You are hereBlogs / Stephen Lendman's blog / Lebanon's Hezbollah-Led Government

Lebanon's Hezbollah-Led Government


By Stephen Lendman - Posted on 26 January 2011

Lebanon's Hezbollah-Led Government - by Stephen Lendman

It's official, or nearly so, Haaretz, on January 25 headlining, "Hezbollah's PM pick wins majority backing as Hariri supporters hold 'day of wrath,' " saying:

Hezbollah-backed Najib Mikati, a Sunni billionaire, became new prime minister after getting 68 votes, a majority in Lebanon's 128-member parliament. Caretaker PM Saad Hariri got 60. As a result, Hezbollah "is now in position to control Lebanon's next government. The move has set off angry protests and drew warnings from the US that its support could be in jeopardy."

"Sunni blood is boiling," chanted protestors. Burning Mikati pictures, they said they won't serve in a coalition government, adding that anyone allying with Hezbollah is a traitor. After being appointed, he said:

"I extend my hand to everyone....This is a democratic process. I want to rescue my country....My actions (as PM) will speak for themselves."

"I affirmed to the president that cooperation will be complete between us to form a new government which the Lebanese want, a government to maintain the unity of their country and their sovereignty, achieve the solidarity of its people, protect the coexistence formula and respect the constitutional rules."

However, nothing in Lebanon is ever simple, especially with Washington and Israel often intervening politically, economically and/or violently.

Commenting briefly, State Department spokesman PJ Crowley said Washington has "great concerns about a government within which Hezbollah plays a leading role," adding that relations and Washington-supplied aid will be affected.

On January 25, Reuters headlined, "Clinton warns Hezbollah-backed government may alter US ties with Lebanon," saying:

She accused Hezbollah of "coercion, intimidation, (and) threats of violence to achieve its political goals," adding, (o)ur bottom lines remain as they always have been. We believe that justice must be pursued and impunity for murder ended. We believe in Lebanon's sovereignty and an end to outside interference. As we see what this new government does, we will judge it accordingly."

In fact, no nation matches Washington's worldwide lawlessness, waging imperial wars for global dominance and increasing repression of its own people at home.

Yet White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said:

"It is hard to imagine any government that is truly representative of all of Lebanon would abandon the effort to end the era of impunity for assassinations in the country (referring to Mossad's 2005 Rafiq Hariri killing falsely blamed on Hezbollah). In the meantime, we call on all parties to maintain calm."

America designated Hezbollah a foreign terrorist organization, meaning aid is automatically suspended. In the past five years, it's been $1.2 billion, and the Obama administration requested $246 million more this year.

Hezbollah supporters dismissed US concerns, saying Lebanon's power shift will be conciliatory and peaceful. According to Hassan Khalil, publisher of the left of center Al Akhbar:

"Mikati is not coming to power by force, a coup or by civil unrest. (It's by Lebanon's) parliamentary system. (Moreover, (f)unding from the United States is limited and will not disturb the balance of power," if cut off.

According to American University of Beirut Professor Hilal Khashan, however:

Lebanon's parliamentary arithmetic may be less important than securing sectarian consensus, saying:

"If most of the Sunni community doesn't accept Mikati's designation, we have a problem. If they are unhappy, that would violate the spirit of the constitution," arguing that he risked "political suicide" if he tries forming a government opposed by Hariri supporters who consider him a tool of a Hezbollah "coup."

On January 23, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah pledged to include political rivals in a coalition government, saying:

We seek a "national partnership in which all parties will participate. We respect everyone's right to representation."

Middle East analyst Franklin Lamb believes Mikati's appointment is a "done deal," substituting "sunni billionaire #2 (for) #1." Though street protests erupted, they "won't amount to all that much and the army will break up rowdy demos." Anger will subside. There's "not much the Obama administration can do. (S)treet pressure (might) close the US embassy, (but Washington) has almost no options since it will not squeeze Israel, so it gifts another Middle East country to the rising other empire," suggesting Iran, closely allied with Hezbollah.

Despite Hariri's March 14 coalition boycott threat, some members may break ranks, shifting loyalties to assure current benefits aren't lost, thus aiding a new government's formation.

On January 24, New York Times writer Isabel Kershner headlined, "A Hezbollah-Run Lebanon, but No Panic in Israel," saying:

Some analysts "said it was not necessarily an immediate cause for alarm." According to Tel Aviv University's Professor Eyal Zisser, the change is largely "semantic," and for Bar-Ilan University's Professor Efraim Inbar:

Though "the Heabollization of Lebanon" is worrisome, it's "not like they will start shooting at us tomorrow. They are busy now with internal affairs."

According to vice prime minister Silvan Shalom, however, a Hezbollah-dominated Lebanon is "a very, very dangerous development," adding it's like having "an Iranian government on Israel's northern border."

An unnamed Israeli official said:

"We are concerned about Iranian domination of Lebanon through its proxy, Hezbollah. We are not going to give the other side any excuse whatsoever to initiate an escalation along the border," no matter that Hezbollah doesn't "initiate." It responds defensively as international law allows to repeated Israeli provocations.

Retired General Giora Eiland perhaps suggested more coming, saying:

"If Hezbollah is behind the government, it will be much easier to explain to the international community why we must fight against the State of Lebanon."

In a January 25 editorial, headlined "Any misstep could imperil Lebanon," Beirut's The Daily Star called "none" of Lebanon's "handful of options" going forward "very promising," adding:

New Prime Minister Mikati is less conciliatory than partisan. "As such, the faction would never have named (him or anyone else) unless their man agreed to (rescind) cooperation with the (UN-backed) Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), (as well as reverse) other decisions or policies of the previous Cabinet which did not accord to March 8's liking (the coalition, including Hezbollah)."

As a result, the "country is a powder keg, and any misstep could have unforeseeable and tragic consequences."

Profile of Najib Mitaki

A Tripoli-based MP before becoming prime minister, he's also a billionaire businessman. In 1982, he and his brother, Taha, founded Investcom, a telecommunications company, transforming an enterprise into an empire with investments in the Middle East, Europe and Africa before selling to South Africa's MTN Group in 2006 for $5.5 billion.

He also co-founded the M1 Group, a multi-billion dollar privately owned financial and industrial conglomerate with interests in telecommunications, real estate, transport, oil and gas.

Since 1998, he's been an MP, public works and transportation minister, and past prime minister briefly in 2005 after Rafik Hariri's assassination.

Although considered pro-Syrian, he promotes consensus. He also supports philanthropic causes, and was involved with the "Beirut Pact," a socio-economic project to improve Lebanon's developmental standards, including working for regional economic parity.

Detailed information on Lebanon's current status can be accessed through the following links:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2011/01/turmoil-in-lebanon.html

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2011/01/druze-leader-jumblatt-backs-hezbol...

As developments warrant, further updates will follow.

A Final Comment

A previous addressed former Guantanamo detainee Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, accessed through the following link:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-embraces-military-commission...

Charged under 284 counts of involvement in 1998 attacks on US embassies in East Africa, his New York civil court trial exonerated him on all charges, save one count of conspiracy used when no evidence exists to convict. It seemed a stunning victory for the defense.

On January 24, however, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan sentenced him to life in prison without parole saying, despite no corroborating evidence:

"Mr. Ghailani knew and intended that people would be killed as a result of his own actions and the conspiracy he joined. The very purpose of the crime was to create terror by causing death and destruction."

His lawyers will likely appeal. However, before conservative justices in today's climate of fear, Ghailani stands little chance because it's the wrong time to be Muslim in America, judged guilty by accusation.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Tags

"Rage follows Lebanon PM nomination
Saad Hariri's supporters lash out after the nomination of Lebanon's new PM, the Hezbollah-backed Najib Mikati
"

AlJazeera, Jan. 25, 2011

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/2011125123043953760...

I got that link at Uruknet and the article has a link for a "day of rage" video and article, Jan. 25, of protests of pro-Hariri supporters.

"Hezbollah-backed candidate poised to become Lebanon PM

Najib Miqati secures majority support in parliament after coalition government fails"

by Martin Chulov, Guardian UK, Jan. 24, 2011

www.uruknet.info/?p=m74256

Actually, use the Guardian copy. It has a short video (1:32).

www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/24/hezbollah-backed-candidate-lebanon-pm

It's very sad to see (in both videos, at AlJazeera and Guardian) Lebanese people protesting a candidate nominated by Hezbollah when it's Hezbollah that defended the country against the country-wide war by Israel in 2006. It takes very ignorant people to forget that Hezbollah is about defense and that no other Lebanese contributed to defending the country in 2006; MANY supported Israel, instead.

These protesters and Saad Hariri should be very ashamed.

Excerpting from the above AlJazeera article:

In a televised statement, Hariri tried to calm the anger that had poured onto the streets.

"I understand the shouts of anger that have come out of your chests," said Hariri.

"But it is not right that this anger leads us to what is against our values and upbringing and our belief that democracy is our only resort and the only way we express our political stance. ... Raise the Lebanese flag high above your head and know that I will always be with you,'' he said.

Words like those makes the speaker sound or seem as if they think they're God or quasi-God, or a messiah. "I will always be with you" is extremely unrealistic and, therefore, immature; or it's said to fool gullible people. And coming from a person who's recently visited Washington and who basically demands support of the STL that's an imperialists' tool? Bs! Not to be trusted!

He said some very good things in an interview for which I posted a link to back in December, maybe end of November. He said that Israel [is] the problem in the Middle East. He also spoke of the false witnesses on the assassination of Rafiq Hariri and said some other good things. But he said that he was going to stand for the STL, though added that he was hoping that Russia and another country, possibly Turkey, would bring the needed influence for the STL to not rule wrongly. If he was sincere about that hope, then it's good hope, but it's not good enough to make his opposition to proceeding through the Lebanese Cabinet instead of the STL, or to at least start with the Cabinet process, supportable. It's a very wrongful decision on his part. And shortly enough afterwards, he visits Washington. Why? Washington should not be brought into what should be for Lebanon to see to with the assistance of governments that are acceptable for this purpose, which the US definitely is not.

He's an immature political representative, unwise, and there's no good reason for him to be opposed to Hezbollah, which is the only Lebanese force that defended the country in 2006.

Druze members of the parliament siding with Hezbollah is telling in itself, I believe. They previously were of the opposite view and didn't make the switch blindly.

There's something very wrong with Hariri and "I will always be with you" is BS. Only an unrealistic idiot or someone trying to deceive others would say that in the formal sense that he did. Maybe some other people would say such words in such a formal setting or context for other reasons, but none come to mind for me at the moment.

We can say that we'll always remember friends from childhood even if we haven't seen and/or spoken with them for decades, but this only a function of memory, not words or thoughts of any political nature or formality.

He's not with the Lebanese people. He's siding with international, foreign imperialists and their STL "game show" that they'll certainly work on corrupting just as they've corrupted every other international tribunal that's happened, the UNSC, the Nobel Committee, the Peace Prize one anyway, and so on. He should work with the Lebanese Cabinet and if he can't do that, then what's he doing holding onto the seat of PM?

If I understand the situation correctly, then if Hariri and his supporters are against the selection or appointment of the Hezbollah-backed candidate, then Hariri would have to resign from the position of PM since he's no longer in that position in a constitutional manner. Another person would have to be placed as temporary PM while elections are held. But he refuses to stand down or step aside.

Quoting from the AlJazeera article:

Mustafa Alloush, a member of Hariri's Future Bloc party, told Al Jazeera that protesters were angry because they believe that Hariri is the legitimate prime minister and that they "feel that their pride has been injured by the way things have been done."

Mikati told reporters that he wants to form a unity government. Even though Hezbollah backed him, he is seen as a relatively neutral figure who enjoys good relations with both Bashar Assad, the Syrian president, and Hariri, although the latter has said he would not be part of any new unity government.

Why does he oppose a unity government? He said in the aformentioned interview that he wanted to work for unity in the country, yet he is opposed to being "part of any new unity government"? What's wrong with a new one? Governments do change from time to time!

The article continues:

'Hegemony'

Alloush, a former MP, told Al Jazeera that Hariri would not co-operate because under the present circumstances, a true unity government would not be possible.

"The way things are going, any new cabinet would be under the hegemony of Hezbollah" Alloush said.

"And Hezbollah wants one thing: The withdrawal of Lebanon from the tribunal and ...they want Lebanon to be part of the Syrian-Iranian alliance."

The 55-year-old Sunni businessman portrays himself as a consensus candidate who can work with all of Lebanon's rival political camps.

"I will co-operate fully with all Lebanese to form a new government that protects the unity and sovereignty of our country," Mikati said on Tuesday after learning of his nomination.

He was chosen as caretaker prime minister in April 2005, when an outcry over Rafiq al-Hariri's killing forced Syria to withdraw its troops from Lebanon.

Mikati served three months until the election won by an alliance of Sunni, Druze and Christian parties led by Hariri's son, Saad.

Mikati served as minister of public works and transport in three cabinets between 1998 and 2004.

Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, urged Mikati to form a national partnership government.

"We have supported the nomination of ... Mikati and we call on him to form a national partnership government. The Lebanese have a chance to close ranks," Nasrallah said in an address to thousands of supporters on Tuesday.

Sounds fine enough to me, and why are Sunnis of Lebanon against Mikati, who's Sunni, for PM?

The rest of the article is about the potential, or most likely, conflict because of Washington bs, i.e., politics, and Hezbollah's opposition to the STL.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:





















The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.