You are herecontent / What the OPR Torture Report Will Not Say

What the OPR Torture Report Will Not Say

Annotated Aggression: Being Jay Bybee
By David Swanson

It's October 23, 2002, and you're Jay Bybee, the man in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel in the United States Department of Justice. John Yoo and a bunch of other lawyers willing to claim that absolutely anything is legal work for you. But you'd much rather be a judge. That would be a cushy job, a lifetime job, a job with a book of the Bible named for it, a job where you would get to decide which crimes to legalize rather than being told by someone else, a job where you might eventually even get to rule on the legality of some of the crimes you were presently engaged in committing. At the moment, however, if you want to become a judge you're going to have to follow instructions, and that means legalizing the greatest crime of them all. Millions may die in the process, but you will get that nomination and you will become a judge.

You pray for divine guidance and sit down to write (or at least sign) this apology for, authorization of, and confession to mass murder, another term for which is often genocide. Here's your opening line in all caps:


This is a remarkable thing for you (or even Yoo, your psychotic sidekick) to have written, because the Constitution is the supreme law domestically, and it gives Congress the exclusive power to decide to wage war. And under the United Nations Charter, no nation has the authority to attack another. But you were Jay Bybee. You were the man. You were the authority handing out personalized torture laws for individual victims. You were, in fact, already a judge convicting and sentencing people in lengthy rulings before "legalizing" and imposing their sadistic punishments. Granting U.S. presidents the power to launch aggressive wars didn't trouble you in the way it might have someone who cared about people and their lives. But this single memo would mean far more pain and suffering than all of your soon-to-be-famous torture memos put together.

You added a bit more to your composition, about 50 pages more in fact. You (or whoever wrote this for you) began thus:

"The President possesses constitutional authority to use military force against Iraq to protect United States national interests."

Now you were showing off, digging yourself deeper. Now you would need to explain how the United States could have national interests in somebody else's distant nation that outweighed that nation's own interest in not being attacked or invaded.

And you were just warming up. You dug deeper:

"This independent constitutional authority is supplemented by congressional authorization in the form of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution."

This is apparently a reference to the 1991 version of this type of congressional buck passing. In fact, such a resolution could not alter the Constitution to either remove or augment anything. In addition, it was more than a decade old. That wouldn't faze you, Jay Bybee, because you'd already given the president "independent constitutional authority" to treat such an authorization as redundant and superfluous. Its primary purpose was to pack these pages and obscure the simplicity of your primary argument, if that's a name merited by your bald assertion that verily this is that.

You did some international digging too:

"Using force against Iraq would be consistent with international law because it would be authorized by the United Nations Security Council or would be justified as anticipatory self-defense."

Now you were digging deep indeed. By citing the two exceptions that the UN Charter makes to its ban on war, you were acknowledging its authority. But neither exception applied. The UN rejected a US attack on Iraq as something it could not authorize, and such an attack would -- of course -- not be self-defense. But that didn't matter either, because you'd already begun to alter the law. You invented something called "anticipatory self-defense." But international law did not recognize such a thing, and no international authority agreed that it legalized an attack on Iraq. Your citation-packed memo failed to present any citations for this hooey.

Through such alterations, of course, you were increasing the "legal" acceptability of almost any future war launched by any nation against any other.

What could possibly be more damaging? Or more well documented? Your crime is in black and white and continues for almost 50 more pages. Yet, as of December 2009, congressional committees were pretending to await a report on your memos from the Justice Department itself, with the incorporation of watering-down edits from you and your co-conspirators. Even bar associations were awaiting the same report before concluding that a desk-chair mass-murderer like you was unfit to be a lawyer.

Rule for civilians: first kill all the lawyers. Rule for lawyers: first kill everyone else?

This "memo" you were drafting for White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales was going to be treated as a secret law, but it would remain on record as some sort of quasi-law after becoming public. Years later it still hasn't been rejected (its existence in fact barely acknowledged), even if your public reputation has been ruined and the failure of Congress to impeach you now in your current office is commonly cited as evidence of the death of Congress as an institution. In fact, you're facing civil prosecutions at home and a possible indictment in Spain for having drafted much less criminal memos than this one. Here's what you wrote to Gonzales, who had asked you on behalf of President George W. Bush to legalize aggressive wars for him:

"You have asked our Office whether the President has the authority, under both domestic and international law, to use military force against Iraq. This memorandum confirms our prior advice to you regarding the scope of the President's authority. We conclude that the President possesses constitutional authority for ordering the use of force against Iraq to protect our national interests. This independent authority is supplemented by congressional authorization in the form of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution, Pub. L. No. 102-1, 105 Stat. 3 (1991), which supports the use of force to secure Iraq's compliance with its international obligations following the liberation of Kuwait, and the Authorization for Use of Military Force, Pub. L. No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001), which supports military action against Iraq if the President determines Iraq provided assistance to the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001."

Now this is curious. You've already granted the president absolute authority. Then you've granted him authority on the basis of an AUMF from 1991. Now you throw in the 2001 version that allowed the attack on Afghanistan. That one will provide additional redundant authorization, you claim, if Iraq provided assistance to 9-11, or rather: if the president determines that to be the case. Congress passed yet another non-declaration of war less than two weeks before the date on your memo. This one, even if you chose to accept it as constitutional, had terms attached to it that George W. Bush had no intention of complying with and in fact violated. And none of these domestic justifications for the crime you are here "legalizing" fit with any of the international justifications you were alleging in this same memo. A war is no more authorized by the UNSC or defensive because Congress misplaces its spine or the president "determines" that pigs fly. And your arguments for the domestic legality of the war do not attempt to portray it as defensive of U.N.-approved.

So, you returned to the international arena with this thesis, to be argued for below:

"In addition, using force against Iraq would be consistent with international law, because it would be authorized by the United Nations ("U.N.") Security Council, or would be justified as anticipatory self-defense."

And you were still just clearing your throat:

"This memorandum is divided into three sections. First, we explain the background to the current conflict with Iraq, touching upon the U.N. Security Council resolutions related to the Persian Gulf War and its aftermath, and highlighting the situations in which the United States has used force against Iraq between 1991 and the present. Second, we discuss the President's authority under domestic law to direct military action against Iraq, examining both his constitutional authority and supplementary congressional support. Finally, we detail the justification under international law for the United States to use force against Iraq, considering the circumstances in which the U.N. Security Council has authorized such action and the scenarios in which it would be appropriate to use force in anticipatory self-defense."

Appropriate? If what is legal morphs into what is appropriate, and the determiner of what is appropriate is Jay Bybee, what are the law books for? And what would best make an aggressive war appropriate? Why, pretending it was simply an ordinary and even defensive continuation of a war long-since legalized. Making that case, however, would require providing some background. Forgive me if I quote and then quickly dismiss a large stinking, steaming pile of it (background). I've deleted your footnotes throughout, by the way, Mr. Bybee, simply because they are in the same vein as the rest of the document and consequently make it even worse, not better. Those wanting to read the footnotes can go to your original: PDF.

To continue reading this annotated blogger's edition of Bybee's confession to mass-murder, open one of these documents:
PDF. Word. Old Word.

beingbybee.pdf384.32 KB
beingbybee.docx259.28 KB
beingbybee.doc376 KB

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hey kidz!!! Guess what ELSE the OPR Report won't say??? . . . ;-)

This is just some speculation from this ol' fool from North Cackilacki . . . put forth and dedicated to all our "Special Friends" . . . those that think the end justifies the means of their "PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION" models and tactics

. . . especially to "Bill Nye - The Zion Guy" who has just discredited himself as a scientist. . . and exposed himself as just another "Shill" for Zionism. . .

. . . "Mr. Wizard" would have NEVER whored himself out like that, kidz . . .;-)


"It is our conclusion that not only was the U.S. Military 'Set Up' to take the fall for the PNAC/AIPAC 'Full Spectrum Dominance' Programs, . . .

. . . but that these TORTURE SCANDALS were just one piece of a GREATER 'World Dominance Agenda' that was designed to completely DESTROY the Constitutional Republic of the United States . . .

. . . and replace it with a North American Union under the complete control of a Centralized World Body.

It is our conclusion that the original "TORTURERS" were Israeli MOSSAD and British MI6 operatives trained in TORTURE techniques. Using emotional manipulations by repeated viewing of 9-11 events and by POWER OF AUTHORITY techniques discovered and refined by Dr. Stanley Milgram, U.S. Soldiers and Blackwater Mercenaries were tricked into violating both the law and codes of conduct. These events were then filmed by MOSSAD for blackmail and smear campaigns against the U.S.

The other programs include:

1 - The Big Lie of 9-11: This was not only used as "The New Pearl Harbor" of the PNAC/AIPAC group to kick start their agenda, but also as a means to suppress and discredit the U.S. Science community in the Political World View.

2 - The War on Terror: This 'Bush Doctrine' agenda of Pre-Emptive Warfare was used to discredit the U.S. and the U.S. Military and make them be seen as a 'Too Powerful Rogue State' with no regard to International Law or International Human Rights in the Political World View while financially draining the domestic economy of the U.S.

3 - The Intentional Destruction of the U.S. Dollar by the Federal Reserve Central Bank - This 'Fractional Reserve Fiat Banking Numbers Racket' has been used time and time again throughout history to wage economic warfare and make the country accountable to the currency in question appear unstable and failing in the Political World View.

4 - The Intentional Consolidation and Destruction of the Distributed and Independent U.S. Banking System - The 'Golden Fleece' Programs - By removing the Glass-Steagall Act firewall between the 'Commercial Banks' and the 'Investment Banks' as well as the Interstate Banking Laws, simple mathematical 'tricks' are used to amplify the 'monetary centrifuge' effect of normal Compound Interest usuary mathematics to produce 'Weapons Grade Financial Mathematics' which again makes the country in question appear unstable and failing in the Political World View.

5 - The Big Lie of Man Made Global Warming - By intmidation tactics, the U.S. and International Science Communities were forced to sign on to a Political Agenda, which like the infamous Downing Street Memo, created a international media campaign where not only were the 'FACTS' manipulated to support an 'Agenda' . . .

. . . but under the new Game Rules of 'Cap and Trade', the Industrialized U.S. is demonized as being the #1 producer of Carbon Dioxide which has been re-branded as a 'deadly toxin' by the E.P.A. (those clowns for hire that told you kidz in NYC the AIR was SAFE to breathe after 9-11). . .

. . . and with all the fervor of Post World War II 'Holocaust Reparations', the International Community is emotionally whipped into a frenzy as they are repeatedly told, 'The U.S. has CARBON SINNED!!!' . . .

. . . and 'The U.S. owes the REST of the World over 45 TRILLION DOLLARS in Reparations' . . .

. . . a debt that, at approx. $150,000 per U.S. Citizen, would be the death nail to an already intentionally crippled economic system.

In conclusion,

It is the recommendation of this committee that the following actions be taken:

a. Audit and Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank, The Department of Homeland Security, and the TSA. Make arrests as needed.

b. RICO ALL PNAC and AIPAC members as well as all Zionist 5th Columnists like John 'Torture Legal Miss Condi' Yoo and David 'Talumd Law Anyone?' Horowitz

c. Force AIPAC to register as a FOREIGN AGENT

d. Re-open the 9-11 Investigation with emphasis on rounding up rogue U.S. Military & Intelligence Staff, Israel's MOSSAD, and British MI5/MI6 Operatives, PNAC, AIPAC, and all members of the OSP - "OFFICE FOR SPECIAL PLANS"

e. Reinstate the U.S. Media FAIRNESS DOCTRINE

f. Break Up The U.S. Corporate Media Monopolies and arrest owners and CEOs for Internation War Crimes and Treason against the U.S.A.

g. Repeal the Telecommunication Immunity Law and move forward with arrests and prosecutions at the NSA and the Telecommunications Industry, especially at Booz, Allen, Hamilton (Order of Arrests: General Michael '4th Amendment' Hayden and Dov 'Books' Zakheim, then the CEOs of the TELCOS, etc) and at Global Knowledge, the contractor that provided the training for the telecom crimes.

h. Stop ALL AID . . . military, financial, etc. to Israel from the U.S. by imposing the Symmington Amendment until such time as Israel comes clean on its own Nuclear and Biological Weapons programs . . . and STOPS its GENOCIDE
and WAR CRIMES against the Palestinians . . . as well as its
WAR OF TERROR "False Flag" operations, illegal Ecstacy and Heroin drug trade, blackmail, and bribery operations around the world.

i. Let former FBI Agents Robert Hanssen and Sybil Edmonds speak . . . and reinvstigate the 9-11 MURDER of former FBI Agent John O'Neill.

j. And give that fool from North Cackilacki that you Zionist ass-holes 'screwed' because he got in your way at the NSA and the CIA. . . a truck load of money . . . a NEW HOUSE and a NEW FARM . . . and a NEW GUITAR since he had to sell all of his to buy FOOD thanks to you assholes!!!

k. . . . and for crying out loud, 'STOP TORTURING EACH OTHER!!! . . . IMMEDIATELY!!!'"


Yup, I doubt any of THAT will be in the OPR Report, kidz . . . ;-)

"The truth confronts you
The truth confronts you as the sea
Crushing without detail
Impassioned and detached
Killing with love and power in God's name.
People stop hurting people,
People stop hurting people"
- "Stop Hurting People" by Pete Townsend


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Julie Varughese


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.