You are herecontent / Government By Pretext

Government By Pretext


By Rob Field
This administration has an appalling habit of dishonesty
about the motives for its policies; the revolving door of justifications for
tax cuts for the wealthy, simple fairness during surplus, economic stimulus
during deficit are all examples.
In no policy area, however, is this tendency more
distressing than in foreign and defense policy, where lives are at stake - and
have been lost by the thousands - in pursuit of a policy the American people
never would have supported had the true reasons for it been known.
The justifications advanced for the current war
policy keep shifting, and have been largely refuted. The Bush administration
has tried to mislead the public in many ways. Ever since the attacks of September
11, 2001, they have continuously tried to manipulate the public psyche into
believing that Iraq was responsible for those events. Officials made claims
about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) that clearly
contradicted earlier pronouncements.
They have ignored far more egregious
examples of WMD proliferation in Southwestern
Asia
, South-central
Asia
, and Northeastern
Asia
. They have talked
up the capabilities of an Iraqi military
that coalition
warfare
and twelve
years of sanctions
had rendered impotent
if not nonexistent
.
They finally appealed to our consciences; don't we all
oppose a dictatorship? (This President's father found
that dictatorship quite acceptable
when it served "American" (read
'oil company') interests) Hussein's was no worse than scores of other loathsome
regimes that American governments have found useful
or safely
ignorable
over the years. Particularly pathetic among the justifications
was the
assertion that Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were acting in concert

because they swapped class rings or some such nonsense.
But even the most stalwart supporter's credulity
must be challenged by the recent revelations about administration plans to conquer
Iraq no matter what, in the forms of the Downing
Street Memo
and the secret
air war
that preceded the invasion of Iraq.
It is now provable that during the entire period
of public debate about the prospective war with Iraq, the Bush administration
was rigging the evidence about Iraq's WMD programs, preparing its forces for
imminent war, bombing Iraq to set the stage for the introduction of ground forces,
and even inserting special forces to scout targets and perform other missions.

Now we have informed journalists reporting that
there are covert
operations under way in Iran
. It seems clear that the administration has
already decided to initiate hostilities against Iran. Leaving aside (for the
moment) the question of precisely what forces the United States Government plans
to use to seize control in Iran, it is deeply disturbing that issues of peace
and war are again to be decided in the absence of public debate and consent,
regardless of the effects of such reckless policies.
These attempts to build an American empire in the
Middle East can only result in disaster for Americans and for those in the region.
The people who attacked the West in New York, Arlington, Madrid, London, Bali,
and elsewhere hoped that they could frame their actions in terms of a holy war
between Islam and the West, a war we cannot win. George W. Bush and his accomplices
seem determined to give them what they died for.
field.rob@gmail.com

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not that it probably matters much to Bush supporters, but it's not just disaster for America and the Middle East that they're courting. If the AIPAC-PNAC consortium (notably Cheney) succeeds in they're efforts to promote the use of "nucular" weapons in Iran, either by the U.S. or by its Israeli "allies", we're looking into the abyss of World War III.

Countries like China (already deprived of previous deals made with Iraq) are not going to stand idly by while another of the world's major energy suppliers is thus cut off and brought under U.S. imperial control. And, although Vladimir Putin is a much subtler game player than George Bush could ever hope to be, I sure hope no one thinks that those recent joint China-Russia military exercises were just "kiss and make up" window dressing.

Read more here.

You state, "In no policy area, however, is this tendency more distressing than in foreign and defense policy, where lives are at stake..." You are forgetting about the environment. Under Bush the medicine we take, the food we eat, the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the soil our children play on is contaminated.
We are looking at an entire generation of poisoned American children. Those that survive will have a diminished mental capacity and cancer. Read about it in detail in a book written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: “Crimes Against Nature

I can't understand why you feel the need to object to an article you obviously have some points of agreement with because I didn't mention that this administration is no better than previous ones on environmental issues. Besides, in this day and time, war can kill us quicker than steelmaking.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.