You are herecontent / OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! NONVIOLENTLY OF COURSE

OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! NONVIOLENTLY OF COURSE


By Bruce Gagnon


Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff likes a big back drop just so you understand he is the head man at the Pentagon


  • I don't usually miss a war $$ vote in Congress but I did this time. I spend my days surfing the Internet looking for such things but the December 8 House of Representatives vote on 2011 Pentagon and war spending appropriations slipped by without a trace. Democrats once again did their best impression of right-wing war mongers by pushing it over the top with a vote of 212-206. Only 35 Dems voted against this endless war spending measure, all of the 212 votes in favor were Democrats. From Maine, Rep. Mike Michaud voted no but our other representative, Chellie Pingree who is also a Democrat, voted yes. Pingree keeps telling us she is against more war spending but votes like this indicate she is pulling our chain.

Rep. Michaud, who has consistently opposed additional war funding and represents the most conservative part of the state, was concerned that the bill contained $159 billion more for endless war. “I believe that we must finalize a responsible plan to end our time in Afghanistan. Our service members are doing their best, but corruption is rampant there and I will continue to oppose these types of funding measures in the absence of a plan to bring our troops home. It’s long past time that we invest in America so that we can improve our economy and start creating jobs again.”

I've seen nothing in any of the newspapers that I daily track about this vote. I only learned about it after a friend tipped me off.
 

  • Ralph Nader has harsh words for Obama's approach to politics: "He has no fixed principles. He's opportunistic - he goes for expedience, like Clinton. Some call him temperamentally conflict-averse. If you want to be harsher, you say he has no principles and he's opportunistic. He's a con man. I have no use for him," Nader said. Nader went on to report that as he travels the country he is encouraging people to run against Obama in the 2012 election.

At this point the mainstream media, while acknowledging Obama has big troubles with his base, is also doing all it can to discourage anyone from running against the magician. With two more years of Obama's (and Democratic Party) sniveling weakness it is likely that someone will take the plunge and run against him.

  • Students in London have been rioting after hearing that their college tuition fees will triple. What did the British government expect after making such an announcement? The new party in power in England, the Lib-Dems, had promised before their recent election that they would oppose these student fee hikes but quickly betrayed their promise. One media outlet reported that "rampaging student protesters attacked a car carrying Prince Charles and his wife Camilla. One group of protesters, some chanting 'Off with their heads!' smashed one of the royal couple's rear car windows and splashed white paint on the vehicle. Charles and Camilla were visibly shaken, but unharmed."

Ah yes, the sounds of feudalism returning......the peasants marching on London once again and coming so close to a royal family coach. A security investigation must be undertaken immediately!

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I wonder how much the student fees were, to get a better idea of what the impact of tripling them would be. F.e., if student fees were $1,000 USD per year and are tripled to $3,000, then it's a 66% jump, but easier to handle than a jump from $3,000 to $9,000, or from $7,000 to $21,000, or $10,000 to $30,000 would be. The higher the initial fee, the greater or stronger the outrage would be from tripling.

And Ralph Nader excellently spoke in very accurate terms. He clearly isn't blind and fooled, or deaf, dumb and blind.

Democrats once again did their best impression of right-wing war mongers by pushing it over the top with a vote of 212-206. Only 35 Dems voted against this endless war spending measure, all of the 212 votes in favor were Democrats. ...

So all Republicans in Congress or the House voted against this bill? That's great and [amazing]. If anyone had asked me if this was possible, then I guess that I'd have to honestly say that sure it is, but extremely unlikely; virtually impossible.

What a laughing stock that makes of the so-called leftists' Dem. Party.

It's excellent to learn that Rep. Mike Michaud, D-Maine, represents a conservative part of the state, and it's "the most conservative part". I was going to say that that was courageous, but if all Republican members of the House voted against this bill, then maybe he voted according to what his constituency in Maine wanted or demanded.

So Republicans in Congress chose to let the Dem. Party hang itself before the next round of elections. Ha ha.

They voted conservatively, while 212 Dems liberally chose to continue to be pro-war. That's one way to be liberal and clearly isn't the good way.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:





















The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.