BP, Halliburton and Transocean Have Unleashed Armageddon And Now There Is No Stopping It

It's interesting to see Chris Landau, who I now learned is a geologist, mentioning his paper on his theory that oil is not a fossil fuel and which he says has been favorably peer-reviewed twice; for the theory might not be identically explained, but I read an article (linked further below) a few years ago about oil having been scientifically determined well over a half of a century ago to not be fossil-based.

What Landau theorizes might differ in terms of details from what Russian and Ukranian scientists found and theorized many decades ago, but they all say that oil is not a fossil fuel. It's not biotic, iow.

I believe they are right. For years it's not been credible to me that oil would be biotic. The geological, a-biotic, aka non-fossil theory is very sensible and credible though. It must be one or the other and I find the latter theory much more credible.

Sure, some dinosaurs were very large creatures, some trees are very large, there's been a lot of vegetation; BUT, I could and can not imagine that there was enough decay from all of this organic matter to be able to form the huge reserves of oil that are known, those that are not known to us, most of us anyway, and other reserves that have only come to the awareness of some of us, like the reserves of Haiti, among other examples.

Peak oil in the U.S.; is it real? F. Wm Engdahl's article provides an explanation for this belief being based on non-fact. He explains that the sole reason a sort of "peak oil" was reached in the US, in terms of its US oil reserves, is NOT because of lack of oil. Instead, it was due to the low cost of very abundant Middle Eastern driving down oil prices so low that exploiting oil reserves in the US became competitively unaffordable.

Russia and Vietnam used the geoligical, non-fossil, a-biotic theory. He says that it's based on this theory that Russia was able to become an oil industry major; while adding that Russia also used the theory to help Vietnam find oil and to develop its oil wells, or whatever they're called. He also says that by relying on this theory Russia's success rate has been much higher than the rate for western oil companies.

He adds that it's also because of this theory that the "vast oil resources of the North Sea" were discovered; and that it's also why Russia has had a high success rate in, f.e., Siberia. If the fossil theory had been used, then it seems likely, if not certain, that Russia wouldn't have even looked in Siberia to determine if there was much oil there. Based on the fossil theory, there should not have been any significant amount of oil reserves worth exploiting in that part of Russia.

The original basis for the theory:

The theory, for Russia and Ukraine, or certainly Russia anyway, originates with or is based on the work of "German scientist Alfred Wegener". He says that western geologists learned of Alfred Wegener and the related work by him in the 1960's, while Russia knew about this around 30 years earlier.

It's Alfred Wegener's 1915-published seminal text, "The Origin of Continents and Oceans", which F. Wm Engdahl describes a little of; and while very little is referred to, it's VERY interesting. It's a real eye-opener. I had science courses in high school and college, but don't recall ever having learned the theory in that seminal text.

"War and "Peak Oil"
Confessions of an ‘ex’ Peak Oil believer"

by F. William Engdahl, Sept. 26, 2007

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6880

Western Big Oil has known about this theory long enough now, but they don't apply the theory, or if they do, then they clearly don't want the public to know about this. And if the latter is the case or true, then we can easily, enough, figure out the little game they're deceptively playing with us.

One this is already certain and it's that they do plan on gaining as much global control as they can over the international oil or energy resource market(s). And we know that they're more than prepared to kill millions of people and destroy entire countries in order to achieve their insane and delusional goals.

We certainly can't trust people like them about which of the two theories is right; and a-biotic is definitely more credible, much more.