You are hereBlogs / Stephen Lendman's blog / Upcoming Iranian Nuclear Talks

Upcoming Iranian Nuclear Talks


By Stephen Lendman - Posted on 18 February 2013

 

Upcoming Iranian Nuclear Talks

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Multiple previous P5+1 talks were held. America manipulated them to fail. So did Israel covertly. Western nations were pressured to go along.

 

On February 26, new talks will be held in Almaty, Kazahhstan. Expect no more this time than earlier. 

 

It bears repeating. Tehran's nuclear program isn't at issue. It's red herring cover for imperial aims. It's the oil, stupid, and regional dominance.

 

Iran's sovereignty stands in the way. Its program is peaceful. It complies with NPT provisions. World leaders know it. So do IAEA inspectors.

 

Washington targets all independent governments. It wants pro-Western puppet ones replacing them. It invents reasons to do so. It operates extrajudicially in defiance of rule of law principles.

 

It gets UN Secretary-Generals to go along. Ban Ki-moon's one of the worst. He shames the office he holds. He spurns UN Charter principles. He's complicit in war crimes. 

 

He's well rewarded for doing so. He lies for Washington. He's a longstanding imperial tool. 

 

On February 14, the Washington Post headlined "Iran could use UN talks as cover to build bomb, Ban K-moon says."

 

He knows Iran has no such intention. He lies and claims otherwise. Decisive swift action should prevent what doesn't exist, he urges. 

 

Accelerated action should be prioritized. "We should not give much more time to the Iranians, and we should not waste time," he says. "We have seen what happened with the DPRK."

 

"It ended up that they (were) secretly, quietly, without any obligations, without any pressure, making progress."

 

The Security Council must "show a firm, decisive and effective, quick response."

 

Like America and Israel, he wants Iran to prove a negative. He told Imam Khamenei he's not satisfied with peaceful reassurances. He did so on orders from Washington.

 

He's "frustrated" about failed international talks. He points fingers the wrong way. He blames Iran for Western intransigency.

 

He speaks with forked tongue. He mimics John Kerry. America's new Secretary of State said progress depends on if Iran's ready to "make and discuss real offers and engage in a real dialogue."

 

Doing so is impossible without legitimate negotiating partners. Iran hasn't had them in decades. It doesn't now.

 

On February 16, Press TV headlined "Iran censures Ban Ki-moon for remarks on nuclear energy program."

 

Iranian UN ambassador Mohammad Khazaei called what he said "unfortunate." He acted "in contradiction to his duties and against international principles."

 

He called on Ban to observe justice and confidence-building measures. He urged him to use his position responsibly. It's his job to do so. He never once tried. He's complicit in imperial crimes. 

 

He makes unjust accusations. Iran has every right to object. It's entitled to use nuclear power peacefully. Ban knows but won't say. He regurgitates what Washington tells him to say.

 

America and Israel claim Tehran is months away from producing a bomb. No evidence whatever suggests it. Saying so is malicious propaganda.

 

Kerry picked up where Hillary Clinton left off. He represents imperial lawlessness. He's Israel's man at State.

 

He said "(w)e are not going to get trapped into a delay-after-delay process here." 

 

"It is incumbent on the Iranians to prove that they are prepared to meet our willingness, President Obama's willingness, again and again stated by the president, to be open to a diplomatic resolution here."

 

Washington doesn't negotiate. It demands. Other countries are pressured to comply. Multiple threats follow otherwise. Iran's familiar with American double-dealing.

 

It's hard imagining why they put up with it so long. Job's patience would be taxed. Tehran prioritizes peace and good relations. It won't stop trying to achieve them. Washington and Israel obstruct them. Rogue states operate that way.

 

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said Tehran's willing to negotiate directly with Washington. At issue only is "the other side (coming) with authentic intentions." 

 

It hasn't happened in decades and won't now. Salehi knows it. So do other Iranian leaders. On February 16, Fars News Agency headlined "Leader Blasts American Officials' Paradoxical Policies." He referred to their "spirit of bullying."

 

"Americans expect others to give in to their illogical words and bullying as some have done, but the Iranian nation and the Islamic Republic does not surrender because it has logic, ability and power," Imam Khamenei said.

 

He stressed key points. They include illogical and contradictory US remarks, using nuclear negotiations to demand Iran surrender its legitimate rights, and lying about removing sanctions through talks.

 

He called America's offer of direct talks disingenuous. It's cover to bully Iran to surrender.

 

It's because "they want to show to the revolting Muslim nations of the region that the Islamic Republic of Iran was eventually made to sit to the negotiating table despite all its resistance and toughness, and that they, thus, have no other option but to give up and surrender."

 

Tehran keeps "its eyes wide open." It understands Washington's duplicity. It responds accordingly.

 

America previously offered direct talks. Iran's "logical words" were spurned. It was blamed for doing so. Expect nothing different now.

 

At the same time, he said:

 

"If Americans show both in their words and actions that they are not illogical, then they would see that the Islamic Republic and the Iranian nation are benevolent and favor interaction and logic."

 

"This is the only way to interact with the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in that case the US administration would receive a proper response."

 

On February 16, Reuters headlined "Exclusive: Big powers to offer easing gold sanctions at Iran nuclear talks." 

 

"Big powers," of course, means Washington. It's offer was duplicitous. It was made to be refused. It demands Iran shut down its newly expanded Fordow enrichment plant.

 

It operates legitimately. Tehran categorically refuses. Washington's latest offer is contemptuous. It assures upcoming Almaty failure.

 

Reuters cited unnamed Western officials. They spoke on condition of anonymity. They're embarrassed to attach their names to surrender demands. They should have kept silent and said nothing.

 

They said the new proposal largely replicates earlier ones. "We don't think the Iranians (deserve) much more," they added.

 

They claim Iran isn't ready to deal ahead of its June 14 presidential elections.

 

Tehran's ready for legitimate talks anytime. It needs legitimate partners to do so. Washington obstructionism prevents it. It's no different now than earlier.

 

Pressuring Iran to halt uranium enrichment proves it. Claiming it's for bomb development is false on its face. Knowing it's true but saying otherwise shows what Iran is up against. 

 

Saber rattling makes things worse. It repeats ad nauseam. It's done so belligerently. False charges follow earlier ones. 

 

Sanctions violate international law. They're imposed to harm Iran's economy, isolate it politically, and cause ordinary Iranians pain and suffering.

 

It's done to turn them against their government. It's been tried many times before. Every time it fails. Ordinary people blame responsible parties. Their governments are their last line of defense.

 

Iranians aren't fools. They know Washington and Israel are Tehran's main enemies. They're enemies of peace, equity and justice. 

 

They're hegomonic partners. They violate international law. They spurn it with impunity. They commit crimes of war, against humanity, and genocide. So do complicit NATO partners and rogue regional allies.

 

At issue is advancing Washington's imperium. It's about regional dominance. It's about controlling world energy supplies. It's about turning Iran into a vassal state.

 

In 1979, Iran ended 2,500 years of monarchal rule. A generation of Pahlavi repression ended. It's not about to roll over for Washington and return it. 

 

Its sovereignty matters too much. It'll do what's necessary to protect it. Its leaders are responsible for doing it. They've done so for 34 years. 

 

Castro's Cuba alone remained independent longer. Both nations abhor imperial Washington’s aims. They do so for good reason. They prioritize peace and good relations, not conflicts and global dominance. 

 

They're targeted for doing the right things. Expect nothing ahead to get easier. Washington has longstanding war plans. It's waging multiple ones already. It has others in mind. 

 

They'll be launched in the fullness of time. Today is the most perilous time in world history. Humanity may not survive America's onslaught. 

 

It's shocking to imagine it's come this far and perhaps no further. If it perishes, it'll be the only species ever to do so. 

 

It'll prove higher intelligence was more liability than asset. Given Washington's rage for dominance, things may turn out that way.

 

A Final Comment

 

In mid-February, FAIR's (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting)  Peter Hart asked if Iranian magnets are the new aluminum tubes.

 

In months preceding the 2003 Iraq war, media scoundrels, TV talking heads, and Bush administration officials lied. They said Saddam Hussein attempted to buy "thousands of specially designed tubes" to advance his nuclear weapons program.

 

Their "diameter, thickness and other technical specifications (had) persuaded American intelligence experts that they were meant for Iraq's nuclear program."

 

None existed. Most people didn't now. This and other false accusations became pretexts for war. Destroying the cradle of civilization followed. 

 

Pre-2003 Iraq no longer exists. Millions died. Conflict continues. More die daily. Human misery is incalculable. No end in sight looks near. 

 

Washington perhaps destroying Iran the same way. Propaganda wars precede hot ones. Tehran faces numerous false charges. New accusations follow earlier ones.

 

Media scoundrels march in lock step with imperial plans. Sources relied on are serial liars.

 

Henry Kissinger may or may not have said "If you can't hear the drums of war you must be deaf." It's true either way. Permanent war is official US policy. 

 

Current ones rage. More are planned. One country after another is ravaged. It bears repeating. Humanity may not survive Obama's second term. Rogue administration policies make it appear less likely.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 

 

His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."

 

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

 

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

 

http://www.dailycensored.com/upcoming-iranian-nuclear-talks/

Tags

It bears repeating. Tehran's nuclear program isn't at issue. It's red herring cover for imperial aims. It's the oil, stupid, and regional dominance.

Indeed; definitely.


Regarding Ban Ki Moon and the UNSC, there's only one unattempted solution that comes to mind and it's a speech or talk by Denis Halliday on December 1, 2009, for a Global Research Public Lecture in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.  GlobalResearch.ca provides this speech in both video as well as full transcript.


Article: 

 

GlobalResearch.ca first published a transcript of the speech and it was posted on the day of the lecture.  It can be found by going to Denis Halliday's author index at GR and the link to get to the authors' indexes is located a little ways down the left-hand-side of the page.


The title, for both the full transcript article, and the GR page for the video is, "The United Nations’ Role in Peace and War".

 

Video:


A GR page for the video, which is 23:33 for runtime, was also published, this one on January 6, 2010, but all it really provides are links for the full transcript and for the video at vimeo.com, so I'll just provide the direct link to the video.


http://vimeo.com/8575942


He says that either the UN, really the UNSC, has to be drastically reformed, or the UN should be obsoleted; and I can only agree with that.


Of course we mustn't call for obsoleting Ban Ki Moon and other puppet UNSC Sec. Generals, but obsoleting the SC and its puppet SG position are the only solution left, if the SC can't be drastically reformed and by drastic, Halliday means drastic corrections. Very serious corrections are urgently required. Otherwise, the SC is just a worthless show of clownistic sort, in a very dark "comedy".


And it doesn't seem that it'd be feasible to reform the SC the way this world needs to happen.  It's absolutely non-representative of democracy. If the contrary were true, then there'd be no permanent member state status for any state, and the veto power those states presently hold would no longer exist, either.


It's better to listen to Denis Halliday, however; or to read the full transcript at GR.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.