You are herecontent / Did Time hide the truth to get Bush re-elected?

Did Time hide the truth to get Bush re-elected?


The Los Angeles Times takes a long look at Plamegate today. There's little new here -- except for a claim by someone close to Karl Rove that Rove first heard Plame's name from Bob Novak -- but the Times does raise an interesting question along the way. We know now that Rove and Scooter Libby were involved in the outing of Plame. But how is it, the Times asks, that their roles remained secret until after George W. Bush was re-elected?

The answer, at least in part: Their roles remained secret because some members of the mainstream press helped to keep them secret. According to the Times' report, Time magazine's Matthew Cooper chose not to ask for a waiver of confidentiality from Rove until this summer -- in part because his attorney advised against it, and in part because "Time editors were concerned about becoming part of such an explosive story in an election year." As a result, the Times says, "Cooper's testimony was delayed nearly a year, well after Bush's reelection."

Translated, as John Aravosis explains at AMERICAblog today, that means that Time's editors didn't want Cooper to reveal information that could be damaging to Bush's re-elections hopes until after the election was over. "It's one thing for Time to do its job and ignore the effects of its reporting and overall work on US elections," Aravosis writes. "It's quite another for Time to make decisions based on whether they'll influence US elections."

In a way, it may be even worse than that. By not seeking a waiver from Rove -- by not reporting what its reporter knew to be true -- Time allowed Americans to go the polls believing that which the magazine knew to be false. Until Time turned over Matthew Cooper's email messages to Patrick Fitzgerald this July, the White House was free to proclaim -- as it did, repeatedly and vociferously -- that Karl Rove had nothing whatsoever to do with the outing of Valerie Plame. That's the false story Americans had been told when they cast their votes for the presidency in November. Time knew better but didn't say.

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2005/08/25/plame/index.html

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And there is no recourse. Just tragedy. I will never buy Time magazine again.

Now, who was it that bought the Zapruder film and locked it away in the vaults for years???

Why, yes, I believe it was TIME-LIFE . . .

It's called "collusion" Certainly people would not have re-elected Bush if they knew Rove was the source of the leak of Plame's name; and, since "Time" suppressed it, it allowed Bush & Co. to have a free-hand before the election in blithely denying they knew who the source was. AND "TIME" KNEW IT & kept silent. Lawyers please respond--it seems we can have a "class-action" suit against Time. Time "colluded" with Rove (Bush & Co.) in not exposing Rove.

As citizens denied the right to know by this collusion, and as taxpayers footing the bill for Bush's policies (war, environmental, tax, rampant corruption) why can't we collect "damages" against Time?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.