You are herecontent / A sad performance so far by John Conyers

A sad performance so far by John Conyers


By JonathanSchwarz - Posted on 25 July 2007

Above is cell phone video of John Conyers telling a San Diego meeting last Friday that he was willing to consider impeachment of both Bush and Cheney if he received support from others in Congress. A transcript is below.

However, Conyers appears to have changed his mind at some point over the weekend. Cindy Sheehan, Ray McGovern and others met with him on Monday to discuss impeachment. (Sheehan and McGovern were two of the witnesses at the hearings on the Downing Street Memo that Conyers held in 2005.) McGovern's report of the meeting is here. Sheehan writes:

The Congressman claims that there is absolutely no way that impeachment can go forward and when I was nearing the end of my hope I cried out: "So, if the people's house won't help us then we the people have no recourse against the executive branch." To which he replied: "Yes you do, vote the enablers out in '08."

Given the Friday video, this is not at all what people were hoping for. The response from Conyers yesterday was bad enough by itself, but it's particularly disappointing that he would seemingly mislead supporters in San Diego.

TRANSCRIPT:

CONYERS: Now, let me close with this one suggestion, is that I need some Members of Congress to come to me and say Mr Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, I heard you were out in San Diego, and they really put it to you, and you made commitments that we don't know if you were just saying, saying something to get out of that hotel alive or were you, or were you serious and here's what we need to do. We need to have three Members of Congress from anywhere come and say, "Congressman, if you... if you are willing to support an inquiry into a resolution of whether there had been acts of impeachability conducted by, the Vice President of, and the President of the United States, that could lead to High Crimes and Misdemeanors, then we will join you if you introduce such a resolution."

SPECTATOR: With House Resolution 333, you have that right now, do you not?

CONYERS: No, I, I, this is something that we are working on right now. We don't have it right now.

SPECTATOR: We do have House Resolution 333.

CONYERS: I'm talking about more. Look. And so let us, let us see how many people would be willing to back us up, in addition to the ones --

SPECTATOR: Maxine Waters.

CONYERS: Let, let us, let us stay in close communication. These are decisions that should not be taken lightly. We have, I want to examine and put forward as we move along a close, critical examination of all of the benefits and the costs involved in making this momentous decision. It's easy to say that this is an easy, this is a no brainer, the logic is all on one side, and I wish that were so. If it were so, you would be here congratulating me for doing what you had been asking me and others to do for so long.

So let's think soberly about it. There is no, let's say, now is the time and we don't have to worry about the future. I, with due respect, disagree with that. I have to think about the future. I have to weigh what this, the impact of this is going to be. And, by the way, you probably know, that there is such a thing as the retroactive impeachment process.

SPECTATORS: No, what's that? Tell us more.

CONYERS: If you introduced the resolution of impeachment after the person is gone.

SPECTATOR: Really? Wow!

CONYERS: When, I just, I just want you to know about all of the things. I am so glad that Bill Moyers did what he did. Those CDs and, we have to, print, and we want everybody to listen to them carefully and think seriously on this matter.

Video and transcript by Richard Matthews (I think).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I do not fault Rep. Conyers for raising the issue of impeachment in the first place. I do fault the entire Democratic Congress for not stepping in when they had a chance and supporting Conyers instead of ignoring him. The ridiculousness of Nancy Pelosi ignoring the will of the people should be the issue here. That, and the fact that there are only a hanful of Congresspersons that have a spine when it comes to doing SOMETHING about the most corrupt and criminal adminsitration---and its lemmings on the Republic side of the aisle---in US history.

He'd do it if he had the votes. He doesn't have the votes.

He's doing what is achievable, going after Gonzo. And assholes who can't see the big pic aren't helping. So pat yourself on the back, for being a Rovian tool. Way to go!

Just remeber before we all jump on poor Conyers, who was the one who said "Impeachment is off the table". Yes his boss Nancy Pelosi, who has a fair majority but has been weak and impotent in her performance. She refuses to really go after Bush with some kick ass legislative leadership.

They didn't have the votes when they began hearings on Nixon. You don't need votes to do what's right. All you need is a president who violates the law and abuses the power of his office.
The findings of a serious impeachment investigation will do the rest.

It's not true that they didn't have the votes on Nixon. There were a lot of votes to both impeach and convict. The Republican leadership in the Senate told him that there were only about 20 solid votes against conviction. That's why he resigned.

Getting Bush impeached now would be difficult since we are at War; people would feel uncomfortable about lack of support for the troops. BUT !!!!!!!! Cheney is another story. People know he has profited obscenely along with Halliburton. Charges could easily be brought and hold him accountable. Gonzalez ?? SLAMDUNK. It is apparent he has committed perjury, but Americans are outraged at what this has done to our system of justice. Of all the defiling things these thugs have done, the most precious thing they have destroyed is the Rule of Law. For the sake of our Constitution and to protect generations, Gonzalez must pay.

that's a crock of shit about the war. people have fucking had it with this dictator and mass murderer and his puppetmaster, cheney.

we need them both out before this nation is plunged into a revolution because We The People have fucking had it with these bastards!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Sign Up Fast Here