You are hereBlogs / dlindorff's blog / Supporting Democracy is So Yesterday: Washington’s Rats are Abandoning Maliki

Supporting Democracy is So Yesterday: Washington’s Rats are Abandoning Maliki


By dlindorff - Posted on 19 June 2014

By Dave Lindorff 


The rat, among mammals, is one of the most successful animals on the planet. Cunning, ruthless, competitive and above all adaptable -- it is able to change its habits quickly as needed to accommodate the situation it finds itself in.  


When it comes to foreign policy, the US government is filled with rats.


Just look at the situation in Iraq. The US invaded Iraq in 2003, claiming it was a rogue nation that had, or was trying to develop, “weapons of mass destruction.”  When it became clear that this was a lie, or at best, simply not true, the stated motive for the invasion was changed to “regime change,” and the goal became “bringing democracy to Iraq.” 

 

The US and the key US corporate news organizations loved Maliki when his party won the largest block of seats in the first parliamentary election in 2006 and he became prime minister. As the Washington Post’s David Ignatius crowed at the time, after the votes were in,  “The most important fact about Maliki's election is that it's a modest declaration of independence from Iran.”  Ignatius quickly went to the US ambassador at the time, Zalmay Khalilzad, for a comment, and Khalilzad, a neoconservative linked to the National Endowment for Democracy, obligingly told him, “His reputation is as someone who is independent of Iran." 


Khalilzad had worked assiduously (almost rat-like, one might say) behind the scenes to build a coalition of Kurds, Sunnis and Shia politicians opposed to the incumbent prime minister Ibrahim al-Jafari (who was seen as Iran’s man), in order to back Maliki’s ascendancy.


In 2010, the US again backed Maliki, supporting him for a second term even though the initial results of the voting gave a plurality to his challenger Ayad Allawi. Using heavy-handed tactics and his control of the judiciary, Maliki essentially stole that election,. He did this with the approval of the US Embassy which, in 2010, was still, if not controlling the country, a major player.


Shift to the present Iraq elections. The US during the campaign, was clearly backing Maliki’s virtually assured re-election as prime minister, with the US Embassy, on May 19 after the votes were all counted (at least those in Shia regions), calling it “another milestone in the democratic development of Iraq.”


     But along the way to Maliki’s re-election plurality, something happened: a lightning-fast military campaign by Sunni insurgents that suddenly put even Baghdad at risk.


Suddenly the rats in Washington, seeing their “man in Baghdad as vulnerable, and their rickety construct in Iraq as facing collapse, aren’t so committed to democracy...



For the rest of this article by DAVE LINDORFF in ThisCantBeHappening!, the new uncompromising, four-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper, please go to: www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/2354


Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.