You are herecontent / Powell Not Qualified for Government Work

Powell Not Qualified for Government Work

By David Swanson

Barack Obama would like to bring Colin Powell into his new administration. But Americans consider Powell only marginally more credible than how the rest of the world views him, and the rest of the world thinks he lies like a rug. Powell either wholeheartedly backed the biggest crime thus far this century, or he secretly opposed it but worked to make it happen anyway. I'm not sure which is worse, but either disqualifies him for future office.

Can you imagine having an opportunity to address the United Nations Security Council about a matter of great global importance, with all the world's media watching, and using it to… well, to make shit up -- to lie with a straight face, and with a CIA director propped up behind you, I mean to spew one world-class, for-the-record-books stream of bull, to utter nary a breath without a couple of whoppers in it, and to look like you really mean it all? What gall. What an insult to the entire world that would be.

Colin Powell doesn't have to imagine such a thing. He has to live with it. He did it on February 5, 2003. It's on videotape.

I tried to ask him about it in the summer of 2004. He was speaking to the Unity Journalists of Color convention in Washington, D.C. The event had been advertised as including questions from the floor, but for some reason that plan was revised. Speakers from the floor were permitted to ask questions of four safe and vetted journalists of color before Powell showed up, and then those four individuals could choose to ask him something related -- which of course they did not, in any instance, do.

The panel that had been assembled to lob softballs at Powell served its purpose well. It was moderated by Gwen Ifill. I asked Ifill whether Powell had any explanation for the way in which he had relied on the testimony of Saddam Hussein's son-in-law. He had recited the claims about weapons of mass destruction but carefully left out the part where that same gentleman had testified that all of Iraq's WMDs had been destroyed. Ifill thanked me, and said nothing.

I wonder what Powell would say if someone were to actually ask him that question, even today, or next year, or ten years from now. Someone tells you about a bunch of old weapons and at the same time tells you they've been destroyed, and you choose to repeat the part about the weapons and censor the part about their destruction. How would you explain that?

Well, it's a sin of omission, so ultimately Powell could claim he forgot. "Oh yeah, I meant to say that, but it slipped my mind."

But how would he explain this:

During his presentation at the United Nations, Powell provided this translation of an intercepted conversation between Iraqi army officers:

"They're inspecting the ammunition you have, yes.
"For the possibility there are forbidden ammo.
"For the possibility there is by chance forbidden ammo?
"And we sent you a message yesterday to clean out all of the areas, the scrap areas, the abandoned areas. Make sure there is nothing there."

The incriminating phrases "clean all of the areas" and "Make sure there is nothing there" do not appear in the official State Department translation of the exchange. Powell was writing fictional dialogue. He put those extra lines in there and pretended somebody had said them.

For most of his presentation, Powell wasn't inventing dialogue, but he was presenting as facts numerous claims that his own staff had warned him were weak and indefensible.

Powell told the UN and the world: "We know that Saddam’s son, Qusay, ordered the removal of all prohibited weapons from Saddam's numerous palace complexes." The January 31, 2003, evaluation of Powell's draft remarks prepared for him by the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research ("INR") flagged this claim as "WEAK".

Regarding alleged Iraqi concealment of key files, Powell said: "key files from military and scientific establishments have been placed in cars that are being driven around the countryside by Iraqi intelligence agents to avoid detection." The January 31, 2003 INR evaluation flagged this claim as "WEAK" and added "Plausibility open to question." A Feb. 3, 2003, INR evaluation of a subsequent draft of Powell's remarks noted: "Page 4, last bullet, re key files being driven around in cars to avoid inspectors. This claim is highly questionable and promises to be targeted by critics and possibly UN inspection officials as well." That didn't stop Powell from stating it as fact and apparently hoping that, even if UN inspectors thought he was a brazen liar, US media outlets wouldn't tell anyone.

On the issue of biological weapons and dispersal equipment, Powell said: "we know from sources that a missile brigade outside Baghdad was disbursing rocket launchers and warheads containing biological warfare agents to various locations, distributing them to various locations in western Iraq." The January 31, 2003, INR evaluation flagged this claim as: "WEAK. Missiles with biological warheads reportedly dispersed. This would be somewhat true in terms of short-range missiles with conventional warheads, but is questionable in terms of longer-range missiles or biological warheads."

This claim was again flagged in the February 3, 2003, evaluation of a subsequent draft of Powell's presentation: "Page 5. first para, claim re missile brigade dispersing rocket launchers and BW warheads. This claim too is highly questionable and might be subjected to criticism by UN inspection officials." That didn't stop Colin. In fact, he brought out visual aids to help with his lying. Powell showed a slide of a satellite photograph of an Iraqi munitions bunker, and lied:

"The two arrows indicate the presence of sure signs that the bunkers are storing chemical munitions . . . [t]he truck you [...] see is a signature item. It's a decontamination vehicle in case something goes wrong." The January 31, 2003, INR evaluation flagged this claim as "WEAK" and added: "We support much of this discussion, but we note that decontamination vehicles – cited several times in the text – are water trucks that can have legitimate uses... Iraq has given UNMOVIC what may be a plausible account for this activity – that this was an exercise involving the movement of conventional explosives; presence of a fire safety truck (water truck, which could also be used as a decontamination vehicle) is common in such an event." Powell's own staff had told him the thing was a water truck, but he told the U.N. it was "a signature item…a decontamination vehicle." The UN was going to need a decontamination vehicle itself by the time Powell finished spewing his lies and disgracing his country.

He just kept piling it on: "UAVs outfitted with spray tanks constitute an ideal method for launching a terrorist attack using biological weapons," he said. The January 31, 2003, INR evaluation flagged this statement as "WEAK" and added: "the claim that experts agree UAVs fitted with spray tanks are 'an ideal method for launching a terrorist attack using biological weapons' is WEAK." In other words, experts did NOT agree with that claim.

Powell kept going, announcing "in mid-December weapons experts at one facility were replaced by Iraqi intelligence agents who were to deceive inspectors about the work that was being done there." The January 31, 2003, INR evaluation flagged this claim as "WEAK" and "not credible" and "open to criticism, particularly by the UN inspectorates." His staff was warning him that what he planned to say would not be believed by his audience, which would include the people with actual knowledge of the matter. To Powell that was no matter.

Powell, no doubt figuring he was in deep already, so what did he have to lose, went on to tell the UN: "On orders from Saddam Hussein, Iraqi officials issued a false death certificate for one scientist, and he was sent into hiding." The January 31, 2003, INR evaluation flagged this claim as "WEAK" and called it "Not implausible, but UN inspectors might question it. (Note: Draft states it as fact.)" And Powell stated it as fact. Notice that his staff was not able to say there was any evidence for the claim, but rather that it was "not implausible." That was the best they could come up with. In other words: "They might buy this one, Sir, but don't count on it."

Powell, however, wasn't satisfied lying about one scientist. He had to have a dozen. He told the United Nations: "A dozen [WMD] experts have been placed under house arrest, not in their own houses, but as a group at one of Saddam Hussein's guest houses." The January 31, 2003, INR evaluation flagged this claim as "WEAK" and "Highly questionable." This one didn't even merit a "Not implausible."

Powell also said: "In the middle of January, experts at one facility that was related to weapons of mass destruction, those experts had been ordered to stay home from work to avoid the inspectors. Workers from other Iraqi military facilities not engaged in elicit weapons projects were to replace the workers who’d been sent home." Powell's staff called this "WEAK," with "Plausibility open to question."

All of this stuff sounded plausible enough to viewers of Fox, CNN, and MSNBC. And that, we can see now, was what interested Powell. But it must have sounded highly implausible to the U.N. inspectors. Here was a guy who had not been with them on any of their inspections coming in to tell them what had happened. We know from Scott Ritter, who led many UNSCOM inspections in Iraq, that U.S. inspectors had used the access that the inspection process afforded them to spy for, and to set up means of data collection for, the CIA. So there was some plausibility to the idea that an American could come back to the UN and inform the UN what had really happened on its inspections. Yet, repeatedly, Powell's staff warned him that the specific claims he wanted to make were not going to even sound plausible. They will be recorded by history more simply as blatant lies facilitating the murder of over a million human beings.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Powell said on Feb. 2001
He [Saddam Hussein] has not developed any significant capability with respect to WMD. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors.

Then an about face.
Secretary of State Powell had the second-highest total in the two-year period, with 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq's links to Al Qaeda.

Powell like Bush Cheney and the rest of the US government war criminals knowingly lied to the american people to get the american people to pay for a very illegal and very expensive war. Not surprised the Obama camp wants his endorsement they also trumpeted the words of another war criminal (Rove) when it served their purpose. Arrest US government war criminals,chris dorsey

"Barack Obama would like to bring Colin Powell into his new administration." David says.

I read this piece twice and I don't get it. Other than this ONE sentence there is nothing of value in it, unless you were locked in a Bush gulag, supported by the Democrat Congress, for the past eight years.

Who's going to start a website so the newly-redisillusioned have a forum to piss away another two years?

you are absolutely right. They will sing and rejoice and dance the victory dance for about a month before Obama comes out an says "We have to put the past behind us and unify the country and for that reason I have decided to give full pardons to Bush, Cheny, Rice, and Powell." And then the dancing will be over, but the progressive lemmings will follow suit right over the cliff for about 2 years till they finally decide they have had enough Bush-Lite, but then, the mid term elections will be going on and they won't do anything for fear of risking a democratic "victory".

without a question the worst atrocity committed during the viet nam war, and who whitewashed the incident? you can read here how in very recent history powell dimisses the incident pretty much as shit happens. who,with any shred of decency would accept an endorsement of any kind from this war criminal?

To bring that total idiot into his administration Obama would have to be nutzo. Think about it. That dingdong had nothing but good to say about McCain, except that his insane supporters seem to not be able to accept someone as president with a name that does not sound European and they don't like Muslims.

These are the same assholes who profess their love of the Iraqi people and their desire to liberate them (or at least their oil). These same Iraqi people are overwhelmingly Muslim. Having endure Crusades and lots of other shit from the European, they are damn tired of it.

What part of GO HOME don't the imperialists understand? Anyway no matter the color of his skin Colin Powell has zero credibility. He belongs in prison, not in the government.

I think he's angling for his presidential pardon.

Could be that Bushco has made clear to him that because of his "mea culpa" regarding the UN speech, it WON'T be coming from the Pretender-in-Chief, so he's kissing up and looking to get it from the guy he's convinced will be the next president.

Good luck with that, Colin!

Unfiltered Video Commentary:

Economist Michael Hudson says Paulson should be in jail

Colin Powell was duped, and used as a dupe to dupe the rest of us. I know people disagree with this, but I would like for them to prove otherwise. His former assistant Larry Wilkerson has spoken on Powell's behalf on this regard. If Powell had declared everyone in the White House a liar at the UN, he would have had to be privy to the evidence of their lies, which would make him complicit with their Neocon plot, not a dupe. There is no evidence that Colin Powell partook in generating the lies that led to the Iraq War. Ok, I've got my flame retardant outfit on now> flame away!

IMPEACH BUSHCO & RICO PNAC/AIPAC...PNAC is Bush/Cheney's "Helter Skelter" !


duped? a guy with those credentials, and information access, and allegedly, 'intelligence' and 'education' to go with that, and you think he was DUPED?

I think you're the one that got DUPED, into being so stupid as to think that Powell was so fucking NAIVE as you assert.

hang that shit up! this fucker knew. he always knew!

next, you'll be hawking the; "bush wuz duped, by the faulty CIA shit he got in the NIE" crap. that's next, isn't it, if you buy this DUPED COLIN POWEL garbage?

I'm constantly amazed as Colin "Teflon" Powell continues to fool some very smart people. Powell was supposed to be the original Barack Obama, the first serious African-American candidate for President, but had too much baggage to make if fly.

Don't take my word for it read what Robert Parry and Norman Solomon uncovered years ago about Powell

Then we should ask ourselves how we could be fooled so easily. And then ask how this may apply to the current day version of the original Barack Obama, Barack Obama.

Who knows if things don't work out for Barack Obama, maybe one day he can cash pay checks from the Carlyle Group the way Colin Powell does. Will Obama offer a slot to Frank Carlucci in his administration as well?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Speaking Events

David Swanson in Fairbanks, Alaska, October 22, 2016.


Find Events Here.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.