You are herecontent / 'Downing Street memo' guides us to the truth

'Downing Street memo' guides us to the truth


By Byron Williams, CONTRIBUTOR
Inside Bay Area

FOR those keeping score, today's column marks the seventh time I have written about the infamous 2002 "Downing Street memo."

The memo in question is the clearest evidence to date that the administration "fixed" the intelligence to justify a pre-emptive war.

I have received a number of e-mails that raise the question, "Why is the memo important now?" Does our presence in Iraq render the memo irrelevant?

In addition to the Downing Street memo, the Los Angeles Times recently reported that according to newly released British memos, the Bush administration had begun to publicly raise the possibility of confronting Iraq in March 2002 — a year before the actual conflict.

The memo adds that the administration had not come up with answers to the following:

-How to persuade international opinion that military action against Iraq was necessary and justified.

-What value was put on the exiled Iraqi opposition.

-How to coordinate a U.S./allied military campaign with internal opposition (assuming there was any).

-What happens the morning after?

It is misguided and extremely dangerous to our own democracy to hide behind the notion that our current status in Iraq renders any past indiscretion immaterial.

Those who dismiss the memo as belonging to the past ignore the fact that the past is what gives the story its strength.

At the time the memo was written, it was simply an innocuous account of a meeting that reported the Bush administration's position on a possible war with Iraq. It was the subsequent case for war, Congress' approval and the more than

1,700 U.S. soldiers who have paid the ultimate price that now makes the three-year-old memo important.

If the Downing Street memo is accurate, it throws out one of the favorite arguments of this administration: that it was operating with the same information as the rest of the world relating to Saddam's weapons of mass destruction program.

It would further prove how tragically farcical the Colin Powell presentation was to the United Nations in February 2003.

Diminishing the importance of the Downing Street memo magnifies the already senseless torture conducted at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, which has served only to make the country less secure.

When one also factors in the portion of the most recent British intelligence memo that concludes the administration was unclear about a postwar plan, incompetence must be added to this potentially mendacious concoction.

If ultimately the occupation of Iraq, along with the war on terror, is a battle of ideas, how can we claim superiority if our war campaign — which has led to more loss of life than 9/11 — began in deceit?

I recognize the divisive nature that has become the recent hallmark of American politics makes any search for the truth increasingly difficult. Moreover, it places a greater burden on the individuals that New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman recently described as those who "think their job is to just applaud whatever the Bush team does."

The Downing Street memo cannot simply be the cause of the anti-war left aided by a smattering of libertarians for purposes of decoration. It must lead to a bipartisan effort if we are to know the truth.

As difficult as it may be, a search for the truth is our only choice if America is to remain a democracy beyond word association.

The bipartisan effort that gave the administration the authority to go to war must now take a leadership position by asking tough and uncomfortable questions, even if it means rethinking one's original support.

But I have my doubts.

Fifteen senators last week refused to sign on as co-sponsors for a resolution apologizing for their predecessors' past failures to pass anti-lynching laws. How can that body be expected to look honestly at its own possible failures?

To do so, however, is what separates democratic societies from the rest; to do nothing is to align us closer to those we have identified as the enemy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byron Williams is an Oakland pastor and syndicated columnist. E-mail him at byron@byronspeaks.com or leave a message at (510) 208-6417.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The United States can no longer set itself apart from the rest of the dictatorship nations of the world where the administration does only what is in its own best interest doesn’t take care of its people and invades whom ever they chose willy nilly. This present administration has lowered the bar to an unimaginable low. I know other nations much older than this one has tried this kind of empire totalitarian rule before, namely, France, England, Germany, Russia and they have all failed. This American attempt too will fail because the world will not bend to us anymore that it did in the past with all the other who have tried. I just don’t want to suffer along with those who blindly chose it for themselves. The one bad thing I have always recognized about Americans and that is their refusal to admit a mistake or apologize for anything and they call themselves Christians! So don’t hold your breath waiting on the Senate to face the truth even now when it is staring them in the face.

It seems there are only two possible outcomes of a congressional investigation of the Downing Street memo: 1. that the president willfully lied to the American public and the senate and congress which qualifies as a high crime against him, or 2. he acted on shaky or even false information and plunged our country into a tragic war which marks him and his supporters as incompetent!
Either way he is unfit to lead our country any longer.
As a citizen of this country I demand the Democratic party and those middle of the road Republicans (code for critical thinkers) go after Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Ashcroft and all of the sorry lot with a vengence that makes the Clinton hearings under Ken Starr look like a Sunday school picnic!
BSBradley@aol.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.