You are herecontent / 'Peace Mom': Spearhead of Peace Movement?

'Peace Mom': Spearhead of Peace Movement?


By Ron Fournier
The Associated Press

Thursday 18 August 2005

What began as one mother's vigil on a country road in Texas two weeks ago has grown into a nationwide protest, putting a grieving human face to the miseries of war and growing misgivings about President Bush's strategies in Iraq.

It's still not clear whether Cindy Sheehan's effort was the start of a lasting anti-war movement or a fleeting summertime story fueled by media-savvy liberal interest groups.

Sheehan said Thursday she was leaving, rushing to the side of her mother, who had had a stroke in California. She said she would be back if possible before Bush leaves his ranch for Washington on Sept. 3.

While her anti-war backers maintain the vigil in Texas, Republican Party leaders are worried that the so-called Peace Mom has brought long-simmering unease over Iraq to a boil by galvanizing anti-war activists. They fear that protests will strike a chord with the large number of Americans who have long felt uneasy about the war yet have been giving Bush the benefit of the doubt.

The president's falling poll numbers - less than 40 percent approve of his handling of Iraq - could drop further, threatening his military plans in Iraq, his agenda at home and Republican political prospects in the 2006 congressional and gubernatorial elections.

But will that happen? Will one woman's demand to meet the president outside his vacation home be viewed someday as a tipping point against the war?

"It's really hard to tell whether this will be a blip on the radar screen or whether it reflects a deep change in public opinion," said John Green, director of the University of Akron's Ray C. Bliss Institute for Applied Politics. "A lot will depend to what extent Sheehan and her vigil link up with the disquiet we're seeing in public polls, especially with the people who haven't been opposed to the war in the past."

It also depends on factors outside the control of Bush, Sheehan and their supporters. A reduction in violence in Iraq or a legitimate, new constitution for the government would help Bush. More bloodshed and no political progress in Iraq would probably give momentum to Sheehan and her supporters.

No matter what happens, it can't be denied that Sheehan thrust herself and her cause into the spotlight at near-record speed.

The vigil began Aug. 6, when she showed up outside Bush's ranch with 50 demonstrators to demand a meeting. "I want to ask the president, 'Why did you kill my son? What did my son die for?'" she said.

Her son, Casey, 24, was killed in Sadr City, Iraq, on April 4, 2004.

Less than a week into the vigil, the president gave Sheehan's protest a public relations boost by talking about it. He told reporters that while he sympathized with her, her call to withdraw US troops "would be a mistake for the security of this country."

MoveOn.org and other liberal interest groups used the Internet, e-mails and cable TV news coverage to keep the protest in full view. Normally slow news cycles of August were filled with stories about Sheehan and her fallen son - an altar boy, Eagle Scout and church youth troop leader.

Even before the vigil, public opinion was shifting against Bush and the war. An AP-Ipsos poll showed a majority of people questioning the president's honesty. A Gallup Poll suggested that nearly six in 10 wanted some or all US troops to be withdrawn.

Bush's own advisers began to privately acknowledge that Americans were finding their views on Iraq out of sync with his upbeat rhetoric.

Confronted by anxious constituents during their August recess, a few GOP lawmakers joined several Democratic in denouncing the war. Some Republicans who favor the war urged Bush to do a better job defending it.

"I don't want to be critical of the White House, but the key is to put the Iraqi campaign in the context of a regional struggle that includes elements in Syria, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and then put that in the context of the larger struggle against the irreconcilable wing of Islam," said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a potential 2008 presidential candidate.

Sheehan has not gotten her meeting with the president in Texas. Bush's supporters note that he met with her in 2004, and that she had nice things to say about him at the time. That's half of the story.

Indeed, after that 2004 meeting, Sheehan was quoted as calling Bush sympathetic and sincere, a man of faith. But she also sharply stated that she wasn't happy with the way the war had been handled, and accused Bush of changing his rationale.

Some Republicans say Bush made a mistake in refusing to meet with Sheehan again. "The better course of action would have been to immediately invite her in the ranch," Sen. Chuck Hagel , R-Neb., another 2008 prospect, said on CNN's "The Situation Room." Others argue that anti-war groups would have found another way to maintain pressure on Bush.

As it is, they organized 1,600 candlelight vigils Wednesday night calling for an end to the war.

One activist has called Sheehan "the Rosa Parks of the anti-war movement," a reference to the civil rights heroine who refused to give up her seat to a white man on a city bus in Montgomery, Ala., in 1955.

What happens in Iraq the next weeks and months may determine whether the "Peace Mom" finds her own place in history, or becomes a footnote.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The anti-war movement is finally "real" - it's on t.v. It's also time to take advantage of the momentum we now have working for us. I thought this comment from Justin Raimondo (antiwar.com) was apropos:

"what's needed is a massive mobilization that includes not only the usual suspects but also antiwar conservatives, military folks and their families, libertarians, and just plain ordinary people who don't necessarily want to sign on to a whole laundry list of leftist causes. Tell the ideologues to leave their hobby horses at home: it's time to get serious about ending this war before it escalates beyond the power of anyone to rein it in."

I agree 100%. Like Raimondo, I happen to be more libertarian-conservative than liberal-progressive and I know how other conservatives and "ordinary folk" think. And they are very much put off by the kind of rhetoric that appeals to the Left. (For the moment) forget about a Living Wage, forget about racism, forget about freeing Mumia and forget about socialized medicine. People from all across the political spectrum can agree on one thing: Bring them Home.

We have to start being vocal about how we love America and American troops and how we don't want them to be abused by a reckless George Bush. We can also take advantage of the fact that orthodox Christianity is on the side of peace (including two Popes!).

If we fail to engage the "heartland", the red states and real conservatives (i.e., not Neo-cons), then we will lose this fight.

Thoughts?

Am I the only one who is sick to death of hearing that the policies of America and the politics of Americans depend on what happens in Iraq in the next few weeks or months?

It seems to me that I have heard that refrain over and over again about every upcoming event staged by the proponents of continued occupation and touted by their media sycophants since the invasion took place. It's like a sad re-run of the "America Held Hostage" drama.

Surely by this time it must be abundantly clear that, so long as the occupier remains and regardless of cobbled together Iraqi governing bodies and their "constitutional" meanderings, the real problems are only exacerbated.

IT'S TIME FOR THE U.S. TO GET THE HELL OUT IN ITS OWN BEST INTERESTS.

By all means, do what can be done thereafter to assist (preferably via internationally supported routes) reconstruction of the country and its institutions by the Iraqis themselves. But more weeks or months of the U.S. presence, while clearly unable to accomplish even the most basic responsibilities of occupiers, achieves nothing but more torture, terror, roadside bombings, and deaths on both sides.

BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.