You are hereBlogs / Stephen Lendman's blog / Defending the Indefensible

Defending the Indefensible


By Stephen Lendman - Posted on 19 April 2012

  Defending the Indefensible

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Robert Shiller is Yale University Professor of Economics and Professor of Finance and Fellow at the International Center of Finance, Yale School of Management.

 

He's best known perhaps for his 2000 book titled, "Irrational Exuberance." At the height of the tech bubble, he got it right predicting it would burst. His analysis included structural, cultural, and psychological factors.

 

His 2005 second edition was right again. He explained the housing bubble and likely aftermath. It peaked in 2005, began declining in 2006, and hasn't yet hit bottom. Maybe a third edition will cover the next inevitable decline. 

 

When it comes, expect far greater trouble than what preceded it. It's building inexorably for eventual collapse. Only the fullness of time knows when, but so will we when the thud's felt round the world.

 

Shiller's new book titled, "Finance and the Good Society," has another purpose. Instead of criticizing predatory finance, he defends it. Doing so may erode years of hard-won credibility. 

 

He claims financial capitalism promotes prosperity. In the process, he defends Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street giants. It's wrong thinking they cheat clients, he claims. Not according to former Goldman executive Greg Smith. After 12 years with the firm, he resigned, calling its "environment....as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it."

 

Goldman's business model replicates others on the Street. It includes advising clients to invest in assets it wants to dump, selling them what makes the firm most money, and trading "any illiquid, opaque product with a three-letter acronym," no matter how toxic or worthless.

 

It made him "ill," he said, "how callously people talk about ripping their clients off." Goldman's entire history, or most of it, reflected it. It's been involved in nearly all financial scandals since the 19th century. So have other Wall Street crooks. They make money the old fashioned way by stealing it.

 

Shiller's right saying not all bankers are banksters. Mostly too-big-to-fail Wall Street ones qualify, but so do many medium-sized banks, large hedge funds, insurers like AIG, Fannie and Freddie for gaming the housing market, Sallie Mae for debt entrapping students, and other major players manipulating markets fraudulently for profit. 

 

Engineering a financial coup d'etat, Wall Street giants inflated multiple market bubbles, pump and dump schemes, naked short selling, precious metals price suppression, high oil prices during falling or steady demand, currency manipulation, and other predatory schemes. 

 

Together with political Washington and the Fed, they game the system, commit massive fraud, scams trillions of public wealth, and get open-ended bailouts when inevitable crises occur.

 

Bill Black Knows the System Well

 

In his book titled, "The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is To Own One," former bank regulator expert on white-collar crime, public finance, economics, and related law, Bill Black explained the disconnect between the real economy and finance.

 

The latter's supposed to make the former work better. In fact, it operates only for itself. In the process, economies are wrecked and millions in them harmed. 

 

Black explained how failed bankers collude with failed regulators to create and sell unwary buyers failed assets. Speculation and debt need more of it to prosper, but it's always a losing game. The greater the expansion, the harder it falls. 

 

Ordinary people are hurt most because freed from regulation, bankers and other FIRE sector (finance, insurance, and real estate) players speculate on financial derivatives and an alphabet soup of securitized garbage.

 

It includes asset-backed securities (ABSs), mortgage-backed securities (MBSs), collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), collateralized bond obligations (CBOs), credit default swaps (CDSs), and collateralized fund obligations (CFOs).

 

They're sliced, diced, packaged, repackaged, and sold in tranches to sophisticated and ordinary investors. Many buy it unwittingly through mutual funds, 401(k)s, pensions, and other financial products.

 

Investors often end up bilked. Bankers get bailed out when fraudulent schemes fail. Regulatory free markets let major players game the system through fraud, price manipulation, insider trading, misrepresentation, Ponzi schemes, false accounting, liar loans, and other deceptive practices.

 

Shiller to the Rescue

 

Defending the indefensible, he says:

 

"People think that the wealthy in our society -- among them the financiers -- have a real and genuine incentive to use devious means to attack and subjugate, economically, the majority of the population." It's "an illusion," he claims.

 

"The assumption today often seems to be that businesses have a real incentive to behave in an aggressive and evil manner."

 

It's not so, says Shiller, despite volumes of indisputable evidence proving otherwise.

 

Believing it, he says breeds resentment and adversely affects prosperity. Maybe he hasn't noticed how disproportionately wealth is shared among an elite 1%. Most others are entirely left out, and it didn't happen by chance.

 

Yet Schiller calls finance a force for good, no matter its flaws. Over time, it builds richer, more equitable societies, he claims. Where's the beef! 

 

Since the 1970s, real wages haven't kept up with inflation. Automated plants displaced workers. High-paying production and service jobs went offshore to low-wage countries, and regulatory free finance capital scams investors repeatedly for profits.

 

Marx was right. He explained capitalism's destructive contradictions, and condemned free market mumbo jumbo as anarchic and ungovernable. It alienates masses, destroys or prevents the creation of humane societies, produces class struggles between "haves" and "have-nots," and reveals what's happening today.

 

It includes stagnant wages, eroding benefits, high unemployment, low-pay mostly temp or part-time service jobs, unmanageable debt, for students debt entrapment at times for life, and booms followed by busts, followed by heading America and EU countries for third-world status. 

 

Social responsibility lost out to predatory capital. It games the system for maximum profits. It buys politicians like toothpaste to let them. The result is a downward destructive cycle. Financialization replaced industrial America. Speculation replaced producing things. Fraud replaced obeying laws and regulations or get punished. 

 

Instead of creating prosperity, Wall Street destroys it. Economies are wrecked. Millions in them are harmed. Fraud's legitimized, and troubled banks most responsible get trillions in bailouts to keep them operating to steal more.

 

Shiller doesn't excuse financial chicanery. Financial capitalism is like nature, he says:

 

"For all its beauty, it produces ugly things as well."

 

Nonetheless, we need more financial innovation, not less, he believes. We need to "democratize" and harness it to create good. He fails to understand that money power in private hands and democracy can't co-exist. Crooked bankers prove it repeatedly.

 

Finance capital's too broken to fix. Harnessing it productively is nonsense. Shiller knows better but claims investment bankers resemble "diplomats negotiating an understanding between contentious powers." They're "keepers of the peace and promoters of progress."

 

His students hear this bunkum. He wants finance given redemption. Forgive their sins because they can, should, and often do improve societies, he claims. He believes financial innovations and societal gains go hand in hand. Securitized fraud proves otherwise.

 

At issue is permitting finance to operate unrestrained, letting it consolidate to super-sized levels, allowing it to occupy and run Washington, and giving it control of the nation's money for private gain. It results in the grandest of grand thefts. Government becomes a willing partner.

 

Instead of praising finance capital, Shiller should condemn it, demand too-big-to-fail institutions be broken up, insolvent ones shut down, regulations with teeth be reinstituted, lawbreakers do hard time in prison, and most of all return money power to public hands where it belongs. It includes publicly run state and local banks, replacing predatory ones.

 

It's an idea whose time has come. Wherever they exist, prosperity follows. Privatized money power is trouble. It creates zombie economies, banana republics, and poverty.

 

When federal, state or local governments lend their own money, prosperity, not profit's the issue. Everyone benefits, including households, small businesses, farmers, and municipalities. Replacing a predatory, rapacious system with one proved workable and equitable is vital to assure societies grow, prosper and help everyone in them.

 

Expecting bankers to act responsibly is like believing political Washington can reform. Both are irreparably corrupted, dysfunctional, and destructive. In their hands, societies and people in them are wrecked. Entirely new political, economic, and financial systems are needed.

 

Shiller's book excluded them. Instead he defended the indefensible and lost credibility in the process. He'll be hard-pressed regaining it.

 

Sustainable, prosperous societies aren't possible without freeing them from rapacious bankers and similar FIRE sector players ripping them off for profit. 

 

It never worked before and won't now. Claiming otherwise doesn't wash.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

The essence of all class apologists is to falsely make social claims while defending a rigged, Zero sum, parasitical class system , where a few make out while others are enslaved.  The problem with PARTIAL, deformed social claims is that they default into enslaving class processes, where there is a deliberate attempt to obfuscate, produce class deformed language and class myths, to hide their corruption, their subordination, their co option of  social principles into totalitarian class outcomes.   Socialized production which increases total wealth is not the same as Socialized wealth and its distribution, a goal that the Enlightenment and its social wealth theories produced the classical school of Economics which included Adam Smith, Ricardo, even Marx.   Social Wealth was always based on an inherent symmetry, universal extension of social rights to wealth, which included human rights, all of which were INDIVISIBLE AND INDEPENDENT from monopoly control by classes.  That was Adam Smith's definition of FREE MARKETS, and Marx's definition of Socialism, where markets reflected social control by Democracies and its people, which implied the end of class deforming hierarchies and its Patriarchal class mechanism.


 


Instead as Marx would say, Adam Smith was turned up side down, through the same Orwellian, totalitarian, class principle which is linked to all existing class hierarchies and its millenium existence of the Patriarchal class mechanism.  Reality is turned up side down by the deforming class functions of the class hierarchies WHICH WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN DISSOLVED, DISMANTLED, by the establishment of an INDIVISIBLE, INDEPENDENT SOCIAL AGENCY, THE FULLY DEVELOPED MIDDLE CLASS, which would have complete SOCIAL CONTROL of wealth, and its inalienable human rights.   Such a historical outcome was logically, morally, posited as the definition of both Free markets and Socialism, which also was the starting point of Libertarianism, where all three social ideologies started on this social principle.    This symmetry between social production and social wealth was based on the concepts of SOCIAL LABOR, where all wealth is derived.  This explains why Smith, Ricardo, Marx from the classical school were on the same page with regard to LABOR THEORIES OF WEALTH, to determine the true social, unit costs of commodities, always in flux, through a growing, increasing social wealth, that were determined in posteriori fashion, through social cycles of production.  The failure to make the middle class INDEPENDENT, INVIDIVISIBLE, free from class deforming hierarchies, with its Patriarchal mechanism, would DEFORM THE MIDDLE CLASS into the class deformed elites, who produced both class deformed language, BASTARDIZING, deforming the social principle of Adam Smith and then falsely countering him to Marx.  Social Free markets became identified with CLASS DEFORMED MARKETS, a CLASS MYTH AND CLASS DOGMA that has degenerated into the totalitarianism of all class parties, where fascist fiscalism, fascist austerity, fascist Capitalism are defined as FREEDOM, from Obama to Mussolini, and all class thugs.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:





















The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.