You are hereBlogs / Ray McGovern's blog / Assange Honored by Intelligence Veterans

Assange Honored by Intelligence Veterans

By Ray McGovern - Posted on 24 October 2010

Julian Assange Honored at London Press Conference
By Ray McGovern

You are not likely to learn this from “mainstream media,’ but WikiLeaks and its leader Julian Assange have received the 2010 Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence award for their resourcefulness in making available secret U.S. military documents on the Iraq and Afghan wars.

If the WikiLeaks documents get the attention they deserve, and if lessons can be learned from the courageous work of former CIA analyst Sam Adams—and from Daniel Ellsberg’s timely leak of Adams’ work in early 1968—even the amateurs in the White House may be able to recognize the folly of widening the war from Afghanistan to adjacent countries. That leak played a key role in dissuading President Lyndon Johnson from approving Gen. William Westmoreland’s request to send 206,000 more troops—not only into the Big Muddy, but also into countries neighboring Vietnam (further detail below in the description of SAAII).

This year’s award was presented Saturday, with the customary “corner-brightener candlestick,” by SAAII awardee, and former UK ambassador, Craig Murray, after Julian Assange and Daniel Ellsberg discussed WikiLeaks’ release of almost 400,000 classified battlefield reports from Iraq. The award reads as follows:

It seems altogether fitting and proper that this year’s award be presented in London, where Edmund Burke coined the expression “Fourth Estate.” Comparing the function of the press to that of the three Houses then in Parliament, Burke said:

“… but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sits a Fourth Estate more important far then they all.”

The year was 1787 — the year the U.S. Constitution was adopted. The First Amendment, approved four years later, aimed at ensuring that the press would be free of government interference. That was then.

With the Fourth Estate now on life support, there is a high premium on the fledgling Fifth Estate, which uses the ether and is not susceptible of government or corporation control. Small wonder that governments with lots to hide feel very threatened.

It has been said: “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” WikiLeaks is helping make that possible by publishing documents that do not lie.

Last spring, when we chose WikiLeaks and Julian Assange for this award, Julian said he would accept only “on behalf of our sources, without which WikiLeaks’ contributions are of no significance.”

We do not know if Pvt. Bradley Manning gave WikiLeaks the gun-barrel video of July 12, 2007 called “Collateral Murder.” Whoever did provide that graphic footage, showing the brutality of the celebrated “surge” in Iraq, was certainly far more a patriot than the “mainstream” journalist embedded in that same Army unit. He suppressed what happened in Baghdad that day, dismissed it as simply “one bad day in a surge that was filled with such days,” and then had the temerity to lavish praise on the unit in a book he called The Good Soldiers.

Julian is right to emphasize that the world is deeply indebted to patriotic truth-tellers like the sources who provided the gun-barrel footage and the many documents on Afghanistan and Iraq to WikiLeaks. We hope to have a chance to honor them in person in the future.

Today we honor WikiLeaks, and one of its leaders, Julian Assange, for their ingenuity in creating a new highway by which important documentary evidence can make its way, quickly and confidentially, through the ether and into our in-boxes. Long live the Fifth Estate!

Presented this 23rd day of October 2010 in London, England by admirers of the example set by former CIA analyst, Sam Adams.

What Is Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence?

SAAII is a movement of former CIA colleagues and other associates of former intelligence analyst Sam Adams, who hold up his example as a model for those in intelligence who would aspire to the courage to speak truth to power. Sam did precisely that, and in honoring his memory, SAAII confers an award each year to a member of the intelligence profession exemplifying Sam Adam’s courage, persistence, and devotion to truth — no matter the consequences.

It was Adams who discovered in 1967 that there were at least 500,000 Vietnamese Communists under arms — more than twice the number that our military in Saigon would admit to in the “war of attrition.” Gen. William Westmoreland had put an artificial limit on the number that Army intelligence was allowed to carry on its books. And Gen. Creighton Abrams specifically warned Washington that the press would have a field day if Adam’s numbers were released, and that this would weaken the war effort.

Westmoreland’s figures were shown to be bogus in January/February 1968, when Communist troops mounted a surprise countrywide offensive in numbers that proved that Adams’ analysis had been correct. But because Sam was reluctant to go “outside channels,” the CIA and Army were able to keep the American people in the dark.

After the Tet offensive, however, Daniel Ellsberg learned that Westmoreland had asked for 206,000 more troops to widen the war into Cambodia, Laos, and North Vietnam — right up to the border with China, and perhaps beyond. In his first such act, Ellsberg leaked Sam Adams’ data to the then-independent New York Times on March 19, 1968. Dan’s timely truth telling, and that of the Times’ Neil Sheehan, won the day.

On March 25, President Johnson complained to a small gathering, “The leaks to the New York Times hurt us...We have no support for the war. This is caused by the 206,000 troop request [by Westmoreland] and the leaks…I would have given Westy the 206,000 men.” On March 31, Johnson introduced a bombing pause, opted for negotiations, and announced that he would not run for another term in November 1968.

Sam Adams continued to press for honesty and accountability but stayed “inside channels” — and failed. He was not able to see that the supervening value of ending unnecessary killing trumped the secrecy agreement he had signed as a condition of employment. Nagged by remorse, Adams died at 55 of a sudden heart attack. He could not shake the thought that, had he not let himself be diddled, the entire left wall of the Vietnam memorial would not exist. There would have been no new names to chisel into such a wall.

In the past, the annual Sam Adams Award has been given to truth tellers Coleen Rowley of the FBI; Katharine Gun of British Intelligence; Sibel Edmonds of the FBI; Craig Murray, former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan; former US Army Sgt. Sam Provance, who told the truth about Abu Ghraib; and Maj. Frank Grevil of Danish Army Intelligence, who exposed his government’s eagerness to conspire with the Bush administration in advertising non-existent weapons of mass destruction in order to “justify” the invasion of Iraq — and went to prison for it; and Larry Wilkerson, Col., US Army (ret.), former chief of staff to Secretary Colin Powell at the State Department, who exposed the powers behind many of the crimes of the Bush administration — first and foremost what he called the “Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal;" in Washington, DC.

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. After serving as an Army infantry/intelligence officer during the early 60s, he entered the CIA and served for 27 years as a CIA analyst. A colleague of Sam Adams, Ray witnessed the gyrations Sam went through to get the truth out about Vietnam (sans the option WikiLeaks now offers)—in vain. Ray has acknowledged that, in 1967, he, too, blew a golden opportunity to “do a Dan Ellsberg” on Vietnam. (See: )

The initial version of this article appeared on


It seems altogether fitting and proper that this year’s award be presented in London, where Edmund Burke coined the expression “Fourth Estate.” Comparing the function of the press to that of the three Houses then in Parliament, Burke said:

“… but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sits a Fourth Estate more important far then they all.”

Anti-liberal, pro-monarchy, et cetera, Burke evidently had serious trouble with speaking and/or writing. "more important far then they all"? What is that nonsensical wording supposed to mean?

He was rather fascist, it seems.

Edmund Burke PC (12 January [NS] 1729[1] – 9 July 1797) was an Irish statesman, author, orator, political theorist, and philosopher who, after relocating to England, served for many years in the House of Commons of Great Britain as a member of the Whig party. He is mainly remembered for his support of the cause of the American Revolutionaries, and for his later opposition to the French Revolution. The latter led to his becoming the leading figure within the conservative faction of the Whig party, which he dubbed the "Old Whigs", in opposition to the pro-French-Revolution "New Whigs," led by Charles James Fox.[2] Burke was praised by both conservatives and liberals in the nineteenth century. Since the twentieth century, he has generally been viewed as the philosophical founder of modern conservatism,[3][4] as well as a representative of classical liberalism.[5]

Some of that sounds likely good, but against the French Revolution?

The French Revolution (1789–1799) was a period of radical social and political upheaval in French and European history. The absolute monarchy that had ruled France for centuries collapsed in three years. French society underwent an epic transformation as feudal, aristocratic and religious privileges evaporated under a sustained assault from liberal political groups and the masses on the streets. Old ideas about hierarchy and tradition succumbed to new Enlightenment principles of citizenship and inalienable rights.

Burke evidently was very biased and what many people today would call a fascist. So he was apparently for a "fourth estate" media, but clearly wouldn't have been favorable towards media that would've supported the French Revolution and possibly other popular liberation movements; besides the much more distant American Revolution. Liberation for Anglos in the not then USA, but not in the nearby France? He had a screwed up mind.

It has been said: “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” WikiLeaks is helping make that possible by publishing documents that do not lie.


Today we honor WikiLeaks, and one of its leaders, Julian Assange, for their ingenuity in creating a new highway by which important documentary evidence can make its way, quickly and confidentially, through the ether and into our in-boxes.

If only we'd get some examples of logs that truly inform us of anything really or very significant that we did not already know, including starting years ago, if we had read enough from good sources; but a problem with perhaps many Americans is that too many of them stick to only corporate and "alternative" U.S. media, which limits these Americans' abilities to become better and more quickly informed. We all have the ability, but we evidently do not all have the will.

Intelligence Veterans should also honor, f.e., Lt Col Anthony Shaffer for his whistleblowing about the roguish shutdown of the US Army's Able Danger project, a shutdown by the Bush Jr-Cheney administration and evidently in relation to the 9/11 attacks that happened relatively shortly afterwards. From earlier whistleblowers, there are John Stockwell, Phil Agee, and Ralph W. McGehee, f.e.

But while I don't disagree with Intelligence Veterans giving an award or mention of honor for the service that Wikileaks provides, it would be far better if Wikileaks received and released leaked information of war-ending sort; like happened with the Pentagon Papers compiled by Dan Ellsberg and which he released through Senator Mike Gravel, who read the papers into the official record, f.e.

It would also be much better if what Wikileaks releases told us anything truly significant that we should or could not already know about, for I've read about no such leaks through Wikileaks, so far. The "Collateral Murder" video is a fine piece of evidence, but anyone who didn't already know that U.S. forces killed visibly unarmed Iraqis, as well as Afghans, would have to be someone who is atrociously ignorant and does nothing serious to become well-informed. And while "Collateral Murder" is evidence of value, it is not an example of the most horrific crimes committed during this war because of the criminal war and occupation; but I won't elaborate on some strikingly more horrific crimes, for I've written enough already, today.

Otoh, I'll provide a brief hint about an extremely horrific crime and it's about the so-calles suicide car bombings in Iraq. A good number of these vehicles had no human bodies or even body parts inside, and no parts of people who would've been in the vehicles were found outside of the vehicles. That is, some, if not many of these cars had been parked and abandoned for hours where they exploded. And checkpoint guards were found to plant explosives in vehicles of innocent Iraqis who were ordered to stop, get out of their vehicles, and present themselves to be cleared at nearby police stations before being allowed through the checkpoints. During this time, the explosives were planted. Many of these vehicles were used to kill many Iraqi civilians.

It was extremely underreported, but we nevertheless got such reports years ago and they're based on eye-witness accounts. Common sense and the knowledge that the U.S. has been committing covert black ops for many decades and longer would tell us that these eye-witness accounts about so-called suicide car bombings in Iraq are most surely right. And it's not that U.S. troops or soldiers, special forces, et cetera, actually carry out these acts; it's sometimes been through U.S. employment of people of the countries the U.S. warred against. If recalling correctly, then the U.S. definitely used the latter approach in Operation Phoenix.

One thing is certain, however, and it's that there have definitely been a lot of covert black ops in this war on Iraq and we're not likely to find this information in the Iraq War logs.

The concept of Wikileaks is good, but it evidently isn't releasing any leaked information of sufficiently strong kind; nothing of war-ending kind. Maybe it will have that effect, but if it does, then it's because the U.S. has a hellishly corrupt and incompetent, lazy, derelict Congress.


Support This Site


Get free books and gear when you become a supporter.



Speaking Truth to Empire


Families United


Ray McGovern


Julie Varughese


Financial supporters of this site can choose to be listed here.



Ca-Dress Long Prom Dresses Canada
Ca Dress Long Prom Dresses on

Buy Books

Get Gear

The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.