You are herecontent / FOR THE HEALTH OF ALL: CAMP HOPE

FOR THE HEALTH OF ALL: CAMP HOPE


By davidswanson - Posted on 03 January 2009

By Mike Ferner

A steady stream of reporters from corporate news media outlets warmed things up at a frigid Camp Hope in Chicago yesterday, when CNN and the local affiliates of ABC, NBC, FOX, and CBS all called at Drexel Park on day two of the 18-day vigil urging President-elect Obama to make good on his campaign pledges.

Universal, publicly funded health care was the theme yesterday, highlighted by a presentation from one of the nation’s top authorities on the subject, Dr. Quentin Young, MD.

For decades, Dr. Young has promoted the benefits of a Canadian-type, “single-payer” system like most of the world’s industrialized nations. Young’s office is in Hyde Park, the same venerable neighborhood where Camp Hope is pitched, a few short blocks from Barack Obama’s home. His partner in the practice has been Barack Obama’s personal physician since the Senator moved into the historic district a few years ago.

Young related that in Obama’s early years in politics, he used to say he was all for single-payer. Then in 2006, the Senator started to say he was still for it, but that it would never happen without a solid Democrat majority in Congress. Then during the presidential campaign, he said that because of America’s rich experience with employment-based insurance that option would be included in the mix of plans he supported.

The white-haired physician paused for a moment and added, “Well I can tell you as someone who has practiced medicine for decades, Americans may have experience with employment-related health benefits but it’s been far from a happy experience.”

Even though health insurance costs in the U.S. add $1200 or more to the price of a car produced here Young said, big employers like General Motors Corp., along with the Chambers of Commerce are opposed to single-payer insurance because “they’re trapped in ideological blinders and unable to see the issues clearly.” However, in Canada, he said, the Big Three automakers and the Canadian Auto Workers Union both say they like the system they have, even admitting when pressed that it gives Canadian industry an advantage.

“The power of corporations is incredibly strong. Take a look at the number of registered lobbyists

Big Pharma (the pharmaceutical industry) employs to sell its message to the U.S. House of Representatives: it has 675 registered lobbyists, plus staff, and there are 435 members of the House. ‘Hope and change.’ I like it,” Dr. Young said, “but I’d rather hear us talking about solidarity.”

Discussing some of the health care proposals under discussion, Dr. Young offered, “The ‘incremental’ plans put forth by some activists are idiotic. Every year companies try to off-load more of the cost of health benefits onto workers. I just hope that when Obama gets into office he quickly says ‘The situation is much worse than I thought. We need single-payer insurance now.’ What’s more likely, though,” Dr. Young observed, “is we will start hearing some baloney like, ‘Don’t worry, the public plan is so much better that it will eventually win out over the private one.’”

Referring to past proposals that maintained the central role of insurance companies, Dr. Young pointed to Hillary Clinton’s plan early in her husband’s first term and charged, “The only thing worse than the crushing defeat it got would have been if it was enacted.”

“You know, we hear so much about the wonders of the free market -- that invisible hand with the extended finger…” Young mused, and then took the next question.

Health care costs a total of $2.5 trillion dollars in the U.S., or 1/6 of the country’s entire Gross Domestic Product, Dr. Young said. He briefly described two of the reasons for the high cost: overspecialization and high administrative overhead.

Regarding the rate of doctors going into specialty practices, Dr. Young said the ratio of primary care doctors to specialists is recommended to be about 70-30. “That might be considered just a little high by some, but it should be at least 60-40. In the U.S. right now it’s 50-50 and the percentage of general practitioners is still dropping.”

He used his own Hyde Park office as a good example of high administrative costs, which nationally account for nearly a third of all health care outlays. “We have five doctors and the equivalent of 14 full time employees. Five of those employees do nothing but shuffle paper,” he added ruefully.

Nick Skala, a law school student and intern with Healthcare Illinois who accompanied Dr. Young to the presentation told the 50 attendees that, “People sometimes ask me ‘Can’t we have serious health care reform without taking on the private insurance companies? Obama says his plan will compete with private insurers.’ The thing is, it’s not just insurance companies that people will be competing with, but drug companies, right-wing think tanks, and a massive, ongoing public relations campaign.”

One way to judge the level of dissatisfaction with the current private, for profit system, Skala said, is that 12 to 14 states now have proposed either legislation or citizen initiatives to get a single payer program. “The California legislature twice voted in favor of a single payer plan, only to have it vetoed both times by Governor Schwarzenegger.”

Asked about Obama’s cabinet nominees, Dr. Young said, “One or two of them have souls, but most of them don’t.” He added that one of his partners recently told him what one of his patients said about the President-elect, “So far all he’s given us is hope.”

Camp Hope continues in Drexel Park until January 18.

###

Ferner is an Ohio freelance writer.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is a shining example of all that is wrong with the "progressive" agenda.

The founding principles of our very nation have been, and will continue to be, trashed by the Democratic/Republican gangsters who collude to maintain their imperial wealth and power.

As of this writing, the civilians of Gaza, living in the world's largest concentration camp for decades, are being murdered in cold blood by the rulers of the Democratic/Republican Empire's treasured foothold in the Middle East.

But here we have a group of greedy "progressive" citizens, who could well live with gangster rule and a murderous empire, as long as they get their cut of the booty.

It really makes one wonder. If these "hopers" had lived in Nazi Germany, would they give a shit if Jews were being shoved into ovens, or their leader declared himself a dictator? Would they have been satisfied with a "progressive" Reich, if Hitler had offered them free housing and health care?

As one who attended Camp Hope's first day press conference and as one who personally knows many of those in attendance, I think you're a little off the mark in your assessment.

I don't think any real peace activists were satisfied with the 8 requests made by the Camp Hope committee. They were compromises with other less progressive groups to open the peace movement to liberals who have not been making requests.

This is a thumbnail of the eight requests:
* War in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan
* Global Climate Change
* Nuclear Weapons
* Guantanamo and Torture
* Immigrant Rights
* Unemployment and the Prison-Industrial Complex
* Housing Foreclosures
* Universal Health Care
http://camphope2009.org/

While the request on War is not my cup of tea, the other issues are also important and should not be ignored.

So on Day One anyway we had an estimated 75 attendees, almost all who have been in the trenches for years fighting for peace and justice and we had an agenda of several ministers address us who were really not clear in what they wanted. We also had Thomas Young's mother, a doctor from Stroger Hospital and a 17 year resident of the US who is being deported after being arrested and serving 3 months in jail. The last three were great speakers.

I share your pain Thomas, as Bush's predecessor used to tell us. Camp Hope was an attempt to reach out to Obama supporters and liberals in general who are not in the front lines. While I can't say how effective it will be and agree with much of what you said, I hate to see friends, colleagues and myself referred to as "greedy 'progressive' citizens.

Many of those present have taken part for years and continue to take part in actions supporting the Palestinian people. If we are getting a national stage to support single payer national healthcare, I am hard pressed to ignore it. Personally I have demonstrated in the streets against Israel's offensive in Gaza and will continue to do so.
Nick Egnatz
Veterans For Peace

Don't take it personally Nick. I am sure you and many of your friends have nothing but the most honorable of intentions.

My goal is to awaken those "hopers" being conned by the Democratic shills. For just as the Republicans buy the "silence and complicity" of the corporate media, so too does the Democratic side of empire try to buy the "silence and complicity" of the less fortunate. "Pay no attention to the war criminals!" touts Obama, "Look here, I've got handouts for all!"

If "progressives" allow those who have wrecked our Constitution, and committed supreme world crimes to go unscathed, any progress made in social programs will be a hollow victory indeed.

Of course it is not impossible to be for single payer health care and opposed to killing innocent people in far off lands also. Poland was so much closer to Germany, but they did not have the Internet then. We know the crimes, Our leaders know the crimes. The Israeli people know the crimes. But it is true that our health care system is messed up.

My little nephew in his early twenties has no health insurance. He had a problem that caused him to have to go to the hospital, and he was taken care of. He has no idea who paid for it. Being a "conservative" (part of the pro-death crowd), he is opposed to government supplied health care. He prefers that the tooth fairy pays for these things.
4Peace

Don't get me wrong. I'll be the first to admit health care, housing, etc. are issues that need attention. But it's all about PRIORITIES.

When the house is burning down, you don't walk around with placards protesting low wages, YOU PUT OUT THE FIRE!

Shills for the Democratic gangsters have conveniently tried to distract people from our country's massive fire. Groups like MoveOn make you think the spectrum of "progressive" issues are practically equal, so the gullible "hopers" can walk over the dead Gazans (with permission from our dictator's Homeland Security, of course) while smiling they get a free medical visit.

In a time of Constitutional crisis, focusing on peripheral issues - while allowing us to "progress" further into empire - is neither prudent nor humane.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Sign Up Fast Here