You are herecontent / We just might learn some truth today

We just might learn some truth today


By Larisa Alexandrovna

Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity.
-Lord Acton

The public demands accountability, as it should, and transparency, as it should, but forgets to participate in making either of those things possible.

For several years now, the ACLU has been fighting to have released the documents, photographs and videos, of detainee abuse under our misguided "noble cause."

Today, August 30 - the court will allow the "People" to hear the government's case on why the rape of children, for example - under Project Copper Green -

is conducive to winning the war on terror. Perhaps the argument will not be made in those explicit, honest terms, but the substance of the crimes discussed and our need to know about them will be evident even if buried under mounds of legal verbiage.

You Are Here

Part of the hearings will be redacted, but the whole hearing may as well be behind closed doors, given the little interest the public has shown for this case.

The "People" are missing from the one moment in which their physical presence is not merely symbolic, but actually and fully active, in making the difference on how the court rules.

The moment our country was hijacked into grief and fear on 9/11, the DOD began to conceive of a policy in which torture, rape, and murder would become the tool of choice for the American military-industrial-complex.

We, the "People", do not know how many "un-Americans" and labeled "terrorists" have been tortured, raped, and murdered and how many are still, to this day - at this very moment - being abused by hired contractors and industrial-grade sadists. We don't know who these "detainees" are or for what reasons they are being held.

What we do know is beyond inhumane. Imagine the horror of what is buried in the crypts of a decadent government and its destructive power lust. Imagine what we do not know.

It is easy to say of the detainees that "they are terrorists." But can anyone know for certain, without a hesitation or doubt that not a single, innocent soul is inside those rooms or graves? Would anyone be willing to wager their life on such an assertion?

Can anyone say for sure that "every" person murdered was a terrorist? Because if the answer is yes, how does one then account for the women and children, some as young as six, found at Abu?

Why are you not here?

There have been precious few moments where the people could be active in holding their leadership accountable. We need to know what was done in our name, using our money, and without our consent no matter how vile. We need to know in order to respond, no matter what the response is.

The DOD has re-interpreted the law and filed appeal after appeal in order to keep us from knowing even the "why." They have argued that we, the "People", should not know "why" the photographs and videos must be classified and permanently sealed - cherry picking the FOIA statutes and conveniently sewing them into an unrecognizable declaration, hand delivered by the Joint Chiefs of Staff himself. Consider the implications of a government using whistleblower status in order to cover up not only its crimes, but even the reasons for the cover up.

Today, however, we just might know a great deal more

There is no Congress here, in the open court, or a series of votes that must be passed for the public to attend and essentially bare witness. This, in essence, is the collective citizen turning to the one bastion of accountability left (perhaps): the courts. That is, if the collective citizen attends.

Imagine how the court might rule if the "People" stood outside, a vigil of lights, signs, pleas and tears in the very city, not far from the very place, where this entire nightmare began.

The impact of such a sea of people at this one moment in time is far more important than a march in any city at any time. The decision to release documents of war crimes committed in our name, your name - my name- may hinge on the one thing that may sway the court: our need to know.

Yet, there are no all night vigils in front of the court to attract the news cameras, who are otherwise disabled by single topic, big money making stories. There are no organized trips for marches down Broadway or any other street. The people are passive spectators awaiting the judges' ruling, as though they had no impact or input in this process.

But the "People" don't realize that they are not only part of the process, they are the process - the collective citizen is the national conscience.

Today

Location:
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein

U.S. District Court

500 Pearl Street, Room #910

New York, NY 10007-1312

Resources of Information:

ACLU FOIA

Source Watch

LINK TO ORIGINAL

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Its time to hold steadfast meetings outside of this one too, it should be easy to get a whole group of people into New York. Especially the 9/11 victims who hated that horrible 9/11 commission whitewash.

Its not even that far, pretty close to New York City capital, hmm..

Doug

In the Soviet Union, tens of MILLIONS of people that the state thought MIGHT be a threat, were secretly arrested, secretly put on trial, and secretly convicted of made-up charges, and sent to prisons, often for the rest of their lives.

The fascist Republicans are trying to impose the same police state tactics here in America. "Freedom" to the fascist Republicans is just a word to include in their speeches, to make their ignorant supporters feel good about voting for them.

The fascist Republicans have contempt for freedom and the Constitution. Their "enemy combatant" designation is a mechanism for separating Americans from their civil rights. The "Patriot" Act is another.

Just as despicable as the fascist Republicans are the Republican-lite "Democrats" who voted for the Patriot Act. They don't deserve our votes either. Likewise for the "Democrats" who voted for the trade agreements that send our jobs overseas, or who voted for the bankruptcy bill, or who oppose a single-payer healthcare system.

Next election, I'm not voting for any alleged "Democrat" without checking their voting record first. It's time to get these enemies of freedom and enemies of working people out of office!

Good analogy. We will very quickly take the same path that they took. It's part of human nature. We have to nip this thing in the bud (assuming we're still near the bud stage). Having some one to vote for is the eternal problem. Perhaps we could choose one of the alternative parties and promote them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.