You are hereBlogs / davidswanson's blog / LiveBlogging US Conference of Mayors Debate on Bring the War $ Home Resolution

LiveBlogging US Conference of Mayors Debate on Bring the War $ Home Resolution


By davidswanson - Posted on 20 June 2011

Here's the resolution's key language:

"NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors supports efforts to speed up the ending of these wars; and

"BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. Congress to bring these war dollars home to meet vital human needs, promote job creation, rebuild our infrastructure, aid municipal and state governments, and develop a new economy based upon renewable, sustainable energy."

This resolution could have passed in a batch of resolutions without debate, but Mayor Pete Lewis of Auburn, WA, asked that it be pulled, resulting in a debate and vote individually on this resolution.

Lewis expressed horror that such a resolution might have been passed during Vietnam or other previous wars - What would have happened?! But the US Conference of Mayors did pass a resolution in 1971 urging that the US military get out of Vietnam.

11:15 a.m. The US Conference of Mayors is clearly incapable of running a PTA meeting. After this stunning display of incompetence, taking half the morning to do literally nothing, it may do something useful.

11:16 Now the antiwar resolution is up. Pete Lewis speaks first. "I live in a military state." As opposed to WHAT? "Making political statements in this forum about the war I do not believe is proper." He equates this with bashing Vietnam veterans, even as claiming to support the redirection of the funding.

11:18 Another mayor does not introduce himself, but points out the resolution that was passed during Vietnam. He calls this resolution "rather temperate" as it "does not call for an immediate withdrawal." He was Mayor Soglin of Madison, WI.

11:21 Mayor John Dickert of Racine WI mentions meeting with Mayor of Kabul (actual mayor of Kabul, not Karzai) and mentions horrible state of US infrastructure and its low rating. He wants troops cared for at home and resolution passed.

11:23 Mayor Mick Cornett of Oklahoma City says the whole topic [of where over half our $$ go] should be ignored and avoided, says the resolution is divisive and not appropriately bipartisan, says Congress should not be "singled out."

11:26 Mayor Randy Hayes of Pendleton SC is from a military city (as opposed to WHAT?). But he thinks the resolution is very restrained and really beyond debate and should be passed. He thinks mayors all actually agree on the substance of the resolution.

11:28 Mayor Craig Lowe of Gainesville FL says this is a resolution that supports troops by trying to bring them home, this is the only resolution anyone has urged him to vote for, and Vietnam veterans have urged him to vote for it. Vote our consciences, he says.

11:31 Mayor Robert G. Sabonjian of Waukegan, IL, says the US military is the biggest organization in the world and out of control, and could control costs if it chose. He sees nothing denigrating to troops or aiding of the enemy in this admirable resolution. The military is full of waste which needs to be called out and be attacked. This money could help fund the educations and healthcare of the families of the troops sent over there.

11:33 Mayor Joy Cooper of Hallandale Beach, FL, says all city budgets have been cut. This resolution is not against troops but in favor of proper spending of money. We need infrastructure, schools, roadways. She supports the resolution and urges others to.

11:34 Mayor Scott Smith of Mesa, AZ, says the headlines in the news will be "Mayors Try to End Wars" even if the resolution is actually about the redirection of spending.

11:37 Mayor Raul Salinas of Laredo, TX, wants a "Support Our Troops Unconditionally" amendment.

11:38 Mayor Villaraigosa of Los Angeles, CA, reads the text of an amendment that was offered in committee that apparently failed in committee. What he read "supported" troops and also urged that withdrawal be done in a manner not to "destabilize".

Two whereas clauses are added by the amendment. Roughly, they are:

Whereas every member of USCM and the Americans they rep support our brave men and women in uniform and their families. [EVERY AMERICAN WHO LIVES IN A CITY??? ME???]

Whereas the drawdown of troops should be done in a measured way that does not destabilize the region and can accelerate the transfer of regional authority to local authorities.

11:41 Another mayor claims, and Villaraigosa admits he was just informed, the amendment was not offered in committee.

11:41 Mayor Brown of Knoxville TN says he is a Vietnam vet and supports the amendment.

11:42 Vicechair of committee urges passage.

11:42 Another mayor veteran backs the amendment, and with it the resolution.

11:43 Another mayor says support the troops, oppose the wars, get the money home.

11:44 Another mayor wants to add in the president, add "As soon as strategically possible", and add "to reduce the national debt." Amounting to another amendment or three.

11:45 Mayor Michael Nutter of Philadelphia PA says nothing for a while. He wouldn't want the president telling him how to deply police. He thinks we can fund both worldwide endless wars and our cities.

11:50 The amendment adding two whereas clauses passes.

11:50 New amendment proposed and passed to change second Resolved clause to something like

"BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. President and Congress as soon as strategically possible to bring these war dollars home to meet vital human needs, promote job creation, rebuild our infrastructure, aid municipal and state governments, and develop a new economy based upon renewable, sustainable energy, and reduce the national debt."

11:52 Whole resolution passes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.