You are herecontent / Elliott Adams' Sentencing Statement on November 11, 2011

Elliott Adams' Sentencing Statement on November 11, 2011


UPDATE: Date of this may have been February 2012

I appreciate the bench’s effort to understand the arguments made - arguments involving local law, international law and, even the principles of civil disobedience. 

My experience in war has taught me that in life we periodically get tested to see if we can stand up to the pressures of “socially acceptable procedural norms” which push us to work with in the little laws and instead comply with the requirements of International Humanitarian Law.  I cannot condemn others when they fail that test for I have failed it myself.  But those who do fail it are condemned to live with the horrendous cost society pays for their failure.  I believe this court failed that test.  The court may not have felt an unavoidable compulsion to comply with International Humanitarian Law, but it certainly was given the justifications it could have used to stand up and comply with International Humanitarian Law.  But being here in DeWitt near an epicenter of war crimes couched in the humdrum of civilian life, the bench may find it is tested again ...  and again.

I believe that my codefendants and I did what is right morally, but more relevant to this court, what is required by the law, the big law, the that law that deals with thousands of lives, not the little law that deals with disorderly conduct.  If the court had chosen to decide on the big law it would have found us innocent.  But since the court chooses to rule on the little law, the law about orderly conduct, then it must not only find me guilty but guilty to the fullest extent, with no mitigation. 

As the court stated there will always be consequences for pursuing justice through “changes made by actions outside the socially acceptable procedural norms.”  Among other life experiences I have over 15 years in local elected public office and it became apparent to me that abiding by the “socially acceptable procedural norms” can only lead to more of the same injustice, indeed those norms are there to prop up those injustices. 

I am proud to accept the consequences of my acts and any jail time.  I do not want any suspended sentence. If you give me one, also please let me know how I can violate it before I leave the courtroom.  I do not have money to pay a court; I spend what little money this old man has trying to bring about justice.  My community service has been doing the duty that the courts shrink from - calling attention to war crimes and trying to stop war crimes.  Standing in this court a community service, it is the little I can do for society.

Informed Activist

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Stores:























Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.