You are herecontent / Why Would Libby Lie?

Why Would Libby Lie?


By Dennis Kelleher
TomPaine.com

Dennis Kelleher is a legislative director for a Democratic senator. He was the deputy staff director and general counsel for the senior Democrat on the Senate Committee on Help, Education, Labor and Pensions and he was a litigation partner at the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. The views expressed are his own.

A key element in trying to prove a crime is showing why someone might have done something illegal. Lawyers call it proving motive. Evidence of motive is often the critical reason a prosecutor concludes that someone has committed a crime and a jury convicts someone of a crime.

Thus far, motive is the mystery in the CIA agent leak case that has rocked the White House. Why would so many of the most senior and seasoned White House officials, including apparently the vice president, engage in what appears to be a coordinated and comprehensive smear campaign that included the outing of an undercover CIA official? And why would anyone risk committing federal criminal felonies by lying about it?

I. Lewis Libby, as assistant to the president, chief of staff to Vice President Cheney and assistant to the vice president for National Security Affairs, was indisputably one of the most powerful officials in the administration. By all accounts, he is a savvy, experienced and careful lawyer who sweated the details and was prudently risk-averse and wily in the ways of dealing with the media.

He has now resigned in disgrace and is charged with the crimes of obstructing justice by lying to the FBI and the grand jury. Prosecutor Fitzgerald has charged him with these crimes for allegedly falsely testifying that he learned of a CIA agent’s identity from reporters rather than from the vice president and other senior administration officials.

If Libby lied, why would he? The prosecutor unknowingly answered that question at his press conference. He said, if the reporters testified when they were issued subpoenas in August 2004, “we would have been here [holding a press conference] in October 2004 instead of October 2005.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

...The LIE that Iraq was trying to buy uranium from Niger (supported by documents that are proven sophomoric forgeries - which is also a crime), the LIE that Saddam was an imminent threat, which was supported by the LIES told by pre-war intelligence cooked up by the Bush administration (proven to be cooked by the revelation of the DSMs)...

...And the TRUTH:
That Bush ignored CIA warnings that the uranium claim could not be substantiated, and the Bush administration admission, subsequent to the 2003 State of the Union, that they could not prove the uranium claim made during the speech.

All the evidence is there. All we have to do is look, discover and pass it on...

John Perry
http://www.johnperryonline.com

The jury doesn't have to agree on the motive, only that there was a motive for the actions.

But if the natural consequence of that action was the result [whatever that was], then this would satisfy the intent element.

Let the prosecutor do his job, and let the DNC provide the leadership to win the 2006 election.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.