You are herecontent / Obama Administration Silencing Pakistani Drone-Strike Lawyer

Obama Administration Silencing Pakistani Drone-Strike Lawyer


By Medea Benjamin

When is the last time you heard from a civilian victim of the CIA’s secret drone strikes? Sure, most of them can’t speak because they’re deceased. But many leave behind bereaved and angry family members ready to proclaim their innocence and denounce the absence of due process, the lack of accountability, the utter impunity with which the U.S. government decides who will live and die.

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government has increasingly deployed unmanned drones in the Middle East, South Asia and Africa. While drones were initially used for surveillance, these remotely controlled aerial vehicles are now routinely used to launch missiles against human targets in countries where the United States is not at war, including Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. As many as 3,000 people, including hundreds of civilians and even American citizens, have been killed in such covert missions.

The U.S. government will not even acknowledge the existence of the covert drone program, much less account for those who are killed and maimed. And you don’t hear their stories on FOX News, or even MSNBC. The U.S. media has little interest in airing the stories of dirt poor people in faraway lands who contradict the convenient narrative that drone strikes only kill “militants.”

But in Pakistan, where most strikes have occurred, the victims do have someone speaking out on their behalf. Shahzad Akbar, a Pakistani lawyer who co-founded the human rights organization Foundation for Fundamental Right, filed the first case in Pakistan on behalf of family members of civilian victims and has become a critical force in litigating and advocating for drone victims.

Akbar is by no means anti-American. He has traveled to the United States in the past, and has even worked for the U.S. government. He was a consultant with the U.S. Agency for International Development, and helped the FBI investigate a terrorism case involving a Pakistani diplomat.

But his relationship with the US government changed in 2010, when he took on the case of Karim Khan, a resident of a small town in North Waziristan who claimed that his 18-year-old son and 35-year-old brother were killed when a CIA-operated drone struck his family home.

“Khan could have responded by taking up arms and joining the Taliban. Instead, he put his trust in the legal system,” Akbar told me in an interview from Islamabad. Akbar helped Khan sue the CIA and the US Secretary of Defense for the wrongful deaths of his relatives. Since then, dozens of families have come forward and joined the legal proceedings.

According to the New America Foundation, from 2004-2011, between 1,717 and 2,680 individuals were killed in Pakistan by drone strikes, and of those, between 293 and 471 were civilians. The UK-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism puts those figures higher, saying that some 3,000 have been killed, including between 391 and 780 civilians.

Akbar disputes even the Bureau’s figures, claiming that the vast majority of those killed are ordinary civilians. “Most of the victims who are labeled militants might be Taliban sympathizers but they are not involved in any criminal or terrorist acts,” Akbar said. “The Americans often use the fact that someone carries a weapon as proof they’re a combatant. If that’s the criteria then the US will have to commit genocide, because all men in that area carry AK-47s. It’s part of their culture.”

Now that Akbar has become the voice of drone victims, it appears that the Obama administration is trying to silence him.

He was invited to speak at a human rights symposium at Columbia University’s law school in May 2011, but he never received a visa. Despite repeated enquiries, he was merely told there was “a problem” with his application. Now he has been invited to speak at the first ever Drone Summiton April 28-29 in Washington DC, organized by the peace group CODEPINK and the legal advocacy organizations Reprieve and the Center for Constitutional Rights. Once again, his visa remains stuck in the never-never land of  “administrative review.”

The Summit organizers have appealed for help from the State Department, key members of Congress and the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan. After looking into the case, U.S. Deputy Ambassador to Pakistan Richard Hoagland responded: “Whether we like it or not, the current U.S. visa system faces significant constraints within the Homeland Security structure.”  Insisting that the issuance of visas was not used as an ideological tool but was a reflection of “complicated and even byzantine laws and regulations,” Hoagland concluded, “I fully sympathize, but I cannot change law and regulation.” His recommendation? “Continued patience.”

“The Obama administration has already launched six times as many drone strikes as the Bush administration in Pakistan alone, killing hundreds of innocent people and devastating families,” said Leili Kashani, Advocacy Program Manager at the Center for Constitutional Rights, one of Summit sponsors. “By refusing to grant Shahzad Akbar a visa to speak at the Summit, the Obama administration is further silencing discussion about the impact of its targeted killing program on people in Pakistan and around the world.”

The Drone Summit’s organizers vow to keep pressuring the U.S. government to grant Akbar a visa and are encouraging their supporters to contact Consul General Steve Maloneyin Pakistan. If all fails, they will have Akbar speak, via satellite, at a press conference at the National Press Club on Thursday, April 26, just before the Summit begins.

“Our legal challenges disrupt the narrative of ‘precision strikes’ against ‘high-value targets’ as an unqualified success against terrorism, at minimal cost to civilian life,” said Akbar, “The CIA does not want anyone challenging their killing spree, but the American people should have the right to know.”

Medea Benjamin, cofounder of CODEPINK and Global Exchange, is author of the new book Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control. . Register herefor the Drone Summit on April 28-29.

Tags

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

All class ideologies have degenerated into totalitarianism, Fascism, Western tyranny, and generic Bribery, threats, corruption where


even international agencies have been CO OPTED, corrupted into servants of WESTERN FASCISM.   The U.N. has been taken over


by Western NATO thugs and U.S./Israeli interests excluding, rejecting the dozens of resolutions coming out of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY,


to ENFORCE Israel to leave the occupied areas.


 


The Security Council and the Fascist U.S prevent what a majority of NATIONS DEMAND.   Similarily, the U.N. Nuclear Agency has been


corrupted, co opted by FASCIST US./ISRAELI interests who come out with false reports and criminal warmongering.   Now it seems,


even the international court , ICC, has been co opted, corrupted, to serve ISRAELI/U.S./WESTERN FASCISM, by refusing to prosecute


ISRAELI WAR CRIMINALS.  The social activist groups, and the CCR, are going to have to confront the fact that appealing to class


Empire, fascist institutions and their corruption, IS A LOSING PROPOSITION, unwilling, unable to redeem itself.   The social activists,


CCR must use their appeals for justice to call on a world wide rejection of these corrupt class/empire institutions and their criminal,


psychotic , warmongering class politicians.     AN INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL ALLIANCE must be the agenda against co option, which is


accomplished by  the mere act of voting for class hierarchies, class parties. CCR and the social movements, masses must realize  that it cannot


be independent, indivisible, free from these deforming class hierarchies, UNTIL THE WORLD REJECTS ALL CLASS POLITICIANS, all class


parties FOR SOCIAL GREEN PARTIES AND AGENDAS, that dismantle these co opting, corrupting criminal, fascist class instiutions.


 


All social movements must avoid co option by the mere act of appealing to their power, instead , supporting INTERNATIONAL STRIKES


ON MAY 1st and expose the HYPCORISY OF VOTING FOR CLASS POWER, WHILE EXPECTING SOCIAL OUTCOMES.   The CCR


can however, call out the corruption of the international courts, ICC, AND REJECT ALL CLASS LAWS, CORRUPT INTERNATIONAL


CLASS LAWS manipulated by WESTERN FASCISM and its global totalitarian MATRIX.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.