You are herecontent / Oh yeah...Remembering the War and Other National and Crises

Oh yeah...Remembering the War and Other National and Crises


By Dave Lindorff

The ongoing and deepening global economic crisis, to which Barack Obama owes his presidential election victory, is no small thing, to be sure. It also presents us on the left with a lot of openings to press for progressive change.

We saw how the Republican attempt to derail Obama by labeling him a “socialist” actually backfired—especially when people were reminded that a fundamental premise of socialism is “income redistribution,” in which some of the wealth of the rich is taken away through taxation, and transferred through federal programs to those who are less wealthy. Joe the Plumber was outraged, but when most Americans who were having trouble paying for gas or making their next mortgage payment, or who were worried that their jobs might be about to vanish, thought about that for longer than a sound-bite, it turns out that, not surprisingly, they decided socialism and redistribution didn’t sound like a bad or scary idea at all.

The same can be said of labor unions. In good times, many Americans have bought the argument that unions are just out to grab dues payments from their paychecks. But as job security vanishes and wages languish, people are waking up to the idea that they are simply expendable “inputs” to employers, and that a union can help them stand up to abusive, uncaring management. Republican propaganda about the sanctity of “secret ballot” union elections—ironic given the GOP’s simultaneous assault all over the country on the right to vote—fell on deaf ears.

Government itself, long a dirty word thanks to years of conservative propaganda, aped and spread through the corporate media, is coming back into favor, now that people see that they cannot count on either themselves or their employers to pull them through hard times. The idea that government can step in with things like extended unemployment insurance benefits, food stamps, and even renegotiated mortgages, makes people who once mocked “big government” view things a little differently.

But this unprecedented economic crisis also poses dangers.

Because we are so obsessed with the ongoing collapse of the economy and the gathering storm of debt, unemployment and loss of retirement savings that it entails, it’s easy for all of us to lose sight of other crises that demand our urgent attention and action.

Chief among these are the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the growing threat of climate change.

The wars are not going away on their own. The Iraq puppet government of Nouri al Maliki is close to approving a deadline for the removal of US troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. That is more than three years from now—nearly as long as the US was involved in World War II! It’s longer, even, than the absurd 16 months that Obama said it would take for him to end the US war and occupation of Iraq during his campaign, which was bad enough. (In the case of Afghanistan, it represents a decade of war—as long as the Vietnam War!) The danger is that Obama will allow that status of troops agreement with Iraq to become his timetable for withdrawal. We have to say “No!” The Iraq War must be ended immediately.

Afghanistan, meanwhile, is in a meltdown, and every day that US forces operate there, the opposition to US occupation grows, simply strengthening the Taliban. Similarly, the more the US tries to attack Taliban and Al Qaeda forces in neighboring Pakistan, the more opposition grows to the US in Pakistan. If we opponents of the war allow Obama to go ahead with his plans for a larger US military force in Afghanistan, we will end up with an even bigger and wider war in the Middle East and Asia, with more terrorist recruits, and with whatever remains of US funds for important domestic initiatives swallowed up by the Pentagon and the secret intelligence budget.

Let me put this simply: Nothing progressive that has been proposed by the Obama campaign can be achieved while the US is engaged in these two criminal wars. No health care reform, no increase in education loans, no early childhood education, no public works jobs programs, Nothing.

And then there is climate change. The Obama campaign promised to finally end eight years of a new Dark Ages, when government simply denied science or actively attacked science, and to start taking serious action to reduce America’s role in spewing out carbon into the atmosphere. But you don’t hear much about that anymore. That’s because reducing America’s carbon footprint costs serious money—money for research into non-carbon energy sources, money for a power transmission system to serve wind generation farms, money to develop a new generation of non-polluting vehicles and to rebuild light rail and inter-city rail systems. And once again, with the economy in a crisis, and with the two wars sucking up all available tax revenues that aren’t being given away to banks and Wall Street financial firms and insurance companies, none of that is going to happen either, unless we demand it.

Meanwhile, while the progressive folks who put their all into the Obama campaign are reveling in his and their Election Night success, and are now taking a breather, the forces of darkness that control the Democratic Party (think Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Rahm Emanuel and the whole Democratic Leadership Council), are grabbing control of the new administration, filling the incoming Obama cabinet with carryover hacks from the Clinton administration, even including the Clintons themselves, and, in some cases, the outgoing Bush administration).

This is, in other words, no time to sit back and relax, reveling in the admittedly hard-to-believe prospect of an African-American moving into the White House. It is a time for action and then more action.

When Barack Obama makes that dramatic walk from his Inauguration Day speech at the Capitol building to the White House, the streets need to be lined with protestors holding up signs calling for an immediate end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

When the new Congress tries to vote for a $50 –billion or $150-billion bail-out of the US auto industry, we need to be packing the halls shouting it down. That money should be going only into development of zero-emission automobiles, and it should be in the form of voting-share equity in those companies.

Here, for what it’s worth, are my top 10 demands for action by the new Democratic government iin Washington:

1. US forces out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Immediately! Shift the funds saved to reconstruction aid for those two countries and to veterans benefits, with any extra savings going to help fund education in poor school districts in the US.

2. Slash military spending by closing most or all overseas military bases, by dramatically reducing nuclear forces to near zero, by reducing the number of men and women in uniform, and by closing bases in the US. Savings should go to shoring up the Social Security and Medicare Trust Fund.

3. Open up the secret intelligence budget, currently running at over $40 billion a year, and cut it, for starters, by half. Savings should also go to the Social Security and Medicare Trust Fund. (Along the way, ban all spying on Americans, and revive the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in full as originally written.)

4. Break up the banking and automobile industry, as well as any other industry in which any player is so large it is able to extort money out of the government by threatening that its failure would cause a national economic crisis. “Too big to fail” needs to mean “too big to be permitted to exist.”

5. Join the Kyoto Treaty, and pledge to immediately begin a campaign to reduce US carbon emissions by 80 percent by 2050 or better, 2030. Establish a crash national research program to develop carbon-free energy sources, and provide funding for households to convert to passive geo-thermal heating and cooling systems. Funds can come from the unused $350-billion portion of the Paulson/Bernacke Wall Street bailout fund. (Talk about a job-creation program, not to mention a big whack at imported oil!)

6. Pass the Employer Free Choice Act, requiring employers to recognize a labor union wherever a majority of the workers have signed cards saying they want a union, and requiring those employers to negotiate and reach an initial contract agreement within 90 days, or under mandatory mediation.

7. Reassert the Constitutionally mandated authority of Congress by rescinding all Bush/Cheney-era signing statements and executive orders and declaring them, by Presidental declaration and by Joint Resolution of the Congress, to have been invalid and unconstitutional.

8. Order the US Justice Department to investigate the actions of the prior administration and, where crimes are discovered, to prosecute offenders, up to and including the former president, to the full extent of the law. This would include obstruction of justice, abuse of power, commission of war crimes, conspiracy, fraud, bribery, war profiteering and criminal negligence.

9. Appoint Ralph Nader as new chairman of the Federal Communications
Commission, with a powerful mandate take the necessary steps to restore
competition and fairness to the nation’s media. (My pet proposal: Establish a government loan fund to allow workers at failing newspapers to buy their publications from the owners and to operate them as employee-owned enterprises, on a tax-free basis.)

10. Enact a national health care program that provides health insurance for every person in America. My choice here would be a single-payer system—essentially an expansion of Medicare to cover everyone, funded by progressive taxation. Failing that, a system in which the government has an insurance program operating in competition with the private sector, should eventually lead to a single-payer plan. One idea: dispatch a public-citizen commission to Canada to study the Canadian health system and report back to Congress and the White House in 90 days.
_____________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I just read that the prosecutor has disappeared!

http://cryptogon. com/?p=5164

Prosecutor Who Indicted Cheney and Gonzales… Disappeared

November 20th, 2008
Via: Express News:
Willacy County prosecutor Juan Angel Guerra stumped a presiding judge and attorneys for clients as high up as Vice President Dick Cheney when he failed to show up to court on his own grand jury’s indictments.

The no-show infuriated attorneys who’d spent the day milling about with what they’d hoped would be slam-dunk motions to quash the cases.

And it put Presiding Judge Manuel Bañales in a position he said he’d never been in before.

“At the very least I expected the district attorney to be here,” Bañales said, asking Guerra’s office manager, “Do you know where he is?”
The manager, Hilda Ramirez, was subpoenaed by defense attorney J.A. “Tony” Canales when buzz circulated in the courthouse that Guerra was nowhere to be found.

Canales summoned Ramirez to act as representative for Guerra in hopes the motions could go forward.

She told the judge she had been trying to reach Guerra all day.

When Bañales asked if she were concerned for Guerra’s safety she said she would not know how to answer the question.

Guerra’s cell phone message box was full much of the day, but an assistant who answered the line late Wednesday said he was not ill.

Bañales said he would not hear the motions without the state present and set arraignments for Friday morning.

He allowed all defendants to waive court appearances and appear via their lawyers and set a jury to be called Dec. 8.

“The State of Texas is entitled to have its day in court,” he said.

Guerra, a 53-year-old Rio Grande Valley prosecutor who drew national attention for suing counterparts in the county justice system and staging a protest with barnyard animals, long has alleged high-ranking corruption in the deals that brought the impoverished county a $60 million immigration detention center.

On Monday, he got a grand jury to sign off on a slew of indictments including an acceptance of honorarium charge against state Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr., and an engaging in organized criminal activity charge against Cheney and Gonzales.

Cheney is accused of contributing to the neglect of federal immigration detainees by contracting for-profit prisons.

“By working through corporations as prisons for profit, Defendant Richard Cheney has committed at least misdemeanor assaults of our inmates and/or detainees,” the indictment reads, adding that a “money trail” can be traced to Cheney’s substantial investments in the Vanguard Group, which invests in privately run prisons.

This morning, attorneys filed motions to quash indictments “for prosecutorial vindictiveness and failure to allege an offense.

“In most of the indictments, the prosecutor identifies himself as the victim. The prosecutor has usurped for himself the role of prosecutor, judge, victim, and director of the grand jury. His conflict of interest and abuse of office require that he be stopped,” Canales said.

A number of experts were shaking their heads at the indictment.

Shannon Edmonds of the Texas District and County Attorneys Association, after reviewing a faxed copy of the indictment against Cheney and Gonzales, said he’d never seen one like it.

“It’s a creative indictment, but I don’t think it properly alleges any crime,” Edmonds said. “It’s more of just a rambling narrative … I think a court will find that it’s legally insufficient in that it fails to allege a crime.

Chip B. Lewis, a prominent criminal defense lawyer in Houston whose clients have included former Enron chairman Ken Lay, said, “It’s a shame. I’m not a Cheney supporter by any means. I’m Democrat. But the misuse of our criminal justice system is apparent … It just smacks of partisanship and it’s a shame that credence can be lent to this type of charge because you have a grand jury indictment.

Lewis said, “I don’t think he (Cheney) will ever spend a day in court.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.