You are herecontent / Eisenhower Carrier Group Sails for Iran Theater

Eisenhower Carrier Group Sails for Iran Theater


By Dave Lindorff, www.thiscantbehappening.org

The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Eisenhower and its accompanying strike force of cruiser, destroyer and attack submarine slipped their moorings and headed off for the Persian Gulf region on Oct. 2, as I had predicted in a piece in The Nation magazine a few weeks back.

The Eisenhower strike force, according to my sources, is scheduled to arrive in the vicinity of Iran around October 21, at the same time as a second flotilla of minesweepers and other ships.

This build-up of naval power around the coast of Iran, according to some military sources, is in preparation for an air attack on Iran that would target not just Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, but its entire military command and control system.

While such an attack could be expected to unleash a wave of military violence all over Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and elsewhere against American forces and interests and against oil wells, pipelines and loading vacilities, as well as a mining of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, with a resulting skyrocketing of global oil prices, the real goal of this new war by the U.S. would be ensuring Republican control of the House and Senate.

It seems increasingly clear that the Republican Party is going to lose its grip on the House of Representatives, and that it may even lose control of the Senate, barring some dramatic October Surprise by the president. So far, the surprises have been working against Republicans, with the Foley sex scandal, the evidence that Abramoff's bribery reached right into the inner sanctum of the White House, and the deteriorating U.S. position in Iraq.

With the number of House seats reportedly "in play" now rising from 15 to 30 and now 50, President Bush is looking at the possibility of a blow out Nov. 7 that could see him facing a Democratic Congress bent on revenge for five six years of systematic abuse.

Bush has committed a long string of impeachable crimes against the Constitution, the Republic and the American people--everything from lying to the Congress and the 9-11 Commission, obstructing an investigation into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, abuse of power, violation of federal laws like the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act, dereliction of duty and criminal negligence, and war crimes. He can expect a Democratic Congress to call him to account for at least some of these crimes, whatever House minority leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) may say today.

This means that the worse things look for Republican chances in November, the greater the likelihood that a desperate President Bush will order a disastrous attack on Iran--one that would have the country enter into a third, even worse, war even as it is currently busy losing two others. But Bush and his gang of cronies don't care about initiating a disaster. They're focussed on the disaster that will hit them if they don't turn around the November election. Sacrificing the country or its young men and women in uniform, or the lives of innocent Iranians, is not a concern, any more than it was when Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq.

Clearly such a war would be an act of madness, and yet we know that the plans, already drawn up, are being updated and fine-tuned now by generals and admirals whose twisted sense of patriotism has them giving primary loyalty to a demented commander in chief instead of to the Constitutional and the people of the United States, to both of which they swore an oath to protect.

I hope I am wrong about all this, but the sailing of the Eisenhower, which had been pushed forward recently by about a month by the Pentagon for clearly political reasons, makes me think I'm right. A key will be what happens with the Enterprise carrier strike force, which has already been on station in the Arabian Sea for six months, where it has been launching air strikes against Afghanistan and Iraq targets. Ordinarily, such deployments last six months and then the carrier group returns to base for resupply and for R&R for the crew. If the Enterprise is held over for a longer deployment, after the arrival of the Eisenhower, we will know that something serious is planned.

Meanwhile, journalist Larisa Alexandrovna, in the online publication Raw Story, reports that top military leaders are already engaging in "branches and sequels" planning for an Iran attack, which her sources tell her is the kind of planning that is done "after an initial plan has been decided upon."

What is deeply troubling here is the total silence on the part of the Democratic Party opposition. Not one Democrat in Congress, and as far as I know, not one Democratic candidate for Congress--not even anti-war insurgent Ned Lamont in Connecticut, has demanded an answer from Bush and the Pentagon for the obvious military buildup around Iran, or about published reports that the U.S. already has special forces in side Iran backing the terrorist organization MEK, and selecting targets for U.S. bombardment.

If and when the U.S. attacks Iran, leading to a predicable--if temporar--rallying around the flag by the American public, and to an upset win by incumbent Republican congressional candidates, Democrats will have only themselves to blame for the debacle.

But it will be the American people--and especially the people of Iran--who will be the victims of this treacherous deed and this treasonous failure of will.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

that an aircraft carrier, named after the man who warned us about the dangers of the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TAKING OVER OUR GOVERNMENT, is going to be an instrument of war that will be illegally used by a dictator non-elect, to strike a nation that poses no threat to us.

Ike Eisenhower must be rotating at about 25,000 rpm in his grave right now..

The Bush Dynasty
"Our enemies . . . never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
-- George Walker Bush on August 5, 2004

"if you believe there is no such thing as a winner in a nuclear exchange, that argument [of nuclear overkill] that argument makes no sense. I don't believe that. You have a survivability of command and control, survivability of command and control ... industrial potential, protection of a percentage of your citizens, and you have a
capacity that inflicts more damage on the opposition than it can inflict upon you. That's the way you can have a winner [in a nuclear war]"
-- George Herbert Walker Bush (the first George Bush), quoted in Robert Scheer, "With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War" (1982)

"If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."
-- George W. Bush, December 18, 2000
"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it."
-- George W. Bush, July 26, 2001

"There ought to be limits to freedom!"
- George W. Bush, commenting on gwbush.com web site May 21, 1999
http://www.oilempire.us/bush.html

See also: http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm

election. Bush's plan to attack Iran to affect the election this fall in his favor one way or another is CUT AND RUN. He sees his party about to lose their seats to Democrats in most cases, so he is going to attack a country without it attacking us first. Bush is hoping that the repercussions of the attack will allow him to proclaim martial law and cancel the election this fall, and all subsequent elections, achieving the dictatorship he has TWICE stated would be a lot easier. Don't forget, Bushcreep, even IRAN ends in I RAN. Even those words should be at your grade level of reading.

They don't want to end up like Senator Wellstone. Paul Wellstone was CLEARLY assassinated, made to look like a "mere" airplane crash, just like Mel Carnahan's was to look like a "mere" airplane crash to clear the way for Ashcroft, who STILL couldn't win against a dead man. Apparently, Missourians saw right through the lose of their senator. They know the plans for his death came straight from the White House, and we all know Karl Rove is most likely to have arranged for the death of Senator Wellstone. All he had to do was bribe airport management to change their approach calibrations so the glide slope took the aircraft to the ground. This is realistic since I have seen even a small twin-engine aircraft auto-piloted to stay on glide slope and localizer needles to the runway surface. Just change one calibration on the airport approach stations, and you can cause an airplane crash. Wellstone's aircraft crashed on approroach. Rove arranged it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

CHOOSE LANGUAGE

Support This Site

Donate.

Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.

 

Sponsors:

Speaking Truth to Empire

***

Families United

***

Ray McGovern

***

Julie Varughese

***

Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.

 

Ads:

Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on Ca-Dress.com

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.