You are herecontent / Fixing the Facts

Fixing the Facts

Memphis Flyer

There are many lessons to be learned from the increasingly famous Downing Street memo and the related documents now emerging in its wake. First of all is the most obvious: a categorical report by Sir Richard Dearlove, the chief of British intelligence, that President Bush was determined to go to war against Iraq in mid-2002 (and probably much earlier), that there was insufficient intelligence data to justify military action, and that the Bush administration intended to "fix the facts around the policy" so as to justify military action.

Dearlove had been invited to Washington to participate in high-level planning sessions in the wake of 9/11. He held talks with George Tenet, director of the CIA, and other high-ranking administration officials. The memo was his no-nonsense summary of those sessions, prepared for subsequent scrutiny by the government of Bush's war partner, Prime Minister Tony Blair. "Military action was now seen as inevitable," wrote Dearlove. "Bush wanted to remove Saddam through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD."

Dearlove wrote further that there was no evidence either of weapons of mass destruction at Saddam Hussein's disposal or of any prior complicity between Saddam, a secular despot, and the jihadists of al-Qaeda, his natural enemies. Subsequent documents released to the British press revealed plans to "wrongfoot" Saddam on inspections and increased (and illegal) airstrikes on Iraq in an attempt to provoke him into an attack.

Dearlove was a senior intelligence operative and, as such, belonged to the profession that has since been widely scapegoated for the foolish and deadly Iraq venture, both by the Bush administration and by members of Congress in both parties, who have taken the self-serving game of Let's Pretend to shameless degrees.

If there was a problem in the intelligence community, it was that high-ranking members of it were all too willing to do what President Bush and Vice President Cheney and their delegated "fixers" pressured them to do. God bless Richard Clarke, the former national intelligence czar, who served under both Republican and Democratic administrations and resisted such pressure. And God bless all those lower-level grunts who said "hell, no" to that obstreperous suborner John Bolton, who tried to get them fired for exercising independence of judgment.

The American public appears to finally be tiring of an administration that all too often fixes facts to fit its policies. Public opposition to war in Iraq is now at around 60 percent, according to the latest ABC News poll. Even some in Congress, like Representative Walter Jones, the North Carolina Republican who coined the term "freedom fries" on the war's front end, have had their eyes opened. Jones has now joined a bipartisan group that insists on immediate extrication from Iraq and, during a recent hearing, had enough chops to call out neocon warhawk Richard Perle for lying. Perle, one of the theorists who got us into Iraq in the first place, had the chutzpah to blame the ongoing debacle there on the intelligence community -- the same intelligence community whose arms Perle and other administration hacks had twisted to come up with preordained conclusions!

We have this advice for those other elected officials and ambitious politicians who perversely just won't add two plus two to get four (or 20,000 -- the number of American dead and wounded who have been sacrificed so far in Iraq): Either you're devious to a degree that makes you unworthy of anyone's trust, or you're stupid beyond redemption. In the wake of the Downing Street memo, there is no third option.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I would onlymake one change to your analysis: The American public appears to finally be tiring of an administration that all too often fixes facts to fit its DICTATES!

Thank you for speaking the plain truth... It is about time the media starts a real discussion of this horrible war of aggression that has killed or wounded 20,000 American soldiers and upwards to 100,000 Iraqi's.

I think it is time we put to our Republican representatives: "The time of reckoning is here. A) Is the Republican Party going to call an inquiry into the President and his administration lying to Congress and the American people about a war that has caused tens of thousands of lives; B) apologize for impeaching President Clinton for lying about a personal matter; or C) admit that they are a party of hypocrites without any moral values whatsoever. There is only one choice possible. Ignoring the truth any longer admits that you as a party have absolutely no moral integrity. "

To our Democratic Reps: " The time for procrastinating and hiding is over. You have two choices: A) Stand up and demand an inquiry into the president and his administration lying to Congress about the war in Iraq, ask why no one in the Democratic party stood up and defied the official propaganda at the time, and join the "out of Iraq Caucus"; or B) Admit the Democratic Party lacks any moral courage and credibility ."

We must press and encourage our leaders in Congress to end the administration that have destroyed any moral credibility our nation had and threatens continued wars and even new ones to protect the wealth of their friends in the oil industry.

The 20,000 figure must be from Gulf war I added to this latest adventure and include al those who have died later from depleted uranium, PTSD suicides etc. Perhaps it also includes the mercenaries; idont know. Would someone please provide a source for that figure.


I am happy to say that I and 25 million people around the world protesting little George's war were not fooled the first time by his lies and bull shit; we are not about to be fooled the second time. Bring on the lies and bull shit little George, we are immune.

I was against the war before being against the war was cool!

Me too brother. I always opposed it, because it always struck me as absurd that a little third world country like Iraq could be any threat and I assumed that bushco was lying. If deterrence worked for forty years in the cold war to keep the US and USSR from destroying the world by attacking each other with nukes I knew the uncontested military superpower could deter Iraq even if they had WMD. I still believe in respecting national sovriegnty as well and it seemed like even on NPR and BBC there was never any discussion of this issue.

There were actually some Dems who opposed the invasion, like Dennis Kusinich and I think there were a handful of Repubs. We should remember there has always been opposopion even on the right, particularly from libertarians. There have even been a few real conservatives who ave opposed it. Unfortunately there are few real conservatives left. A real and principled one would be for smaller government and avoiding deficit spending. Reagan broke the record on deficit spending and now Bush is setting new records. This is all in the interests of crony capitalism.

This link does not work. Is the article still available?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Julie Varughese


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.