You are herecontent / Court Won't Force Testimony On Firings of U.S. Attorneys

Court Won't Force Testimony On Firings of U.S. Attorneys


Court Won't Force Testimony On Firings of U.S. Attorneys"
Issue Left to Next Congress In Victory for White House
By Carrie Johnson | WashingtonPost.com

A federal appeals court declined yesterday to order current and former White House aides to testify before a House committee about the firings of nine U.S. attorneys, leaving the next Congress to decide how aggressively to pursue the constitutional showdown.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the dispute over the role of politics in the 2006 dismissals would not be "fully and finally resolved" by the time the 110th Congress gives way.

So the court granted a delay in the case, pending the results of an appeal by former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers and presidential chief of staff Joshua B. Bolten. The aides are contesting a July ruling by a lower court that ordered them to produce documents and testimony. They had asserted that lawmakers are intruding on President Bush's executive privilege.

"The present dispute is of potentially great significance for the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches," the appellate judges wrote in their unsigned opinion.

The decision is a victory for the Bush administration, which for more than a year has fended off attempts by Democrats and the Justice Department's inspector general to trace the basis for the federal prosecutors' firings to the White House.

Last week, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey appointed a veteran public corruption prosecutor, Nora R. Dannehy, to investigate White House involvement in the dismissals and any false statements made by witnesses who discussed their roles. Investigators concluded that improper political motives contributed to at least three of the firings.

But it remains unclear whether a new Congress will have the political will to chase the issue.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said yesterday that he thinks lawmakers ultimately will "get to the bottom of the Bush administration's disgraceful politicization of the Justice Department."

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said the administration was pleased that the court had recognized that "there are serious questions regarding the separation of powers between the branches."

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I believe that someone has some real dirt on Conyers. He is scared to the point of total loss of courage. He ought to just resign and go home. He has disgraced himself beyond hope and apparently beyond change.
4Peace

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.