You are herecontent / Mr. President, can we talk about the war too?

Mr. President, can we talk about the war too?


by Clarence Page
Chicago Tribune
Published August 14, 2005

Cindy Sheehan's vigil raises uncomfortable questions for Bush

WASHINGTON -- I sympathize with Cindy Sheehan, the California woman who wants to talk to President Bush about her son Casey, who was killed in Iraq. I also sympathize with President Bush. It can't be easy to look as confident as he usually does while he's trying to get his country out of a bigger mess than he expected to get it into.

It is August, normally a no-news time in which the president can roll up his shirtsleeves and clear brush around his Crawford, Texas, ranch while news cameras click and roll and his approval ratings soar. It is interesting how presidential approvals tend to ascend in August, regardless of which party happens to be in power. The American people, in accord with Thomas Jefferson, seem to appreciate government the most when it is governing the least.

But Mrs. Sheehan isn't having that. The Vacaville, Calif., mom threw a big clod into Bush's butter churn. She set up camp with other war protesters outside the president's ranch on Aug. 6 and vowed to keep her vigil until Bush meets with her and other Gold Star mothers to explain why their children had to die in Iraq and to hear her argument for quickly ending the war.

She's hardly alone. A new poll by CNN, USA Today and the Gallup organization found a third of those surveyed say the United States should withdraw all troops from Iraq. That is the highest percentage calling for a full withdrawal since Gallup began asking the question in August 2003.

Also, a majority of Americans (57 percent) now feel the war has made them "less safe" from terrorism and (54 percent) that the United States made a mistake in sending troops to Iraq. Of course, if Bush could end the war quickly, he would. Just as nobody believes Bush can't afford to pay somebody to clear his brush, hardly anybody believes he has a plan to get us out of Iraq.

I, too, would like to talk to the president. I'd like to talk to him about how it feels to live near Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. Hardly a week goes by that I do not run into a young wounded GI at a local market, movie theater or 7-Eleven who is getting used to the latest technology in artificial arms and legs. Like the president, I don't want their sacrifices to be in vain.

I'd like to trade war stories with my fellow Vietnam-era veterans. Thirty-six years ago I was drafted into the Army during the Vietnam War. Like Bush, I never saw combat. I knew quite a few who did. I hoped that my generation had learned its lessons about getting into wars without having, as Colin Powell long advised, a clear strategy for how we were going to win. It sickens me that my generation isn't as smart as I had hoped we would be.

The president is properly worried that Iraqis are not ready to handle their own security well enough for the United States to begin leaving anytime soon. Little of the news coming out of Iraq argues with that.

So Bush had to throw cold water on the sunny optimism of Army Gen. George Casey, head of the multinational force in Iraq, who said last month that forces might be significantly reduced next spring. That would be a relief to incumbent Republicans, but Bush says no decisions had been made. We might even have to add more American troops to safeguard the Iraqi elections scheduled for December. No, the question is not whether to withdraw from Iraq, but how?

A quick withdrawal could lead to all-out civil war among Iraq's factions, which may be building anyway, and no one knows what kind of chaos or despots could emerge out of that.

Ominously we have Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld last week accusing Iran of allowing increasingly sophisticated IEDs, or "improvised explosive devices," and other weapons to make their way across the border to insurgents in Iraq.

Iran? Oh, yes. It's back. Iran, with its long record of sponsoring terrorism against Israel and the United States, is becoming a nuclear power and not a terribly friendly one.

That's why I'd like to ask President Bush whether he got his countries mixed up. Did he really mean to invade Iran? Does he now wish that we had?

Questions like that help explain why the president's handlers steer him exclusively to friendly audiences-- and why his surrogates try to challenge the patriotism of reporters and commentators who get too uppity. We all make mistakes. Team Bush just doesn't want to admit any. That's too bad. Facing up to your mistakes is the first step toward avoiding more mistakes in the future.

----------

E-mail: cptime@aol.com

LINK TO ORIGINAL

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

We should all support Cindy. Why? Have a look at this pool of mostly
slime, lies and dirt.

http://www.technorati.com/search/%22cindy%20sheehan%22

Better to just focus on supporting Cindy and give no mind
to the ignorant. They just want attention, like rude little children.
IGNORE THEM.

I am stunned, is this the Real “Clarence Page

Bush ignors this mothers cry.

After reading all the opposition to Cindy and those of us who question the reason for this war and want the troops home now, it's refreshing to hear from someone who may not agree with us on everything, but has an intelligent response. Thank you!

And as for your statement: "It sickens me that my generation isn't as smart as I had hoped we would be."

I'm not sure Bush or the people who work for him are of your generation, or mine. Somehow they skipped the 60s and 70s and went straight to the 80s. They missed those messy years in between the Cold War fifties and the Reagan 80s, and it shows.

There must be momentum building to pull out when Clarence writes the truth and there are no more excuses for invading Iraq. There's one thing still missing from most of the main stream press - there's proof Bush and Blair lied to get us in there. It's called the Downing Street Minutes and it's impeachable!

There must be momentum building to pull out when Clarence writes the truth and there are no more excuses for invading Iraq. There's one thing still missing from most of the main stream press - there's proof Bush and Blair lied to get us in there. It's called the Downing Street Minutes and it's impeachable!

There must be momentum building to pull out when Clarence writes the truth and there are no more excuses for invading Iraq. There's one thing still missing from most of the main stream press - there's proof Bush and Blair lied to get us in there. It's called the Downing Street Minutes and it's impeachable!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.