You are herecontent / Mainstream Press Ignores Monumental House Debate on Afghan War
Mainstream Press Ignores Monumental House Debate on Afghan War
U.S. Rep. Patrick Kennedy has a withering assessment of news media coverage: ‘despicable.’ The Democrat says reporters are focusing ‘24/7′ on sexual harassment allegations against a New York lawmaker while ignoring the war in Afghanistan.
Mainstream Press Ignores Monumental House Debate on Afghan War
By Norman Solomon | Media Channel
The event on the House floor Wednesday afternoon was monumental — the first major congressional debate about U.S. military operations in Afghanistan since lawmakers authorized the invasion of that country in autumn 2001. But, as Rep. Patrick Kennedy noted with disgust on Wednesday, the House press gallery was nearly empty. He aptly concluded: “It’s despicable, the national press corps right now.”
Sure enough, the Thursday edition of the New York Times had no room for the historic debate on its front page, which did have room for a large Starbucks ad across the bottom.
Despite the news media and the lopsided pro-war tilt on Capitol Hill (reflected in the 356-65 vote Wednesday against invoking the War Powers Act), antiwar organizing has a lot of hospitable terrain at the grassroots. National polling shows widespread opposition to the Afghanistan war effort — a far cry from the dominant lockstep conformity in Congress.
“Apparently, as with many issues in Washington,” Congressman John Conyers said in a written statement hours before the vote, “those who are forced [to] bear the costs of war are the first to recognize a flawed policy, while those who profit from perpetual war do their best to blunt any change in course.” Read more.
- Login or register to post comments
-

- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version





Stay warm this winter in a black hooded sweatshirt. Order one. Order them by the dozen and donate them to occupations!





John Conyers isn't. What about the others named in the article?
I don't know enough about the others. While I've read some articles in which Rep. Lee was mentioned, this was quite a while back, so I don't recall whether it was about her doing something good, or rotten. And Rep. Kennedy is someone who's name I've only see a few times, and only as of recently. I know basically nothing about him.
It's too easy for political representatives to make public statements of popular nature while knowing that there's really no chance at all that what they say or propose, or pretend to propose, will ever be accepted by most of Congress and the Senate; iow, while knowing that all they're doing is fooling the public. Too many political candidates state that they're of popular positions, but once elected, then the campaign statements are dropped, disappeared, ...; and this evidently is deliberate.
Mike Corbeil