You are herecontent / Writing in an Age of Terror

Writing in an Age of Terror


Writing in an Age of Terror
By David Swanson

Remarks delivered at National Writers Union conference in Philadelphia, October, 29, 2005, opening forum with Ed Herman, Danny Schechter, and Linn Washington, on "Writing in an Age of Terror."

_______________

Obviously, if this really were an age of terror, an age in which we were all terrorized, there would be no writing. You can't write if you're terrorized. I mean, you can, but your writing will have all the clarity of a campaign speech by John Kerry, or all the relevance of the election-year literature produced by the AFL-CIO, which refused to acknowledge that there was a war in Iraq.

Every serious article about U.S. or global politics that pretends there is no war in Iraq is an example of writing in an age of terror. Every article that pretends the war is not a blatant violation of international law and a crime against humanity is an example of writing in an age of terror. But that sort of writing, during other wars, predates the commandment from Bush to feel terrorized.

What's new about writing in this age, I think, stems from the rule that you must be either with or against the anti-terror crusaders being led by George W. Bush. You must be with Bush or with the terrorists. What seems possibly new from this is an increased unwillingness on the part of those opposed to Bush's policies to openly say so, or to say so without all sorts of qualifications.

The progressive PR firm Fenton Communications in March 2003 published a book of tips for "navigating media in wartime," which began "DON'T bash Bush. 2 out of 3 Americans approve of Bush's handling of the confrontation with Saddam Hussein. In times of war -- especially the early stages -- the public's instinct is to stand behind its leader. You won't win any allies by alienating yourself with harsh attacks."

Now, of course, 2 out of 3 Americans disapprove of Bush's war, but Fenton hasn't really changed its tune. In fact, everybody's singing from the same hymnal. Another progressive organization called Demos released a set of "[Hurricane] Katrina Talking Points" some weeks back that included this:

"Keep the conversation in a 'reasonable mode.' Appeal to people across political ideology. This means avoiding sharp, rhetorical language about political parties, politicians, etc. Stay away from discussing particular people who are to be blamed. This is very important. When highly political, partisan or ideological images are triggered people revert to their own traditional identifications and positions and stop 'hearing' a more reasonable discussion about government and its purposes."

There is absolutely nothing reasonable about self-censorship during a time of rising fascism. The right wing does not self-censor in this way, and it has not worked for Democrats over the course of my lifetime. It's not a new approach. But what strikes me as new is the degree to which ordinary activists are all modeling themselves as amateur PR strategists and all parroting the self-defeating centrist talking points put out by the people paid for that service.

You can go to strategy meetings of liberal activist groups of any size, from the largest coalitions to the tiniest small-town gathering, and the discussion will focus on properly framing the message so as to appeal to those who completely disagree with us. And that framing of the message will not be about persuading people to change their minds so much as it will be about censoring parts of our message so as not to offend them.

The corporate media should get a pile of blame for this. The way it shuts out voices and labels positions as unacceptable is not just manufacturing consent. It's manufacturing a million little manufacturers who go out and spread the gospel, who nominate unelectable candidates because the media said they were the electable ones, and who ultimately are speaking and writing from a place of fear and terror.

The question for us is not how we can write better in an age of terror, but how we can write ourselves and others into a realization that this is not an age of terror, that many many people are not scared, that a majority of us oppose Bush, oppose his war, and want to see him impeached over it, and that no matter how radical the message framers tell us that is, it is still majority opinion and we still must write about it without any fear, with complete honesty, without any modification for alleged broader appeal.

Emerson said "To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men [and women], -- that is genius."

Conversely, then, to believe that others cannot handle your thoughts must be idiocy.

That means that if you believe a war is wrong because little Arab children get their limbs ripped off, you should write that. You don't have to write that it's wrong because some veterans now oppose it. You can and should write that if that's what you believe, but I'm not convinced that we stop enough and ask ourselves what we believe.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Don't wait for politicians, pundits, polls or permission. Get out there now and speak Truth. Impeach for Peace. Tools are available at www.twincitiesvfp.org. Use them to spread the good word and don't worry about the fanatics.

At this point anyone who still supports Bush and his war is not amenable to rational discourse. We can only hope they have some sort of conversion experience on their personal road to Tarsus. But, there are plenty of others who just might need some encouragement. Tell them the emperor has no clothes.

This war and the Bush Regime will end when enough people don't cooperate with the fantasy. This Horror will end when enough people stop playing the "no you go first" game. Is this was illegal and immoral? Yes. Is George Bush corrupt and despicable? Yes. Are you going to do something about it?

Who was it exactly, that decided we were all in terror after 9/11? Who had the authoritiy to make the decision that "the world changed on 9/11"?

Was it the media which loves to exagerate and sensationalize everything? Are they to be blamed for the false perception that we were all scared children?

Perhaps it's the self aggrandizing, neocon "intellectuals" that fabricated this ugly little psuedo reality. They are the ones all spun up with fear and paranoia. Their fixation on heaven and hell, the forces of good and evil, the second coming (The Lord of the Rings, Dungeons and Dragons), [insert fairy tale here].

How many people were really scared? How many really thought fundamentalist terrorists were targeting their neighborhood? Other than the enormous outpouring of sympathy towards America from around the world.. what had really changed before Bush went bizarro? Nothing. Bush and the neocons are the ones that "changed the world".

The world changed when Bush and the neocons stole the opportunity to lie us into their stupid little ideological war.. when they pushed away and insulted our allies.. when they committed treason by manufacturing, or using known forgeries, to make up lies about "mushroom clouds".. when they ignited this burning fiasco in Iraq.. when they began to lead us away from the enlightenment of reason.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.