You are herecontent / Santoromney and Rove Call Election for Romney, But Paul Wins

Santoromney and Rove Call Election for Romney, But Paul Wins


By davidswanson - Posted on 04 January 2012

From Daily Caller:

In Clinton County, Rove said, a missing vote tally prompted observers from the Romney and Santorum camps to huddle together and agree on what the reported totals should have been. Their consensus, which Fox News later confirmed through a second source, was that Romney prevailed by 18 votes.

That scenario overcame a previous four-vote Santorum edge and appeared to award Romney a 14-vote victory. When Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn made the final announcement at 1:34 a.m., however, he said the margin was just eight votes. Strawn also cautioned that precincts have two weeks to officially certify their results.

Hours before the margin between the two top finishers reached photo-finish dimensions, Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator, led an emotional speech to supporters with a clarion call of “Game on!” Santorum told his crowd that he was taking his surging campaign to New Hampshire in an effort to solidify his role as the conservative alternative to Romney.

 
Ron Paul may have officially come in third tonight, but if the campaign's caucus strategy went off as planned, then Paul may actually be the real winner of the first Republican voting contest.

That's because Paul's massive organizational push in Iowa focused on both winning votes, and also on making sure that Paul supporters  stuck around after the vote to make sure they were selected as county delegates — the first step towards being elected as a delegate to the Republican National Convention.

That's because Iowa's Republican caucuses are non-binding — they are technically just a straw poll, so once selected, delegates are free to vote for whichever presidential candidate they choose.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The title had me going.  I actually spent some time last night looking into the so called caucus manipulation.

There wasn't any, apparently everything was conducted in public.

 

when you said ron paul own, you stoked my fears for real!

Why would you "Fear" Ron Paul. . .  the ONLY Anti-War candidate on either side . . .   winning?

 

I can understand why the Zionist Establishment would "Fear" Ron Paul winning, . ..

 

(link to video - approx. 8 minutes)

"The Establishment Afraid Of Ron Paul"

http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=17183

 

. . . but why would someone posting on THIS SITE be afraid of someone that wants to end

these ILLEGAL and IMMORAL Wars for Israel, International Central Banksters, and the

Military-Security-Industrial Complex???

 

Do tell . ..  ;-)

 

"You say you'll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead"

- "Revolution" by The Beatles

 

peace.

anliot is probably still waiting for all the flowery Obama campaign talk of hope and change to kick in...

 

Always nice to see you 'round these parts, Frederick!

http://www.JohnPerryOnline.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Sign Up Fast Here