You are herecontent / Free Tickets For "Countdown To Zero" Movie In DC
Free Tickets For "Countdown To Zero" Movie In DC
We are helping to promote the new anti-nuke movie "Countdown To Zero" that is debuting on July 23 in Washington, DC at the E Street Cinema. This is a must see film produced by the same folks who brought us "Inconvenient Truth." The movie focuses on the threat of nuclear weapons and what must be done to counter that threat. Check out the website and trailer here.
Our friends at Justice Through Music have made hundreds of free tickets available to our members for the opening weekend, July 23-25. These tickets will go fast so if you want to attend, go to http://www.jtmp.org/ctzdctickets and reserve your ticket now. JTM will have a table set up at each screening where you can pick up your reserved ticket.
UPDATE: I've been advised this movie attacks Iran and whitewashes Israel, so view at your own risk.
- Login or register to post comments
-
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
Iran has no nuclear weapons, no nuclear weapons program at all, and abides by the NNPT or simply NPT. Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons that the Israeli leadership has long tried to keep a secret, but such secrets can't be kept for very long before there are leaks of one sort or another that reveal the secrecy. Israeli leadership hasn't wanted to admit to having nuclear weapons, but even some of them haven't been able to avoid the occasional slips of their forked tongues. And they reject the NNPT, NPT tout-court, as well as international laws.
But the film whitewashes EVIL Israel or Israeli leadership and attacks Iran.
Who made this bs film, Zionists?
It's a film I'll surely be among the non-viewers of. There are sufficient unbiased sources of information on nuclear weapons so there's no need to view a half-truth and war-mongering film about the topic. Promoting half-truth sources is to take part in promoting the producers of such media.
It's war-mongering since it attacks Iran when the topic is nuclear weapons and Iran's innocent, which it would be even if it did have a nuclear weapons program and/or nuclear weapons. Iran would have the right to this program because the world's most evil govts have these weapons and criminally war on others that are not in possession of such means of defense. They do that and they threaten to attack Iran with nuclear weapons.
But the film wants viewers to believe Israel's innocent and Iran's bad or evil. Why the hell would I want to view this bs and, in the process, help the corrupt, perverted, ... neoliberal, ... producers promote their half-truths? I wouldn't.
If viewing it as a film and/or scientific analyst and critic, then there's a point in viewing the film. Otherwise there would be no point for me; or if there still is, then what's the point?
That's the so-called documentary with Al Gore, or one he was going around promoting, and people should be skeptical, wary of this film, also. The mere fact that Al Gore's talking bla bla bla in the film is enough to warrant [caution].
And the fact that it's produced by the same people who produced this new film on nuclear weapons that whitewashes Israel and attacks Iran should immediately tell us that we should realize that anything and everything these jerks produce involving [some] truths on [some] important topics merits serious caution.
Like enough critics have said about the IT film, Al Gore is a major waster of energy resources, while some sound-thinking analysts have also said that he's pushing "green" technologies as part of his get rich business scheme that he of course doesn't publicly talk about, but which is known.
He's one of the many jokers who pretend that OIL is a fossil fuel, but it credibly is NOT. It's not credibly fossil. Burning oil nevertheless produces CO2 and/or CO, but substances don't need to originate from fossilization or organically in order to produce CO2 and CO when burned.
If it was fossil in origin, then it surely would not be found many thousands of feet deep in the Earth and there are such locations of plenty of oil. And if it was fossil in origin, then it surely wouldn't exist in the huge known, still unknown, and known, but usually left unreported or news-censored quantities that do exist.
The IPCC's report was not properly reviewed and some of the signatures on the report for people the public's supposed to believe are endorsers are of scientists who have said that they never gave their permission for their names to be included on the report, while some others later said that they no longer supported the so-called findings of the IPCC.
The IPCC was of the UN. Who dominates the UN? Whoever dominates the UNSC. Who dominates the UNSC? The US. And the same applies with the ICC. Neither the ICC nor the IPCC can be trusted when they are really dominated by the US. Can the US elites be trusted? Absolutely and obviously NOT.
Some of the scientists who've said that they never gave their permission for their names to be included as signers of the IPCC report and/or others who've since said that they disagree with the report have said that they don't believe that we are the only cause of global climate change. Some people who are said to be scientists have said that they don't believe that we are part of the cause, at all, but more have said that while they believe that our emissions are part of the cause, they believe that we're not the sole cause. And some of the latter scientists have said that they believe we're the lesser cause, while others have said that they're not sure in this respect.
The real or most significant cause evidently remains theoretical or hypothetical. It certainly is not established fact! And by the time that it might become established fact, if it ever does, it'll probably be ET's who are the historians; for it'll probably be too late for us to be able to factually know what the cause of catastrophic global climate change that wiped out life on Earth was.
Anyway, the "Inconvenient Truth" of the matter of the film by that title is that the leader of it, monsieur neolib Gore, is a con man, charlatan, corporatist, and so on. And a major waster of energy resources, so a hypocrite, too!
Who cares to view either film made by these producers? Not this citizen. If I made an income from viewing documentaries and films to review them and publish the reviews, then I'd view it; but not otherwise. Instead, I want real and truthful documentarians; no biased bs, no half-truths, and no total lies. We're inundated with half-truths, lies by omission, and other lies as it is, so why invite or support more?
"The Legend of Zu" directed by Tsui Hark is more interesting, and fun; even if it isn't the best film he's directed.