You are hereForums / ADS Forums / Impeachment Discussion / Activism Forum

Activism Forum


This is the forum to discuss activist efforts, meetings and other activism re: the Downing Street Minutes and the After Downing Street Coalition. Please limit discussion to this topic, and discuss other topics under the other forums - Congress, Evidence, Media, or General.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Make A Difference... Right Now... & Pass It On

Can’t See Image Go To www.RogerART.com Scroll Down

1. Paint Cardboard White - Then Print ( DOWNING STREET ) On Cardboard

2. Then Tape SIGN To Your Local... Street, Road, Highway Sign - NOW – Repeat

3. Hang ( DOWNING ST. ) Sign Under Your Mail Box

4. Downing Street - On A Stick - As A Yard Sign - What-Ever

Inspired by: snowho. Let's do it People... ECs

Help Make Every Street... " Downing Street "

Until Bush Is Impeached !

Paste... ( Downing Street ) Over Every Street Sign... Across America

____________________________________

OGC adds… And Around the Planet Earth ( www.OneGlobalCommunity.com )

Add You & Yours… To this Listing…

Copy, Paste And

Pass It On

Repeat…

More info @ www.AfterDowningStreet.org

Make A Difference... Right Now... & Pass It On

Can’t See Image Go To

www.RogerART.com

Scroll Down

1. Paint Cardboard White - Then Print ( DOWNING STREET ) On Cardboard

2. Then Tape SIGN To Your Local... Street, Road, Highway Sign - NOW – Repeat

3. Hang ( DOWNING ST. ) Sign Under Your Mail Box

4. Downing Street - On A Stick - As A Yard Sign - What-Ever

Inspired by: snowho. Let's do it People... ECs

Help Make Every Street... " Downing Street "

Until Bush Is Impeached !

Paste... ( Downing Street ) Over Every Street Sign... Across America

____________________________________

OGC adds… And Around the Planet Earth ( www.OneGlobalCommunity.com )

Add You & Yours… To this Listing…

Copy, Paste And

Pass It On

Repeat…

More info @ www.AfterDowningStreet.org

RogerART.com

Make A Difference... Right Now... & Pass It On

Can’t See Image Go To

www.RogerART.com

Scroll Down

1. Paint Cardboard White - Then Print ( DOWNING STREET ) On Cardboard

2. Then Tape SIGN To Your Local... Street, Road, Highway Sign - NOW – Repeat

3. Hang ( DOWNING ST. ) Sign Under Your Mail Box

4. Downing Street - On A Stick - As A Yard Sign - What-Ever

Inspired by: snowho. Let's do it People... ECs

Help Make Every Street... " Downing Street "

Until Bush Is Impeached !

Paste... ( Downing Street ) Over Every Street Sign... Across America

____________________________________

OGC adds… And Around the Planet Earth ( www.OneGlobalCommunity.com )

Add You & Yours… To this Listing…

Copy, Paste And

Pass It On

Repeat…

More info @ www.AfterDowningStreet.org

Investigate memogate-pass it on
johnconyers.com

The Democrats are engaged in a party building process where they want to develop their ability to do better door to door work. As a long time veteran of door to door work, it's my opinion that we need to lobby Dean and push him to get the troops in the field over this issue.
The party staff and leadership seem to want to focus the door to door work on elections, but like alot of skills in life , practice makes perfect. The groups who are part of the coalition should be picketing the DNC , to get Dean to hit the doors on this issue.
Dean's rescent democrats.org email about covering every precinct, every street and every door would only improve by focusing on an outreach effort on this issue which would be great both for this campaign as well as for the Democratic Party.
It can only help the campaign and only make the party's grassroots efforts stronger.

If any one is interested in a story that TREMENDOUSLY lends itself to the Downing Street Minutes story, let me know and I will be happy to send you a 30minute interview of a former Pentagon official who witnessed firsthand how Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney, (and the neoconservatives) knowingly and deliberately created false intelligence to support their pre-existing plans to go to war. The footage was shot about 2 years ago, yet it is completely in sync with the revelations of the Downing Street Memo, Richard Clarke's story (that the administration was looking for war rationals immediately after 9/11) and so many other facts.

The video footage is from a film I purchased, titled "Hijacking Catastrophe" and the interview is with Karen Kwiatkowski. The film was released almost 2 years ago and only appeared in a few small theatres. I was fortunate to live in the only town in the state of Washington that hosted the film, and by mere chance I stumbled across the film, then bought a copy.

I spoke with the production company and the producers gave me the okay to distribute "Fair Use" copies of the interview, at no charge. If you are interested please let me know and I will send you a CD-ROM of the video ASAP. I'll even pay the shipping costs.

This story needs to be heard...

To my knowledge Karen Kwiatkowski's story has received little to no press attention, except an article in Salon a long time ago. Following is a except from the Salon article (which I copied from the "Timeline 1" link on afterdowningstreet.org)

I STRONGLY recommend everyone watch this video, here is a quick glimpse of some of what Karen talks about in her interview:

May 2002 Karen Kwiatkowski says:
"From May 2002 until February 2003, I observed firsthand the formation of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans and watched the latter stages of the neoconservative capture of the policy-intelligence nexus in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq... I saw a narrow and deeply flawed policy favored by some executive appointees in the Pentagon used to manipulate and pressurize the traditional relationship between policymakers in the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies. I witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within OSP usurp measured and carefully considered assessments, and through suppression and distortion of intelligence analysis promulgate what were in fact falsehoods to both Congress and the executive office of the president. (Salon)

Peace,
Brian

wheels777@msn.com

PS The production company is interested in putting the video online, but they do not have the resources to do so. Does anyone know of a website or someone who might be willing to host the interview online? If so, please contact me soon. I am awaiting a reply from the folks at this site (afterdowningstreet.org), but figure that the more sites we can get this video on the better. Thanks. Please contact me with any ideas or contacts.

“We must all hang together, or assuredly, we shall all hang separately.

Brian,

Kwiatkowski gives the same low-down - no doubt from a very similar (if not the same) interview - in this profound and "big picture" documentary of what's wrong, called "Why We Fight". I found one on DVD - sitting cheap in a used bin at BlockBuster - so I know it's been widely distributed (by Sony Pictures; apparently you can also get it here: http://www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/catalog/catalogDetail_DVD043396138... ).

And you're right, buddy - Karen Kwiatkowski's story is "must-see TV" for any American with an ounce of integrity.

You can read much more from Kwiatkowski on the Web, too. She announces some of her new articles via a Yahoo Group: karen_kwiatkowski-owner@yahoogroups.com

And she periodically posts yet more at LewRockwell: http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski-arch.html
The latest of which - "Martyrs of the Republic" - is her best yet, IMHO: http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski171.html

But you're not going to be a martyr. You're going to Impeach for Peace - and WIN - now!

Semper Fi, buddy

-Matty
Florida
(Where our votes didn't count the first two times but an impeachment this time sure as hell will!)

Read the discussion and post your pics here.

----------------------------------

Also:

This just in!
Here's another excellent idea (brought to us by RumsfeldResign):

The Downing Street Bumper Sticker (click image to purchase)


We need to change our party! Lets all become republicans. We would regain control of the government. People. THIS IS THE WAY FOR OUR VOICE TO BE HEARD AND IT IS SIMPLE!

BURN THE WITCH LOL

Sorry:
The link below does not work. Go HERE.

I noticed from reviewing blogs on this that Republicans who watched the Conyers hearings found it compelling and a solid case. Showing the Conyers hearing video to Americans may be the best tool to compell attention to this issue for two reassons:

It airs the facual case for investigating this issue and its imprtance to the people of the United States.

It shows the public how a hearing, with a deep and detailed look into issues vital to this country has been, and continues to be covered up by the media.

Show the tape - the larger the audience that sees it, the louder the voice to be heard. It is communicating to both Democrats and Republicans - if a large segment of America ever sees this historic hearing - it's over.

I happened to catch a rerun of this hearing on CNN2. I by no means believe I am an uniformed American. I watch the news, read the paper, etc. BUT, I had not heard of this memo on any news program and while watching the hearing, I was appalled and certainly wondered where the media was with this issue. After knowing about Downing St. memo and watching CNN, there are brief clips about it, but nothing much. I am educating friends, co-workers, anyone who will listen. To think this went on sickens me. The American people deserve an answer. President Bush should be forced to be held accountable.

REGISTER REPUBLICAN. WE CAN BECOME THE VOICE OF AMERICA. We have to play their game only smarter. Democrats register republican and have a voice. I believe this is a way to get our country back.

On www.congress.org, you can select Media and write up to five outlets at once. Arianna Huffington has a great article on salon.com w/stats on coverage of Downing St. Memos. I used it to write nbc, msnbc, cnn, cbs, and ABC does not have a link from congress.org - you can write them at: netaudr@abc.com. Here's my letter:

You should know why I no longer subscribe to cable and no longer watch network news. I wanted news on the obvious grounds for congressional investigation of the administration and of Conyers' efforts to start this investigation being stymied by Republican reps, but I got what's below instead, and I won't watch again until this changes. Here's a statistical explanation, laid out by Arianna Huffington in Salon.com (and CNN, what is your fetish with MJackson -633 segments!?):

Here are the number of news segments that mention these stories (from a search of the main news networks' transcripts from May 1 to June 20):

-- ABC News: Downing Street memo: 0 segments; Natalee Holloway: 42 segments; Michael Jackson: 121 segments.

-- CBS News: Downing Street memo: 0 segments; Natalee Holloway: 70 segments; Michael Jackson: 235 segments.

-- NBC News: Downing Street memo: 6 segments; Natalee Holloway: 62 segments; Michael Jackson: 109 segments.

-- CNN: Downing Street memo: 30 segments; Natalee Holloway: 294 segments; Michael Jackson: 633 segments.

-- Fox News: Downing Street memo: 10 segments; Natalee Holloway: 148 segments; Michael Jackson: 286 segments.

-- MSNBC: Downing Street memo: 10 segments; Natalee Holloway: 30 segments; Michael Jackson: 106 segments.

Sincerely,

It is great to see :AfterDowningStreet.org working together with http:://www.democrats.com.

What about some way of cooperation with:

http://dailykos.com/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

http://www.juancole.com/

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

as a suggestion?

-Helping and promoting each other.,
-Synchronizing talking points and approaches.
-Focussing and remaining focussed upon chosen subjects and targets.

peterwerbe.com
-Hey, "nightcall" on WRIF detroit radio (also streams live) is another great source of info, and deserves support.
In today's climate of bullying and intimidation,not too many
people have the guts to speak the truth on these issues!

By CHRISTOPHER COOPER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
June 28, 2005; Page A4 (an excerpt)

"Mr. Clark plans to turn his campaign on Congress this summer and has told supporters to email Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas. "I've been so busy with this that I haven't been out to spray my orchard," Mr. Clark said. "I'm going to lose my crop this year." A spokeswoman says the Republican senator has received about 40 emails but doesn't plan to hold hearings".

Congressman Conyers has already given us an example (ie Dana Milbank and the WP) of how to deal the press's obfuscation and deliberate downplaying of the seriousness and resolve of this movement to end this senseless war of aggression for resources and imperial conquest and to restore democracy in America.

We need to Call them on it immediately, Publically, And with extreme predjudice. The precedent has been set; and the MSM needs to know that there WILL be swift and sure consequences to their trifling actions.

This article is clearly trying to minimise our efforts. They payed lip service to the efficacy of the initial effort; whilst ignoring the over a half a million signatures and the 122 Congressional signatories to the letter to the President. Including the ten Senate member's letter. "Mock Hearing" Indeed! So, I think two things need to be done here:

1. The Wall Street Journal needs some serious mail to help them understand the error of their ways. Not forgetting the positive reinforcement for the part that they Did get right.

http://online.wsj.com/public/page/0,,contact_us,00.html

2. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas needs an Avalanche of mail!

I mean seriously; "the Republican senator has received about 40 emails but doesn't plan to hold hearings" - 40??? That has to be a barefaced lie. That would mean that me and my family make up almost half of those received?! Not bloody likely. I say we start another petition on one or more of the more prominent sites such as this one; and make it PUBLIC so that the response and the numbers cannot be downplayed, dismissed and/or outright lied about.

http://roberts.senate.gov/office_locations.html

Good luck and a heartfelt thank you to all of you that have worked so hard to come this far. Now all we need to do is TRIPLE our efforts! ;) Hope to see you all in September!

Yours in solidarity,

Tim

Peace out -

PS: (I recently lost my 24 yr old Nephew in Iraq but have been against this "war" since its inception.)

My complaint, filed yesterday on the GAO website, will be displayed today on Al-Jazeerah (no relationship with Al Jazeera of Middle East origin; this is an American site).

Link to Al-Jazeerah:
http://www.aljazeerah.info/

Link to my editorial:
http://www.aljazeerah.info/3o/Claim%20Sent%20to%20US%20Government%20Acco......

The complete message I received today from Dr. El-Najjar, Ph.D.

***
Thanks Illyia. It’ll be published in the July 3 issue, as fewer people may read it on the July 4 issue.

Hassan El-Najjar, Ph.D.
Editor

Al-Jazeerah.info

-----Original Message-----
From: Illyia [mailto:illyovan@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 2:57 PM
To: editor@aljazeerah.info
Subject: Complain of fraudulent actions by the Bush Administration made to the Government Accountability Office.

To: Hassan El-Najjar, Ph.D.
Editor
Al-Jazeerah.info

From: Illyia Zhamar
Artist and Writer
America

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. El-Najjar,

Thank you for posting my editorial, July 1st. Having read Jane Stillwater's "Life in Post-Bush America: Control freaks, rebels and drones" (and realizing that I hate being controlled as much as she does), I followed the link to her blog where I read about her Small Claims Court idea. Good idea, but that got me thinking. We have something called a "Government Accountability Office" or GAO in the United States. As a citizen I am allowed to report fraud and abuse of public assets and ask the GAO to investigate.

So I did.

It occurs to me that if a very many people asked for the GAO to investigate the fraudulent use of public moneys - if there was a flood of demand, we might see some accountability supplied to meet that citizen demand.

To that end I am sending you (as well as several other sites - for self-protection as much as anything else) the text of my complaint of fraud against the below named government officials. It is my hope that you will publish this on July 4th, as this has much to do with the future independence and freedom of the American people. I further hope that your readers will take it upon themselves to make similar complaints, in mass. Although these persons have great power at their disposal, we peoples of the world completely trump them in numbers. A complaint may be post anonymously, or not, if reprisal is feared.

You may include this letter (or not, as you see fit) as a pre-amble to the below report of fraud. Thank you for your consideration.

illyia

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/fraudnet.cgi

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Claim sent to the Government Accountability Office of the United States, by me, July 2, 2005.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CLAIM MADE AGAINST

The Department of Defense and The Office of the President of the United States.

George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, Richard Cheney, Karl Rove and others.

Fraudulent claims of Weapons of Mass Destruction and threat to the security of the United States of America in order to justify a preplanned war against the sovereign nation of Iraq.

Fraudulent dispersal of public funds to private corporations through non-transparent, non-open bidding contracts; and acceptance by Haliberton and other corporations of moneys for "black operations" resulting in activities such as kidnapping, torture and abuse of uncharged citizens of sovereign nations; subversion and illegal activities by sworn United States officials.

As of June 30th, 2005, misuse and misallocation of at least $200 billion dollars in an illegal and mismanaged war. As of June 30th, 2005, the unnecessary deaths of over 1700 American citizens/soldiers; and the physical maiming of over 10,000 soldiers for purposes misrepresented to Congress and the American people by named officials.

Willful subversion of citizens rights and privileges as guaranteed by our American Constitution and Bill of Rights through the Patriot Act and the pending Patriot Act II legislation as sponsored and promoted by the named individuals, for the purpose of suppressing civilian protest against said fraud.

Possible fraud in the election process.

This citizen asks for an inquiry into all cases of fraud, as outlined above, as perpetrated by these above named officials including, but not limited to, the election process, itself.
_________________
If you dance with the devil,
Then you haven't got a clue.
'Cause you think you'll change the Devil,
But the Devil changes you!

my soldier was totally decieved-and payed to be deployed,I have all the papers,congress promised me a hearing on all issues after I had enough,and took my soldier (whom was in the last yr.of a 5yr commit.)from base in tex.and contacted congress,its been over a yr,still waiting,-bush has made me proud that I was unable to vote, and thats all he has done for me,who is in charge of the people in charge? IMPEACH HIM!!! and sue- for wrongful deaths,and crimes against humanity!

I would like correct my earlier statement,my soldier payed to assist the u.s.a.f. (my soldier was army)in operation endureing freedom,then upon returning (after 6months) was charged -$$-for this-by our-goverment...hmm? and there is olot more-but thank GOD,my soldier is alive....who is in charge of the people in charge????-no-one in the military knows,no-one at the D.O.D knows-no-one in washington knows.....Iam gonna find out who..momofsoldier2


Spreading the truth this July 4th.

Northern California Action Alert.
The SF Mime Troupe has just started it's Summer Tour. Did a lone-wolf action on the 4th handing out flyers and was, again, ASTOUNDED by how few in the audience had heard of the DSM, even here in Loony Leftie San Francisco. They should be our base, the already converted. It appears that while word may be spreading on the web it's not yet getting down to the grassroots. We need more "boots on the ground", person to person contact, respectful in your face confrontation of complacency. If the Mime Troupe is appearing anywhere near you, get a few folks together, print up and distribute some material, boo the villains, cheer the heroes, spread the word to your neighbors, and, oh yeah, have a good time. For those not fortunate enough to live here in Paradise, look for similar events and gatherings of good folks in your area and do the same. The People still have the Power..use it or loose it.
In solidarity, patrickmonkrn.sf. [Mime Troupe itinerary >sfmt.org<]

..for spreading democracy, goodwill and hope throughout the world and making us safer from terrorism, i sure sleep sounder at night. How long before The Butcher Of Baghdad and Britain becomes The Destroyer Of Detroit. Come on folks, spend some time away from the keyboard and get out and meet folks face to face, spread the word beyond the web, let's Impeach the SOB and prosecute him and his Cabal for war crimes, see how they like the food in Gitmo. patrickmonk.

I am dying to take it to the streets. So many people here are red necks who would not think twice about shooting a woman. So many people are still all "God BleSS America" How does a person do it? How do I organize a group larger than 5-10 people who will get met with violence.

I live in a small town,too. The city next to me has the highest concentration of Republicans in all of California. I know how you feel. But you have to speak up and be heard. I just go to events in the biggest city next to me (30 mins),Sacramento. So go to a larger city like that for demonstrations and attend the smaller ones in your town,too. Even if only 5 people show up, you'll feel better knowing that not everyone in your town is a stupid redneck, and that some people agree with you. Good luck.

Please come this Thursday to Benicia's 150th weekly anti-war vigil on First and Military Sts. between 4-6pm.

I love it. My sentiments exactly. Let's keep the momentum building!!

http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id362.html

Warning:

The above link includes multiple pictures, most of which have obviously been taken by Americans because of the proximaty of the camera to the subject. I do not believe the photographers would put this material on the net. And yet, somehow, this information supposedly made it into the hands of the resistance. Some pictures have been posted on other sites. Some are unique in this presentation. Some are of a graphic nature.

Question arises, how did this material get into the hands of the folks that supposedly made the slide presentation?

The possibilities include: This is a 'black' psychological effort, to enflame Americans, placing the blame for this production on the 'resistance'.

Or, the 'resistance' is so sophisticated they can acquire, edit and produce such a presentation, with music, in the midst of a shooting war and distribute the finished product to those who have spread it around the globe. If this is the case, as it appears to be, especially if you are prone not to consider the black psy ops potential, then we really are in deep trouble and don't recognize that yet!

In either event, it shows what the US media is NOT showing the families and friends of the boyz and girlz they are sending off to war.

Some would call it propaganda. I'd say it was probably a fat slap in the face of the idiot who said, "Bring it on!" Boy, did they ever.

I truly believe those eligible for military service deserve to know what they are getting into BEFORE signing the bottom line, BEFORE that fatefull day. Only a combat veteran can be this emphatic.

Tell the kids! They will know what to do. They will pass it on to fellow students and others. You may wish to assist.

Thank God for the Internet.

Bests,
John
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com
_________________
It is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong.--Voltaire

You may choose to ignore the facts, but you cannot change the facts --Author Unknown

Submitted by HELP ALL THAT ARE IN NEW ORLEANS! NOW (not verified) on Tue, 2005-09-06 10:00.
Relative to Katrina......look what is now spread around NEW ORLEANS.

Somebody needs to let the media know what the soldiers are WORKING IN! Write your newspapers Online.

Reuters, AP, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, Washington Post, Washington Times, NYT, Wall Street Journal,Yahoo NEWS

http://www.solidwastemag.com/article.asp?id=47051&issue=09012005http://w...

http://www.umich.edu/~snre492/Jones/agstreet.htm

» reply

Do pro-war leaders (and those who have not joined the US House of Representatives' "Get out of Iraq" caucus, see http://indymedia.us/en/2005/10/11271.shtml for more info) attend soldiers' funerals? I believe that if websites, google groups, yahoo groups, tribe.net and blogs could focus the public's attention on whether or not our pro-war leaders (from the Bush Administration, Congress, US governors, states legislators, etc.) attend the funerals of our military's soldiers then we would probably end our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan much sooner. We also need to let our elected officials know that we are watching them to see if they are going to attend these funerals particularly for Congressional representatives during Congress's recesses. I suppose we could expect Governors to be able to attend more than those in Congress. We could call their offices and tell them about the latest casualties (see http://icasualties.org/oif/BY_DOD.aspx for the info on the latest casualties) their states and districts and then follow up to see if they did or not. Also we can use google news alerts for soldiers for our individual states (use the same states abbreviations as the news releases use as search words, i.e. Ark. for Arkansas) to keep track of press releases which announce new casualties at http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2005

The PDA (Progressive Democrats of America) Presents
National Day of Town Hall Forums on Ending the War
DATE: JANUARY 7TH 2006
TIME: 11 am – 12 noon (reception to follow)
GUESTS: CONGRESSMAN ROBERT (BOBBY) SCOTT (confirmed)
Congresswoman Thelma Drake (unconfirmed)
PLACE:
NORVIEW UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
1112 Norview Avenue
Norfolk, Virginia 23513

WE NEED TO ORGANIZE AND MARCH ON THE WHITE HOUSE AND SHOW UP IN WASHINGTON, D.C. WITH SUCH NUMBERS THEY CANNOT STOP US, AND IF NECESSARY, THAT COWARDLY DICTATORIAL BASTARD STARVE TO DEATH IN THE BASEMENT OR GETS HELICOPTERED AWAY BUT NEVER AGAIN WILL WE LET THIS
FUCKER RESIDE THERE. IT'S TIME TO GO BY THE TENS OF THOUSANDS IF NOT MILLIONS AND JUST TAKE IT BACK. LET'S ORGANIZE AND JUST DO IT!!!!

THEY CAN'T KILL US ALL. WE WILL PREVAIL!!!!!

We, the opposition to this gang in the Executive Office and Congress must unite our opposition behind the opposition candidates running in November. We must get the vote out. And we must demand a paper trail to our votes. Only then can we be assured that our votes were honestly handled. Take action now by contacting your state election officials and demand that there be a print out of your vote. We must support the Democratic party (only because that is the only viable party large enough AT THIS TIME). Once the oppositon party is able to control the Judicial Committee can we then move swiftly to impeach this president and vice-president. Please write, call, or email your state election department today to demand a system of print out be instituted before the fall election or we can count on another railroading of a election such as the past two national elections. Thanks. George Francuski Kingman, Arizonaa Azgeff1@excite.com

I think we should show the country we will not just keep taking it sitting down. Let's protest King George like the "boston tea party"
Send tea bags to all those whose voted for Alito? Dress like indians and march on D.C. and throw tea bags in the reflection pool at the mall. I will not worship a monarch or sit by and watch another election be lost because of Diebold. Lets all do somthing that makes a statement.

There are many groups that will be there - join us! See details at www.unitedforpeace.org and meet us at 9:00 a.m.

power to the people!

Dear Mr. Bush,

Why did you bomb the World Trade Center? Everyone knows that you did it. Why did you
murder all of those people? Was it strictly for personal gain? Did you have selfish motives?
Or are you actively trying to accomplish as much destruction in the world as humanly
possible?

I don't know what your real religious beliefs are - whether you worship God or Satan - but it is
never too late to change your mind. As long as you are willing to change your behavior as
well. I don't particularly want to see you punished, because there simply is no earthly
punishment commensurate to your crimes. But you must relent, and you must cease this
rampage of lies and destruction, before it destroys you. Sooner or later, you will be removed
from office.

Yours Sincerely,

Joseph McCord

Should I have addressed it to, "Your Highness"?

IDIOT

.

Dear Emperor George,

Having, to all intents and purposes, openly declared yourself Emperor - the First American Emperor in history -

Having, I say to start again, openly declared yourself Emperor: We, your Loyal Subjects, would request the permission of having an audience with You. We have (begging Your permission to speak) been prodded and tested and focus-grouped so severely, that we can no longer distinguish between the Governing and the Governed. Our Constitution - the Great Law of this Land - guarantees us that we, the Subjects of Your Empire, are the Governors of the Land - that our Government exists to serve us, and not we to serve Them. Why O Sir, does it not serve us today?

Your Loyal Subject,

Joseph McCord

BOSTONIANS FOR THE OVERTHROW OF KING GEORGE
http://www.impeachbush.meetup.com/335/

A Joint Resolution of the California State Legislature (Proposed)

WHEREAS, United States House of Representatives rules allow for setting a federal impeachment in motion by charges transmitted from the legislature of a State or territory; and
WHEREAS, The State of Florida and the former territory of Mississippi have established precedent by referring such charges to Congress, which in each case resulted in Congress ordering a Committee to investigate and report on the charges, and which in one case resulted in the impeachment of Judge Charles Swayne of Florida; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush, acting President of the United States, has so conducted himself and his office as to cause the People of California to doubt his integrity and to believe that his official actions as President have constituted High Crimes and Misdemeanors, having repeatedly and intentionally violated and ignored the United States Constitution and other laws of the United States and of the international community; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush has ordered the federalization and deployment of this state's National Guard members overseas and thus has exceeded the authority granted in the provision of the United States Constitution that Congress shall have the power to "provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the laws of the Union, to suppress insurrections and repel invasions," reserving to the State Assembly, the State Senate, and the Governor of this state the authority to direct the training and arming of members of the state's National Guard for defense of the state; and
WHEREAS, The federalization and deployment of National Guard members has rendered the National Guard force unable to carry out its state activities effectively and thus deprived the state of its Constitutional power to keep the National Guard for defense of the state; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush has allowed stop-loss orders that violate the mutual understanding between Californians in the Armed Forces including the National Guard and the state and nation they agreed to serve; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush has admitted that he willingly and repeatedly directed unwarranted surveillance of U. S. persons, in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of the United States; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush committed a felony under 18 U.S.C. 1001 by withholding information from Congress about doubts in the intelligence community about Bush's justification for war; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush committed a felony under section 1001 by providing information to Congress he knew or should have known to be false, including the claim that Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger and the claim that Iraq gave aid and comfort to the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush committed a felony under section 1001 by providing information to Congress he knew or should have known to be false, including the claim that the cost of the Medicare bill would not exceed the limits Congress intended; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush committed felonies under 18 U.S.C. 641 and 643 by embezzling funds authorized for use in the war in Afghanistan and diverting it to an as-yet unauthorized build-up towards war in Iraq; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush committed felonies, namely espionage, fraud, or obstruction of justice, through involvement in the cover-up of the leak of Valerie Wilson's identity; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush has committed an act of terrorism under 18 U.S.C. 2339A by ordering the kidnapping of President Aristide, a violation of 18 U.S.C. 956; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush has approved of torture under the name of stress and duress, has denied the applicability of existing laws and treaties against torture, and has indicated in his signing statement of H.R. 1815 his future intention to continue to disregard such laws and treaties; and
WHEREAS, George W. Bush has repeatedly acted to expand the power of a “unitary executive

February 24, 2006
Assembly Member Loni Hancock
State Capitol
Room 4126
Sacramento, California 94249-0014

Dear Assembly Member Hancock,

As your constituent and as a United States Citizen, I am gravely concerned by the fact that our Nation as a whole suffers under a government which is Constitutionally illegitimate – a government which has shown its contempt for all of the principles on which sound government and human rights and liberty are based: for the due process of law, for human life and the dignity of persons, for the legitimate electoral processes of our nation, for the American People as a whole and for the People of California, for the Constitution of the United States of America, and for the rule of law itself. A government which has never been duly and legitimately elected, but which comports itself as if it had been handed autocratic, dictatorial power; a government which is rapidly bankrupting our country, pillaging the lands of others, wantonly destroying life and property, condoning and encouraging heinous acts of torture aimed at the systematic destruction of the human mind and spirit. A government which will leave a legacy of debt, deceit and despair for untold generations to come; a government which has already destroyed most this nation's fund of goodwill abroad and its People's faith in themselves at home, leaving a legacy of hatred towards the United States of America and all of its people, and thereby making the world a far more dangerous place for us all. A government which has already indicated its willingness to use, for the first time ever since Hiroshima, nuclear weapons in time of war, and which may very well do so if it is not stopped in time. A government which was soundly rejected by the People of California in two elections, and which has with exceptional pettiness and zeal attempted to fiscally punish our State for its impudence in rejecting its rule. A government which, finally, while quoting the most sacred of scriptures, demonstrates itself over and over again to be nothing short of nihilistic in the deepest foundations of its behavior. Such a government, having acceded to power through unlawful means including ballot fraud, the violation of voters' rights, and unlawful or irregular court intercessions, must be removed from office through any lawful means necessary; and it must be removed from office a quickly as possible, before it causes any further damage to the body politic and to the community of nations. To this end, in consonance with Jeffersonian democratic principles and in accordance with the Rules of the House of Representatives of the United States, I ask you to introduce before the California State Legislature a Joint Resolution to be presented to the U.S. Congress, calling for the impeachment and removal from office of acting President George W. Bush and acting Vice President Richard B. Cheney. Indeed, I beg it and demand it of you. It is morally, politically, economically, humanly and humanely imperative that all possible steps toward the removal of this abominable travesty of a government be taken as soon as possible, so that the legacy of shame which has already been left as a burden for future generations of this nation may begin to be healed. Thank you, in advance, for doing so.

Your Loyal Constituent,

Joseph L. McCord

Enclosure

cc:Senator Don Perata, other Assembly Members and Senators

I use political satire and comedy as my way of opposing and resisting the Bush administration. Please click the link below to preview my band "The Corned Beef Jerky Boyz." If you like it, please share the link with your friends and fellow conspiritors. Thanks!

Zeke Skidcastle

www.officialcornedbeefjerkyboyz.com

The world has seen terror for millenia. The world has suffered starvation and will continue to die of thirst and hunger for relief from the masochistic nature of this alien called man. As our population grows exponentially, as does our greed. As our intelligence grows exponentially with every generation, the convoluted circuiting of our system, with so many variables and loose ends... is hopeless. I believe this world, this free world is turning, revolving, into a new world of many different futures. People all over this world are waking up to the fact that so much of the population can easily parish. How can we stop the impending collusion? It's amazing really, how we should never fear the government, it should fear it's citizenry. isnt that right people? It's not the depleated uranium seeping into our water or the iraqi's water or anyones blood that i know will kill us. It's not the diseases our gluttonus fast food will mutate or the chemical warfare i know is forboding. It's the fact that for the past 30 years we've tried a number of things. What is protest? what is lobbying? what is boycotting? what is insanity but doing the same thing but expecting different results? I think it's time that as the richest and some of the brightest middle class population in the world that we unite with those parts of the world that already have the same interests as us. Can we all really network with foreign countries? E-mail me at thejuryissleepless@yahoo.com i'd love to exchange words of wisdom and hope. Peace, Love and Equality.

HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN???
http://files.meetup.com/222807/WANTED%20POSTER.pdf

Be on the look out! He is heavily armed (with nuclear weapons even!) and considered extremely dangerous (to America and the World)!

He is WANTED for Fraud, Treason, and Crimes Against Humanity!

Download this WANTED POSTER and post it at your LOCAL POST OFFICE (or other suitable location) today!
http://files.meetup.com/222807/WANTED%20POSTER.pdf

(And, when you do, please send us feedback (and photos) on any Post Offices (or other creative locations) where you were able to post your WANTED posters.)

DO IT TODAY!

Citizens remain vigilent! Only with everyone's help will we eventually be able to stop this dangerous felon!

Thanks,

BOSTONIANS FOR THE OVERTHROW OF KING GEORGE
http://www.impeachbush.meetup.com/335/

My opinion/my mind/my heart
Batman, get Robin... someone send out the Bat signal!
The Joker is loose in Metropolis!

sir ian blair: YOU ARE the weakest link.

...GOODBYE!

Attention:
sir ian blair
Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis
London, England
c/o
Caring Cross Police Station
Charing Cross
London, England
sw44444444
02073217711

Dear Sir:

I believe the first thing I need to do is to clearly define some words in my own mind. That would be a good place to start when attempting to decipher the murky world of "anti-terrorist" law and the world of Blair and Blair - the naughty pair - the lepers of London and civil liberties or should I say... the liberators of civil disabilities as may be a more politicalally correct way of approaching the matter. Definitions are a must when approaching the law. Apparently, the first definition of the 'crappy' Oxford Dictionary, which has eliminated the noun 'free speech' from its concise tenth (hard cover) edition contents hence defacating on the English language and democracy herself, is the rule of thumb where Tony's modern, new and improved English law is concerned. (That was a mouthful!)

Words are very important in my mind. I recently purchased a white t-shirt with three words on it that has recieved a few comments from society. It started a rather interesting lengthy conversation the other day. The conversation began, "What does that mean?"

I replied that's it is a rather impolite way of saying, "Hell No!"

I thought is was just a North American colloquialism. I was informed that the English understand where this Canadian transplant, with her English roots, is 'coming from'.

£2.99 Oxford everday dictionary - old small paperback - containing a definition of free speech

colloquialism: noun a colloquialism word or phrase
colloquial: adjective (said about a word or piece of language) suitable for ordinary conversation but not for for formal speech or writing

That's odd. I always assumed that colloquial meant a phrase pertaining and relevant to/understood mainly within a certain geographical area and associated within a region of people with a common language; is generally slang as opposed to grammatically correct. 'Monkey see, monkey do', as an example.

The three monkeys posed in a sculpture generally is recognised everywhere as it artistically depicts the combined words and saying 'Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil' with three individual monkeys sitting collectively, side by side. Each little monkey has both of their hands placed over their ears, eyes, and mouth repectively. An assumed meaning behing these three little dudes could be that if you don't hear about evil and you don't see it and you don't speak about it - you won't know about it; in essence; evil won't exist. If no little monkey talks about evil at all and no one sees it and no ones hears about 'it', how could 'it' possibly exist? Quantum physics clearly states that things must be observed and quantified in order to be percieved as part of reality.

exist: 1. verb to be present as a part of what is real

real: adj. 1. actually existing, not imaginary 2. actual or true 3. genuine, not imitation

imaginary: adj. existing only in the imagination, not real... unreal, fanciful ficticious, invented

imitation: adj. 2. something produced by copying or imitating something from a Latin word imitari meaning 'to copy'

You could make another assumption of meaning behind the three monkeys. All knowledge of evil could be eradicated by simply completely ignoring evil and refusing it to be allowed to be imitated in any given way. If it can't be seen or heard or spoken about, the assumption one is left with in a non-existence of evil which seems highly unlikely given todays oversexualised greedy mentality of most warmonging nations involved in weapons trading. Or, it could artistically depict that once these three little monkeys heard what they heard and saw what they saw, they said what needed to be said and the evil wasn't tolerated anymore. Art is like poetry, it inspires differing meanings in different people. Words can be very artistic, by nature - they paint a picture.

The phrase on my t-shirt is, "DO I FCUK". It is a French Connection U.K. brand t-shirt. There is no question mark at the end of the statement. While it appears to be a question, there is only a grammatical reference to a question of thought in the use of the word 'do'. Do I swim? Do I bike? Do I love my children? Do you read? These are all phrases that raise a question mark at the end of each thought expressed in a questioning format, complete with the proper punction mark needed - a question mark.

We all know that the logo FCUK is a cheeky way of printing the "F" word from the English language which is pretty much globally understood to be the word 'f*ck'(replacing the * with the vowel 'u'. It is a slang word and a dirty word, as I was taught by my mother. As an adult, I now understand it to be a colloquial word. It was generally known in society as a foul word and not acceptable to be said within the public media; i.e. television or radio. It is certainly not acceptable to be used within a court of law or legal documents when addressing memebrs of the legal community unless quoting the words of a statement given by an individual. You could quite rightly get arrested by an officer of the law in many countries, whether it be in its English form or whatever transaltion of language, when combined with the threee letter word 'off'. Now now I am being cheeky.

Where I come from in Eastern Canada, the Maritime Provinces to be specific, we use the phrase "Do I f*fuck!" as an exclamatory remark of disgust and objection to an unreasonable question, especially when the question is of an insulting nature. If I were to take personal affront to a man asking me a rediculous question that insulted my intelligence say...

"Do you have permission to" sing a song?

"Do I f*ck!" I thought in my mind.

Did a police officer of the Diplomatic detachment of the Police of the Metropolis threaten once again to have me arrested and therefore separated from my child, interrupting me from singing a song to my youngest daughter for an 'offence' that is only reportable and not arrestable by definitions contains within SOCPA legislation? Was he abusing his powers and the laws of justice? Did someone ask him to approach, abuse the law - question, bully and threaten me? Was it sir ian's behalf or am I being completely paranoid? Do I need permission to sing a song in public areas, specifically outside - exterior to any public or privately owned building, in a free and democratic society, providing no foul language is used? "Do I f*ck!"

'Hell no!' is a more polite response within the accepted morality of general society than the above noted phrase and yet still wouldn't be regarded as a remotely polite response within a court of law. The response "Hell no" would have certainly gotten me arrested last Thursday afternoon. I simply exerted my knowledge of the SOCPA Act and clearly stated that Joe Coppo was abusing the SOCPA legislation and his assumed position of power over my freedom of speech. I carried on singing, as usual. He said goodbye and toodled back to his position behind the gates.

Do I need a courts permission to wear a t-shirt that bears a logo outside a courtroom? "Hell no!" Inside a courtroom, I would assume that a FCUK t-shirt would not be deemed appropriate attire by any persons sitting in judgement of those individuals accused of crimes.

"DO I FCUK" - French Connection U.K.

There is little opposition to Capitalism and the wearing of branded items of clothes within a Capitalistic society, that may be by their artistic expression, offensive in nature. Here is hoping we are all 'on the same page'; another colloquialism that delivers the assumption that should we all be reading the same book by the same author, we have all read up to the same page in said book and have therefore read the same information and have a shared understanding of the grouped meanings of these words - a common knowledge.

'Ask a stupid question - get a stupid answer' is another good saying. Is a saying is a colloqialism?

saying: noun a well known phrase or proverb

The correct response to the question of whether a saying is a colloquialism is - possibly yes, possibly no. The words that combine to make a 'saying' are also known as phrases. Certain phrases, certain people use, generally, in certain geographical areas. The question of colloquialism depends not where the saying originates from but whether the phrase is suitable for formal speech or writing."Is it f*ck!" is a variation of Do I f*ck!"; both are sayings and and a colloquialisms - not suitable for formal speech and writing.

formal: adj. 1. strictly following the accepted rules or custom 2. following a set structure or form

Providing a phrase is suitably in line with the accepted rules and customs of a democratic society, is a phrase just a phrase or is it a security risk? Given a phrase is not suitable to be expressed in public due to the use of foul language and/or that it would be found to be offensive to the majority of said public, i.e. racial slurs, is the verbal expression of certain phrasings that incite hatred towards a specific segment of society an arrestable offence?

The phrase 'Ask a stupid question - get a stupid answer' is acceptable in public and might not be in a formal setting and therefore, by accepted definition, is possibly a colloquialism depending upon whether respect is an accepted formal standard. I would assume the correct grammatical expression of that phrase as an assumption and a complete sentence would be, "If you ask a stupid question of a person, you wil recieve a stupid answer in response." Ask a stupid question - get a stupid answer.", is a shortened version and is grammatically correct and I do not believe it is acceptable at a formal level of society as formal or proper English due to the implied cheekiness and lack of respect that specific statement creates. The saying implies that only stupid people ask stupid questions and therefore deserve stupid responses.

proper: adj. 3. according to social convention, respectable

respectable: adj. 1. honest and decent; of good social standing

decent: adj. 1. conforming to the accepted standards of what is moral or proper, not immodest or obscene

immodest: adj. not modest, indecent

indecent:adj. offending against generally accepted standards of decency

obscene:adj. indecent in a very offensive way. synonyms: indecent, pornographic, coarse, filthy, dirty, vulgar, smutty

offense: noun 1. breaking the law, an illegal act

offensive: adj. 1. causing offence 2. disgusting or repulsive
offensive: noun a forceful attack or campaign

disgust: noun a strong feeling of dislike or revulsion

repulsive: adj. 1. disgusting... revolting, repugnant, repellant, vile, hideous, loathsome, obnoxious

pornography: noun pictures or descriptions that are intended to stimulate sexual excitement

pornographic: adj from a Greek word porne meaning 'prostitute' and graphy from a Greek word graphia meaning 'writing'

f*ck: not to be found in my old paperback Oxford everyday dictionary... perhaps because the word is pornographic and obscene and the noun free speech was still defined?

Concise tenth edition Oxford dictionary - hardback - lacking a definition of free speech

fuck: vulgar slang verb 1. have sexual intercourse with ... loads of definitions and phrasings offered... of Germanic origin - 16th century

£2.99 Oxford everday dictionary - old small paperback - containing 'free speech'

vulgar: adj. 1. lacking refinement or good taste 2. rude or coarse 3. (old use) to do with or used by ordinary people

rude: adj. 2. indecent or vulgar 3. roughly made, not sophisticated

ordinary: adj. usual or normal, not special... commonplace

sophisticated: 1. having refined or cultured tastes or experienced about the world 2. complex or elaborate 3. able to understand complex issues

Getting back to my French Connection U.K. t-shirt... by definition f*ck is a ponographic vulgar word. 'F*ck off' is a colloquialism that would not be acceptable in a court of law or as a response to an officer of the law. 'F*ck you' as a phrase could and would have the ability to insult pretty much anybody who understands the meaning of the saying. 'Do I f*ck' as a phrase, a verbal statement of response and a colloquialism is most probably an arrestable offence in England, when spoken directly towards an officer of the law. I do not believe society accepts men who are supposed to be respected within our society for their roles as protectors of society to be sworn at. I am certain it must be an arrestable offence; regardless that I have been informed by Inspector Lyons of the Charing Cross division of the Metropolitan police that a man who thumps an officer will serve very little time, if any. He also told me he teaches his children that it is a hard, cruel world during a conversation in which I attempted to report an assalt committed by an officer of his police station, Charing Cross, witnessed by myself and my two children and many other independent witnesses at the gates of number 10 Downing Street and clearly filmed by an independent member of the 'news' media. (can be found on the internet on the indymedia UK site - thank you rikki for your talent of always being at the right time at the right time and your anti-capitalist spellings and reporting of the real news from London, without political bias.)

Opposed to Inspector Lyons, I teach my youngest daughter the names of flowers, her times tables, respect and the value of honesty. She sees the corruption of the beauty, the value of knowledge and the kindness respect regenerates , for herself.

respect: noun 1. admiration felt towards a person or thing that has good qualities or achievements

respect verb 1. to feel or show respect for a person or thing... admire, revere, look up to 2. agree to abide by a rule, agreement atc.

good: having the right or desirable properties, satisfactory 2. appropriate or suitable 3. morally correct virtuous 4. strictly following the principles of a religion or cause 5. kind 6. well behaved

bad: adj. of poor quality or a low standard 2. unpleasant or upsetting 3. serious or severe 4. wicked or evil... immoral, corrupt villainous, sinful

F*uck is not a good word - it is a bad word. I think that is what we still teach the children at school. I do not believe the children are permitted to swear at their teachers and are generally reprimanded and/or punished for the use of foul language towards a person within society who is employed to educate. I do not believe swearing in tolerated within most daycares of the infants of todays Capitlaist society. Doesn't Pete of Big Brother fame having issues and perhaps mainly a disease associated with the inability to control his outward expression of inappropriate words which sometimes includes 'swear' words.

swear word:noun a word sonsidered offensive or obscene

Which brings me back to...

free speech : the right to express your opinions

... and democracy.

democracy: noun 1. government of a country by representatives elected by the whole people 2. a country governed in this way from a Greek word demos meaning 'the people' and cracy from a Greek word kratia meaning 'rule'

demonstration: noun 1. demonstrating 2. a show of feeling 3. an organised gathering or march held to express the opinion of a group publicly

demonstrate: verb 1. to show evidence of something, to prove it

demonstrative: adj. 1. showing or proving something 2. expressing your feelings openly

SOCPA - the Serious Organised Criminal Protection Agency or is it...
the Serious Organised Crime Prevention Act... I am uncertain.

Section 134 - The Authorisation of Demonstartions within the Designated Area which curiously happens to also be the main area of central London containing the tourist sites most tourists are likely to and most tourist buses are likely to cruise by, if not stop at... ironic.

Sub section 3. condition may be imposed and specified in the authorisation relating to a demonstarion which are necessary to prevent the following in the COMMISSIONER'S r.e.a.s.o.n.a.b.l.e. OPINION.. This statement implies that the Commissioner is the only person who may authorize and the only person who may impose specified conditions and that his opinion is reasonable. In order to have a reasonable opinion, one would have to demonstrate a reasonable mind through reasonable actions which is simply not the case. Sir Ian Blair has shown himself to consistently be the JOKER of the Metropolis of London in his curtailance of free speech - the right to express opinions publicly. He has consistently shown and proven himself to be a most unreasonable excuse for an English officer of the law and a poor example of a 'male' member of the human species.

Conditions may be applied should there be r.e.a.s.o.n.a.b.l.e. cause to assume it would be necessary to prevent:

a) hindrance to the entrance of parliamentary buildings. The 5 year longstanding protest of Brian Haw of Paliament Square provided absolutely no hindrance to the entrance of Parliament on any occasion, at any given point in the past and yet was limited to three metres in length and one metre in width? Is this reasonable? I understand that metric is not the accepted term of measurement used in the English Court rooms; I could be mistaken. I believe all the road signs in England limiting speed are designated in miles per hour and all speeding tickets are given out in miles over the speed limit.

b) a hindrance to the proper operation of parliament. Once again, over a 5 year period, Mr. Brian W. Haw has never stopped parliament from carrying on willy-nilly, exactly as they pleased, despite the Nourembourg laws of 1945 that clearly state, as valiantly noted in the courtrooms of this land by Chris Coverdale, defining genocide as a war crime and pre-emptive strikes of war by a democratic government are illegal by the laws of England and treasonous to the nation thereof. When reporting a crime, as is every citizenz duty, under said Nourembourg laws, is it reasonable for an official of the law to ask the reporter of said crime as to whether or not he has applied for permission to report said crime? Permission is required to report a crime? Is that a reasonable question I just wrote or does it sound completely farcical and illogical?

c) serious public disorder

disorder: noun 1. lack of order; untidiness or confusion 2. a riot 3. an illness

serious: 4. causing great concern, not slight

c)(cont'd) Is the public the slightest bit concerned regarding the realtively few people of this nation exercising their right to free speech? Is it a crime to confuse someone - create a little confusion in their mind? Isn't that what politicians and propaganda do every day in one country or another somewhere in the world? Is that where democracy has come to? Politicians can blatantly lie though their teeth and Steve Jago may not hold up a board with a few quotes from George Orwell? Babrbara Tucker could not possibly be concieved to cause a riot simply by wearing a pink sparkly banner declaring "peace love and justice for all". Is her pink banner a threat to public order? Does she pose a serious public threat to the order of the the public? Is that a reasonable question to ask? How many times has she been victimised and bullied by various officers of the law? 57 times I believe. Is that reasonable? Has Sir Ian Blair ever accepted that an application has been recieved by himself from Barabara Tucker despite numerous emails and legal letters that have been exchanged through umpteen hands? Is that reasonable? Brian Haw has resided at Parliament Square day and night for over five years and there has not been one terrorist incident at said location nor any assalts or acts of violence, except by officers of law against peaceful protesters.Is that reasonable?

d) danger to property.The only property that has been damaged is that of the people which was gifted to Brian Haw and damaged by agents under direct orders from Sir Ian 'woof woof' Blair. I would ask of the artist Mr. Banks as to whether he believes his gifted artwork was treated in a fair and reasonable fashion when it was removed carelessly, to say the least, in a clandestine early morning raid on free speech that could only be perpetuated by the Joker himself. Is this reasonable way to go about enforcing limitations to freedom of expression as allowed for under the Human Rights Act, Article 10 and/or 11, I believe.

e) a distruption to the life of the community.

community: noun 1. the people living in one place or country and considered as a whole 2. a group with similir groups or origins 3. the state of having interests in common

e)(cont'd) I will assert that working in the community is not the same as living in the community by definition of each and every word of that statement. I will again assert that Maria and Brian live at Parliamnet Square as Brian Haw 's address is recognised by the Royal Courts of Justice to be Parliament Square. Maria is also known to the Metroploitan Police as residing at Parliament Square. On occasion, various other individual has made a conscious choice to live at Parliament Square for periods of time and have been recorded by several CCTv cameras as doing exactly that. I would assert that the community must only be treated as a whole without neglecting one individual who abides within the 'Designated area' specifically including peaceful protesters. Lastly I would assert that bullying tactics of a broad range have been used against a small segment of said community under the direct orders of Sir Ian, a.k.a. the JOKER or Tony Blair's lap dog. I will assert that the only disputive force within said community are the actors of this political police farce - notably the Charing Cross branch who have been known to have behaved abominadably in the past; curiously and specifically since the introduction of the SOCPA ACT. I would question whether bullying is a reasonable tactic for an officer of the law towards a peaceful member of society and the community. I would question whether the Senior Officer of the Police of the Metropolis of London is reasonable to tolerate and condone bullying.

BULLYING: verb to use strength or power to hurt or frighten a weaker person... threaten, intimidate, coerce, domineer, tyrannize

BULLY: noun a person who tries to hurt or frighten people who are weaker

POWER: noun 1, strength or energy 2. the ability to do something
... to do something i.e. 1. illegally arrest a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable and only a reportable offence (Cuba? Russia? China? England?) 2. illegally threaten to arrest a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable and only a reportable offence a.k.a. a breach of the peace - to incite fear - an arrestable offence 3. illegally physically threaten and/or physically harm a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable and only a reportable offence a.k.a. grievious bodily harm - an arrestable offence 4. illegally arrest and detain a peaceful individual for a non-arrestable and only a reportable offence for any indeterminate amount of time a.k.a. kidnapping - an arrestable offence

f) security risk.

security: noun 1. a state or feeling of being secure
secure: 1. safe, especially against attack

f)(cont'd) In a democracy, is a verbal attack reasonable? Threatening someone verbally in order to cause or instigate fear is not a reasonable act in a safe democratic society. Threatening to physically harm someone through dialogue is not reasonable in a safe and secure environment. Is accusing the government of a war crime considered a reasonable verbal attack? Is a reasonable display of evidence in the pictoral form known as photography and/or iluustrated through artwork on canvass a security risk? Did Maya Evans not grieve on queue at that appointed hour and minute as stated by the government as a time to grieve and therefore was her statement of the dead soldiers of this illegal war a security risk? Is it reasonable for me to witness a gaggle of female cHARING cROSS police officers drive off only one group of several VISITING tourists, from Parliament Square, who sat peacefully and filmed Parliament and the tower that contains the bell, liitle known to many , named Big Ben. Please correct me if I am wrong.

When I have seen so many groups film parliament at various times of the twenty-four hour solar cycle, is citing the area as a "high security risk" a reasonable explanation for rude behaviour, bullying tactics and general poor form as officers of the policing community? Was it reasonable of me to assume that their only crime was that they were black and were obviously, to myself, Moslem? Did I really witness a hate crime of a racist nature on behalf of those cows on bikes against peaceful tourists - a visiting sector and representatives of a community? Is it reasonable to assume that bullying a race or a religion goes against the laws of this multi-cultural society Tony Blair has for sale? I met two famous comedians that day. One was Mark Thomas from England and the other was from the Sudan. I don't find the The Joker that heads the Met funny in the least. Is free speech a security risk in a democratic society? If Sir Ian Blair believes the act of expressing the God given right of free speech is a security risk, is he a reasonable man?

g) a risk to the public.

risk: noun 1. a situation involving the chance of suffering injury or loss 2. the possibility that something unpleasant will happen
risk: verb 1. to expose something to the chance of injury or loss

g)(cont'd) Is it reasonable to assume that someone will get hurt at the hands of the verbal assalt - the most unpleasant angle of free speech? Can sticks and stones really break your bones? Yes. Will name calling ever really truly physically hurt someone or place them at risk of physical injury? Possibly. Could the public loose something by being offered the opinions of its members of the community? Their ignorance, perhaps? Are the presence of any group of individuals who obviously share a common bond to the naked eye a security risk or a risk to the public?

Have the reasoning abilities of sir ian blair, or lack thereof, ever been demonstrated to be, in the present or in the past, of a reasonable nature therefore indicating his capacity to hold a reasonable opinion ? I think not.

reasonable:adj. 1. fair and sensible 2. in accordance with reason, not absurd.
reason: noun 1. a cause, explanation or justification for something 2. the ability to think, understand, and draw conclusions 3. person's sanity 4. good sense or judgement; common sense

absurd: adj. having little sense, rediculous or foolish... silly laughable, ludicrous, preposterous, nonsensical; from a Latin word absurdus meaning 'out of tune'

pervert: noun to turn something from its proper course or use 2. to cause someone to behave wickedly or abnormally

I BELIEVE sir ian blair IS COLLUDING WITH tony blair in PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY; ABUSING SOCPA LEGISLATION, AND INSULTING THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE ENGLISH PUBLIC THROUGH THEIR CLEAR DEMONSTRATION OF A LACK OF ABILITY TO REASON REALITY FROM THE IMAGINARY PERCIEVED THREATS OF TERRORISM CONCIEVED WITHIN THEIR OWN DIMENTED PSYCHES.

pervert: noun a person whose sexual behaviour is thought to be abnormal or disgustings.

PERVERTS ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS OF SOCIETY: ALL PAEDOPHILES MUST immediately BE CLASSED AS DANGEROUS OFFENDERS - SEPARATE AND DISTINCT FROM THOSE WHO COMMIT MURDER AND MANSLAUGHTER; PERMANENTLY ISOLATED FROM ALL SOCIETIES CHILDREN and ALL SOCIETY FOR ALL TIME.

Do I need permission to have an opinion and to speak my mind or to sing a song?
"DO I FCUK" - French Connection U.K.

sir ian blair: do you exercise your free speech, power and authority regularly and freely or are you someone's pet monkey?

one ringy-dingy... two ringy-dingy...
tony... pick up the phone you soul-less monster. I do not approve of your war-mongering in this day and age, in this country or any other for that matter.War Kills Children. Weapons are an evil abuse of the tax paying public funds. Kiss my ass you bastard.
- Charity Sweet:

"stop inventing crimes and admit your own" on a plain white otherwise bank placard
- anonymous author/artist of placard present, photographed and physically supported by a lone individual above the sometimes green grass of Parliament Square in opposition to SOCPA and Tony Blair, its author; in unity and solidarity with Mark Thomas and Brian Haw and many, many other like-minded individuals as an expression of free speech and democracy in action and art.

Sincerely,

Charity Sweet

'wake up and smell the coffee'
anti copyright Charity Sweet acknowledging Brian W. Haw, Parliament Square, John Catt, Mark Thomas, Ziggy Abu and FCUK - all equally, greatly inspire free speech
www.howtobeanarmsdealer.com

Baa, Baa, Baa: Tony’s Liberal Sheep

News Item: All Cabinet Sheep MUST support “genocide” in the political barnyard. Baa, Baa, Baa.

Some years ago on the Funny Farm in the land of the political cronies we have seen some political sheep follow their master, the political sheep-herder, into supporting ‘genocide’. It would have been a sight to behold; these woolly headed Cabinet Ministers all Baa, Baa, Baaing on cue when their shepherd and political ewe ram herds them all in the direction of the barnyard NONSEnse; watching them rise from their sheepish positions and bleating Baa, Baa, Baa, which means YES, YES, YES in Liberal lingo, to this deviation of law called ‘genocide.’

Hear them bleat: “We’re Liberal sheep and we can bleat, and you know where to find us. Following Tony, your pal - our crony, leaving our principles behind us.” This is a true Baa Baaing statement. The Liberal sheep, having no principles, just followed their sheep-herder as the sheep are fed, watered and housed in the ‘well guarded’ Funny Farm Houses. Some of the sheep have been there for years and have no desire to lose any of their feedstuffs and perks at the political trough. You see, ‘good’ sheep always follow their master’s voice. Baa, Baa, Baa. The political shepherd and his political lap police dog lead the way for the sheep to follow.

“WOOF, WOOF, WOOF!” barked Sir Ian Blair, the political lap police dog as he sent 78 British bull terriers to remove ‘free speech’ and all traces of ‘genocide’ from the SQUARE. “We must protect the ‘rights’ of those who are different from us sheep. We are a ‘non-discriminatory’ and ‘tolerant’ Funny Farm of ‘equality’, subject to the invented Barnyard rules of our Charter.”

Baa, Baa, Baa bleat the Liberal cabinet sheep in unison. Then they will all sing in bleating sheep language, “We’re Liberal sheep with no Bo Peep and we don’t know where to find her. But we’ll follow the Blair’s, the naughty pair, we’ll vote yes - we don’t need a reminder.” Hey, a nice tune from a bleating good herd.

A few years before that song and dance, on another Farm where everyone is ‘Lordly’ and small ‘c’ conservative, those sheep had voted against lowering the legal age of sexual consent for homosexual males. In fact,,, three times the ‘Lordly’ ‘c’ Farm said, “NO!” to the Funny Farm Houses. The ‘c’ sheep had no intention of changing this accepted ‘normal’ age of consent for homosexual males. But many of Tony’s cronies were going Baa, Baa, Baa in support of this perversion of the ‘law’. And so, it came to be, Tony and his barnyard buddies invoked their very first Act of Parliament, effectively over-riding the ‘c’ sheep, and lowered the legal male/male age of sexual consent. Now that’s Baa Baa Baarking mad!

Tony says it’s all about ‘freedom’ and ‘security’. Funny Farm watchers have wondered if mad ‘Cow’ disease has infected the Blair’s and most of the other sheep for this sheepish behavior. Some humane animals are worried that perhaps these political sheep have swallowed their own sheep dip, resulting in a poisoning of their minds.

At one point, even the QUEEN BEE, had to remind Tony that the Army Ants were ‘hers’ and not ‘his’ - no ‘his and hers’ allowed. Could there be an explanation for this mind madness in the sheep? Rumour has it; there is a worry of mad ‘Cow’ disease in the Funny Farm Houses. A recent news headline said: “Mad Cow Disease found in German goat.” (NAZIsm? /HITLER? Ringing any bells folks?) Which raised the question: Did the German ‘goat’ interfere with the English ‘Cow’, and if this happened, could Liberal sheep get infected as well?

These are strange times on the Funny Farm, indeed. Still, this mad ‘Cow’ disease should be very worrying to the Liberal sheep. If this disease could jump from a ‘goat’, it could jump to a sheep as well. And wouldn’t that be ‘goat’-awful. (Hey, isn’t that an awful pun?) But here’s hoping no German ‘goats’ have infiltrated the Funny Farm Houses. Certainly, our Liberal sheep are acting very strangely. It would appear they are unable to think for themselves anymore. Their shepherd has trained them to stand up on their hind legs and show their support for ‘genocide’. Are they again planning to be Baa, Baa, Baaing YES to this in sheepish language denying ‘free speech’? Their shepherd says no sheep exemptions allowed.

Could mad ‘Cow’ disease have infected these cabinet sheep? Is their a German ‘goat’ loose in the Funny Farm Houses and chasing the sheep? If so, could the ‘goat’ be charged for sheep interference? Could this be an animal ‘hate crime’? Mad ‘Cow’ symptoms do attack the brain and can cause unnatural behavior to the thought processes. Does this mean the Funny Farm Houses across from the SQUARE will need to be QUARANTINED?

This is a very worrying situation for the inhabitants of the Funny Farm currently governed by this madness. Who will run the Funny Farm if all the cabinet sheep are QUARANTINED? Would some other Liberal turkeys take charge? Is this ‘1984’ or 2006? Is this England or ‘Animal Farm’? These are important questions that need answers.

Hopefully, Tony, the ‘master political sheep-herder’, will hold a news conference and declare there is no mad ‘Cow’ or German ‘goat’ infecting his sheep and that they are all healthy to vote ‘stand trial’ for ‘genocide’ and a ‘failure of duty to protect all God’s children - small and great’ as this is no bull poop. Baa, Baa, Baa. The Liberal sheep have all been ‘swined’ and dined and now all must join in a celebration song of a sheepish victory: “We’re cabinet sheep who have lost their way, Baa, Baa, Baa. Liberal sheepsters not really free, Liberals in the grip of Insanity, Lord, have mercy on such as we. Baa, Baa, Baa.” What will the QUEEN BEE say?

(Paraphrasing, with apologies to Stephen Gray and the Whip and Poof oops I meant Whippenpoof song.)
Anti copyright acknowledging the farcical/genocidal/eugenical British/American/Canadian
Baa Baa Baarking mad government

The FCC is now holding public hearings primarly on the issue of the continued consolidation of media ownership. There is a current "cap" on the percentage of media ownership allowed to any one corporate conglomerate such as Clear Channel who already control many former individual radio and tv outlets. Three of the five FCC members are dedicated to allowing a continued consolidation of control over our public airwaves by media conglomerates such as Clear Channel. C-Span just televised a repeat of the hearings held in Los Angeles approx Oct 4th 2006.

This is a crucial issue for our democracy. The FCC were stopped from allowing further consolidation several years ago simply by the
overwhelming public outcry against this move towards a corporate state owned/controlled media. Comments may be forwarded to WWW.FCC.ORG. " Orwell's 1984 was a warning not a blueprint"
Lady at hearings. Please let us write to this Commission and voice our concerns. Thank you. Cit. G

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support WarIsACrime



Donate.








Tweet your Congress critters here.


Advertise on this site!




Facebook      Twitter





Our Store:



















Movie Memorabilia.



The log-in box below is only for bloggers. Nobody else will be able to log in because we have not figured out how to stop voluminous spam ruining the site. If you would like us to have the resources to figure that out please donate. If you would like to receive occasional emails please sign up. If you would like to be a blogger here please send your resume.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.