You are herecontent / Doctors, Media Critics Demand Broader TV Debate On Healthcare
Doctors, Media Critics Demand Broader TV Debate On Healthcare

Doctors, media critics demand broader TV debate on healthcare | Press Release
NYC, JULY 28--Between noon and 1 pm, FAIR and local healthcare advocacy groups will deliver a petition signed by over 12,000 people demanding that the TV networks include the single-payer proposal in their coverage of the national healthcare debate. The petition's signatories include Obama's longtime physician, Dr. David Scheiner; filmmaker Michael Moore; former MSNBC host Phil Donahue; actors Mike Farrell, Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon; and doctors Quentin Young, Stephanie Woolhandler and David Himmelstein of Physicians for a National Health Program.
The petition will be presented to a representative of ABC News, which disinvited Dr. Scheiner from its recent forum on healthcare reform, where he'd been planning to ask Obama a question about single-payer.
FAIR, Physicians for a National Health Program, Healthcare Now!, the Private Health Insurance Must Go Coalition, Code Pink and the Raging Grannies are taking part in the petition delivery. In addition to the petition, the groups will be presenting a giant prescription--for a broader healthcare debate--to a representative of ABC News at the network's NYC headquarters at 77 West 66th Street.
FAIR communications director Isabel Macdonald commented, "When 59 percent of the public and an equal percentage of physicians say they want a Medicare-for-all type of plan, and that perspective has not been covered at all this year on a major TV network like ABC, one has to wonder what kind of journalism that is."
FAIR's petition, which is available here, reads as follows:
Many experts see single-payer national health insurance as the most sensible solution to expand coverage to the uninsured and to reduce costs.
This proposal polls well with the public, who preferred it two-to-one over a privatized system in a recent survey (New York Times/CBS, 1/11-15/09). It is also preferred by 59 percent of physicians, according to a recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine (4/1/08).
Yet a recent study by FAIR found that of hundreds of stories about health care in major outlets earlier this year, only five stories included the views of advocates of single-payer--none of which appeared on the television networks.
The insurance lobbies and many politicians may not want to talk about single-payer. But that makes it all the more important that the media do.
- Login or register to post comments
-

- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version





Stay warm this winter in a black hooded sweatshirt. Order one. Order them by the dozen and donate them to occupations!





all have one thing in common, they are all owned by Corporate America. If there is anyone who thinks they will actually begin to tell the truth about THEIR healthcare plan, and any changes to their PROFIT driven plans, has to be a fantacy dreamer.
I firmly beleive that "IF" the public was trufully aware of what the private insurance industry was actually doing for "PROFIT" only plans. Most people could clearly see for themselves, the truth about what their intentions really are, I see for themselves that actual healthcare is not in their best interests. "ONLY PROFIT" is their goals.
Having those elected officials who have taken money donations from these companies, and other companies associated with healthcare for the American people, it is nothing less than a conflict of interest at its maximum form. These elected officials have sold out the people of the United States to Corporate America. Yet our government has turned its head away, and their backs on the People.
Instead of demanding these officials to represent the people who elected them, our government choses to say nothing, or do anything. Their oaths of offices is merely a waste of time. Our Constitution is a thing of the past that we can look upon and wonder out loud if we chose, "What could it have been like to have elected officials who actually wanted to serve the people of this great country???
We have "A GOVERNMENT, for THE GOVERNMENT, by THE GOVERNMENT", OWNED and controlled by "CORPORATE AMERICA", and supported by most of the people, by their votes..
Not only makes you wonder what kind of jounalism will not cover the facts, but opens our eyes to what kind of country we live in now!
Beware! It's only going to get worse, Obama is a turncoat.
IBETT