You are herecontent / George Galloway on Those Who Voted to Attack Iraq
formerly AfterDowningStreet
User login
Stay warm this winter in a black hooded sweatshirt. Order one. Order them by the dozen and donate them to occupations!
Our Store:
Find movie memorabilia and more today!
Get reviews and pricing on Tahoe Boats and other top brands at Boating.com.
Galloway....
where are you now
where is video of you speaking about the Lisbon Treaty and the dissolution of the U.K.
New day, new challenges
all over America there is much less fanfare, but the SPP is being fought over tooth and nail
England is understanding what is NOW at stake
Galloway - adapt and add that big voice of yours to your own constituants
Iraq is not an either an Americans or British War -it's Bush and Cheney's War - maybe it's Blair and Browns war too
they will be on the dustheap of history when the liars and they're lying ways don't work anymore
the people's of these two nations need leadership
another speech?
how about working for your constituants who cannot believe the mess they find themselves in
the time for action is here
juggling Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, the economy, and Sovreignty are a big job
THOSE in the US Congress who voted so quickly to go to war with Iraq, knowing it was NOT sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council, should also know it was NOT in compliance with the 2 "Authorization to Use Military Force" Resolutions passed by Congress in 2002 and 2003-"Bush Exceeded the Authority of HJR114" LINK http://www.impeachbush.tv/args/noiraqauthority.html If it wasn't in compliance to begin with and not in compliance now then certainly it should be ended. LISTEN UP and bring the troops home now.
He says (in the video clip) that anyone in the British Parliment that voted for the war must be either too wicked or too stupid to have done that. He's right except I believe he should consider removing that tiny little word -- or. They're both of those things, ie., wicked AND stupid.
Exact same thing applies to our Congress having done similar. Our two governments are linked in this crime against humanity in ways that are BOTH stupid AND wicked. It's a New World Order (NWO) concept being realized right before the unblinking eyes of the world populations. Together, hand-in-hand, our two governments have launched an assault on the entire world -- but there is nothing at all 'new' about it -- it's a quest for world domination that's again lifted its ugly head. Again at the expense of the weak and meek.
Isn't it always like that? That reference to carry a BIG STICK and beat the living hell out of another without a stick of any sorts. Iraq did nothing to either of us, to either of our nations. They sure in the hell had 'nothing' to do with 9/11. So when our GWB explained same after the fact (to the amazement of those listening) and yet went on to try and justify WHY we sucker punched their cities early one morning this month FIVE (5) YEARS ago anyway // It made no sense. How can any rational person make sense out of killing innocents? NWO my ass -- NWO is just another term for classroom bully, and no one (except the bully of course) truly likes that person.
And this particular bully (two of them, both our governments) are the ones holding the BIG STICKS and bashing heads as they tell the others watching it's for everybody's good. That they're just out to spread democracy, i.e., force everyone to comply and see matters in their twisted way. Makes you wonder (not really) who the real terrorist are in all of this. It's not a war ON terror -- It's a war OF terror.
-- Sorry for the rant.
___________
Check out this short version of George Galloway being questioned by the US Senate back in 2005
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrdFFCnYtbk