You are herecontent / "Deep Throat": Then and Now

"Deep Throat": Then and Now


By Institute for Public Accuracy

MIKE GRAVEL:
U.S. Senator from 1969-81, Gravel said today: "W. Mark Felt, the assistant director of the FBI during the Watergate scandal, has admitted to being 'Deep Throat.' He was the source of important information for Washington Post investigative reporters Woodward and Bernstein. Felt's revelations and tips kept the investigation alive by pulling back the shroud of secrecy hiding the criminal activities of the Nixon White House.
"Felt should receive the American Medal of Freedom for his courage and patriotism in defense of our democracy. The greatest threat to
democracy is secrecy. It is a generic flaw of our representative system
of government. Secrecy is endemic to government; it is the device
government officialdom uses to hide the truth and to manipulate the
media and the public, and is the slippery slope leading to tyranny."

Gravel added: "The only antidote to the excesses of secrecy is the
occasional patriot leaking the truth to the media or to the Congress.
Unfortunately, the Congress is all too complicit in maintaining secrecy
in government. Thank you, Mark Felt, for your service to freedom and
democracy; let us hope that your revelation is an incentive to
present-day whistleblowers. The need for whistleblowers has never been
greater." Gravel is now chairman of the Democracy Foundation, which
works to institute methods of direct democracy.

NORMAN SOLOMON, http://www.WarMadeEasy.com
Solomon, executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, is
the author of "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death," which comes off the press this month. The book includes detailed analysis of parallels between presidential deceptions on behalf of the Vietnam War and the current war in Iraq. Solomon said today: "Potentially, the most important 'Deep Throat' in American politics
today is the anonymous source who, several weeks ago, leaked the Downing Street Memo to The Times of London. The memo -- providing minutes from a high-level meeting that Prime Minister Tony Blair held with British government officials on July 23, 2002 -- reported that President Bush had already made the decision to order an invasion of Iraq, while the president was telling Congress and the American people that the opposite was the case."

Solomon added: "The memo also provides evidence that U.S.
intelligence was being tailored to fit President Bush's decision to go
to war: 'The intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.'
So far, in the aftermath of this leak, the current White House has been
successful as it tries to stonewall. But the longer-term political
impacts of this memo remain to be seen. We should remember that the
Watergate story was at first viewed as a minor burglary, and most news
editors treated it as meriting no more than sporadic back-page coverage.
Now, at a time when a war based on deception is also raging, the
momentous question of presidential accountability hangs over Washington
and the nation."

For text and background on the Downing Street Memo, see:
and
.

Institute for Public Accuracy
915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Deep Throat Cover Blown
Washington Post Still Sucks

Wednesday, June 1, 2005

By Greg Palast

I've been gagging all morning on the Washington Post's self-congratulatory preening about its glory days of the Watergate investigation.

Think about it. It's been 33 years since cub reporters Woodward and Bernstein pulled down the pants of the Nixon operation and exposed its tie-in to the Watergate burglary. That marks a third of a century since the Washington Post has broken a major investigative story. I got a hint of why the long, dry spell when I met Mark Hosenball, "investigative" reporter for the Washington Post's magazine, Newsweek.

It was in the summer of 2001. A few months earlier, for the Guardian papers of Britain, I'd discovered that Katherine Harris and Governor Jeb Bush of Florida had removed tens of thousands of African-Americans from voter registries before the 2000 election, thereby fixing the race for George Bush. Hosenball said the Post-Newsweek team "looked into it and couldn't find anything."

Nothing at all? What I found noteworthy about the Post's investigation was that "looking into it" involved their reporters chatting with Florida officials -- but not bothering to look at the voter purge list itself.

Yes, I admit the Washington Post ran my story -- seven months after the election -- but with the key info siphoned out, such as the Bush crew's destruction of evidence and the salient fact that almost all those purged were Democrats. In other words, the story was drained of anything which might discomfit the new residents of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Let's not pick on the Post alone. Viacom Corporation's CBS News also spiked the story. Why? "We called Jeb Bush's office," a CBS producer told me, and Jeb's office denied Jeb did wrong. End of story.

During the Clinton years, the Washington Post and Newsweek allowed reporter Mike Isikoff to sniff at the President's zipper and write about our Commander-in-Chief's Lewinsky. But when it came to a big story about dirty energy industry money for Clinton's campaigns, Mike told me his editors didn't "give a sh--" and so he passed the material for me to print in England.

Today, Bob Woodward rules as the Post's Managing Editor. And how is he "managing" the news? After the September 11 attack, when we needed an independent press to keep us from hysteria-driven fascism, Woodward was given "access" to the president, writing Bush at War,a fawning, puke-making fairy tale of a take-charge president brilliantly leading the war against Terror.

Woodward's news-oid story is a symptom of a disease epidemic in US journalism. The illness is called, "access." In return for a supposedly "inside" connection to the powers that be, the journalists in fact become conduits for disinformation sewerage.

And woe to any journalist who annoys the politicians and loses "access." Career-wise, they're DOA.

Here's a good place to tote up part of the investigative reporter body count. There's Bob Parry forced out of the Associated Press for the crime of uncovering Ollie North's arms-for-hostages game. And there's Gary Webb, hounded to suicide for documenting the long-known history of the CIA's love-affair with drug runners. The list goes on. Even the prize-laden Seymour Hersh was, he told me, exiled from the New York Times and now has to write from the refuge of a fashion magazine.

And notice someone missing in the Deep Throat extravaganza? Carl Bernstein, the brains and soul of the All-the-President's-Men duo, is notably absent from the staff of the Post or any other US newspaper.

But before we get too weepy about the glory days of investigative journalism gone by, we should remember that the golden era was not pure gold.

Newspapers are part of the power elite and have never in US history gone out of their way to rock the clubhouse. Let's go back to Hersh's stellar story of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam.

The massacre was first uncovered by the greatest investigative reporter of our era, the late Ron Ridenhour. Then a soldier conducting the investigation on his own, Ridenhour turned over his findings to Hersh, hoping to give it a chance for exposure. That wasn't so easy.

Ridenhour told me that he and Hersh pushed the story -- with photos! -- at dozens of newspapers. No one would touch it until Ridenhour threatened to read the story from the steps of the Pentagon.

It's only gotten worse. After all, Hersh's latest big story, about Abu Ghraib prison, was buried by CBS and other news outlets before Hersh put it in the New Yorker.

The Washington Post has no monopoly on journalistic evil. If anything, the Post is probably better than most of the bilge contaminating our news outlets. This is about the death-march of investigative journalism in America; or, at least, its dearth under the "mainstream" mastheads.

Why don't we read more "Watergate" investigative stories in the US press? Given that the Woodwards of today dance on their hind legs begging officialdom for "access", news without official blessing doesn't stand a chance.

The Post follows current American news industry practice of killing any story based on evidence from a confidential source if a government honcho privately denies it. A flat-out "we didn't do it" is enough to kill an investigation in its cradle. And by that rule, there is no chance that the Managing Editor of the Washington Post, Bob Woodward, would today run Deep Throat's story of the Watergate break-in.

And that sucks.

****
Greg Palast's reports for Britain's Guardian newspapers and Harper's Magazine can be found at www.GregPalast.com. Palast won this year's George Orwell Courage in Journalism award at the Sundance Freedom Cinema Festival for his investigations of the Bush family for BBC Television.

And if wasn't for Amy Goodman/Juan Gonzalez on Democracy Now, the 'seamy' side of Felt:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/02/1445253

It is truly a national scandal that in a nation that has as a founding principle 'freedom of the press' that the press doesn't exercise that right. That reporters allow themselves to be intimidated and lied to just so their 'access' isn't taken away. If there ever was a situation that called out for a union -an honest union-, it is the situation in the U.S. when it comes to governance and reporting.
I don'r even bother listening/watching any of it anymore and it only makes me more determined than ever to be an activist for community internet.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.