You are herecontent / A Measure of Morality in Congress

A Measure of Morality in Congress

By David Swanson

If you could secretly tell a magic genie "Yes" and receive a million dollars but cause the deaths of a million people you've never met in China, would you say No? This is no longer just a philosophical brain teaser. The U.S. House of Representatives is expected to vote Friday morning on funding for a war that has already caused the deaths of possibly as many as a million Iraqis. Some of the money might very well go to funding an attack on another nation (Iran). Many members of Congress are expected to vote Yes in order to keep their committee chairmanships, or in order to receive funding for projects in their districts, or in order to receive assistance or not face opposition in their next reelection campaigns. Among the most principled few who are holding out and voting No, some of them are encouraging others to vote Yes.

If you could secretly tell a magic genie "Yes" and suffer horribly and die but save the lives of a million people you've never met, would you say No? This one they don't even ask in philosophy school, much less Congress. But let's think about it for a minute. What's the worst fate a Congress Member could face as a result of voting against funding the war? For most it must be the loss of their seat. How horrible is that? Some of these congress members are freshmen, first elected last November campaigning on promises to end the war. Now they're prepared to vote $100 billion for the war in hopes of getting elected again in 2008. What in the hell did they want to get elected for in the first place? What district is going to receive less money if we end the war and redirect our spending to useful projects than if we continue the war but fund special pieces of pork here and there?

And why are the deals being cut in secret? If an honest Congress Member is threatened with a loss of funds for pet projects or a loss of a committee position or election support, he or she should publicly announce the dilemma and ask for constituent input. "Dear constituents, which would you have me do? Choice number 1 is I vote to fund the war and put our grandchildren into debt funding the murder of hundreds of thousands of people and turning much of the world passionately against us but I get the money for that sewage plant we've been wanting and the aide our agro-corporations have been whining about, or choice number 2 is I vote against the war money and I don't get the money for the sewage or the farms. I'm sorry we can't have it both ways. Which would you prefer?"

That way it's on the table and out in the open air. This allows citizens to weigh in. It also allows other congress members to join the conversation. Nobody wants to face hardship to make the right vote against a bill only to have the bill pass anyway. If members talked more openly with each other, they might better recognize their collective ability to stop a bill like this one. And there's also the possibility, of course, that publicizing all of the pressure being applied would serve to discover what has thus far been missing from Speaker Nancy Pelosi's persona: shame.

The only argument that Pelosi and her coalition of the bribed and threatened make for their bill is that it can pass. Well, not easily it can't. If it fails, perhaps on attempt number 2 Pelosi will choose to struggle for a bill that's worth the effort and focus her attentions on persuading the right-wing Democrats rather than the left-. They'll be able to face a far more palatable dilemma. If you could tell a magic genie Yes and receive a million dollars AND save a million lives, wouldn't you do it?

If Pelosi's first bill passes and is vetoed, or if it does not pass, there will no doubt be a slight delay before attempt number 2. That delay should be used by Congress Members to speak with Iraqis and come to know them and their lives and the impact every $100 billion worth of war has on them. This is not a fantasy, but a horror as real as they come. However, the Democratic leadership is more interested in symbolism and unity and passing a bill, any bill. As far as the goal of unity, that's already shot. As far as the bill, it will either be vetoed, or all the toothless limitations in it will be "signing statemented" away, an action that Pelosi will not challenge, leaving us with exactly the bill the President wanted but no opposition party in Congress for us to turn to.

Whichever way the vote goes, we will have at least a handful of heroes to thank. If those heroes grow in strength and numbers, there may just be hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who owe them a great debt of gratitude.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you David for your column pointing out what that $100 billion of money to continue Bush's War (now Pelosi's and Emmanuel's War, and everyone else who caved in/sold out to them and the AIPAC) is going to do to the Iraqi people in addition to what we've done to them already. My God, man ... we are allowing GENOCIDE to be committed in our name and now the Pelosi-Hoyer-Emmanuel led majority in the House are funding $100+ billion of more GENOCIDE without the informed consent of the American people. This Democratic Leadership Sickens Me To No End !

Speaker Pelosi does NOT have the interests of the American people at heart. She's a cold, calculating, professional politician who's not above using various pressures, including financial pressures, to get her way.

She has no shame concerning this ludicrous, insulting bill to continue funding the war, because, in her mind, there's nothing to be ashamed about. Her husband is a dear personal friend of Felix Rohatyn and George Soros, two of the major money men for the Democratic Party, and she's not about to come down with a serious case of moral principle and do the right thing, even if it means losing campaign contributions from Messrs. Rohatyn, Soros and their well-heeled Wall Street pals.

Among the Democrats, you've got the bribed, the threatened, and those who "go with the flow" and not make any waves which would cause them to lose the election in 2008. When it comes to putting forth the case to the constituency about whether to votw for the bill and support and unpopular war, or vote against the bill and lose funding for public works projects, few Democrats in Congress aren't going to take the chance of presenting their case to the people and allowing them to weigh in on the matter.

Still, there are those few brave souls who are committed to doing the right thing and who will vote "No" on the funding bill ... but they will be far outnumbered by the opportunists who seek to retain the power, prestige and perks which come with political office.

DonP The only reason for the existance of 90 per cent of politicians is to remain in office. There is no moral dilemma when you have no morals. Dem or Rep they are the same, bluster rail, promise the voters anything but, get re-elected. Its all for show, the realality is never discussed openly. Give it up, its over for this country.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Find the perfect Purple Bridesmaid Dresses for your bridesmaids from




Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.