You are herecontent / Witness to Iraq war forum says lack of debate led to war

Witness to Iraq war forum says lack of debate led to war

The Associated Press
June 16, 2005, Thursday, BC cycle
SECTION: Washington Dateline
LENGTH: 552 words
HEADLINE: Witness to Iraq war forum says lack of debate led to war
BYLINE: By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer
Some congressional Democrats are insisting that the White House provide more information about what led to the decision to go to war in Iraq, citing a British document known as the "Downing Street memo" as evidence intelligence was distorted.

Rep. John Conyers and other Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee conducted a public forum Thursday prompted by documents that have surfaced from inside the British government about prewar planning.

Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who advised the Bush administration in 2002 that Saddam Hussein had not tried to buy a certain kind of uranium from Africa, said Conyers' hearing was important.

"We are having this discussion today because we failed to have it three years ago when we went to war," Wilson said.

"It used to be said that democracies were difficult to mobilize for war precisely because of the debate required," and the lack of debate in this case allowed the war to happen, he said.

Wilson wrote a 2003 newspaper opinion piece criticizing the Bush administration's claim that Iraq had sought uranium in Niger. After the piece appeared someone in the Bush administration leaked the identity of Wilson's wife as a CIA operative, exposing her cover.

Wilson has said he believes the leak was retaliation for his critical comments. The Justice Department is investigating and two reporters are being threatened with jail time for refusing to divulge their sources on the issue.

The Downing Street memo says the Bush administration believed that war was inevitable and was determined to use intelligence about weapons of mass destruction to justify the ouster of Saddam.

The "intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy," says the memo, recounting a July 23, 2002, meeting of Prime Minister Tony Blair and his national security team. The meeting took place just after British officials returned from Washington.

U.S. officials and Blair deny the assertion about intelligence and facts being "fixed," a comment that the memo attributes to the chief of British intelligence at the time. The meeting took place eight months before the invasion of Iraq.

Conyers pointed to statements by Bush in the run-up to invasion that war would be a last resort. "The veracity of those statements has - to put it mildly - come into question," he said.

The London Sunday Times disclosed the contents of the memo May 1.

Bush should respond to questions raised by the Downing Street memo, says a letter signed by Conyers and over 90 other members of Congress, as well as a half-million Americans.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan dismissed the memo on Thursday and indicated that no one in the White House plans to respond to the letter.

"This is simply rehashing old debates that have already been discussed," he said.

The Sunday Times also reported on an eight-page briefing paper prepared for Blair which concluded that the U.S. military had given "little thought" to the aftermath of a war in Iraq.

The briefing paper of July 21, 2002, said a postwar occupation of Iraq could lead to a protracted and costly nation-building exercise and that "as already made clear, the U.S. military plans are virtually silent on this point. Washington could look to us to share a disproportionate share of the burden."


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

having grown up during and after WW2 in germany I am especially sensitive to war and its devastating consequences.History will document that bush2 is the most dishonest,decieving,conniving,sanctimonious and stupid President this nation has ever is also interesting to observe that religion and violence usually go hand in hand.

I am amazed at the level of discontent that the DSM is causing. The DSM provides NO new information. Anti-war activists pointed out that all the "intelligence" that "proved" Iraq had WMD was false. Activists at the time also pointed out that Bush had been aiming at over-throwing Sadaam Hussein since campaigning to become president in the 2000 presidential race. Activists likewise pointed out that there was no connection between Sadaam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. I'm 100% against Bush's regime, but I must ask: why the uproar now? Instead of concentrating efforts on making the public aware of the DSM, the activist community should be focusing on holding Bush, Cheney, and members of Bush's cabinet responsible for their illegal actions. Instead of proving the case against Bush in the public press, activists should be focused on proving the case against Bush in a court of law.

Bush and his neocon puppetmasters knew that the public and Congress would not have supported attacking Iraq for the real reasons; oil, Israel and bases throughout the Mideast. Therefore, they used scare tactics based on fabricated intelligence of mushroom clouds and weapons of mass destruction to stampede the country, in particular the US Congress into war.When UN inspections in Iraq, reluctantly agreed to by Bush and his neocons, began to expose the the fact that the scare tactics were based on lies, Bush forced the UN insectors out of Iraq by threats of bombing raids. Clearly, Bush was not going to allow the truth about Iraq having no WMDs undermine his scare tactics and erode support. He had to get the UN inspectors out before the neocons' lies were completely exposed, and what better way than to start the immediately.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Find the perfect Purple Bridesmaid Dresses for your bridesmaids from




Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.