You are herecontent / Kucinich and the Media

Kucinich and the Media


By davidswanson - Posted on 17 March 2010

By David Swanson

When I worked for Dennis Kucinich's presidential campaign in 2003, he routinely won the most applause at debates but was minimized or entirely left out of the next day's stories in the corporate media. This meant that peace, and fair trade, and single-payer healthcare were left out too. At one debate at the University of New Hampshire, Kucinich pushed back.

Ted Koppel of ABC opened the debate with questions about endorsements. The second round of questions was about standing in the polls. The third was about the campaigns' bank accounts. One had to wonder when, if ever, the debate would touch on, you know, what the candidates intended to do if elected. Kucinich cut Koppel off, saying:

"I want the American people to see where media takes politics in this country. We start talking about endorsements, now we're talking about polls and then talking about money. When you do that you don't have to talk about what's important to the American people."

The applause for this was so intense that the other candidates on the stage started joining in the media bashing. Kucinich had briefly changed the narrative from a horse race to a demand for decent political reporting.

That's what he should have done on Wednesday when he flipped to support a disastrous health insurance bill. Rather than talking about the legitimacy of the presidency, Kucinich should have talked about the illegitimacy of the current narrative in the corporate media.

The major corporate news outlets, and all the smaller outlets that follow their lead, and all the partisan outlets that obey the White House, have created a false story that was clearly turning Kucinich's own constituents against him. According to this story, of the dozens of Democrats and over a hundred Republicans not committed to voting for the insurance corporation bailout bill, only Kucinich's vote mattered, so the blame would go to him if it failed, just as Ralph Nader alone was blamed for Al Gore losing the election that Gore won in Florida in 2000.

Kucinich was to be blamed for denying people healthcare by opposing a bill that makes the healthcare system worse. Now he'll be credited with helping to provide people with healthcare, even though he's done the opposite. I think he gave in to the power of a false narrative, and that he ought to have said so. When Kucinich fought with us for impeachment, and John Conyers refused to act, Conyers admitted that his greatest fear was of media hostility. When Kucinich pushes to end wars, other congress members tell us they cannot afford to challenge media nonsense about "supporting the troops." The corporate media now run our government, and need to be called out.

I don't think Kucinich flipped because of money, either direct "contributions" or money through the Democratic Party. I think, on the contrary, he hurt himself financially by letting down his supporters across the country. I don't think he caved into the power of party or presidency directly. I don't think they threatened to back a challenger or strip his subcommittee chair or block his bills, although all of that might have followed. I think the corporate media has instilled in people the idea that presidents should make laws and that the current president is trying to make a law that can reasonably be called "healthcare reform" or at least "health insurance reform."

I don't excuse Kucinich flipping his vote. I just want to find the right explanation for it. There may be many factors I'm unaware of. But I have no doubt that with real freedom of the press in this country it wouldn't have happened. This sad incident is not an argument for ending the two-party system. That argument has been made overwhelmingly for many years. We must end that system. Nor is this an argument for campaign finance reform, although we won't survive long without that either. Nor is this an argument to give up on Dennis Kucinich, since we would clearly have a dramatically better Congress if we had 10 others as good as him. Kucinich's cave in is most clearly an argument for media reform and for progressive investment in truly independent media.

Kucinich Will Return Money to Donors.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What kind of an answer do you want from Kucinich? What would you want him to say and what do you deem as a satisfactory answer?

I think that too many people do not give IDEOLOGY, the place it deserves in history. Class politics and class parties produce class hierarchies.

Subordinating oneself to the party machinery and class ideology that is locked within it, means that social reforms must betrayed, and principles be damned.

Embracing real social agendas with social ideologies, and social parties, means walking away from class parties, corporate and fascist class appeasement. Kucinich may not have flipped for money, but he flips his social concerns to the inherent betrayals within class ideolgies/class hierarchies by aceepting their rules and dominance.

IBETT
I believe Dennis is the only political representative that works HARD, questioning the status quo and pushing for what is right for ALL AMERICANS! I emailed him Monday asking him to vote 'no', but he decided to vote 'yes'. I respect this person so much that I believe he would not have changed his vote if it was not for the best over all. I will continue to follow his work and continue to financially support him (even though I am disabled and on fixed income)and I live in NEW MEXICO, this is how much respect I have for this man!
News Media BEDAMNED!

I wasn't asking him anything. ??

You write the following:

*** I just want to find the right explanation for it. ***

My question to you is what kind of "an explanation" do you want from Kucinich? What kind of a response from Kucinich would satisfy you? What is it that you want him to tell you?

I'm an advocate for single-payer too, but I understand the policy process comes in pieces. I think Steve Benen's piece in the Washington Monthly gives a good and honest forecast on what can happen. If not, then we continue fighting.

But keep in mind, I know many people, who were not Obama fans, who worked their tails off on the health care issue. The one that they'll be voting on is not the one they envisioned nor is it the one they'd like to see. But we can't just throw it away for nothing. Like Benen said, it's a foot in the door. It's got to start somewhere. To pull the rug from under the carpet of all those who work their tails off just to get something is, IMHO, not fair to them. I know if I worked my tail off on this issue and I was satisfied with the progress and someone came in and just ruined "the deck of cards" for a lack of a better metaphor, because it wasn't the design they hoped for would really upset me.

Legislation is a process. I trust future administrations and future legislators will move it forward. It just goes at a speed we don't have any control over. Plus there are many obstacles in the way (i.e. the health care industry).

So if you're looking for Kucinich to provide you an explanation why he voted the way he voted, which you obviously want to know, what kind of an explanation would make you satisfied? I'm just asking.

i suppose

but the point of my article above was that i think i already have a sufficient and probably complete explanation, which i explained in the article

I trust that wasn't meant to sound like a shrill and/or flippant remark. I'm a single payer advocate, just like you.

As someone who's on your side, I'm still not sure what your explanation and what you'd like to hear from Kucinich. As someone who's trying to have a serious and productive conversation, do you mind telling me again what would be a sufficient response for you from Kucinich? I seem to be missing the point.

Remember that Kucinich was the guy who even brought Impeachment charges against both Dick Cheney and George Bush.

So something else is going on here.

Kucinich always bucked the Media narrative. His whole life is the total opposite of the Beltway/Media narrative of U.S. Politics.

If Kucinich wasn't afraid of Cheney and Bush (two guys who are deep CIA operatives, and have deep ties to criminal networks), why then is he afraid of Barry ORahmObama --- a man who is a weak, capitulator by nature?

Something else is going on here. I think Kucinich may have been physically threatened (CIA blackops) by Obama and his goonsquad, or maybe Obama used his unconstitutional, warrentless wiretapping (which he loves) to dig up or fabricate something embarassing about Elizabeth, or threats were even made directly against her (which is why Kucinich reported that he arrived at his decision after consultation with Elizabeth). Maybe Kucinich woke up and found half of a Horse carcass lying in his bed.

But clearly something else is going on here.

Kucinich knows that if this Insurance Monopoly bill failed, it would then be possible to bring to the floor individual, separate bills to do things like: a) Ban pre-existing conditions, b) permit the reimportation of cheaper generic drugs, c) expand Medicare or have a buy-in option, d) and allow States to not be sued for experimenting with Single-Payer.

Those things as individual bills, would be quite popular (aside from the GOP minority), and therefore a far better strategy to pursue. Kucinich knows all of this.

He was threatened.

gordon

Dennis will be on the Ed Show on MSNBC tomorrow. I don't know what time he will come on or for how long he will be interviewed, but I'd like to withhold judgment until I hear his reasoning on this.
If you miss the show, it'll probably be posted on Youtube not too long afterwards.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.





Facebook      Twitter

Stay warm this winter in a black hooded sweatshirt. Order one. Order them by the dozen and donate them to occupations!

Our Store:











Find movie memorabilia and more today!

Get reviews and pricing on Tahoe Boats and other top brands at Boating.com.

Sign Up Fast Here