You are herecontent / BP's Nuke-Powered Liability Cap

BP's Nuke-Powered Liability Cap



BP's nuke-powered liability cap
By Harvey Wasserman | Solartopia | May 17, 2010

As BP destroys our priceless planet, its lawyers gear up to save the company from paying for the damage. The same will happen---only worse---with the next atomic reactor disaster.

By law, BP may be liable for only $75 million of the harm done by the Deepwater Horizon.

Ask yourself why the federal government would adopt legislation that limits the liability of an oil driller for the damage it does to us all.

Ask the same question---on another order of magnitude---about nuclear power plants.

Some lawmakers have tried to raise this cap so BP could be made to pay for the wounds they have not yet stopped inflicting.

By any calculation, BP did more than $75 million in harm during the first hour of this undersea gusher. That sum won't begin to cover even the legal fees, let alone the tangible damage to our only home.

But "free market" Republicans have resisted raising the limit. So BP will walk away virtually scot free. All this will be tax deductible. So will the millions they'll spend changing the name of the company, and dumping all those pathetic "Beyond Petroleum" pamphlets.

Now imagine a melt-down alongside the blow-out. See the Deepwater Horizon as a nuclear power plant. Think of the rickety Grand Gulf, a bit to the north, or the two decaying reactors at South Texas, a ways to the west.

Imagine that apocalyptic plume of oil ravaging our seas as an airborne radioactive cloud.

Feel it pouring like Chernobyl over the south coast, enveloping all of Florida, blowing with the shifts of the winds up over the southeast, irradiating Atlanta, then Nashville, then New Orleans, then Houston, all through Mexico and the north coast of South America, the Caribbean, then around again across Florida, through the Atlantic and all over Europe, then around the globe two or three times more.

The instigators of such a nightmare are currently on the hook for a maximum of $11 billion. Ask yourself why the federal government would limit the liability of a reactor owner for the damage it imposes on the public.

There's a clear historic answer: In the 1950s, when the bomb-making Atomic Energy Commission wanted a civilian PR front, it asked the private utility industry to build commercial reactors. The electric companies refused, fearing that a melt-down could cost them everything.

So Congress passed the 1957 Price-Anderson Act, limiting a reactor owner's liability to a paltry $560 million. They promised that private insurers would soon take up the risk.

A half-century later, taxpayers---and victims---are still on the hook. The feds have raised the liability limit to an utterly inadequate $11 billion.

A melted reactor today would do that much harm in the first hour. By any sane calculation, the non-radioactive Deepwater Horizon has long since done more.

According to the comprehensive study just published by the New York Academy of Sciences, the 1986 explosion at Chernobyl has killed some 985,000 people. The governments of Belarus and Ukraine estimate more than $500 billion in damages just to their countries alone.

Reactor advocates say with a corporate sneer that no such accident is possible in the United States. That's exactly what those Bumbling Petro-criminals said before they erupted this gusher.

The current "Climate Bill" would use billions of your taxpayer dollars to fund new nukes all rigged up with all those ancient liability caps. Like Deepwater Horizon, the owners of these "advanced" reactors not yet built will be liable for virtually nothing.

Before tomorrow's radioactive cloud follows today's oil-soaked plume...before the next melt-down follows this blow-out...we need a green-powered Earth.

We have no choice. Our economy, our planet, our bodies cannot handle more public-funded corporate-imposed suicide.

--
Harvey Wasserman's SOLARTOPIA! is at www.harveywasserman.com, as is HARVEY WASSERMAN'S HISTORY OF THE US. He is senior advisor to Greenpeace USA and senior editor of www.freepress.org, where this first appeared.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is a CBS 60 Minutes set of interviews with a survivor of the Deep Horizon rig's "accident", and two engineers. The second engineer to speak explains that BP's Atlantis rig in the Gulf of Mexico is a far greater danger. He says, with first-hand knowledge, that Atlantis wasn't properly constructed due to BP execs having ordered that engineering review of plans be left aside; something very much like that anyway. He says if this rig had an "accident" like Deep Horizon's, and the construction of the rig [is] seriously flawed (due to BP execs), then the consequences would dwarf those of Deep Horizon.

He saw the plans and I forget what he precisely says, but he knows the plans and that, either, BP execs made sure that they were not reviewed by engineers before being used for the construction of the rig, or the plans were correct, but not followed. I think the former is what he says, that the plans had flaws and BP execs did not make sure that these were reviewed by engineers, who would have caught and corrected the flaws. Whatever the exact details are of what he explains, this should give a general idea of the topic; the issue, the criminal negligence, and the very serious danger.

"VIDEO: BP'S Criminal Negligence
Despite Knowing It Had a Damaged Blowout Preventer, BP STILL Cut Corners By Removing the Single Most Important Safety Measure" (11:59)

by Washington's Blog, May 17, 2010

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19214

By law, BP may be liable for only $75 million of the harm done by the Deepwater Horizon.

Ask yourself why the federal government would adopt legislation that limits the liability of an oil driller for the damage it does to us all.

Ask the same question---on another order of magnitude---about nuclear power plants.

Some lawmakers have tried to raise this cap so BP could be made to pay for the wounds they have not yet stopped inflicting.

By any calculation, BP did more than $75 million in harm during the first hour of this undersea gusher. That sum won't begin to cover even the legal fees, let alone the tangible damage to our only home.

SEE the 60 Minutes video linked in my above post, and then it will become more clear than most people realize that $75mn is NOTHING; even a particle of dust amounts to more.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.