You are herecontent / A Republican Woman asks why Democrats do not demand Impeachment
A Republican Woman asks why Democrats do not demand Impeachment
By Melinda Pillsbury-Foster
"The tea was held upstairs, past open doors that held the portraits of First Ladies and mementos of previous administrations. I don't think I will be having tea with Laura Bush again."
I wrote the above to appear in a newsletter for the National Federation of Republican Women soon after the event. I had gotten my invitation to the White House Tea as a Regent for NFRW. The sandwiches were delicious - but subsequent events have persuaded me that what America needs most is an impeachment and more honesty in politics. Since it is clear the Republicans are not going to clean their own house I am urging Democrats to act now and remove both President Bush and Vice President Cheney from office.
As a long time Republican who worked for Barry Goldwater I have watched with dismay as events play out in the Administration of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. The reasons grow more compelling every day.
It is not that our military are dying in a war, but that the war was sold with lies and that the real reason over 2,5000 Americans and God knows now many Iraqis have been killed is to stop the flow of oil to France and Russia. Those countries had just signed an oil deal with Saddam Hussein when the war began.
As events played out it became gut wrenchingly obvious to me that Bush and Cheney had not just overlooked their oaths of office; they had shredded the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, documents that any American should respect. Torture in the name of freedom? Taping Americans in the name of security? Someone has obviously lost their mind or is following an agenda that has nothing to do with their rhetoric.
I understand why Republicans can't take this necessary step; the Republican Party was quietly taken over by the NeoCons who run the Bush Administration, starting a while ago. In California they marched into the Republican State Convention several years back and just took over, overthrowing leadership that really represented the grassroots. Exerting control happens in many different ways and Rove most probably made sure of that first.
Republicans, the kind of people who believed and lived the ideas of Barry Goldwater, low taxation, local government, and individual rights, have been marginalized throughout the Republican Party. The only people left in positions of authority, for the most part, are either NeoCons or NeoCon sympathizers. Long time organizations like the Republican Assemblies, the John Birch Society, and the newly formed Republican Liberty Caucus despise Bush and understand that we stand on the brink of fascism. They do nothing but wring their hands, unfortunately. Some of that is probably fear; some comes from the Republican Command, "Thou shalt not speak evil of another Republican." I disagree obviously.
Political parties are just tools we use to work for an agenda agreed on by those who are active. If we owe loyalty to anything it is to the principles for which America was founded. Today we have confused the word, 'rights,' with 'privileges.' Rights are not a list of specifics, they are the acknowledgment that each of us is born possessed of inherent rights to act, own the property we earn, and to be free in our own persons. That is Jefferson's, "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Converting those God given rights to privileges made all of us subject to government when the whole ideas was that our freedom existed before any government we adopted as a tool for ordering our human world.
Loyalty to a political party should never be stronger than your loyalty to that original vision of a people coming together to govern themselves using persuasion and consent. Members of Congress should burn their party membership cards before being sworn. It is as if you left loyalty to your hammer, a tool, instead of to the family you love who live in the house you built using that tool.
I have been wondering for a long time why Democrats have not taken action. John Conyers has proposed a Censure, a good start. Others outside Congress are talking about impeachment. But nothing happens. Why is the Democratic faction of Congress tip toeing around, pretending that all is well in Congressland? http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060109/motion_for_censure
I have a nasty streak of cynicism so answers did occur to me. I hope I am wrong, but my reason says I am dead on. The Democratic contingent of Congress spends its time watching the steady roll of fascism through America's Institutions, silent where you would expect outrage, because they are all too aware that if they speak out their own dirty laundry will be dragged out for examination. They watched the appointment of federal judges carefully steered through the process of ratification through the system who had been solicited by the Federalist Society. Founded in 1982 by Republicans and Libertarians that organization had an agenda that includes lofty rhetoric that states:
"[T]hat the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be."
That is what they say. One wonders if they ever read it. This is one of those times when rhetoric us used as cover, I suppose. The actions of the Federalists included placing judges with a political agenda who do as they are told. Clarence Thomas was their shining moment and the destruction of Anita Hill business as usual. Time and several thorough books have determined the truth of those questions.
I think it likely that Democrats serving in Congress cringe at the idea of an investigation into matters they know will not stand the light of day in a court overseen by one of these Federalist graduates. The meaning of 'is' does not even come close to not being able to see the difference between the separation of the branches of government and the monolithic state that confronts our eyes today. Remember the downcast eyes of Teddy Kennedy during the Clarence Thomas hearings. There is a reason that Democrats are afraid to speak out.
Democrats are vulnerable and they know it. Some of them probably wonder what the NSA picked up in its tapings or what kind of home movies Bush gets from his operatives and if they played starring roles. Not all of them have that kind of worries; I am sure there are good, decent, honest Congressmen on both sides of the isle. But there are enough to make it impossible for any counter move to be successful. Enough is all the NeoCons needed.
If an individual Congressman has dirty laundry he is vulnerable. He can be depended on to be quiet on those issues that really matter and the censure and impeachment matter. If this Congress fails we will lose more than the illusion that the Democratic Party is at least marginally competent as a tool of political action. I used to believe that there was a vast Left-Wing conspiracy! Ha!
Impeachment matters; removing this administration is essential if America is to reclaim the vision that summoned it into being, if it is to again be the means by which a people govern themselves.
No president has ever violated the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and the other tenets of American thought as thoroughly as the weedeating wonder who occupies the White House today.
Any Democrat who asked to be re-elected to Congress without having signed on to the Censure by Conyers, promised to work for it, and then put his or her name to a bill of impeachment is a traitor to freedom and to America. I am a Republican and I am telling you the truth. I wish those in my own party would step up to the plate, but I do not expect it.
Our lives and the future of our country depend on taking action. Now.
In 1776 a group of men, supported by their wives who would also suffer, pledged, "Their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor," on a venture that looked impossible. The world expected us to fail; instead we won the Revolution and then lost the battle for freedom with the Great Compromise that ignored the inherent rights of blacks and women.
I suspect that the Founders know that now and hope that we will do better.
The Founders were mostly well off or at least middle class. Life and doing the right thing is about risk and they understood what they could lose. Life is temporary, honor is forever. They were imperfect and so are we. They had the courage to do what had to be done. Do we?
If the Democratic Delegation to Congress is afraid they should remember that the Constitution and Bill of Rights is precisely what they are sworn to protect. If doing that means they risk having their sins exposed to public sight then they should remember that the only two people who matter already know; they themselves and God.
Speak out, act, risk what is only yours on trust anyway. Are Democrats up to that challenge? The courage must come, as always, from individuals. For a moment imagine what might be possible. What if those who are controlled by guilty secrets came forward and simply admitted what has been hidden? What if they offered to make amends for any wrongs they have done? Confessed to those they had harmed? Asked forgiveness?
That would be a powerful statement that would leave them feeling better about themselves and on a firmer footing with everyone around them - and with God. Their fellow members could support and encourage them. Many would find that much would be forgiven them. It would be a revival of American trust, something much needed by all of us today.
America, needs clean, open, politics and the means for ensuring that the government we pay for does not become the government that owns us. Impeachment is necessary. I suggest that the Democrats in Congress get off their duffs and get started. Forget your favorite entree in the Congressional Dining room; forget that plush retirement; forget the junkets and perks. Your country needs you NOW. Time is short and should not be wasted.
A Republican woman told you so.
- Login or register to post comments
-

- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version





Stay warm this winter in a black hooded sweatshirt. Order one. Order them by the dozen and donate them to occupations!





She got the whole thing right as far as I'm concerned. What jumps off the page is that the Republicans, though responsible for a bunch of this whole mess, seem to get off the hook by being too irresponsible to be trusted with protecting the American Consitution or living up to the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights.
The Republicans being irresponsible in protecting the Constitution? Are you joking? Who is the party that runs to the Supreme Court to advance an adgenda? Who are the activist judges that use foreign law and NOT our Constitution to make decisions? It is the LEFT and Liberals on the bench my friend not the Right and the Originalists on the bench. Have you done any research on this topic?
Clinton put Ruthie on the bench, she worked for the NAACP for Christ sake. How can she be trusted to protect the Constitution and not push and adgenda? She can't just read some of her opinions...Scary stuff.
EconGuy huh? We'll see...
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
You said it all, you and the Cabal are not just kooks you are insane. This government is taking us to a place we have always feared.Thank you GOP, thank you Neocons, thank you corrupt cabal. Thank you that the world is such a mess. Thank you republicans!
All I have to say is nice try at an explaination for my words. This government is no different than any other, just less corruption than most. You people just HATE losing and wonder where your power has gone. You people think you are doing good when all you do is want to expand government. Something our Founders left England for. Read the Constitution and come talk to me.
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich aka NEO-CON
Does your cartoon name allow you to live in a cartoon world? Your arguments are so devoid of reality you are comical. Have you noticed how many real conservatives are speaking out against this administration and it's insane policies?
My comments are comical? So you don't think the Founders would be sick to their stomach seeing what the Left and the Judicary has done to this country? That is comical.
I too do not agree with everything the Admin does but no Admin is perfect, not even Reagan's or Clinton. So where did that come from? Insane policies? Like what fighting terrorism? Yeah, that is CRAZY!!!! ;)
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
Ronald Regan; sold missiles to terrorists and armed Iran, death squads in Central America, refused to fund Aids research for 5 years because only gays were dying, stopped the Justice Dept. from prosecuting businesses that hire illegal aliens causing today's problems, arming Saddam and Ayatolla Khomeni, what a great President.G.H.W. Bush ;too stupid to do anything. Clinton; sanctions against the children of Iraq causing thousands of deaths, DU weapons used against civilians in the Balkans,Then we come to the worst President in America's history. G.W. Bush;This war is not about terrorism and if you believe that you don't read . My son spent 1 1/2 years in Baghdad ,this war was started because France and Russia signed a contract w/ Iraq for oil and Bush wanted that oil for his buddies.This is the same man who said the Constitution is "just a goddamn piece of paper" so don't start waving that Bush is a religious man because no religion in the world professes anything like the Bush doctrine.William Buckley is a conservative ,what does he say about this war ? " It is the biggest mistake America has made in years"Afganistan is about terrorism , but 5 years later OBL is still enjoying his life, and GWB "doesn't give him much thought"He isn't capable of mush thought though.
Worst President in History? That is a stretch.
So do you think 9-11 was part of W's plan? If you think Iraq is all about oil, you are stretching again. I do remember Mr. Clinton also giving Halliburton no-bid contracts. I somehow don't see the link as we experience such high gas prices. Please don't tell me that W is to blame for that too...I would be forced to give you a lesson in economics.
Mr. Buckley also supported the Veitnam War so what is your point? He is not the soul voice of the Conservative movement. Everyone is allowed to disagree. Bush feels that terrorism is a global problem and it is. People's refusal of this fact are in for a rude awakening. 9-11 was wake-up call enough for me but some will need something far more destructive than that to help them realize the problems we face from Muslim Extremists.
I salute your son's service to this country and admire him for it. France and Russia were not the spark they were just crooks in the U.N.'s food for oil scame that no doubt took billions of dollars from peoples that actually needed it. Kofi is a crook and for him to open his mouth about the Isreali conflict is a joke.
Again, no admin is perfect and only time will tell the legacy of this admin. I think you are jumping the gun a bit but to each their own. I just will be interested to see what people on this site have to say if W is right and democracy flourishes in the Middle East...
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
My dad was a paramedic at the WTC on 9-11,most of the NYFD believes it was allowed to happen.In the 40's a B-29 flew into the Empire State Building at the mid 70th floor , it didn't tumble straight down ,It was repaired.Up to 9-11-01 every plane that was off course was intercepted within 9:00 ,on 9-11-01 the planes were off course for over 45:00.Do you really believe that one of the hi-jackers passports would survive the explosion to be found a few blocks from ground zero? As for Iraq ,over 95% of the people fighting us are Iraqi's who want us out of their country .Those are the words of returned troops.The war was over in May '03 this is an occupation.During the Nuremburg Trials the U.S. wrote and required others to accept the opinion that countries can't invade another if you THINK someone will attack also stating that countries attacking without provication are guilty of crimes against peace and the world . This opinion also stated that the leaders of attacking countries were guilty of war crimes.Please don't say Iraq was resopnsible for 9-11.And to the evidence for 9-11 why doesn't the FBI wanted poster for OBL mention the 9-11 attack? I hope you don't really believe the crap you write and are just posting to be a wise guy .
You think 9-11 was allowed to happen? To me that makes you a little too out there for me. Have you seen the documentary that was done while 9-11 was happening? And not that fiction Farhenheit...
Sir, a B-29 and a commercial jet are two totally different animals. A Commercial jet today DWARFS a 1940's B29...Do some home work. A commercial jet probably holds 10x the fuel, flies much faster, etc. I am not getting into this. If you beleive what you profess, you are a more out there than most.
I too have MANY friends who have come back from 2+ year stints in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have all told me totally different stories than what you are telling me. They also tell me things much different from what you are telling me about the Iraqi people. I will beleive them. Your beleif in 9-11 will make me think twice about anything you say.
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
Read the report on the Northwoods Project.U.S. plan to fly commercial jets into U.S.buildings and blame it on Cuba to justify an invasion. Sound familiar?
that W can kill Arabs in foreign countries like it was going out of business, but when it comes to protecting Americans on OUR OWN SOIL he can't fart straight.
New Orleans? A Hurricane? Fuck it. We've got other cities, right? Karl? You know, backups? We needn't do anything right away. It's just one, and they are mostly African American People anyhow.
Here you go again, W is to blame for Katrina (not the mayor/govenor), 9-11 (not terrorism), gas prices (not China, the world economy and liberal legislation), wire tapping TERRORISTS (protecting our citizens), my upset stomach (my lunch), etc.
But don't give him credit for the economy, record revenues into the Treasury due to the tax cuts, no 9-11's since.
Let's blame W for things that aren't his fault and pretend the good things aren't happening? The motto of the Left...
You people are a trip!!!!
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
That the 100 Innocent Iraqi Civilians that WILL DIE today are not "W"'s fault?
Yours Truly,
-- Delusional Leftist
You have FINALLY properly named yourself.
I love how you Lib's go right to the DEATH OF INNOCENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN to try and push your adgenda...Pathetic, just like the Left uses Blacks for their votes and gives them NOTHING in return.
Do you ever blame the people who start the fight or only those that finish them?
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
1. They caused 9-11
2. They Invaded Afganistan
3. They Perpetrated "Shock and Awe"
4. They Committed the Nation's resources to the Invasion of Iraq on false pretenses and trumped up intelligence, countermanding the order of the UN Security Counsil and without seeking or obtaining the Declaration of War from Congress. They made a big splash about going it alone.
There is no Arab responsiblity for any of these atrocities.
So, to answer your question:
Yes, I always blame the people who start the fight.
Oh and one *final* small point....
What precisely has Bushco "finished"???
1. Osama Been Where? (For you idiot true-believers who STILL believe he, dialysis machine and all, were behind 9-11)
2. Mission Accomplished ... My Ass.
3. Cheney 2003: "The Insurgency is in it's last throes...."
Cheney 2004: "The Insurgency is in it's last throes...."
Cheney 2005: "The Insurgency is in it's last throes...."
Cheney 2006: "Really Guys, C'mon, The Insurgency is in it's last throes, I promise, for real this time!"
4. Taliban Resurgence, Afganistan -- 2006
5. FEMA will have those trailers along AN-EE DAY NOW.
Oh wait, I know what Bushco finished:
CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED STATES
My Apoligies, My Mistake, Very Sorry.
--Resonator
You have to be one the dumbest people alive.
And those that support Bush are puppets? Take a look in the mirror Doug!!!!
See any strings?
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich aka The Compassionate Racist Neo-Con
Where the fuck was the USAF?
Answer: ( cricket chirping sound ).
That is all you need to know.
Complete failure to defend. Total breakdown in the chain of command. THAT IS THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF's PRIMARY ROLE: TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF THIS NATION.
Why don't you ask Clinton you dope? It was his errosion of the military that left us grossly unprepared for this.
I just stepped on your crickets...
You people will believe anything or do you forget that W was only in office for 9 months when this happened? I love how you only blame W but don't look at the prior resident of the White House. As radical Islamo-facists were planning right under his nose he was too busy getting himself a shiner in the Oval Office.
You people are pathetic. It is no wonder you continue to lose elections. The majority can actually see the writing on the walls. You people are so "smart" you completely miss the point. The US was attacked, what, 3 times under Slick Willy and he did NOTHING. No wonder these people thought we were a paper tiger.
Anyway...
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
Unfortunately, you did not step (stomp, whatever...) on the allegory that the crickets represent: THE COMPLETE FAILURE OF COMMAND AND CONTROL DURING THE EVENTS OF 9-11.
That is the difference between arguing about substance, and arguing about arguing.
The Person to ask about the absence of the USAF during September the 11, 2001 is Vice President Cheney, who had conviently redeployed half of it to Alaska, Outer Mongolia, and Guam under operation "Vilgilant Guardian".
Why you would think Bill Clinton would be worth querying about a tragedy one year after his exit as Commander-in-Chief is beyond me. You are the dope. And worse:
I'm glad you take such an amused, blase tone with regard to all this dying.
Motivated Democrats with a majority in the house and the subpoena power back where it belongs: at the behest of the *People*, might just start to erode that snotty grin from your fugly mug.
Short of that, I'm fairly certain that the imaginary brick-throwing militant from your previous post would not succeed in such an effort, even if the brick hit you square in the jaw and knocked out every single one of your teeth. You are that jacked up an Laughing gas --the bad stuff.
Have a good laugh while Rome burns: God willing the fire dept. is on its way
You jeer well, what can you do that doesn't suck?
--Resonator
Then why the fuck did he find it more important to continue reading to a class of first graders, than to instead take up IMMEDIATELY his APPOINTED AND SWORN PLACE AT THE TOP OF THE COMMAND AND CONTROL CHAIN AS COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
Apparently Two of your "B-29 Dwarfing" Modern Jetliners Being crashed into Manhattan island did not even RATE AN INTERRUPTION IN THE CAT IN THE HAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the "W" Priorities System.
NOBODY IS THAT STUPID. NOBODY. NOT EVEN YOU.
-- Resonator
would be sickened at seeing the beautiful system of checks and balances and human rights they gave they lives to create and implement destroyed by a group of self-interested, money grubbing facists who are no different than the Nazis.
The Founding Fathers sought to liberate humanity. And came along way in achieving that end, for themselves and future generations
The Necons are crapping all over THAT LEGACY: Imperialist, sick, remorseless mass murderers who seek to enslave humanity, not free it.
There is a big fucking difference, freakout.
Dribbled out the bottom of hacked up Diebold fraud box.
Some of us give a shit about that, other's don't
--Resonator
EconGuy said:
"too irresponsible to be trusted with protecting the American Consitution."
Tell us all something, genius. Which activist judge came up with the entirely unconstitutional "Unitary Executive" theory that Bush has used hundreds of times to subvert the Constitution with his bullshit signing statements?
Keep talking, buddy.
Demand accountability.
http://www.johnperryonline.com
You people are so hung up on this notion of "Unitary Executive" crap that does not exist and has never existed. You people are just pissed that Bush could care less about what YOU think and does what he feels in his heart is right. He has not done anything unconstitutional. If he had, I can gaurantee the MSM would have been all over it and would be pounding it everyday.
John, it is a pipe dream theory and you know it.
I'm no genius, I'm just a fun-loving guy that can except reality.
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
P.S. I really liked your Jeezus. Does it scare you to actually type Jesus? Or would you be offending people on this site. God, God God..Jesus, Jesus, Jesus... That wasn't so bad.
LET'S JUST LEAVE IT AT THAT, SHALL WE?
Should be tried for War Crimes under the Geneva Convention and roundly shot in public when their number by jury comes up.
They are evil, traitorous, murdering, theives who have no concern or love of anything but power.
If you believe all that God crap they sell their lies behind you are ****EVEN**** DUMBER than I had previously thought. What do think God thought of Shock and Awe? Was that turning the other cheek??? Love thy Neighboor as thyself???
They have abrogated every amendment in the Constitution, Murdered, tortured, confined, butched INNOCENT MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN IRAQ AND IN NEW YORK AND NEW ORLEANS. Your beloved Neocons kill Children in New York City.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it, fucker.
You remind me of this Doug character that was on here a while back. He had quite the potty mouth too.
I love how you people invent this crap about W and the Constitution, "war crimes", the Geneva Convention (that does not apply to terrorists), murder, torture, etc. And you still blame him for N.O., 9-11, calling me a Jew aka Neo-Con...
And then you attempt to show the hypocrisy of W and his Christian values...Nice try. Did God look the other way? That is kind of funny. I also think is is funny that the Left is for Partial Birth Abortion and against the death penalty? (just thought I'd throw that in)
Again, if your claims were true he would be prosecuted for them. The fact is your facts are fiction and you HATE IT. W "The Dummy" and you can't get him on anything. That too is funny.
Keep up the good work!!!! ANTI-SEMIT!!!! There, you call me a NEO-CON, I'll call you an Anti-Semit. It is childish, I know, but so is calling me something I am not.
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich
You are always saying things like "you people", "guys like you", "your type". It belies your underlying racism, sterotyping and bias. You fit people into convient little self-constructed mental plastic pails that have nothing to do with reality other than it makes it easier for *YOU* to cope with.
My name is not Doug, and I have nothing to do with Doug, OK SHITHEAD?
Nice try with the weak attempt at holier-than-thou sanctimony.
Potty mouth, my ass. At least some sense comes out in between the tourettes relapses: SOME PASSION. You are consistant: you never connect with sense and reason at all, you just float around with "the all is well and who really cares if is or isn't? it's just life that's drifting by."
I, for one, happen to give a shit.
Your tone is like the French Court of Louis the XVI: Better than and too good for you all. You wouldn't deign to condescend, right Kookie?
And you know what Emerson said about... you know what: fuck it. I can't be bothered.
Racist???? LMFOA here Doug... You can't win an argument so you call me a racist...Typical Liberal response aka People Like "YOU".
Buddy, I don't go to church. I just thought was funny how you tried to use the whole God thing to prove a point. And did a $hitty job at it.
"I, for one, happen to give a shit." And so do I, I just have a different view so you put people like me "into convient little self-constructed mental plastic pails". You think you can talk your way out of every situation...When the reality is, you can't. Like it or not.
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich aka The Racist Neo-Con
You are getting more airtime than you deserve, simply by virtue of being the most offensive, least considerate person posting on this site.
I will no longer give you the satisfaction.
If you aren't a racist then how do you explain this:
[http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingstuff]
the website you directed our collective attentions toward about a month back. If that's not racism, I'm a hampster. And yes, I know that is misspelled, I just happen to like spelling it that way.
I'm done with out little dialog until that day you acquire a sense of compassion.
--Resonator
Your senseless crap was giving me a headache (too bad for you my head did not explode with my spleen from laughter). I had to walk away for a while, make sure the real world was still surrounding me before I made another appearance.
It was fun while it lasted...
With love...
Richie "The Right Wing Kook" Rich aka The Compassionate Racist Neo-Con
P.S. That is a GREAT site isn't it!? You should see my closet full of 1st Amendment Gear!!!!
This courageaous and smart woman perfectly illustrates the essential point that IMPEACHEMENT OF THIS ADMINISTRATION IS NOT A DEMOCRATIC ISSUE, IT IS A BI-PARTISAN ISSUE, IT IS A COMMON SENSE ISSUE, IT IS A SURVIVAL ISSUE.
How embarassing that Democrats have gotten to the point of spinelessness to have to be told by Republicans to get on with it !!!
Yes! Why are all of the other right headed Republicans so cowed . . . the confused Democrats aren't likely to successfully purge the crazed gang that is recreating the "Dance Band on the Titanic" as it plays "Nearer My God to Thee" (Karl Rove conducting) on the good ship America without the help of all Americans who value the rule of Constitutional law. Isn't the situation obvious? Certainly false prophets are proliferating and profiting mightily.
We need strong minded men and women to stand and be counted NOW. We need rational leadership that bring us home to truth—our country is dying of lying.
This is why I have terminated my membership in the Democratic Party after 32 years. I have also read Nancy Pelosi has promised that should the Dems. win the House in Nov. they will not impeach. I am convinced that the Republicans and Democrats are branches of the same diseased tree. Money wins out over patriotism to America.
you don't have to be a patriot to see that our entire government, with a very very few exceptions, is totally corrupt and needs to be GONE.
without a total reformation of our government, there can never be democracy in this nation again. the corruption is way too deep and pervasive to just expect it to 'go away' with the corrupt pieces of shit who occupy those offices and rape and pillage while the common working person watches their lives go down the toilet.
this isn't a republican versus democrat issue anymore, it's an INCUMBENT versus CLEAN SANE NON-CORRUPT GOVERNMENT issue now.
"...what America needs most is an impeachment and more honesty in politics."
Indeed, indeed, indeed. But why does this Republican woman not move for impeachment? Seems to me she would be the perfect person to do so.
Dennis Eros