You are herecontent / A Personal Vision for Cindy Sheehan's Campaign

A Personal Vision for Cindy Sheehan's Campaign


By davidswanson - Posted on 09 August 2007

By Daniel Ellsberg

[Remarks of Daniel Ellsberg at a press conference August 9, 2007 at which Cindy Sheehan announced her independent candidacy for the 8th Congressional District of California, an office now held by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House.]

I don't speak for Cindy Sheehan—whom I admire unreservedly—or for her campaign. When I say "we" in what follows, I'm really just giving my own perspective on this campaign, as one of her supporters.

I see this campaign as aiming much higher than putting Cindy Sheehan in Congress in 2009. Well before that time, we aim to help restore our Constitution, to end a war and avert starting a new one, and to remove from power two officials—George W. Bush and Richard Cheney--who block those objectives before they can do more harm in their remaining months in office.

That's an ambitious project; but there's a clear path to achieving it. We will work to change public awareness and, as a result, Nancy Pelosi's policies as Speaker of the House well before the election, by revealing to the public real alternatives to the courses she and the Democrats have followed so far, and demonstrating the breadth and strength of public support for those alternatives.

The truth is that Democrats, and even Republicans, can do much better than they have been doing, under Pelosi's leadership in the House, to protect our freedoms and our security. In this campaign we will publicize specifics of what can and should be done, and let the public tell the politicians which approach they want.

One essential demand is for Pelosi to encourage, rather than to block, Congressional investigations of past and ongoing administration deception, unwisdom, illegality and unconstitutionality in pursuing an aggressive war and in curtailing our rights. Such investigations, calling forth testimony under oath of current and former officials many of whom are eager to tell the truth at last, as well as demonstrating continued administration stonewalling, will almost surely lead to what does not yet exist: irresistible pressure from a belatedly-informed public for the impeachment and removal of Bush and Cheney.

Further, we need Pelosi's leadership in rescinding the unconstitutional parts—which will not leave much—of the Patriot Acts, the Military Commisions Act and the recent, outrageous legislation purporting to legalize warrantless wiretaps and data mining. And—absolutely essential to ending our war in Iraq, ever—public pressure is needed to demand that Congress defund our indefinite occupation, providing funds only for the orderly, safe withdrawal of all our troops, contractors and bases on an announced time-table.

If this campaign can help bring about even the first of these, it will also, almost incidentally, put Cindy Sheehan within reach of success in the election. This is, in fact, a historic campaign opportunity, exploiting an opening unique in American politics. At this moment, Cindy appears to face insuperable odds, opposing without party support a powerful, heavily-funded incumbent. But we aim to change that. All we are asking is for Nancy Pelosi to do what she should: to uphold her oath of office, which is not to obey a Commander-in-Chief or to enlarge a Democratic majority but to uphold and defend the Constitution.

If we can induce her to do that, then a year from now Cindy Sheehan should be running for an open seat, or against a brand-new incumbent appointed by our Republican governor. Nancy Pelosi, third in line for succession when Bush and Cheney are impeached and removed, will be in the White House. That will, as it happens, leave an open field for Cindy.

So you see, it's nothing personal for us. After all, as representatives of big business go, Nancy Pelosi is better than most. We don't aim to kick her out of politics, we aim to kick her upstairs. And there's a bonus: President Pelosi as a write-in candidate in November. She's far from ideal, from the point of view of members of this campaign, but for a Democrats we could do a lot worse. Off the record, some of us see this as the best strategy for keeping Hillary out of the White House without letting a Republican in.

So there it is: a vision for 2009 that can evoke some real enthusiasm: Cindy in the House, Pelosi in the White House, the US out of Iraq. Our Constitution back, and Bush and Cheney under criminal indictment.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It is an honor to post to an article by one of the nations greatest heroes Daniel Ellsberg who writes about another hero destined to take a seat in our House of Representatives, who is leading us where we want to be. That is, a nation among nations Free of the jingoistic, fascist, corporate hegemonists and back to the US Constitution and the rule of law.
I just want to emphasize that this is an Illegal Occupation preceeded by an Illegal Invasion not any kind of 'war'.
Thank you Daniel and Cindy

William in Billings, MT

Darwin26
Viet Nam drafted Veteran WIA '68
Co-State Coordinator PDA Montana
www.pdamontana.org
www.williamsstudiogallery.com

I mean this with all honesty and not to disrespect anyone. The intentions are great but wouldn't you expect any candidate to run on more than one issue? I'm an ardent impeachment supporter, don't get me wrong. But historically speaking third party candidates in national elections never finish well in the final election. I fear this may be looking into a well expecting to fine water and find out there's nothing there. What kind of formula will Sheehan use that's proven to work for her third party run? I want to know before I get behind her.

I'm not being a troll mind you. I just wanna make sure all the bases are covered realistically before we venture into something as serious as a run for U.S. Congress. It's not as easy as we all think!

NPR tonight reported Cindy's announcement to run - mentioned it not once but TWICE, within the space of 4 hours - and they are even REPORTING WHY she's opposing Pelosi.

This is something new; this is seismic - even if still "low-magnitude".

Oh and "ctrenta", you already came here asking your question; I answered you, and you even said you appreciated my point. So forgive me if I AM a little inclined to suspect you are acting as a troll.

Nevertheless - and especially for everyone ELSE who might sincerely wonder - the "how" of a "single-issue" candidate is that sometimes ONE ISSUE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ALL OTHERS PUT TOGETHER. Cindy's issue is indeed such an issue; it is THE issue.

And if there is still a single person on the planet who DOESN'T know what is "THE ISSUE" - actually an interwoved mass of problems, all requiring the same solution - just go here and LISTEN closely.

Semper Fi,

-Matty
(In Florida, where WE'RE GROWING ORANGES!)

Can you give me examples of single issue candidates winning major elections? Who are they? How did they campaign? More specifically, what strategies did they employ and how were they effective? And lastly, can you you give me specifics from a subtle and sober perspective, not simple sloganeering or flame throwing people who respectfully ask questions and want a meaningful discussion? I'm not disrespecting you. I'm only speaking from experience and learning the hard way that politics isn't as simple as I made it out to be (but more nuanced).

I hope we can have a respectful discussion and come to some commonalities as opposed to a "I''m right, you're wrong" discussion. I also welcome others to chime in and hear what they have to say.

And who would the one issue candidate be? Certainly not the Cindy Sheehan I know. You could start with Peace & Justice. That's two issues right there. Speaker Pelosi is not doing so good on the first, peace, since she negotiated the compromise on the supplemental continuing the war before she voted against it. Justice, not so good either since she took impeachment off the table.

Cindy is a thoughful, intelligent citizen. After she takes office, she can quickly learn the difficult issues of the day that our representatives have been pondering (such as trashing the constitution and legalizing the wiretapping of just about every U.S. citizen) while avoiding returning the country to the rule of law by impeaching both the President and Vice President.

LMAO - you're killing me, buddy!

Your upside-down depiction of reality puts me in mind of two great quotes:

"Actors use lies to tell the truth, while politicians use lies to cover up the truth." - V for Vendetta

"...Me, I ALWAYS tell the truth. Even when I lie." -ScarFace

Don't change, "Nick Egnatz"!

Semper Fi,

-Matty in Florida

The issue needs to be to boot out Pelosi for protecting Bush & Cheney. The issue needs to be that Pelosi wants the war to continue because she thinks it will reelect Democrats at the expense of military casualties and massive sums of money. Those are the bases that need to be covered.

Cindy Sheehan is a hero for doing what no others have done. If the Republican wins that's fine too. As long as Pelosi loses.

N. Pelosi uses illegal aliens on her Napa vineyard to harvest grapes etc. and then sells only to non union processors. Pelosi can do no wrong to some true believers. They will deny it but its fact. Cindy would do well to point out Pelosi as a hypocrite - one who does not truly care about the citizens of this country.

"So there it is: a vision for 2009 that can evoke some real enthusiasm: Cindy in the House, Pelosi in the White House, the US out of Iraq. Our Constitution back, and Bush and Cheney under criminal indictment."

What's Good For CSPAN and COURT TV, is Good for America!!!

This will not end until our Constitution is Whole !!!

Thank you Cindy and Thank You Mr. Ellsberg

Impeachment may be the only way to get to a semblance of Constitutional recovery, but neither Pelosi nor Hillary or Obama have shown any signs of respecting the will of the people.

Can you give me examples of single issue candidates winning major elections? Who are they? How did they campaign? More specifically, what strategies did they employ and how were they effective? And lastly, can you you give me specifics from a subtle and sober perspective, not simple sloganeering or flame throwing people who respectfully ask questions and want a meaningful discussion? I'm not disrespecting you. I'm only speaking from experience and learning the hard way that politics isn't as simple as I made it out to be (but more nuanced).

I hope we can have a respectful discussion and come to some commonalities as opposed to a "I''m right, you're wrong" discussion. I also welcome others to chime in and hear what they have to say.

I'm being marginalized by not asking me. You and Matty don't have a thing, do you ctrenta? I can't get no respect.

Anyway who says Cindy has only one issue? I'm sure if you ask her she would be glad to give her position on many issues such as corporatism run amuk, lack of govenrment paid single payer health care for all Americans, living wage for all Americans, fair trade instead of rigged free trade, peace instead of endless war and of course accountability instead of nothing.

Just because the corporate media focuses on her anti war activities whenever they are forced to give her coverage, it doesn't mean that she is not an intelligent woman with intelligent positions on a wide range of issues.

If impeachment/Constitution wasn't an issue, would Sheehan still be running against Pelosi? I think it has a lot to do with why's she running, not universal healthcare, fair trade, Israel/Palestine, etc. She could've done that any time. Why now?

I love Sheehan and my heart goes out to her. I just think this is not the right strategic move. Third party candidates don't win all that often and you better do all your homework, be politically savvy, and have the necessary qualifications of a politican to win. Sheehan's never run for political office and she's running to replace Nancy Pelosi. That's a steep order.

Look at Ned Lamont. He pretty much ran on a "Troops Home Now" platform and had the assistance of the liberal blogosphere (DKos, Atrios, etc.). But he couldn't even bump off Lieberman in the general election.... and he ran as a Dem! That's just an example of what it's like to run on a single issue.

I do think Pelosi's done a poor job as Speaker and I'll speak out against here wherever I can. However with Sheehan's lack of political experience, I think her strengths and resources would be put to better use elsewhere.

I fear this will be a very humbling experience for her.

RE: RESPECT

Impeachment/Constitution is an issue and perhaps Cindy would not have decided to run if it wasn't. However, it seems the truth behind the Impeachment/Constitution issue is a lack of representation...
i.e. , to "re" present our will...WE THE PEOPLE. This is a strong
issue in itself. Talk has become not cheap but very, very, expensive.
The lies told to us, the ignoring of the people who give our Reps power through elections (O.K...let's not debate stolen elections right now) is out in the open more than any other time I can remember..The big picture...just the act of her running brings more pressure to bear and helps to get publicity for the issue itself.
Not bad for a days work! Cindy lost a child...I don't think she
can suffer more if her run is not successful...but many many more will suffer with the kind of politicians we have now. Why should we vote for people that we will have to oppose? Or more to the point...
why re-elect those we oppose now? There is the lesser of the two evils choice
which we sometimes can't avoid...but what if?

If Nancy Pelosi was allowing the party she leads in Congress to pursue impeachment, Cindy wouldn't be running and in fact would be supportive of her efforts. That is not the case.

Our country is in a constitutional crisis and Cindy is running to restore our lost civil liberties and return the country to the rule of law under the Constitution. All other issues pale in comparison to this.

Cindy will beat her too. I spent much time in San Francisco in the 60s after returning from Nam and being stationed nearby. I have every confidence that the citizens of the City by the Bay will rise to the challenge and send Cindy to Congress.

Our country is in a constitutional crisis. Because of the people we have elected and put in office. From our city counsel members to the President of the United States. "We The People" are to blame for the condition our constitution is in. Had Mrs Sheehan's son come home from his tour of Duty, we would not have heard of her. I am truly sorry for her loss, and the loss of all the other brave young men and women. What many people seem to forget is, that this is an all volunteer force. None of our Military members were drafted.

Having said that, "We The People" need to support our troops by pressuring our current elected officials in whatever way each one of us deems necessary. Either bring them home or pass a budget that will keep them safe until they can come home. Forget what the results of elections that have not happened, and work with what we have to work with. None of us, is ever truly happy with all the election results anyway.

IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT THE WAR, SUPPORT THE WARRIOR!!

Nice to see the discussion taking a civil tone. Thanks y'all!

I just think a majority of voters out there think beyond a single issue. Granted the issue of impeachment, preserving and protecting the Constitution is a major one (especially for me) but that's not what I (or many of us) solely base our decisions on.

I live in Vermont where 38 towns passed impeachment resolutions (my town was one of them). Our Congressman Peter Welch has steadfastly (and unwisely) been opposed to impeachment because of x,y, and z. The impeachment movement hear is following suit and running someone against Welch next year.

OK, fine.

But speaking from experience, I know that middle-of-the-road mainstream Vermont is not going to vote out Welch over impeachment alone. I know for certain that there are a lot more of them than there are of us in Vermont and I'll bet it will be even more so in the Bay Area (especially since Pelosi is the Speaker, has major influence and can bring home much needed "bacon" to your district). But IMHO, without instant runoff voting, that 3rd party person running on the anger against Welch's or Pelosi's inaction doesn't stand a chance. In a primary, if (s)he's a good, well-rounded candidate that can do better than Welch/Pelosi on multiple issues, with restoration of Constitutional gov't being one of them, there could be a chance. Other than that, don't expect either one of them to get beyond 5% of the vote.

Pass IRV first before you run any third party candidate!

Couldn't agree more on instant run off voting, but I believe you are mistaken to think that either the Repubs or Dems will even consider talking about it much less voting for it without everything but the kitchen sink being thrown at them (that would include 3rd party candidates running).
After being a Democrat for many years, I am not content to settle for whatever they are dishing out. I would just as soon see the Repubs win as Democrats that talk a good game and wimp out at the first sign of a fight.
Pelosi gets 80% of the vote and that will work in Cindy's favor. She doesn't get it because they love her. It is because they are liberal progressives and they will flock to Cindy in droves because Pelosi has betrayed them.
Nick

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Sign Up Fast Here