed mobilization the following day in support of the war. A phrase kept running in my head from someone progressives do not generally quote: Winston Churchill. After the British defeat of the German Afrika Korps in Egypt in November 1942, during World War II, Churchill stated, "Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." And I couldn't get that phrase-the end of the beginning-out of my head. Yet that article, that I could've and should've written, got lost in the day-to-day hub-bub of my life.

What a difference two months makes! On November 17th, Pennsylvania Democratic Congressman John P. Murtha made a speech, pointing out that not only did the Emperor have no clothes on, but that the Emperor had lied about ever having clothes in the first place. In Murtha's statement, he's summarizes some of what the Department of Defense has told Congress:

Oil production and energy production are below pre-war levels. Our reconstruction efforts have been crippled by the security situation. Only $9 billion of the $18 billion appropriated for reconstruction has been spent. Unemployment remains at about 60 percent. Clean water is scarce. Only $500 million of the $2.2 billion appropriated for water projects has been spent. And most importantly, insurgent incidents have increased from about 150 per week to over 700 in the last year (emphasis added). Instead of attacks going down over time and with the addition of more troops, attacks have grown more dramatically. Since the revelations at Abu Ghraib, American casualties have doubled. … I have concluded that the presence of US troops in Iraq is impeding this progress. .

And Republicans-and a number of weak-kneed Democrats-either condemned Murtha or ran as far away hastily as they could.

However, we progressives need to understand what this meant. Murtha is a former Marine, who was decorated for bravery for fighting in Viet Nam. He's been a long-time supporter of the military, and has long-time relationships with senior officers throughout the military. He's served in the US Congress, and on the House Defense Appropriations Sub-committee, for over 30 years. In other words, this wasn't Ted Kennedy condemning the US invasion, but it was John Wayne, or Rambo, or who ever is the most militaristic, gung-ho, crazed symbol around today, defecting from the President. And telling everybody that was what he was doing. This was BIG.

Now, let's be clear: Murtha hasn't become a peacenik: in fact, there were problems with his approach, as he wants to keep the US military in the "Middle East" for the future, and he wants to station Marines just "over the horizon" from Iraq (i.e., so they can re-invade immediately). But he said, unequivocally, that the President's war was "a flawed policy wrapped in illusion." Bush and his War Machine was hit right between the eyes and cold-cocked: he couldn't have been hit any harder other than by impeachment, and I'm not even sure of that. (Sy Hersh, in an article published in the New Yorker on November 28th, quoted an unidentified defense official as saying that the White House was "beyond angry at [Murtha], because he is a serious threat to their policy-both on substance and politically.")

Murtha's statement moves us from "the end of the beginning," I believe, to "the beginning of the end."

Between September 24th and November 17th, however, there was Hurricane Katrina. There are many others who have written and spoken much more eloquently than I can about this, but one point needs to be made about that hurricane and the aftermath: as limited as it's been, for the first time in 25 years, we've have been able to have a serious widespread public discussion about poverty and race in this country. Katrina tore the scab off these issues.

And the National Priorities Project brought out research showing that 44 percent of all military service people recruited during 2004 are from the rural areas of the US, which basically means they are poor whites. Along with this, as Michael Moore has shown, we also know that recruits are coming out of the impoverished inner cities, with African Americans and Latinos being forced into the military by lack of viable economic alternatives. In other words, we have a economic draft currently taking place in this country, "drafting" our poor men and women of all colors into the military-and many, to Iraq.

Tied to the above is that the US is spending approximately $450 billion for the military this year. That does not include the almost $250 billion for the Iraq war to date, nor he $44 billion for our vaunted intelligence systems that failed so obviously on 9/11.

At the same time, we know several things: our society is becoming more and more unequal-in fact, not only much more unequal than any other so-called developed country in the world, but more unequal than a number of the poorest countries on the face of the Earth, including Bangladesh! (See for a report from last year.) We have General Motors, once the most powerful corporation in the world announcing 30,000 jobs will be cut in the near future. We know 45 million Americans have no health insurance. We know African-American and Latino poverty rates are more than double that of whites. We know women make around 74% of what males make. Additionally, our schools are in desperate shape and our drop-out rates are incredible.

And we know that in 2003, of the world's military spending, the United States spent 47% of that total amount. Our next closest competitor, Japan, spent 5%. And, in fact, the 14 closest competitors to the United States, spent less money combined on their militaries than the US did alone. Who are we afraid of?

Without trying to elaborate these points or add others, I think the basic situation has been delineated. Our social situation is terrible: take away credit cards and mortgage refinancing, and our economy in general would be in terrible shape. Millions of blue-collar workers have lost their jobs over the past 30 years, and many will never see the jobs or make that kind of money again. We see growing numbers of mothers with children under three going into the work force to try to make ends meet, whether they are alone or with a partner. A college degree won't even solve their problems: where in the past, a college degree used to guarantee a good job, today all it will guarantee is the chance to apply for a good job.

And, amazingly, the left has seemed incapable of taking advantage of the situation. Our organizations should be growing like crazy, our finances expanding. Yet, if this is happening, it certainly is not being made obvious.

There are all kinds of reasons for this. Rather than rag on the left for our deficiencies, I'm going to argue that our biggest problem collectively is that we are being too timid; we have not taken advantage of what is going on. And we need to get off our butts and strike while the iron is hot!

Yet, I don't think it is enough to challenge the war, and the "war president." I basically think that the war is over, politically, although that doesn't mean there won't be a lot more killing and dying going on between today and when the US withdraws (and afterwards).

I believe that for the first time in 30 years we can have perhaps our biggest issue heard and responded to by the American public. We need to ask in every place, and in every way imaginable, a simple question: How should the US act toward all the other nations of the world: do we want to continue trying to dominate them, or do we want to find ways to help other countries and try to live in peace and harmony?

The choice is stark. If we want to continue dominating other countries, we will have to keep pissing away $400 billion (give or take) every year from here until infinity. We must be willing to force our sons and daughters into the military to fight wars for the US Empire-and no one can explain satisfactorily how Rumsfeld can keep 135,000 troops in Iraq indefinitely without reinstating the draft. We have to accept our social problems, since we won't have the resources to address them and fight the war, so that means millions will be uninsured, and our schools will only get worse, as millions suffer from inadequate health care.

On the other hand, if we want to live in peace and harmony, the US military could be drastically reduced, confined simply to defense of the country's borders (and not allowed overseas); the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank could be used to address developmental and international financial failures around the world, rather than causing them; our health care "system" could be replaced with a single-payer plan than spends its resources in preventing and treating bad health while promoting good health; and we could address the glaring disparities in our residentially-based school systems, which hurt people of color the most. And we could use the money to create jobs, and/or create opportunities for all to contribute to the well-being of our society.

The beauty of this idea is that we do not have to come up with the answers! (All contributions and ideas are welcome, however!) We can ask the question, clarify the issues, discuss the ramifications, and help encourage our fellow Americans to consider and address the issues. We may not get to solutions in the quickest, most eloquent manner, but we will at least be moving in the right direction, toward social and economic justice.

Like I said, Murtha's rolling over was the beginning of the end. We need to make sure "the end" is not just confined to the war-we need to go much farther than that: we need to get the American people to decide whether they want to continue supporting the Empire, or if they want to build a new world out of the ashes of the old.

Kim Scipes is a member of the National Writers Union, and a long-time global labor activist in the US. He currently teaches sociology at Purdue University North Central in Westville, Indiana. His on-line bibliography on "Contemporary Labor Issues" can be accessed at . He can be contacted at .



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's nice to see somebody writing about the basic problem and that is the people in charge of our country are running it into the ground while we sit around and complain about it. They are also turning our democracy into a fascist state or god knows what. They are doing this for reasons of power and wealth. They don't care about any of the issues you or me or anyone else brings up. All you have to do to believe this is to go to the pnac They want to take over the world maybe not in the classic sense of conquerers, but of influence power and wealth. And they are doing it and have been ever since the Reagen era. When you say Its the beginning of the end for the empire, you are right. Our democracy as envisioned by the Founding Fathers is coming to an end and is being slowly morphed into something else. Call it fascist, communist or whatever you want but it happening right before our very eyes. Am I a left wing nut? I don't think so. I like to think I am a realist dealing with the truth instead of sticking my head in the sand.

Here is the way I see it. Going back to Lincoln's statement about fooling the people, all the people in power now need to do to keep that power is to fool at least 51 % of the people. So far they have successfully done that. Will they continue to do that? Of course they will. How will they do it? Anyway they can. Will they respect the traditional aspects of democracy to do that? I don't think so? Will they subvert every aspect of our democracy to stay in power? You better believe it. The 51% of the people, their base, will continue to be fooled and the 49% of the rest of the us will sit around ranting and raving but accomplishing nothing. You know why? Because complaining never accomplishes anything. Action does! While there is a lot of grassroots efforts going on it won't accomplish a thing unless it can be translated into political power. What political power? A third party perhaps?
Don't bet on it! What other political power is left? Ah the Democratic Party the party of the common man! The Great and Powerful Democrat party! Ha..what a joke. Its just like Oz...ignore the man behind the curtain. So pull back the curtain and what do you have? Howard Dean!! the almighty and powerful DEM. Do I make my point?

Am I being too cynical? Maybe, but as a life long Democrat who was on the streets on Oct 15,1969 I am ashamed to admit I am a Democrat today. You may never be too old to rock 'n roll but I am getting to old too fight.

They say in any country no matter what form of government you have you have three choices in dealing with it, support it, fight it, or leave it. I am looking for property in Costa Rica.

The only problem with moving elsewhere is that you never know when some new cabal in Washington is going to decide that an erstwhile ally is no longer useful and needs to have some different form of "democracy and freedom" imposed at the point of a gun. But good luck in Costa Rica just the same.

Leaving is not an option for most of us, I'm afraid. Once this dictator collapses the nation from within, do you think any country will be willing to take american refugee's?? not too very likely. Canada cannot support tens of millions of running away American's who want shelter from this fascist storm.

Best we can do is get ready for revolution. The press has completely capitulated to the corporations and the fascists, our political system is in utter disarray and shambles with rigged elections now possible without any form of federal investigation or prosecution of those who would rig and steal them. Our congressmen and senator's are all bought and paid for, or flat out afraid to take on the cabal that has hijacked our government. Means somewhere out in the future that, not unlike France, once the ruling class totally destroyed the middle class there in the 17th. century, we'll have to form up in huge groups and storm them and take our nation back. It's entirely possible we'd have troops killing civilians in our streets, but this would only hasten the end of the'd add unprecedented levels of anger to the already explosive revolutionary atmosphere. Ten years or less, I give us, before we have anarchy and revolution and an overthrow of the fascist regime and perhaps a restoration of democracy again in this once great nation, hobbled and sullied by fascist dictator's and apologists for the corporatization of the country.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Julie Varughese


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.