You are herecontent / Re-enlistment Pressures

Re-enlistment Pressures


Lietta Ruger, military family experience of deceptive use of stop loss.

I am mother-in-law and aunt to two Iraq veterans of 1st Armored, both served extended 15 month tours in Iraq, March 2003 through July 2004. The 1st Armored was the first division to be 'extended' at the time of the Sadr City uprising in May 2004. My two were already on their way home when the extension was initiated and required to remain in Iraq with their division and units as there were not enough troops on the ground at that time. They returned to their bases in Germany in July 2004. By Jan 2005, both were required to make re-enlist decisions. What they were told is that they would redeploy to Iraq for second deployments under Stop Loss, regardless of whether they re-enlisted or chose not to re-enlist. This left them both with the limited option of second deployments under stop loss orders less the promised re-enlistment bonus or with the re-enlistment bonus. The end result either way would be another deployment to Iraq. I would call this an involuntary deployment, and a strategical use of intimidation of stop loss to force decisions of retention of the existing troops. I would hardly call it the voluntary military, rather involuntary retention; an under-the-radar method of a forced conscription draft.

My two did decided to re-enlist (how voluntary was their decision is directly related to the forced choice via stop-loss). My son-in-law received bonus of $4,000.00 which falls far short of the touted amounts of $15,000 and above being promised as re-enlistment bonus. He did not complain, rather reluctantly offered up the information when I asked him if he indeed did receive any amount of 'bonus' once he signed the re-enlist forms. His life for $4,000.00?

Hardly seems to me that the military is living up to any promises being made to the troops and has engaged in deceptive practices through use of stop loss to retain a military presence in Iraq, rotating troops through second and third deployments to maintain an appearance of a voluntary military. As one returning Iraq veteran told me over the weekend, the troops view these repeat deployments via stop loss as being punished for voluntarily enlisting in the first place and strongly wonder why the load is not being more equitably distributed amongst Americans who claim continued support for the war in Iraq.

When my two Iraq veterans did return alive to their bases, rejoining their families (wives and children) in July 2004, by January 2005 they were told they were stop-lossed for second deployments. This hardly allows time to reconnect to their marriages and children. Meanwhile while waiting for their redeploy dates, they are in perpetual 'training' being 'downfield' for a month at a time, away from their families yet again, and when home working 10-15 hour days as part of the 'readiness training' (might I suggest direct relationship to too few troops to meet the needs). I know from my own contacts with other military families, and the young spouses, that this situation is not unique to my two, rather is the 'norm' amongst most military families who face second and third deployments to Iraq.

A few facts;

-- 1 million American children have a deployed parent

-- 304,000 troops have deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. (Do the math, and with the standing 150,000 deployed troops, yet the actual 304,000 deployed, it's fairly easy to discern the same troops are being rotated in second and third deployments).

-- This is the first 'war' in which young people with spouses and children (families) have been deployed. Previous engagements and wars consisted more of young people who had not yet begun their families.

-- Divorce rate in military families is at 40%. I would point out that young marriages, young families have difficult enough time maintaining family bonding, and the excasperation of repeat deployments with absent parent serves to further antagonize and destroy the bonds of family.
In my own state, Washington, there have been 3 separate incidents of soldiers returning home to Ft Lewis base and killing their spouses.

-- Deployment time frame puts soldier and family under an 18-month period of uncertainty with the rules of stop-loss requiring a 3-month window pre-deployment and post-deployment plus the actual deployment which is subject to 'extensions'. That is one deployment. Repeat deployments subjects the soldier and family to repetitious 18-month periods of risk. It hardly makes for a foundation of strengthening family.

Lastly, I will add the 2 statements I usually make when speaking on behalf of the troops and their families. The military families carry the disproportionate weight and burden of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. While the troops do their jobs and their families do their jobs, the Commander-in-Chief is expected to do his job on behalf of the troops and their families. When this Commander-in-Chief appears to have abandoned responsibility and accountability to the troops, it is the job of the Congress and civilian citizens to hold the Commander-in-Chief accountable on behalf of the troops and their families and have the backs of our troops. It is a relationship of responsibility, accountability and trust that was taught to me as a young military brat. As a military family with background having been raised in military family, a young wife to young husband drafted and sent to Vietnam, and now a mother and aunt to two young Iraq veterans, I continue to be astounded that this model has been broken, violated, abandoned and supplanted with a model that has no basis in integrity, honor or dignity on behalf of our troops and their families. Yet our troops continue to honor their own integrity, honor and dignity, despite the lack of reciprical respect from this administration.

Respectfully

Lietta D. Ruger, military family

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My heart goes out to your family. This is an excellent letter; please circulate around everywhere. Send it to your Congressman. Send it to your newspaper's letter to editor. We need more numbers to gain peace; people need to wake up and get involved. I do support our troops; that is why I am against war. And then the administration makes the public think if you talk against the war (i.e., expose the lies of this administration)you are unpatriotic and don't support our troops. Their mind control is working still with too many people, although I think the numbers are lessening. So we MUST ALL BAND TOGETHER and do eveything we can to get the word out. Our troops and our future troops (which I fear will one day include my 16 year old son)need our support by exposing the administration. Every one please help!!

I know, it's a little late for Mrs. Ruger's kids, but there's a simple way to avoid going to Iraq again (and again): tell 'em to forget it. Tell your platoon sergeant to forget it, your company commander, your battalion commander, commanding general, and even Donald Rumsfeld while you're at it. Tell them you'd rather do Kitchen Police for ten years than fight their fascist Iraq War. Or if you're daring...
Commit a homosexual act on the nearest officer you can find. That'll get you kicked out quick, fast, and in a hurry!

Seriously, there's no telling when America's politicians will save our soldiers, so our soldiers had better start taking matters into their own hands.

Its a difficult challenge, but we're at a juncture in time where we're about to re-live the fate of Nazi Germany! The Bush Whitehouse has run the Hitler-Goebels playbook to perfection, and the nation has been found horribly unprepared for such a dire challenge to its core principles! Over two hundred years of the constitution is about to go down the drain with this generation. Congress has sold us out, so we're pretty much on our own! Each individual must be prepared to resist or go along with the program. When history repeats itself, does anyone notice?

Its a difficult challenge, but we're at a juncture in time where we're about to re-live the fate of Nazi Germany! The Bush Whitehouse has run the Hitler-Goebels playbook to perfection, and the nation has been found horribly unprepared for such a dire challenge to its core principles! Over two hundred years of the constitution is about to go down the drain with this generation. Congress has sold us out, so we're pretty much on our own! Each individual must be prepared to resist or go along with the program. When history repeats itself, does anyone notice?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.