You are hereBlogs / jimstaro's blog / "Merry Christmas" 2010, not in Iraq
"Merry Christmas" 2010, not in Iraq
Every action has a reaction, every destructive action has destructive reactions!
This report is just a part of the legacy we've left to an entire small Country of innocent people, as well as their neighboring countries, whose doctoral leader was under our thumb, right up till his hanging, as to the policies of that whole region we push in the names of Freedoms and Democracy!
The damage done over the previous decade, the pandora's box destroyed, the tens of thousands killed and maimed, the millions turned into refugee's within and running to escape, the children who've grown up in the destruction and death around them, the now selective cleansing of once neighbors and friends.
It isn't only the war of choice that has reaped the damage but the hate, and fear, rhetoric coming from within our country as well as from others who also use it to control their own, now a decade of it as it continues.
AIR DATE: Dec. 24, 2010 - SUMMARY
Lindsey Hilsum of Independent Television News reports on the rise of anti-Christian violence in Iraq.
You can read the transcript here but a few snippets of below.
JEFFREY BROWN: Next, even as Christians around the world celebrate Christmas, many churches in Iraq have canceled festivities. Lindsey Hilsum of Independent Television News explains why.
snip
LINDSEY HILSUM: Standing here in this church it`s not hard to understand why Christians want to leave. Christianity has been here in Iraq for more than 2,000 years. Some of the Christians still speak Aramaic -- the same language as Jesus. But the killings and bombings and attacks of the last few weeks may have tipped the balance. People want to go.
snip
ZUHAIR MARZINA EASHOUE (TRANSLATED): We don`t want to leave, because we`ve watered this country`s soil with our blood for thousands of years. And this is a Christian civilization with Christian history. But what`s happened has made us hate the country, which doesn`t protect us and our children.
snip
HANNAH (ph) (TRANSLATED): We were happy and getting on with our lives. But as soon as the Americans came into the country, this is what happened to us. They say to us, "The Americans are your people. They`re Christians." They say, "You brought them here," and they kill us for it.
snip
WAJDAN SALEM: Since 2003 everything in Iraq have been damaged. We are building a new army. We are building our new police. It was the responsibility of the coalition force. And that mean the situation in Iraq is not just the Iraqi government`s responsible (sic), it`s the responsible (sic) of all the world -- all the country (sic) who were part of the war. {continued}
What gifts will the children, who've grown up in these conditions we set in place or those to come and are told of the recent history, going to give back to us?
Not only in or from Iraq but that region, especially Afghanistan and northern Pakistan, as our words are as damaging as the bombs and bullets.
Some who've grown have already picked up arms and are fighting against the occupiers in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Some who not only watched the continued reaping of terror, death and destructive damage but have heard the also continuing hate speak coming from those that profess a different religious ideology then their own as well as ethnicity and culture have also grown up through these past years and are seeking ways to retaliate.
- jimstaro's blog
- Login or register to post comments
-

- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
AIR DATE: Dec. 24, 2010 - SUMMARY









The following is an important article by the excellent Arab woman Layla Anwar, who certainly knows how to express herself and her humanity very well.
"Baghdad's Bloody Xmas Leaks..."
by Layla Anwar, An Arab Woman Blues, arabwomanblues.blogspot.com, Dec. 25, 2010
www.uruknet.info/?p=m73249
I'll include links and excerpts from some articles regarding the killings with guns with silencers, for I've read about the use of such arms before during this war in Iraq and it was very unlikely that these killings were committed by Iraqi Resistance fighters. It's extremely unlikely that many, most or any of the killings of Iraqi medical professionals, academics, et cetera, were committed by Iraqi Resistance. It's extremely unlikely that they would have intentionally killed innocent Iraqis who didn't work for and with the criminal foreign occupation forces. Et cetera. Iraqi Resistance would have absolutely nothing to gain and either a lot or everything to lose by committing such violence; but the US and UK would not stand to lose, excerpt for losing their souls, to Hell.
Guns with silencers:
"Iraq: The Age of Darkness"
by Dirk Adriaensens, The BRussells Tribunal, www.brussellstribunal.org, Sept. 19, 2010
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=21097
"Crimes against Humanity: Iraqi academics assassinated during the US-led occupation"
by Pakistan Daily, Nov. 26, 2008
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11187
We could have guessed when Professor Chossudovsky wrote his editorial note for the above article that the answer to his question about whether, or not, a President Obama would "turn a blind eye to this diabolical and criminal agenda" was YES; and, today, we can be very certain that it we would have been right.
Excerpting, now, from the Pakistan Daily piece:
There are most lists of assassinations of academics at several other Iraqi universities and institutions following the list for "Baghdad Institutes", which I included the subheading for, above. It's MANY assassinations of academics. The Baghdad University list, alone, is LONG, and the total is a lot more; and that's for an article of Nov. 2008 that doesn't provide a complete listing even for that date.
Who stands to gain? Well, I agree with Professor Chossudovsky, and I've referred to a related index at BRussellsTribunal.org plenty of times here, the index linked in the home page and for which the link is entitled, "Salvador Option and Death Squads". And I think that that's likely the explanation for the murderous attacks on Iraqi Christians or Christian Iraqis, whichever way they refer to themselves, as well as other innocent Iraqis, today and recently. Who stands to gain?!
Really, only the US and its puppet Iraqi "friends" in Iraq.
"Did Blackwater sneak silencers into Iraq?
Security firm under investigation for allegedly sidestepping export controls"
by Aram Roston, Nov. 1, 2007
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21565556/ns/world_news-mideast/n_africa
The article provides a picture and the caption for it reads, "A Blackwater employee shows off a silencer-equipped rifle in Iraq in a photo obtained by NBC News. The picture has been digitally altered to protect the identity of the subject".
"New Blackwater Iraq Scandal: Guns, Silencers and Dog Food
Ex-employees tell ABC News the firm used dog food sacks to smuggle unauthorized weapons to Iraq"
by Brian Ross and Jason Ryan, ABC News, Nov. 14, 2008
www.truth-out.org/111408R
How is it that Blackwater mercenaries need guns with silencers when John Kiriakou is clearly right and Blackwater was not ostensibly hired to conduct assassinations? Blackwater had no legitimate or defensible need for guns with silencers and there have been many hellish assassinations of Iraqi medical professionals, academics, scientists, government officials, and police, including with the use of guns with silencers. Perhaps not many of most of these groups of assassinated Iraqis were killed with such guns, but many Iraqi guards or police have been; according to articles I came across during Web searches for articles about guns with silencers being used in Iraq.
Other articles I've read and which can therefore be found reported that many of these assassinated Iraqis were opposed to the criminal occupation of their country, so it's not at all likely that Iraqi Resistance would've committed these murders. And Iraqi Resistance certainly wouldn't want to send Iraq "back to the stone age", as a US military commander once threatened to do to Vietnam. There were also articles that reported about US forces basically raiding Iraqi hospitals, where US troops threatened medical staff and made work for them basically impossible, and I believe that some articles also reported about US forces attacking some Iraqi university or universities.
The US did not launch war on Iraq to bring democracy, justice, or anything else that's good for the benefit of Iraqis; the US brought hell to Iraq. And the US has not withdrawn from Iraq and clearly is not prepared to withdraw, but like with the Bush administration, violence in Iraq is used by Washington to "justify" US presence in, occupation of Iraq.
It's evidently not known who is committing the killings of Christian and other innocent Iraqis, but only the US and its corrupt puppets in the government in Iraq stand to gain from such violence.