You are herecontent / In Defense Of Troops...War Opponents, Supporters Speak Out On Their Behalf

In Defense Of Troops...War Opponents, Supporters Speak Out On Their Behalf


In Defense Of Troops
War Opponents, Supporters Speak Out On Their Behalf
September 19, 2005
By CHRISTINE DEMPSEY, Courant Staff Writer NEW HAVEN --

Military mom Cindy Sheehan, who injected unprecedented zeal into the nation's anti-war movement by holding a nearly monthlong vigil outside President Bush's Texas ranch last month, slammed Bush at a rally on the green Sunday and urged hundreds there to do more to promote peace.

As people applauded, cheered and bobbed signs with anti-war slogans, Sheehan urged them to put pressure on the administration to bring home the troops stationed in Iraq. She told the crowd she wants them at an anti-war rally Saturday in Washington. .

"We're committed to keep going until our troops are brought home, and after that, to make sure this never happens again for the young people who are here, for our unborn grandchildren and born grandchildren," Sheehan said. Sheehan's son, Casey, an Army soldier, died in Iraq on April 4, 2004. In early August, Sheehan sat in a lawn chair outside Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, and vowed to stay there until he could tell her why her son died.

Bush never came out to talk to her and instead left. But by that time, busloads of supporters had arrived at the makeshift vigil site to support Sheehan and many remained with her.

On Aug. 31, they left "Camp Casey," as the vigil site came to be called. They split into three groups and traveled through the eastern half of the nation. In all, the groups - the northern, central and southern tours - plan to stop in 28 states before converging on Washington.

New Haven was a convenient stop for the northern tour, Sheehan said in a brief interview before entering a waiting mobile home headed for New York. She had been in Providence earlier in the day. Sheehan said she didn't know Bush was born in New Haven and attended school in the city.

Sheehan took the stage late in the afternoon and was awash in cheers and sunlight.

Her son, she told the crowd, "was sent to Iraq. He was sent to his death by a man who was afraid to talk to me. A man that had no courage. ... And if George Bush had as much courage and integrity in his entire body as my son had in his pinky nail, he would have met with me. But you know what, if he had that much integrity, this never would have happened. We wouldn't be standing here."

She told the crowd about an ulterior motive for joining her on Sept. 24.

"We have to have 5 million people there so the media will say we had 500,000. You'll read in your paper tomorrow that there were a couple hundred people here. I don't know, I'd say a thousand."

Estimates ranged from about 500 to 1,200, according to observers. Police did not have estimates available.

Names were read of more than two dozen people with Connecticut ties who died in Iraq. Jeff Key of Alabama, who served in Iraq in 2003 as a Marine reservist and is traveling with the tour, sounded taps.

Not everyone in the crowd supported Sheehan's appearance. There were arguments in the crowd between peace activists and a mother and daughter who have a family member overseas.

Branford resident April Mongillo's son, Edward, is in Afghanistan. She held up a sign that said, "Everyone knows the risks when they take the oath."

Mongillo and her daughter, Jamie, said the event was disrespecting the troops. The mother raised her voice when people questioned her.

"If it wasn't for my son signing up, there would be a draft," she yelled. "I won't shush."

Edward Anderson of New Haven, one of those who exchanged words with the Mongillos, accused them of "blindly" following the lead of the administration. "Yeah, yeah. Great. Rah-rah, wave the flag," he said.

Judy Case of Cheshire, another person who had sparred with the Mongillos, called the disruption unfortunate. In a way, they're on the same side, she said.

"We're doing it for them, I feel," she said.

Sheehan's effort to end the war is being supported by families of veterans and former military members. Sponsoring the three tours are Sheehan's Gold Star Families for Peace, Military Families Speak Out, Iraq Vets Against the War and Veterans for Peace.

More than a dozen speakers, some from those organizations, urged people to contact their legislators and anyone they can think of to talk about withdrawing troops. Nearly 1,900 servicemen and women have died in Iraq since the beginning of the war, according to an Associated Press count Sunday.

The speakers gave reasons for their strong feelings.

There was Tammara Rosenleaf of Helena, Mont., whose husband is about to be deployed to Iraq. "I don't think there's anything worse they can do to him then to send him to an unjust war," she said.

Anne Roesler of Saratoga, Calif., broke down when she talked about her son, who is heading to Iraq for his third tour. Carlos Arredondo of Rosindale, Mass., a native of Costa Rica, talked about how he lost his son to the war. Another speaker said her son committed suicide when he returned from Iraq.

Michael Hoffman of Bucks County, Pa., a founder of Iraq Veterans Against the War, said a new survey shows that 52 percent of Americans now support withdrawal of U.S. troops as soon as possible.

"The majority of Americans want the troops home now," he said.

The rally attracted many Connecticut speakers who wanted to add their voices to the protest. Roger Vann, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Connecticut, led the crowd in a chant: "Dissent is Patriotic. End the Gulf Wars."

Kathleen Sloan, executive director of the Connecticut National Organization for Women, drew loud applause when she accused the Bush administration of turning Iraq into "a breeding and training ground for terrorists."

"The war has drained the U.S. of vital resources, desperately needed to assist the victims of Katrina, and the millions of poor, unemployed and uninsured Americans here in the United States," she said.

The makeup of the crowd, varying in age but mostly white, didn't go unnoticed by the Rev. Cornell Lewis of the Men of Color Initiative. "A strong movement - anti-war movement - must include people of color."

Lewis was one of many diverse voices at the rally. The lineup of Connecticut speakers included another Hartford-area resident, Marela Zacarias from Latinos Contra La Guerra, or Latinos Against the War, who spoke in Spanish at the end of her speech. New Haven peace activist Dawood Yasin, a Muslim, also addressed the crowd.

Organizer John Shanley said his 72-year-old mother was there. It's Sheehan's appeal that brought her there, he said.

LINK TO ORIGINAL

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

What a disgrace to her son Ms Sheehan is. She can rally all she wants (it's her right), granted I might say, by our brave soldiers willing to fight for them. If there were a legal way that I could stop that woman from invoking my fallen son's name, I would. Don't speak on my behalf lady. God bless all our brave soldiers and families.

Mrs. Del Greco,

The right to free speech is inalienable. It is not granted by any soldier or any government. If service to one's country is the determinant of rights and privilege, then I say I have plenty of right after serving 8 years in the Marine Corps Infantry on active duty to say George Bush lied and started an unnecessary war and has used criminal means to pursue it.

If it gets down to who has more rights, I say I do. More than George Bush does certainly; and unfortunately, more than your dead son has. Tragically, we will never know his opinion on this subject because he is now dead and can not testify to the living. Can you be so sure of his what he would say if he were to be granted the grace of a second chance?

Are you willing to serve on the tribunal that decides who can speak? Do the dead have more rights than the living? Does the dead Grunt have more rights than the dead truck driver? How about the admin pogues? What about women? Civilians? Enemy civilians? Enemy children? Where will it end, Mrs. Del Greco?

There has to be a better way and surely talking is better than the silence of the crypt. I don't not wish to trespass on your grief. Please, Mrs. Del Greco, do not tread on anyones' inalienable rights to enshrine your son's memory.

I respect your feelings. You and others that feel as you do please keep supplying soldiers for Bush's illegal war, then we do not have to sacrifice our offspring for something that was started on a lie. Or, do some research and see if you really believe in Bush's illegal attack on a country that did not attack us...It is worth it for a ruler to use your young ones for their politian wars...?

Iraq war was based on lies by the Bush Administration.
US troops dead because of these lies stands at 1,899.

Nothing else needs to be said....well, excpet that Bush should be impeached for his crimes.

Mrs. Del Greco, Mrs. Sheehan has not once endeavored to "speak on my behalf"! She does however speak for a great number of Americans who will not, like you apparently, get down on bended knee and allow George Bush and his administration to de-democratize the nation.

I give you great credit for identifying yourself. That is most unusual for supporters of Bush on this site. I respect your right to feel as you choose.

I would however, challenge you to then give Mrs. Sheehan an answer to her question, For what noble cause did her son die? Your support for Bush and the war implies that you have figured out the answer. Please favor us with it!

Mr. Schaedler:

It seems to me that for some people, such as Mrs. Del Greco, having such a terrible loss thrust upon them, can only deal with it by way of the rationalization that the lost loved one, having taken a justified risk, lost, but did not die in vain.

It is of course,still a terrible loss, for which they are no less deserving of sympathy than those who take the opposite tact, accepting the fundamental wrongness of the reason for their loss and attempting, as Mrs. Sheehan does, to right the wrong.

War supporters who have suffered such a loss seem to allow themselves to develop a compelling vested interest in the illusions of the war's justifications.

The thought that the death was pointless, or worse, a result of willful deception,is just to terrible to accept.

How then to lead them to see the truth?

Separate the question of the perspective of the lost individual from the loss OF the individual by his loved ones. By treating the causalty's choice as separate from the broader issue of the justification for the war, their is no need to think ill of the lost individual, or or view their death as in vain in order to acknowledge the blatant wrongness of the war.

Please see my elaboration here: http://www.smallgov.org/?p=54

---The Bikemessenger

MWC Special Feature 
Emerging Strategic Nuclear Environment: Iran & North Korea   While posted at Dakar in Senegal in West Africa ,I commenced in October 1980 the first leg of my travelathon crisscrossing continents on an Air Algeri flight which after a brief halt at Nouakchott , Mauritania , zigzagged East to Niamey, Niger's throbbing capital (thanks to uranium). Looking down from the plane, the journey across Sahara, crossing river Niger, over Timbuktu and Gao was fascinatingly dull.Read more...

Just by speaking, you digrace the names of all who have fallen. These troops offer us here at home the greatest of gifts. For us to send them war for the lies they went for is like taking their gift and slapping them in the face with that gift. Yes, all of us living in America and who call ourselves Americans should beg for forgiveness to our troops for allowing our troops to be put in harms way for nothing more than greed and a handfull of lies. Whether you support the side that sent our troops to war that lied to get them into war, failed to provide the troops with proper body armour or sufficient armor for their vehicles. Or, you support the side that wishes to bring our troops home for the reasons they were sent to war. We all should pray for the safe return of our troops.

The PNAC is being taken to court by Doug Wallace.

I read Wallace's complaint; It's dismissable, and more easily so, on the same basis as the order of dismissal to Stanley Hilton's.

---The Bikemessenger

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.