You are herecontent / Money runs out on U.S. projects in Iraq

Money runs out on U.S. projects in Iraq

By T. Christian Miller
Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — The United States will halt construction work on some water and power plants in Iraq because it is running out of money for projects, officials said yesterday.

Security costs have cut into the funds available to complete some major infrastructure projects that were started under the $18.4 billion U.S. plan to rebuild Iraq. As a result, the United States has had to pare back some projects to only those deemed essential by the Iraqi government.

While no overall figures are yet available, one contractor has stopped work on six of eight water-treatment plants it was assigned.

"We have scaled back our projects in many areas," James Jeffrey, a senior adviser on Iraq for the State Department, told lawmakers at a hearing of the House Appropriations Foreign Operations Subcommittee. "We do not have the money."

Bipartisan frustrations

More than two years after Congress approved funding for the rebuilding effort, electricity and oil production remain at or below pre-war levels; and unemployment remains high. The slow pace of progress appeared to exasperate both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, who compared the situation with the Bush administration's handling of damage from Hurricane Katrina.

Both situations reflected a lack of planning, poor execution and a failure by senior White House officials to follow through on commitments, Democrats said.

"We can't seem to get (Iraqi rebuilding) right. We see it in Katrina, the lack of leadership, the lack of coordination," said Rep. Nita M. Lowey, D-N.Y., the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee.

"It seems sort of almost incomprehensible to me that we haven't been able to do better on" restoring power to Iraq, said Rep. Don Sherwood, R-Penn., who recently visited areas damaged by Katrina. "Coming back up through Mississippi and Louisiana after being down on some relief effort, you know, when power shuts down, everything shuts down."

Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., who has previously criticized the Iraq rebuilding effort, said the Bush administration's vision for using reconstruction funds to stabilize Iraq "was largely a chimera, a castle built of sand."

"Reconstruction in Iraq has been slower, more painful, more complex, more fragmented and more inefficient than anyone in Washington or Baghdad could have imagined a couple of years ago," said Kolbe, chairman of the subcommittee.

Security diversions

U.S. officials said security costs — now estimated to account for 22 percent of all reconstruction contracts — had forced them to redirect money to pay for weapons and training of Iraqi troops.

They said that the United States was now spending $150 million per week on reconstruction, and that more work was flowing directly to Iraqi contractors instead of U.S. multinational firms.

They also said some infrastructure projects handed over to the Iraqis had suffered because of Iraqi government funding shortfalls. As a result, U.S. funds have been directed to simply maintaining electricity and water plants the Iraqis can't afford to operate.

"The last thing we wanted to do ... is to put hundreds of millions of dollars in power generating plants and into water plants and then have them simply not work, or simply have them run down," Jeffrey said.

Another concern is corruption. Stuart Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, said his office is conducting 58 criminal investigations in Iraq, including several that are close to prosecution. So far, a handful of U.S. contractors have faced criminal charges.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This report will never see the light of day in the MSM. I'm guessing that it was page 8 in the L.A. Times, right next to the ad for lost pets.

Looks like G Petrus and I have the floor here.

1) Until a proper accounting of the missing money is made, I have no reason to suppose the present money is short or spent. Remember the money that went to the transition government--the caretaker, pre-constitutional government? It has been forgotten, written-off.

2) What does it mean to "stay the course" and "keep the troops there until the job gets done"--what does it mean when you add the proviso "so long as you , the fledgling Iraqi government, must choose between clean water and electric power versus fighting a growing insurgency"?
Is this our noble cause?

3) And since Bush admitted recently the Iraqi adventure was really about the oil (as Ms Sheehan recently pointed out), and since it is the oil companies that are making out like bandits now, shouldn't the government just transfer the gas tax to the war tax function for the duration of our security obligations?

4) I think all appropriations in future should be witheld until the Bush Administration provides a transparent audit of the entire package of Iraq money and War on Terror/Homeland Security money that he is so proud of spending over these past 3 years.

5 Am I dreaming? Yes. I also dream of impeachment for the President. I dream when a moment of desperate realization breaks across the face of our leader and his supporters, when a light bulb goes on, when insight occurs. I want to see it like the day I saw Richard Nixon sweat in the kleig lights, walk like Howdie Doody toward the presidential helicopter, give a pathetic jerk of his arms in farewell and disappear into the obscurity of the low lying clouds. I will live to see these guys wimp out too.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Julie Varughese


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.