You are herecontent / This Nation Needs a Fighter in the White House, not a Gabber and Glad-Hander

This Nation Needs a Fighter in the White House, not a Gabber and Glad-Hander


By Dave Lindorff

If the disaster of the so-called "stimulus" bill just passed by the Senate doesn't convince President Obama and his advisers that the strategy of "bipartisanship" that he has been espousing is a political suicide, nothing will.

The Republican Party, with the willing help of conservative Democrats like Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Democratic turncoats like Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), has forced Obama to agree to a joke of a stimulus package that is nearly half composed of tax breaks which will do nothing to bolster the economy (since most of the money will end up either paying down credit card debt or buying Chinese and Sri Lankan imports) and that is stripped of $40 billion to help struggling state and local governments.

Fresh from its rout in November, the GOP is, in fact, openly trying to sabotage Obama's economic stimulus plan, because the last thing Republicans want to see is an economy on the upturn in 2010 or 2012.

Meanwhile, Obama, who had the chance to add 2-4 Democratic senators to the Senate by naming Republicans to his cabinet or to other key administration positions, and having Democratic governors replace them with progressive Democrats, has wasted several opportunities. When he did name a Republican senator from a state with a Democratic governor--Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, named to be Commerce Dept. Secretary--he instead cut a pathetic deal to have the state's Democratic governor name another Republican Senator to replace Judd. Almost as bad, in New York, when he named Sen. Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State, he allowed New York's Democratic governor, David Patterson, to name a conservative Democrat to replace her.

What is this guy trying to do? Obama is from Chicago, a town where politics is a blood sport, and where as a young politician, he played that game with brass knuckles himself. Now he's trying to be everybody's best friend?

The result is he's being steamrollered.

So what should he do? Tell conservative Democrats in Congress that if they want any of their pet bills or projects passed in the next four years, they will pass a stimulus bill as he wants it written, with limited tax breaks and with all the money he proposed for states and localities. Republicans, meanwhile, should be told bluntly that if they vote against the measure once it is reconciled in a House-Senate conference, they get shorted on stimulus money in their districts. Let them explain it to their constituents.

Hard ball.

That's how Republicans have played for the past eight years, and how they've turned Congressional Democrats into a quivering mass of gelatinous goop.

Obama won a landslide electoral victory and a big popular vote majority. It wasn't his promise to be bi-partisan that gave him that win. It was his promise to be a real leader.

Leaders have to be respected, and they get respect from the opposition not by being courteous and by bending over, but by carrying a big stick and using it occasionally. Those who fail to use that stick end up getting whacked by one themselves, which is what happened to Obama's two Democratic predecessors, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

The other thing Obama is going to have to recognize, and recognize fast, is that his strength lies his progressive base. He has been dissing that base since the minute he won the election. Progressives have cut him a lot of slack--far more than he deserves--as he appointed (mostly white male) Clinton hack after Clinton hack to his cabinet, held over key (all white male) Bush appointees like Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense and Gen. David Petraeus as head of Central Command (CentCom), and backpedaled on key campaign promises like ending the war in Iraq and winning passage of the Employee Free Choice labor rights restoration bill.

With this odious betrayal of his base, he is losing support from the very people who can sustain his presidency through four tough years of struggle. Without them, he is doomed to a one-term failure of a presidency.

Obama now faces three key tests. If he fails on any of them, I would argue that his presidency is finished before it starts.

* The first is the stimulus bill. If it passes largely in the Senate version, it will be a waste of $820 billion, because so much of the money will be blown on tax breaks and so little on real stimulus spending that it won't do anything to break the fall of the collapsing economy. Obama needs to get Democrats to report out of conference a bill that is close to what the House passed last week, and then he needs to use his "bully pulpit" and his power to punish those who vote against the measure to win passage in both houses. If conservative Democrats are worried about the costs, he should revoke Bush's tax cuts and raise taxes on the rich immediately (he should do that anyhow and call it a retroactive and long-overdue Bush war tax).

* The second test is ending the Iraq War. The latest reports are that Obama is being sucker-punched by the war's leading generals, primarily Gen. Petraeus and Iraq theater commander Gen. Ray Odierno, into considering a longer pullout than 16 months, with both a 19-month and a 23-month pullout being proposed for his consideration. Given that there are also credible reports that these generals and lower-ranking supporters are actively lobbying against a pullout--an act of insubordination against a commander in chief that borders on treason during wartime--Obama should fire these guys immediately and order a prompt pullout. Even 16 months is far too long to maintain the occupation. I'd suggest three months to get everyone home.

* Finally, Obama should recognize that the Afghanistan War is an unwinnable disaster that long ago morphed from a police action attempting to capture and destroy Al Qaeda's organization in that country into a war against the country's indigenous political/military force, the Taliban, which was never a threat to the US, and which cannot be defeated, no matter how many resources the US throws into the fight. He should call a halt to this fiasco before he owns it, order UN-sponsored regional peace talks among the conflicting parties within and around Afghanistan, and pull all US forces out of that nation as fast as the planes can carry them.

At that point, Obama will have won the passionate support of his base, and the grudging respect of conservatives in Congress. The remaining years of his presidency will inevitably be full of conflict, but he will be fighting his political battles from a position of strength. This will allow him to campaign forcefully for progressive House and Senate candidates in the 2010 off-year congressional elections, when he could win more seats and stronger control in the Senate.

Meanwhile, he should replace Gates at Defense, ideally with some liberal Republican senator from a Democratic state (I'd suggest one of the two women, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, who represent the state of Maine--a woman Secretary of Defense would be a great move), so that another Democrat could be appointed to the Senate. He could do the same thing with the Department of Health (another good place for a woman senator from Maine!). That would give the Democrats 61 seats in the Senate, assuming Al Franken finally gets named the winner in Minnesota.

The key thing is, no more nice guy. Obama needs to return to his roots and start acting like the Chicago pol that he began as. It's what his base wants, it's what the broad mass of the electorate wanted when they voted for him, and it's what the country needs.
________________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now available in paperback edition). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Obama needs to understand that the American people are ready to give up on genocide as a foreign policy objective. We do not have the right to control other people's lands and resources. Those who claim that "protectionism" will ruin the world economy do not care about the people whose lives and livelihoods they would willingly destroy.

President Obama (it is so good not to have Bush any longer) needs to get on with the program of restoring America. I am not starry-eyed. I know that America was built on slavery and genocide, but that does not mean that we cannot get past that point in our moral culture.
4Peace

haven't commented on this article by Mr. Lindorff. A fascinating article that I have to say, I agree with, kinda.

"The other thing Obama is going to have to recognize, and recognize fast, is that his strength lies his progressive base. He has been dissing that base since the minute he won the election."

"...the stimulus bill. If it passes largely in the Senate version, it will be a waste of $820 billion, because so much of the money will be blown on tax breaks and so little on real stimulus spending..."

"Obama now faces three key tests. If he fails on any of them, I would argue that his presidency is finished before it starts."

I wonder why it is that certain commenters here want to run everyone down that even questions Obama's "stimulus bill" yet, this guy writes this detailed article, and they say absolutely nothing about it.

Funny, ain't it? I guess they just hope this one slides off the radar without people noticing...

A stimulus bill that will work is one where they stimulate the economy by putting $$$ in the hands of those in the basement of the "Trickle Down Theory"...The workers and low incomes.
They have their estimates of how much every man, woman, and child will be on the string for this "stimulus", then WRITE EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD A FUCKING CHECK FOR THE AMOUNT THE STUDIES SHOW!!! THERE IS YOUR STIMULUS to get money flowing.

For-fucking-get about loans. Loans are the reason the economy in in a shit hole right now. Debt is a BAD thing; CASH is a good thing. If you can't afford to buy a fucking $55,000 car then you DO WITHOUT IT and buy what you can afford. (Those of us in the economic basement have been doing it for years!)

The government keeps its hands out of private sector enterprises (Banks, loan companies, etc.) and let the chips (And, hence, the companies) fall where they may just like they would any small business owner who fails. Yes, there will be chaos, ranting, and gnashing of teeth for a while but eventually there would be a leveling off.

Credit-not-cash, insurance companies, the stock market, and tax loopholes for the wealthy and churches are major factors in inflation and poverty. Bring back GOLD and CASH and after the dust settles you will see a more level playing field for EVERY American.

I didn't comment on this article, Willy, because I believe ANY Bailout/Stimulus going UPWARD is not going to do a fucking thing-NOTHING!-to truly help what ails this economy. I condemn any form a bailout/stimulus takes if the "remedy" is focused UP instead of DOWN. It is a waste and it is throwing gas on the fire.

REAL "CHANGE"? http://www.dsausa.org/about/index.html

Several economists as well as a few congressmen, have proposed lessening interest rates on mortgages and thus the payments due every month as a means by which we should help families stay in their homes. and I think that is a good idea. People stay in their slice of the "American dream" and have more money to stimulate growth in the economy immediately. I agree with that approach.

I also agree with what you are saying:

"A stimulus bill that will work is one where they stimulate the economy by putting $$$ in the hands of those in the basement of the "Trickle Down Theory"...The workers and low incomes."

absolutely.

understand? I come here for one reason. If I happen to branch off from time to time, it's for levities sake and nothing more (i.e. my suggestion for "Operation Valkyrie 2.0" was just humor for the troops). I'm all over the blogoshere pushing for War Crimes investigations (prosecutions, convictions) and this is merely one stop of MANY.

criminal behavior of the current regime, because it is exactly the same as the last administration.

Many people would like the "progressive" left to focus solely on the past crimes of BushCo so that the continuation of these same policies of globalization and imperialism can go on, unfettered under the NEW Obama administration.

It is classic distraction. Once again using the false dichotomy of the "two party system" as cover for the decades long usurpation of the American way of life.

Well, I don't buy it, and neither do many others here. Yes we need to hold those accountable for the actions of the past; the war crimes, the lying to the people, the events of 9/11. Yes. absolutely.

But not to the exclusion of efforts to stop the same policies that caused those actions in the first place that are currently shaping this new administration. That is my point. That is my "job description".

But thank you for commenting on this thread. It's a good article by Mr. Lindorff.

You don't know me. Do not assume you do.

... here in this forum. I do not "assume to know you"... but I can read what you write.

test note

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.